Defense of Europe: “Tommorow’s Solutions are No Longer Yesterday’s Habits.”

03/06/2025

By Murielle Delaporte

President Macron’s address to the French on March 5, 2025[1] echoes the speeches of his predecessors, who tirelessly fought for an autonomous and sovereign defense, or at least the most sovereign defense possible in view of global economic constraints and realities.

General de Gaulle’s vision of a strong defense industrial base and nuclear deterrence enabling us to hold our head high in the post-war decades is an opportunity today, even if the dividends of peace have somewhat weakened it.

But the legacy and the spirit have always prevailed, whether in the pursuit of our comprehensive army model enabling us to be present in external theatres and be respected there, or in being pioneers in Europe in the development of a cyber strategy or a space defence strategy, new battlefield fields unfortunately confirmed for the 21st century.

The post-war reshuffle, which is currently underway and has been going on for a number of years now, is also in line with NATO’s enlargement from 12 to 32 members between 1949 and 2024[2], on the one hand, and the rise of China, whose rearmament is a cause for concern in Washington[3], on the other.

Rather than talking about a transatlantic rift, such as the “excessive warmongers” and “excessive defeatists” – to use the expression of President Macron in his speech – tends to depict the current situation, it seems more realistic to talk about a readjustment of the sharing of burdens and responsibilities within an Atlantic Alliance that still has its say.

This is what has been desired on both sides of the Atlantic for decades – in any case in France constantly and in the United States more sporadically depending on the different presidents from Kennedy to Trump today.

The overall objectives are therefore now aligned so that the American contribution to NATO, currently estimated at around 64% of the total budget, can be partly redirected to face other threats – just as real – on its western front[4] and a true European defense can emerge.

As for the nature of Washington’s support for Ukraine, it is still too early to know what will happen – in one direction or another – at the end of the peace negotiations with Moscow and depending on how they progress, if they are confirmed.

What we must remember, however, are the ups and downs that have regularly punctuated the history of NATO and especially Franco-American relations since the post-war period: the current disagreements over Ukraine are in many ways similar to the Suez crisis, the reaction of the Americans during our wars of decolonization (Indochina and Algeria), or more recently the Euromissiles crisis under the Reagan administration (a de facto president as hated and booed by the media of the time as Donald Trump is today)[5], or even the differences between the two nations over the war in Iraq.

Americans and Europeans are different and have the right to disagree on everything, but that does not mean an all-or-nothing policy. Only their common enemies have an interest in a decoupling between Allies who were celebrating their 75th anniversary a few months ago and who have gone through many similar crises year in and year out since the end of the Second World War.

Let’s keep our fingers crossed that the same will be true today and that this transition towards a rebalancing of NATO will take place in a harmonious and natural way.

Notes and references:

[1] https://www.elysee.fr/front/pdf/elysee-module-24161-fr.pdf

[2] https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_52044.htm

[3] See for example on this subject: https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/military-balance/2024/05/asian-defence-spending-grows-chinas-grows-more/; or the Pentagon analysis >>> https://media.defense.gov/2024/Dec/18/2003615520/-1/-1/0/MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA-2024.PDF

[4] https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2024/6/pdf/240617-def-exp-2024-fr.pdf ; see also: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2024/6/pdf/240617-def-exp-2024-fr.pdf

[5] See: Murielle Delaporte, La politique étrangère depuis 1945 : l’Amérique à la croisée de l’Histoire, pages 67 to 79 in particular >>> https://www.fnac. com/a147470/Murielle-Delaporte-La-politique-etrangere-americaine-depuis-1945-l-Amerique-a-la-croisee-de-l-histoire – or the PDF extract >>> Extract pages 67 to 71 La politique etrangere americaine depuis 1945 DELAPORTE

This was published on 6 March 2025 in French on Operationnels.

Italy and the F-35: Shaping 21st Century Coalition-Enabled Airpower

03/05/2025

Our latest book in our airpower and maritime force modernization series has just been published.

The book highlights Italy’s significant role in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program.

The book details Italy’s contributions to F-35 manufacturing and maintenance at the Cameri facility, highlighting its status as a key production and sustainment hub for European and allied partners.

