An Update on F-35 Manufacturing: Donald Kinard Talks with Aerospace Manufacturing

06/21/2018

Ed Hill, Aerospace Manufacturing

In this Q&A session Don Kinard, Lockheed Martin senior fellow F-35 production, discusses with Ed Hill how the defence giant is applying automation, robotics and additive manufacturing to production of the F-35 Lightning II.

Q) At what stages have you introduced more automation in your aircraft construction. Is it in the manufacturing of components, systems testing or assembly?

We’ve introduced automation in several areas of F-35 production to increase efficiencies, reduce costs and meet requirements. We’ve introduced automation for detail parts fabrication, such as fibre placement for composites.

We’ve automation for assembly, including flow to TAKT manufacturing material handling systems, automated tool storage and retrieval systems, robotic coatings, and auto drilling.

We also have some limited automation for test; however, assembly is typically where we focus most of our automation development.

Q) Would you say at present automation suits certain materials and processes more than others?

Depending on their configuration, composites lend themselves to fibre placement, while metal parts fabrication isn’t as ideally suited for automation, unless you’re doing large volumes of parts and automated material handling. The majority of our automation efforts focus on assembly.

Additionally, coatings are typically robotically applied to meet tolerance and quality requirements.

Q) Is it more difficult to apply automation to military aircraft construction compared to civil/cargo aircraft?

Historically, military aircraft production has been more challenging to automate because of less volume, with higher tolerances and requirements, and different contracting and funding approaches. That said, the economies of scale, volume and longevity of the F-35 programme really enables us to invest in automation throughout our production.

Q) What potential is there for speeding up the development phase of aircraft with more Industry 4.0 elements in manufacturing. Are you employing CAE and simulation to hasten aircraft development?

Yes, the industry must get faster at the development of new products and utilize simulations, digital twins, and more – to turn out products faster and also of higher initial quality so that they require less testing to validate the designs. This is essential to industry viability in the future.

Q) To what extent are you using additive manufacturing processes in your aircraft development and construction? Does it have potential for genuine volume production?

We have made, and continue to make, thousands of tools using polymer additive manufacturing – and we have about 15 machines cranking these parts out.

We produce ground support parts using additive (polymer and metal) manufacturing and even have a couple of small, non-structural polymer parts flying on the F-35 from suppliers.

When it comes to the major structures this is likely years away with certification and qualification requirements in aviation.

On the aircraft sustainment side, we are also working closely with operators in the fleet to identify F-35 hardware and support equipment manufacturing opportunities with alternate methods such as additive manufacturing.

These have the potential for fast, low-cost delivery of replacement support equipment, tools and components. Additive manufacturing will continue to have an impact on the aerospace industry and from our perspective there is a lot of development underway.

Q) How do you share what you have developed in automation with other assembly sites of the F-35 and the rest of the supply chain?

We share our development activities with our supply chain, within all ITAR requirements. Our global supply chain constitutes about 75% of F-35, so we’re highly engaged in sharing manufacturing technologies, affordability projects, and lessons learned to significantly reduce costs.

Q) How do you see automation/robotics and concepts, such as the Smart Factory developing in the aerospace industry? Could it ever reach the levels that we see in other industries?

While automotive and consumer electronics industries lend themselves well to ubiquitous, full scale automation, I envision the aerospace industry steadily increasing its use throughout phases of development, production and sustainment.

We’re looking at lots of different automation applications for some of our high-volume products like F-35 where we’ve a long production run.

As I mentioned earlier differences in military and commercial economic analysis and policies have an impact on capital expenditure decisions. We’re also looking at smart factory applications like RFID and IoT sensors to monitor equipment.

https://www.aero-mag.com/multiplied-automation-multirole-fighter/

The featured photo can be found here:

http://www.defesaaereanaval.com.br/lockheed-esta-perto-de-fechar-venda-de-jatos-f-35-de-mais-de-us-37-bilhoes/

For past interviews which we have done with Don Kinard, see the following:

The F-35 Final Assembly Line Ramps Up: Digital Thread Manufacturing and Design-Manufacturing-Sustainment Learning Curve

Building Wings for the F-35: Israel, Italy and Fort Worth Shape a 21st Century Capability

The Maturing of F-35 Manufacturing and Crafting Synergy Among Suppliers, the Final Assembly Line and Maintainers: An Update With Don Kinard

Shaping F-35 Production Maturity: A Dialogue with Dr. Don Kinard

Visiting VMX-1 at MCAS Yuma: Working MAGTF Modernization

By Robbin Laird

What was clear from my visit to MAWTS-1 and getting a chance to look at the work of the latest WTI is that the Marines are working ways to enhance the combat capability of the MAGTF but in a way that can reach back to joint assets and shape evolving capabilities.

Enhancing the combat power of the MAGTF is unfolding as the reach of the MAGTF is extended back into the air and maritime strike capabilities of the joint force.

I have visited VMX-22 in the past, and VMX-22 played a major role in introducing the Osprey to the Marine Corps and shaping operational concepts for the use of the Osprey.

