The Putin Narrative and the Way Ahead for Russia

09/24/2019

By Robbin Laird

Putin came to power at the end of the Yeltsin presidency when appointed Prime Minister by Yeltsin in 1999 after which he would become the second president of the new Russian state.

What Putin would create is the rebirth of the centralized Russian state or perhaps better put, the latest version of a powerful state in Russia.

As Putin underscored in his December 30, 1999, turn of the millennium speech:

It will not happen soon, if it ever happens at all, that Russia will become the second edition of, say, the US or Britain in which liberal values have deep historic traditions. Our state and its institutes and structures have always played an exceptionally important role in the life of the country and its people. For Russians a strong state is not an anomaly which should be got rid of. Quite the contrary, they see it as a source and guarantor of order and the initiator and main driving force of any change.

Modern Russian society does not identify a strong and effective state with a totalitarian state. We have come to value the benefits of democracy, a law-based state, and personal and political freedom. At the same time, people are alarmed by the obvious weakening of state power. The public looks forward to the restoration of the guiding and regulating role of the state to a degree which is necessary, proceeding from the traditions and present state of the country…..

We are at a stage where even the most correct economic and social policy starts misfiring while being realised due to the weakness of the state power, of the managerial bodies. A key to Russia’s recovery and growth is in the state-policy sphere today.

Russia needs a strong state power and must have it. I am not calling for totalitarianism. History proves all dictatorships, all authoritarian forms of government are transient. Only democratic systems are intransient. Whatever the shortcomings, mankind has not devised anything superior. A strong state power in Russia is a democratic, law-based, workable federative state.

A significant part of his state building effort was shaped by forging a narrative about Russia and its place in the world, which resonated with many Russians who suffered through the decade of the 1990s, and its chaos and wanted a more stable environment.

And Putin’s state would deliver both enhanced stability and an improved way of life than the one experienced during the Wild West period of the 1990s.

The Putin narrative has evolved over time, and he has leveraged global events to shape what he sees as Russia’s new destiny.

Over his time in power, the West has gone from being selectively attractive to becoming a force to interact with and to be reshaped as he is reshaping Russia itself.

He is not so much anti-Western as seeking ways to shape the West to become a more commodious partner in Russia’s return to the world stage.

Because he is judo master, not a chess master, he has played off of opportunities to work towards these objectives, rather than following some sort of master plan.

Putin’s clearly identified sense that the Russian state should speak for Russians is one of the most challenging parts of the Putin narrative.

He argued that the collapse of the Soviet Union meant that Russians were living in the Soviet Union one day and woke up the next living in another country.

As Kimberly Marten noted in an article published on March 19, 2014 with regard to this aspect of the evolving Putin narrative:

There are two ways to talk about a Russian person or thing in the Russian language.  One way, “Rossisskii,” refers to Russian citizens and the Russian state.  Someone who is ethnically Chechen, Tatar, or Ukrainian can be “Rossisskii” if they carry a Russian passport and live on Russian territory.

Up until now (i.e., prior to the seizure of Crimea) that is how Russian President Vladimir Putin has always referred to the Russian people….. That all changed on Tuesday.  In his Kremlin speech to the two houses of the Russian parliament, Putin made a fateful choice.  Instead of sticking to the word “Rossisskii,” he slipped into using “Russkii,” the way to refer in the Russian language to someone who is ethnically Russian.  Putin said, “Crimea is primordial “Russkaya” land, and Sevastapol is a “Russkii” city.”  He went on to say, “Kiev is the mother of “Russkie” cities,” in a reference to the ancient city of Kievan Rus’….

When speaking of the collapse of the Soviet Union, Putin added, “Millions of ‘Russkii’ went to sleep in one country and woke up in another, instantly finding themselves ethnic minorities in former Soviet republics, and the ‘Russkii’ people became one of the largest, if not the largest, divided nation in the world.”

Putin thereby signaled a crucial turning point in his regime.  He is no longer simply a Russian statist, an old KGB man who wants to recapture Soviet glory…. Instead Putin has become a Russian ethnic nationalist.

Given the legacy of Hitler with regard to a similar perspecitve, which asserted that the Third Reich should speak for all Germans, it is not surprising that the new European states such as the Baltic states or Poland, would find such a statement very disturbing.

And when followed up by the actions in Chechnya, Georgia and Ukraine, this perspective seems more than a bullet point in a briefing.