Furthermore, the book highlights the integration of the F-35B into the Italian Navy’s ITS Cavour aircraft carrier and its implications for sea-based operations.

Finally, the book discusses Italy’s participation in multinational exercises, such as Pitch Black, showcasing its long-range deployment capabilities and commitment to international partnerships, and the development of advanced pilot training facilities.

The book is based on interviews in Italy, the United States and Australia conducted with Italian pilots and airpower leaders since 2013.

Each chapter is presented first in the original English and is then followed by a translation in Italian.

The translation was a machine translation and can be considered only an approximate one but having a translation in Italian can help the Italian reader to better understand the English and can provide for a wider audience as well for the book.

As LT Gen (ret.) Pasquale Preziosa, Former Chief of Staff, Italian Air Force, noted in his foreword to the book: “Robbin’s extensive research and interviews—conducted across continents and institutions—bring authenticity and breadth to this book. He captures the essence of Italy’s “double transition,” as it modernizes legacy systems like the Eurofighter Typhoon while embracing the transformative potential of the F-35. Through detailed accounts of exercises like Pitch Black and the integration of platforms such as the KC-767A and E-550 CAEW, Robbin illustrates how Italy is leveraging its airpower capabilities to project influence and enhance NATO’s collective defense posture.

“This book is more than a chronicle of Italy’s airpower evolution; it is a blueprint for other nations navigating similar transitions. It highlights the importance of embracing new technologies, fostering interoperability, and investing in training and sustainment to address the security challenges of an increasingly complex world. As such, it is an invaluable resource for military professionals, policymakers, and defense analysts alike.”

For a podcast discussing the book, follow the link.

Global Eagle 2024

Exercise Global Eagle 2024 took place at Moody Air Force Base, Georgia, and Avon Park Air Force Range, Florida, Nov. 4-21, 2024.

Global Eagle is an annual base defense exercise conducted between international partners with this year’s iteration including the U.S. Air Force, Royal Air Force, and Royal Norwegian Air Force designed to exchange tactics and advance interoperability for these international partners.

AVON PARK, FLORIDA

11.22.2024

Video by Airman 1st Class Iain Stanley 

93rd Air Ground Operations Wing

Shaping a Way Ahead for U.S. Air and Space Forces

03/04/2025

The Department of the Air Force faces a crisis. Decades’ worth of insufficient budgets has slowed essential modernization, necessary capacity and key personnel investments.

Air Force and Space Force leaders have warned of these risks for years.

However, resource decisions were largely out of their control. As a result, the U.S. Air Force now operates the oldest and smallest aircraft inventory in its history.

Combined with a lack of spare parts, an enduring pilot shortage, and falling pilot experience levels, the Air Force finds itself in a precarious condition that portends a national security disaster.

The U.S. Space Force, meanwhile, is struggling to meet growing demand for the essential capabilities it provides. One of the biggest challenges: scale.

The Space Force is constrained by its size and must grow as rapidly as possible. The cost to recover the Air Force’s decline and adequately fund the growth of the Space Force will require an increase of at least $45 billion annually for at least the next five years.

The Department of the Air Force underpins and enables warfare in every domain, not just air and space.

Prioritizing these capabilities can help the Trump defense team achieve its objective of “pursue peace through strength” but doing so requires a new way of doing business and in particular not the conventional stove-piped, “salami slice” budget cutting approach.

Using cost-per-effect assessments to make optimal decisions, the new administration can achieve the best use of the nation’s resources.

There is no time left to delay reversing the Department of the Air Force’s current course.

The fixes must start now, or the United States risks losing the next major war.

For the paper, follow this link.

VMM-165 Offloads USS Boxer

03/03/2025

U.S. Marines assigned to Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 165 (Reinforced), 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit, conduct an offload of aircraft and personnel from the amphibious assault ship USS Boxer (LHD 4) in the Pacific Ocean Nov. 22, 2024.

Elements of the 15th MEU are currently embarked aboard Boxer and are conducting routine operations in U.S. 3rd Fleet.