Clearly, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine and the prospects for Ukraine to become a member of the European Union and even perhaps NATO was a flash point for Putin where the new narrative of the Russian nation was to be joined by the action of seizing the Crimea and “returning” it to Russia, or in this case, the new Russian republic.

Put in another way, the narrative about Russia and its legitimate rights to shape its own ethnic destiny and its role as a Euro-Asian power was backed by actions. And the seizure of Crimea, was very popular in Russia to say the least.

But what are the prospects for Russian going forward as this narrative is adapted or replaced by Putin’s successors?

Contained within Putinism are the seeds of its own destruction.

Although a nationalist, Putin is cautious.

But will his successor be as cautious is he, or will he shape a more directly aggressive approach to the West?

Alternatively, will his successor recognize the weaknesses of Russia and seek to seek to work with those states and societies in the West which would help Russia out of its economic dilemmas in return for well what exactly?

Could a successor emerge with a much bigger version of Russia and its future, and use adventures like Syria to shape European and GCC efforts to work together to reshape the Middle East, why the United States is embroiled in its cold Civil War?

Will the Russian relationship with China turn conflictual as the Chinese turn to dominating Siberia and the Far East?

Put in other terms, Putin has provided a transition from the turbulent, post-Cold years, which were considerably more democratic than now but also pushed many Russians into poverty.

Putin used the early 21t century and its rise in energy prices as a way to pay for the revival of Russia and in the throes of so doing built out his narrative. Putin is a geopolitical actor, in every sense of the word.

A key element of the narrative built by Putin has been to highlight great moments in Russian history around which authoritarian leaders have made Russia a powerful global actor and one to be respected.  In this narrative build, nothing plays a greater role than remembering World War II or what the Russians call the Great Patriotic War.  The way this has been done though is the problem or the challenge for Russia’s future.

There is no doubt that the citizens of the Soviet Union suffered mightily from World War II or fought heroically against the Nazis.  That part Putin remembers and highlights.

But what gets lost is an equally important point – how the mistakes made by an authoritarian leader can lead to the destruction of his people.

In a perceptive analysis by Allen Lynch of the University of Virginia, the post-Putin future of Russia is the focus of attention.

The first snapshot looking forward in the final years of the Putin leadership would be continued economic deterioration of Russia while avoiding economic collapse.

The second snapshot would be to see the centralizing efforts of Putin backfiring. Because regional flexibility has been undercut by Putin’s system of vertical integration, explosions in the periphery could have a rapid Russian system wide impact.

The third snapshot would further economic deterioration spiraling into economic bankruptcy.

The fourth snapshot was be see the return of the Westernizers a constant force bubbling under the surface in late 19thCentury Russia, but remaining a force even in Putin’s Russia. And it should always be remembered that Putin’s kleptocaracy relies on the Western banking system and the rules’ based liberal order to protect their money abroad.

Lynch concludes that it is time to shape a Western perspective which understands that Russian authoritarianism of one form or another is most likely to stay and we need to sort out ways to cope with it as well as rethinking ways to shape Russian policies which are not going to be our own.

For example, the cost of holding the indefinite future of U.S.-Russia relations hostage to Crimea seems wildly excessive given the contingencies stretched out over time that could imperil both nations. Short of the headlong collapse of the Russian state—which would actually be a disaster for U.S. and global security—there is no plausible route to severing Crimea from Russia.

So why not consider a trade greased by the salve of a professional diplomacy: de facto U.S. acquiescence to the reintegration of Crimea into Russia in return for Russia’s leaving the rest of Ukraine alone, pending a suitable and achievable compromise over Ukraine’s geostrategic status and internal language and identity issues.

If Russian-Ukrainian relations remain a powder keg when Putin has left the scene, Americans may well come to regret that they passed on exploring an outcome that Putin could agree to.

Even if one disagrees with this specific policy issue, what Lynch has underscored is a key nature of dealing with the Russian challenge today.

How to deal with rise of 21st century authoritarianism in the context of Western disunity, which will not go away any time soon?

Can shaping states with clusters of defense or economic interests in the West giving real meaning to the European alliances, NATO and the EU, provide a better leverage point on the evolution of a Russia, whose regionalization might well be a better outcome for the West?

What Russia Will Be

For articles we have published which highlight Russia under Putin, see the following:

Putin

For an e-book version of this report, see the following:

The Second UK Aircraft Carrier Sets Sail

09/23/2019

Britain’s second aircraft carrier, HMS Prince of Wails, has sailed from Rosyth Dockyard for the first time.