USS BOXER (LHD 4), PACIFIC OCEAN

11.22.2024

Video by Cpl. Luis Agostini 

15th Marine Expeditionary Unit

An Update on the French Government Approach to Drones: A March 2025 Update

03/02/2025

By Pierre Tran

Paris – The armed forces minister, Sébastien Lecornu, visited Feb. 27 Turgis Gaillard, a private company developing and building a low-cost medium-altitude, long-endurance combat drone, dubbed Aarok, at Blois, central France.   

“Turgis Gaillard had the honor to welcome the armed forces minister, Sébastien Lecornu, on its site at the Blois-Le Breuil aerodrome,” the company said in a Feb. 27 statement. “At this visit, the teams were able to present the latest developments on the Aarok project, which stands as a symbol of innovation and French military sovereignty.”

That high-profile ministerial visit to the Aarok unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) at Blois, underscored a French switch in procurement policy of military drones, sparked by the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.

That Aarok drone made a bigger media splash when it went on display two years ago at the Paris air show, with the company pitching its prototype as an affordable UAV for combat, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, offered at a low price and speedy delivery.

The static display of the Aarok drone at the air show, right next to the French armed forces chalet, sparked doubts on the outlook for the European MALE UAV, dubbed Eurodrone, which carries a price tag of €7.1 billion. 

The Safran AASM powered smart-bomb and an unidentified anti-tank weapon were among the weapons displayed with the drone.

Blois is in the Loire valley, known for its elegant chateaux and rolling green countryside along the great Loire river. The defense ministry sees the work on the Aarok combat drone as creating jobs and regenerating the local economy.      

Game Changer

The war in Ukraine was nothing less than a “game changer” for drones in reconnaissance, tactical observation, and as lethal weapons, the private office of the defense minister told journalists. That conflict showed France needed to catch up in drone capability, and build a solid domestic industry building drones.

A financial effort worth €5 billion was earmarked in the French 2024-2030 military budget law for development and procurement of drones for all the services – land, sea, and air, the office said. Some €500 million was set aside for drones in the 2024 military budget. 

The importance of drones could be seen with the defense ministry signing at the Eurosatory trade show last June its pact with industry for building air drones for the military, indicating the pivot to pursuing development of a domestic drone industry. 

Keep It Simple 

A major change came in early 2024 with a simplification of procurement, ditching a detailed set of specifications for a more basic expression of requirement, with a number of companies informed of requirement for a low-end MALE drone, the office said.

That simpler approach sought to stimulate innovation, the office said, as the ministry was not launching a detailed procurement for a specific weapon, but was offering government funds for development of a low-end drone, with first flight in 2026 and delivery in 2027. 

It was up to companies to find a way to meet the requirement.

The first batch of government funding to companies proposing a low-cost UAV was due to be announced in June at the Paris air show, the office said. If the companies could fly their low-cost drones in 2026, contracts could be signed in 2027, with several suppliers being selected.

It was uncertain how much funding would be provided, as much depended on how many companies submitted bids. But there was a figure of some €10 million to be distributed to contractors offering to develop a low-cost UAV. 

The minister’s office declined to say which companies have shown interest in developing such a drone, other than to say there were some “large, historic companies” active in the field. 

Funding from Late Delivery

The source of government funding will stem from penalties charged for lateness on large arms programs, particularly the four-nation European MALE UAV. 

Airbus Defence and Space, based in Germany, is prime contractor on that drone program, which is under development and running late. The leading subcontractors are Dassault Aviation for France, Leonardo for Italy, and the Airbus DS unit for Spain. Germany is the lead nation. That twin-engined drone is due to fly in 2030. 

There are potential offers of low-cost UAVs from five to 10 or so companies, the office said, and the authorities will provide some government funding, although that will not cover full development costs. The companies will need to fund from their own resources. A mix of large and small companies have shown interest.            

Turgis Gaillard has not been selected to supply its UAV, but its Aarok prototype is considered to be “certifiable but not certified,” the minister’s office said. 

Aarok Works on Loitering Munition

The Aarok drone completed tests on the runway a couple of weeks ago, and the UAV is due for maiden flight with a pilot onboard in May, the office said. The DGAC civil aviation authority has held up first flight of the Aarok, but that authorization is expected for May or June, the office said.

Turgis Gaillard previously expected first flight in early 2024, entering into service two years later, Patrick Gaillard, chief executive and co-founder of the company has previously said.