According to a story on the UK’s Ministry of Defence website published on September 19, 2019:

Eight years after her first steel was cut, the 65,000 tonne warship will head under the iconic Forth Bridges in the coming week to begin her initial sea trials.

Defence Minister Anne-Marie Trevelyan said:

“Prince of Wales’ departure from Rosyth is a landmark moment for the carrier programme. As the ship takes the next step to becoming fully operational, she carries with her the story of Britain’s maritime might.

“This tremendous achievement is a testament to the talent of British industry and I look forward to the moment we can welcome her into the Royal Navy family.

The carrier will conduct extensive sea trials off the coast of North East Scotland upon departing Rosyth before arriving at her home port of Portsmouth later this year.”

Upon her entry to Portsmouth, she will be officially commissioned into the Royal Navy by her Lady Sponsor, HRH The Duchess of Cornwall, and sit alongside her sister ship for the first time.

Prince of Wales’s Captain Darren Houston said:

“I am immensely proud of the professionalism and determination that my ship’s company have shown in preparing themselves and their ship for this historic day.

“Whether through working alongside our industrial partners to support the build and commissioning of key systems or training tirelessly to operate the ship and work as a team, the crew have demonstrated unfaltering dedication and resolve in the face of a multitude of challenges.”

The Prince of Wales is only the second ship in the world after HMS Queen Elizabeth to be built from the hull upwards, specifically to operate the fifth generation F35B Lightning II Joint Strike fighter jet.

Sir Simon Lister, Managing Director of the Aircraft Carrier Alliance said:

“The Aircraft Carrier Alliance has bought together the very best of British industry, and it is thanks to their hard work, skill and determination that we have reached this important stage in the programme.

“By working together as one team, we are now able, on schedule, to start testing this magnificent ship in preparation for handing her over to the Royal Navy.”

First Sea Lord, Admiral Tony Radakin said:

“This is much more than just the departure of the second ship in the class from Rosyth, but marks a sea change in Britain’s aircraft carrier capability. HMS Prince of Wales confirms Britain’s place as the leading European carrier strike nation within NATO.

“From high-end warfighting to humanitarian assistance, Britain remains ready to deliver on operations anywhere in the world.”

The ship has emerged from build two years after her sister ship, HMS Queen Elizabeth, which is currently transiting the Atlantic, including visiting Canada. The deployment, known as WESTLANT19 is an Operational Trial to be conducted with UK F-35Bs off the East Coast of the US.

The introduction of the new carrier flying F-35Bs opens the transformation aperture to provide a forcing function for RAF and Royal Navy integration. As Group Captain Ian Townsend, a key officer involved in working the F-35 introduction Ian Townsend into service for the RAF and now the RAF Marham Base Commander and currently the F-35 force commander, put it with regard to the Queen Elizabeth and F-35 transition put it in an interview with us:

As an airman, I like anything that enhances my ability to deliver air power, and the ship certainly does that. The ship has been tailor-made from first principles to deliver F-35 operational output. The ship is part of the F35 air system.

I think this is the key change to where we were in Joint Force Harrier where the ship was really just a delivery vehicle. The ship was just a runway.

The Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers are much more than that. They are right at the heart of the air system’s capability fundamentally enabling and supporting what the air vehicle is doing three, or four, or five hundred miles away from the ship. And that wasn’t quite the same in Joint Force Harrier with the Invincible Class CVS carriers. So it’s very different for us.

Everyone involved in embarked F-35 operations needs to understand what the air vehicle is going off to do because everybody on the ship is much closer to that end delivery of effect. This is a very different concept of operations from 15 years ago.

And in a 2018 interview with the then head of the F-35 force based at RAF Marham, Air Commodore David Bradshaw, now in a senior position at the Ministry of Defence, the integration piece for the Royal Air Force and Royal Navy enabled by working the carrier operational envelope was highlighted.

“We have designed the Lightning Force from the very beginning to be joint. My deputy is a Royal Naval officer. The entire Lightning Force is a mix of light and dark blue.”

The new Queen Elizabeth class carrier is the largest warship ever built in the United Kingdom. While most of the focus of the press coverage has been on the process of building the carrier and now its sea trials, the carrier is coming at a very interesting point in British history.