Turgis et Gaillard was also developing a long-range loitering munition, seen by the French authorities as one of the top priority weapons in the war economy, the office said. 

The €500 million funds for 2024 earmarked for French drones included development of loitering munitions – or “kamikaze drones.” 

The war in Ukraine showed the deadly effectiveness of loitering munitions, leading Paris to order an emergency shipment of short-range loitering munitions built by Delair and KNDS France, under the Colibri project. The French authorities are also shipping a munition from MBDA, and its project partner, Novadem. 

Procurement of low-cost UAVs is seen as “complementary” to the Eurodrone and Safran Patroller tactical UAV, the office said. 

“It is definitely not a substitute,” the office said.

There was interest in the car industry in building a low-cost drone, the office said, as there was experience in mass production, which helped drive down costs.

Turgis Gaillard was looking closely at the car industry in their work on developing a long-range loitering munition, the office said. 

The company was offering a drone which would be “ITAR-free,” the office said, referring to equipment which would avoid authorization for shipment from the U.S. international traffic in arms regulations.

Electric motors, most of which are built in China, will not be used on the low-cost drones, which will be powered by turboprop, with expectations a Safran engine will be used, the office said.

There were no French companies with a MALE drone available on the shelf, the office said. The task was to innovate, develop those drones, fly them in 2026, and deliver in 2027.  

The ministerial visit to Blois underlined the political significance of “re-industrialization” of the regions and creation of jobs, the office said. A planned opening of a factory for Aarok at Blois would create 50 or so jobs, adding to the 30 staff working there, up from the eight in 2020. There were also some 100 engineers working in the Var region in the south.  

The Aarok has a take-off weight of 5.5 tons, and is powered by a turboprop engine. The drone has empty weight of 2.5 tons, and can carry almost 3 tons of fuel, weapons and mission kit.

The UAV can fly more than 20 hours, with cruising speed of some 450 km/h and at 15,000 meter altitude.

Meanwhile across the Channel, the U.K. is reported to complete the early retirement of the British army’s Watchkeeper drone in March, following the November announcement by the secretary of defense, John Healey, of cuts in military spending. 

The British unit of Thales, a French electronics company, won that Watchkeeper contract, worth some £800 million, with an offer based on the Hermes 450 drone from Elbit Systems, an Israeli company. That Watchkeeper drone entered service in 2010 and had a troubled life.

An Update on European Drones: February 2024

AAROK MALE UAV

 

Keen Sword 25

02/28/2025

U.S. Air Force F-22A Raptors assigned to the 525th Fighter Generation Squadron, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, Japan Air Self-Defense Force F-15J Eagles assigned to the 305th Tactical Fighter Squadron, and U.S. Marine Corps F-35B Lightning IIs assigned to Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 121, Marine Aircraft Group 12, takeoff in support of Keen Sword 25 at JASDF Nyutabaru Air Base, Japan, Oct. 29, 2024. Keen Sword is a biennial, joint and bilateral field-training exercise involving U.S. military and Japan Self-Defense Force personnel, designed to increase readiness and interoperability while strengthening the ironclad U.S.-Japan alliance.

JAPAN AIR SELF-DEFENSE NYUTABARU AIR BASE, MIYAZAKI, JAPAN

10.29.2024

Video by Staff Sgt. Gary Hilton 

18th Wing

The Payload Revolution: Surveillance, Reconnaissance and Decision-Making

02/26/2025

By Robbin Laird

When I visited VADM Miller, then the Navy’s Air Boss, in 2020, I learned of something called MISR. No not a cheap person, but the Navy’s rethink of how to work the left side of the kill chain or to expand its capability to provide the data necessary for more accurate and rapid decision making.

As Vice Admiral Miller, the Navy’s Air Boss said to me: “The next war will be won or lost by the purple shirts.  You need to take MISR seriously, because the next fight is an ISR fight.”

I went to the Naval Aviation Warfighting Center or NAWDC to follow up and to learn more about MISR. I talked with NAWDC officers three times that year and visited twice. The last visit was to observe the exercise which was led by MISR officers, namely Resolute Hunter. At that exercise when I visited, the main focus was upon how to leverage ISR platforms which the Navy could work with which were non-Navy platforms.