There is a clear need to shape a post-Brexit defense policy, and having a significant epicenter of national sovereignty able to operate throughout the region and beyond But it is also at the heart of integrating UK forces to deliver UK capabilities within the integrated battlespace, both in terms of an integrated carrier strike force as well as in terms of shaping the various war fighting systems which will come together onboard the ship.

It is however at the heart of shaping 21st century interoperability, notably in the Northern European defense effort. There is the interoperability being worked with the US Navy, as evidenced in the Saxon Warrior exercise off of Scotland.

There is the interoperability being worked, as the USMC will operate its F-35Bs off of the ship. This will require an ability for the ship to operate US weapons onboard as well as to accommodate USMC maintainers as well with their specific national maintenance approaches. The ship is an F-35 carrier and will work its interoperability with other F-35s as well in the region, notably with the Dutch, the Norwegians, the Danes, the Italians, the Israelis, the US and perhaps others Europeans as well.

In other words, the carrier is at the vortex of a turn in British history, and a key element of shaping 21st century force integration and interoperability. It is clear as well that the way the RAF is going about its transformation provides opportunities to shape new collaborative opportunities with European allies as well going forward.

Obviously, with the political changes underway in Europe and elsewhere, the UK is looking to shape partnerships, which protect its interests and provide strategic opportunities to shape its capabilities going forward.

And flying a force of F-35s and Typhoons provides them with an interesting opportunity to work with Europe going forward. As Air Commodore Bradshaw added during our 2018 interview: “With the F-35, we will have unique opportunities to work with our Northern European allies, including the Norwegian, Danish and Dutch Air Forces as well as out USAF neighbors at RAF Lakenheath. And with the Typhoon, we have good opportunities to work with the Germans, Spanish and Italians. And with the Italians flying a mixed force of F-35A, F-35B and Eurofighter, we have great opportunities to work together as well.”

Rapid Runway Repair

Lulu Edwards, an engineer with the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center ‘s Geotechnical and Structures Lab, presents Rapid Large Crater Airfield Repair.

The Geotechnical and Structures Lab has refined tactics, techniques, and procedures to repair large areas of damaged airfields.

Runways can now be repaired and used within hours instead of weeks, even in remote areas.

VICKSBURG, MS, UNITED STATES

03.26.2019

Video by Robert DeDeaux and Dakota Pope

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center

Remembering Australia’s First Submarine

09/22/2019

By Sub-Lieutenant Jacob von Marburg

19 September 2019

While conducting survey operations off the coast of Papua New Guinea, the crew of HMAS Melville took time to commemorate the first Australian casualties of WWI and the loss of the Australian submarine AE1.

Melville’s commanding officer, Lieutenant Commander Michael Kumpis, addressed the ship’s company, and spoke of the sacrifice of AE1 and her crew, who were last seen departing Blanche Bay, Papua New Guinea, on September 14, 1914, to conduct a patrol with HMAS Parramatta (I).

She was never seen again and presumed lost at sea.

“It was honour to be in Rabaul, Papua New Guinea, to commemorate AE1 and her ship’s company for the sacrifice they made to Australia,” Lieutenant Commander Kumpis said.

“And, with the recent discovery of her wreck, hopefully it will provide answers to their families and the nation, who still mourns the loss of her courageous crew.”

September 11 marked the anniversary of the capture of the German wireless station in Bita Pika, Papua New Guinea, in 1914.

The action involved the Australian naval task group, which included HMA Ships Australia (I) and Sydney (I), and the submarines AE1 and AE2.

Lieutenant Andrew Taylor gave a speech about the fierce fighting by the Australian sailors, who were deployed on land in order to capture the wireless station.

Over the course of one day they would succeed in their mission and Australia would suffer her first casualties of the World War I.

The memorial service ended with the singing of the Naval Hymn and the reading of The Ode.

https://news.defence.gov.au/international/remembering-australias-first-submarine

Director General Submarines, Commodore Timothy Brown RAN, and Lieutenant Commander (Retired) Jim Smail laid wreaths at the last post ceremony at the Australian War Memorial to commemorate the 105th anniversary of the loss of the 35 officers and sailors from Australia’s first submarine, HMAS AE1. Lieutenant Commander Smail is the nephew of Petty Officer Robert Smail who was part of the AE1 ship’s company when she was lost.