This past Fall, I visited NAWDC again and spoke with MISR officers again and learned about the development of the Resolute Hunter exercise.  What I learned is that the payload revolution had come to the ISR challenge. Rather than ISR platforms, the focus is upon sensor awareness delivered to the distributed decision maker. It is about enabling a variety of platforms with payloads which can deliver the surveillance and reconnaissance data to the distributed decision maker to be able to act rapidly and accurately in a fluid battlespace.

This means that MISR and its Resolute Hunter exercises has evolved to be able to encompass payloads on various platforms, and payloads on autonomous systems as pipelines providing the data needed for accurate and rapid decision making.

Recently, I talked with the MISR Department Head at NAWDC, CDR Timothy “HaveQuick” Bierbach about the evolution. He provided me with his perspective on the evolution which I had observed.

He noted: “What you saw in 2020 was the utilization of manned ISR dedicated platforms in the battlespace. How can we better utilize and optimize the functionality of the reconnaissance strike complex that we built out during the 1980s? We now are focused on how we can leverage new payloads and a wider variety of platforms to deliver the decisive information which the commanders need, known as the layered reconnaissance strike network. The focus is not on a narrow number of assets to provide ISR data; rather it is upon enabling the decision-maker with the most relevant data to make a more rapid decision.

“The combination of all of these systems, sensors, platforms and weapons makes the current battle space characterized by more rapid decision making  and also changes how legacy industrial military technology can operate more effectively.”

The focus is upon training MISR officers to learn how to leverage new technologies, new payloads and combine them with the evolution of the legacy force to deliver capability to the force to fight more effectively, rapidly and decisively.

Secretary Wynne, who brought me in to the world of fifth generation aircraft, always argued that the warrior shaping the con-ops guided how technology would be used.

He argued the following: “A new CONOPs leveraging the new aircraft and able to incorporate legacy platforms and to shape new investments enhancing the joint effect is crucial to success. Declining numbers, coupled with a refusal to recognize the “re-norming challenge,” will lead to a needless loss of capability.

“But we need as well to invest in the future, not just modernize the past, and step back and consider which tactics techniques and procedures have current technology trends been guiding the future fight.

“We need to also consider the training needed to perfect our capabilities. We need to retool and to rethink, and it must start in our imagination and not assume that historical success will be replicated in the future without serious effort.”

This is clearly what MISR is doing, not just building muscle memory for the past fight using legacy systems but building forward to shape ways to deliver the effects needed for the future fight. This means as well that MISR and NAWDC are working ways for training to drive development of new payloads for the operational force. By bringing in developmental payloads to Resolute Hunter exercise, the MISR team can test out what helps, what works, what does not and what can fill gaps and drive greater mission success.

This effort reflects another Wynne insight as well.

“Look to the future technology base, and consider how it will affect the conduct of warfare. Now, bring to bear the military operational brilliance so necessary to converting any technology into a weapon of warfare.”

MISR and NAWDC are focused on shaping the military art by embracing relevant new technologies and in the ISR world, a major change is that the sensors available to a distributed force using a version of a local area network is becoming a reality. The Navy leadership has been focusing on the need to fight from the Maritime Operations Center (MOC) which clearly can be distributed. Now the payload revolution is enabling distributed combat clusters to have the ISR data they need or the S and R data they need to make their decisions they are authorized to do.

The MISR approach is tailored to such a dynamic approach moving naval warfare forward beyond the information age to the age where the warrior in the high end fight needs to fight at the speed of light.

CDR Bierbach noted that “a local reconnaissance strike network now can operate much more rapidly in terms of decision cycle than a single national reconnaissance strike complex”

And frankly, in my view, the payload revolution is providing to a very wide range of platforms including maritime autonomous system mesh fleets the kind of ISR and C2 nodes enabling distributed forces and strike complexes.

Bierbach then posed the key challenge: “How do we utilize to a maximum capacity and the maximum functionality of the local area reconnaissance strike networks and combine it with the national reconnaissance strike network to create the maximum desired effects?”

Return to NAWDC: An Update on the MISR Pilot Program

The Wynne quotes are taken from our forthcoming book to be published 7 April 2025.