September 17, 2019

RAAF in Exercise Mobility Guardian 2019

09/21/2019

By Flying Officer Clarice Hurren

20 September 2019

In the valley between the mammoth volcano Mount Rainier and snow-capped Mount Adams, personnel from 383 Contingency Response Squadron (383CRS) were flown into Selah Airstrip at Yakima Training Center as part of Exercise Mobility Guardian.

The team, made up of airfield engineers, medical and movements personnel, demonstrated the ability to plan and execute support to multinational forward operating bases and landing zones in the United States’ Pacific North-west.

Wing Commander Alan Brown, 383CRS Commanding Officer, said the exercise was also testing Air Force’s ability to execute an aeromedical evacuation in a coalition operation.

“This exercise is testing interoperability agreements and providing opportunities to take the lead on combined airfield operations, including securing, assessing, surveying, defending and handing over,” Wing Commander Brown said.

Wing Commander George Hodgson, the combat support group capability manager, said the exercise gave unique opportunities to learn and train with international partners in the air and on the ground.

“It has allowed us to observe and discuss the benefits of different ground equipment that is operated at a main operating base and also in an expeditionary setting,” Wing Commander Hodgson said.

“We have been able to understand the interoperability issues and come up with solutions to recognise our abilities and what each nation can bring to the fight.”

https://news.defence.gov.au/international/air-force-demonstrates-swift-response

 

Wedgetail Returns to the Middle East

A Royal Australian Air Force E-7A Wedgetail aircraft has arrived in the Middle East as part of Australia’s contribution to the US-led global coalition against Daesh.

Defence Minister Linda Reynolds said the deployment of the E7-A Wedgetail will support the Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) in their ongoing fight against terrorism in Iraq.

“The ISF is leading operations to prevent the re-emergence of Daesh in Iraq and in repelling incursions by Daesh into Iraq’s sovereign territory,” Senator Reynolds said.

“Australia has made a significant and continuous contribution to the global coalition against Daesh in Iraq and Syria and continues to provide support to Iraq to ensure progress is sustained.”

The aircraft has been deployed to the Air Task Group several times since October 2014.

As an airborne early warning and control platform, the E-7A Wedgetail can gather information from a variety of sources, analyse it and communicate this information to friendly air and surface assets.

The E-7A Wedgetail will join the KC-30A Multi Role Tanker Transport aircraft currently providing air-to-air refuelling capability to a variety of coalition aircraft supporting operations in Iraq and Syria as part of the Australian Defence Force’s Operation Okra.

Australian Department of Defence

September 12, 2019

Sat Loading on C5

09/20/2019

U.S. Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center personnel and civilian ground crews load the Advanced Extremely High Frequency-5 (AEHF) communications satellite onto a C-5M Super Galaxy aircraft from Travis Air Force Base, at Sunnyvale, California, April 19, 2019.

SUNNYVALE, CA, UNITED STATES

04.19.2019

Video by Lan Kim

60th Air Mobility Wing Public Affairs

France, Germany and New Defense Projects: Framing the Challenge

09/18/2019

By Pierre Tran

BOURGES/AVORD AIRBASE, France

France and Germany need to resolve political, industrial and operational differences hanging over projects for a new fighter jet and a new tank, a French senator said Sept. 13.

A New Generation Fighter is key to the planned Future Combat Air System, backed by France, Germany and Spain, while Berlin and Paris are also looking to develop and build a new tank in the Main Ground Combat System.

French parliamentarians, chiefs of staff and top industry executives at a plenary session of a Sept. 12-13 conference heard a summary of problems hanging over the two arms projects seen as cornerstones for future European defense.

The conference, dubbed summer defense university, was organized by CEIS, a consultancy, and backed by Dassault Aviation. The event was held at Bourges and Avord airbase, central France.

The conference is run on Chatham House reporting rules which ask for anonymity of speakers.

“Today, there is concern over FCAS,”said the senator, pointing out that France wants to pursue “operational capabilities,” while Germany seeks industrial content for its companies in a drive for economic gain.

There is also a German call for close parliamentary oversight of the FCAS program through a release of funding in small tranches.
France leads on FCAS, with Dassault Aviation as prime contractor, while Germany steers the MGCS tank project and a planned European medium-altitude, long-endurance unmanned aerial vehicle.

FCAS and MGCS may be separate projects but they have become closely related, as German parliamentarians have linked supervisory approval of one to the other.

Progress on FCAS depends on Berlin finding work to be assigned to Rheinmetall in Germany’s 50 percent in MGCS, the senator said. A US pension fund holds a large stake in Rheinmetall, the senator added.

The assumption had been family owned Krauss-Maffei Wegmann would hold the German stake in MGCS, with state-owned Nexter holding the French 50 percent.

Talks are still going on for how to share out the work between KMW and Rheinmetall, and it cannot be assumed there will be a 25 percent stake for each company, a European official said on the sidelines of the conference.

Rheinmetall supplies the turret, while KMW works on the chassis on the Leopard 2 heavy tank.

A senior French executive, also speaking on the sidelines, made it clear it was only “certain parliamentarians” which were holding up FCAS rather than the full German Bundestag parliament.

An operational issue to be resolved is how the new fighter jet will be able to carry the French nuclear missile and Nato atomic bomb, as the German air force flies the latter, supplied by the US, the senator said.

A further concern is need for an agreement between Berlin and Paris on arms exports, as FCAS will need foreign sales to help fund its program, the senator said.

An export agreement will soon be reached, a senior French official said at the plenary session, declining further comment.

President Emmanuel Macron and chancellor Angela Merkel reached an agreement at the G-7 summit at Biarritz on Franco-German arms export policy, with Berlin foregoing a right of approval if there were less than 20 percent of German content in value in a French weapon being sold abroad, afternoon daily Le Monde reported.

France wanted a lower level of German content, as that would have given Paris more latitude in pitching French arms in overseas markets.

That 20 percent threshold also applied for French oversight of German arms exports.

“When there is a big deal, like a fighter jet, it has to be discussed,” said François Lureau of EuroFLconsult. “There should be rules, but it is hard to generalize and foresee the situation in 30 years time,” he added.

There should be discussion and compromise, he said, adding that the Debré-Schmidt agreement on foreign arms sales had never been observed. That was a Franco-German pact dating back to the 1970s.

Lureau is a former procurement chief.

The arms export deal was included in a Franco-German treaty signed Jan. 22 at Aix-la-Chapelle, magazine Der Speigel reported Feb. 15.

French executives point up a tardiness of German delivery of components, seen as a bid to slow sales of French weapons. France and Germany compete in the world arms market.

There was a deafening silence at the conference on the UK’s pursuit of its Tempest project, despite the Sept. 11 announcement British companies had signed a statement of intent with Italian partners on cooperation for a new fighter.

The senior French official, however, did predict there would be cooperation with the British on the new fighter programs.

It made no sense to have two new European fighter programs and it was likely there would be a merging of the projects, a British executive said.

BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce, and the British units of Leonardo and MBDA signed statements of intent with Avio Aero, Elettronica, Leonardo and MBDA in Italy to work on a “concept and partnership model,” seeking to share knowledge, product definition and technology development for development of a future combat air system

That industrial agreement followed Italy and the UK committing to work together closely on combat air capabilities including Typhoon, F-35 and Tempest.

There was no surprise Italy teamed up with the UK as both nations operate the F-35, a French executive said. It remained to be seen whether there would be funds for Tempest in view of the acquisition of F-35.

Italy had shown no interest in joining FCAS, and there is doubt whether Rome had sufficient funds, a French officer said on the sidelines of the conference.

On the proposal for the European MALE UAV, there is a vast difference between industry’s offer and what the governments are willing to pay, the officer said.

Armed forces minister Florence Parly said in her June 17 speech at the Paris airshow that industry needed to cut the price of the UAV.

“I say to them — and the companies know it — that this program will not get off the ground unless the drone they are proposing is competitive,” she said.

That pricing was not just for the launch nations —France, Germany, Italy and Spain — but prospective export clients, she said. An intensive negotiation was opening up, which she hoped would lead to announcement of a launch contract this year.
Airbus and Dassault are industrial partners, with the former in the lead on the UAV.

The French air force staged an extensive flying display of Rafale fighter, A400M transport plane and Puma helicopter at the airbase on the opening day. There was a display of ground troops attacking insurgents, supported by a low pass by Rafale and helicopter evacuation of a wounded soldier.

On the ground, there was display of armored vehicles including Jaguar troop carrier, high mobility vehicle, AMX10 RC fighting vehicle and Leclerc tank. The airbase supports the fleet of Awacs spy plane.

In a vast hanger, alongside an Awacs plane, there were many stands showing military programs and equipment.
Parly attended the conference.

For a look at Tempest, see the following:

The Next Phase of Airpower Transformation for the UK: Putting Team Tempest in Perspective