With the coming of the F-35, VMX-22 has become VMX-1, and has generated a broadening of the aperture of what the new combat air assets can do in the process of the transformation of the MAGTF and its reach back as well.

The CH-53K will soon come into this transformation process and will both contribute to and leverage the overall process of change.

Next up will be new remotes, including a Group 5 UAS, which certainly will enter the universe of VMX-1 at some point.

In a 2016 visit to Yuma, Ed Timperlake and I had a chance to talk with the first Commanding Officer of VMX-1, Col. George Rowell.  In effect, what VMX-1 focuses upon is testing and working TTPs for aviation modernization for the USMC, with the F-35B as the latest key driver for change.

And later that year Todd Miller of the Second Line of Defense team visited the USS America to get updates on the ACE working onboard the new LHA and preparing for the future.

https://sldinfo.com/2017/09/uss-america-flight-ops-at-sea/

https://sldinfo.com/2016/12/the-moment-pilots-first-realized-the-f-35-was-something-extraordinary/

https://sldinfo.com/2016/12/the-marines-onboard-the-uss-america-the-remaking-of-the-amphibious-strike-force/

https://sldinfo.com/2016/11/the-next-phase-for-the-f-35b-empowering-the-sea-base/

During this visit to Yuma in May 2018, I had a chance to talk with several members of VMX-1 during a roundtable discussion. Here we focused on an update on the Osprey, on the ongoing work with regard to the F-35B and the core effort to shape a digitally, interoperable MAGTF.

Currently, VMX-1 owns six F-35Bs with two in depot maintenance at Cherry Point and second undergoing modifications at Edwards AFB. Two of the officers at the roundtable have extensive experience working with the aircraft.

Major Brendan Walsh who has been flying F-35Bs since their standup at Eglin AFB provided an overview on the aircraft within MAGTF operations. He served as the operations officer for the Green Knights and worked their preparation for deployment to Japan. He now is leading the Marine Operational Test & Evaluation Squadron 1 F-35B Detachment at Edwards Air Force Base, CA., under the command of Col. Rowell.  Major Walsh had just under 600 flight hours in the F-35B when we discussed his work during the roundtable.

A second Marine who discussed the F-35B from a strong basis of experience working with the aircraft was Major Paul Wright. Major Wright was originally a F-18 pilot but has worked through training and related F-35 activities to become a test pilot with VMX-1.

Major Walsh worked DT-3 as well where 12 F-35Bs operated with Ospreys onboard the USS America and supported assault operations in the San Clemente Island test area.

They underscored that the Osprey working with the F-35B enabled an ability to insert force into hostile areas of the sort being prioritized now with the strategic shift underway.

Given my recent visit to the UK and discussions at Marham and Portsmouth, I discussed with them their working relationship with the Brits. Not surprisingly, the two pilots emphasized the close working relationship but in so doing underscored a core point about the F-35 operating community worldwide.

As Maj. Wright put it: “I see the Brits on a daily basis at Edwards.”

It should be noted that at Edwards all three US services flying the F-35 as well as the Brits and Dutch work with the USAF Test Squadron.

And as Maj. Walsh added with regard to their work experience at Edwards, “We fly together regularly and work together closely as well.

“It is great to work commonality and to understand differences as well with how the partners and the services are working the airplane as well.”

The aircraft is a flying combat system with significant C2 and ISR capabilities.

And a clear challenge is task management with the aircraft as opposed to sensor management, which is what a legacy multi-mission fighter will focus upon.

As a multi-domain fighter, the focus of the information generated and displayed in the cockpit is about allowing the pilot to task manage and enable other fighters to be more lethal and survivable.

As Major Walsh put it: “With legacy platforms you would have one piece of the situational awareness puzzle and have to rely on other platforms to direct you.

“And we elevate the team operating around us.”

Major Wright added: “There is a culture or mindset change for the F-35 pilot compared to a legacy pilot.

“You work with the key information for the combat situation and can choose to employ your weapons, both lethal and non-lethal, against a target, or pass that information on and employ another asset in the attack phase of the OODA loop.”

Major Walsh then added with regard to his Red Flag experience in 2016: “If you look at what Vipers can achieve with and without the F-35, the difference is dramatic.

“You will find a lot of legacy platforms very happy to operate with F-35s for sure.”

One aspect of the Osprey working together with F-35s is the ability of the MV-22 to tank the F-35s, which provide a significant capability notably when operating off of ship or operating ashore in assault operations.

At MAWTS-1, they are working the STOVL distributed operations piece as well.

They have worked with the MV-22 providing the support last year, and at the last WTI, they used the C-130.

VMX-1 is clearly involved with shaping the TTPs for this operational capability.

The Marines initially worked the IOC support for the F-35, now they are working on leveraging the aircraft in its current configuration for the MAGTF and will spend the next couple of years working with the next iteration of the aircraft, the 3F software configuration and winging out its capabilities, notably for the Ground Combat Element.

The 3F will allow the aircraft to work with externally loaded ordinance for operational situations in which Low Observability is not the primary aspect of what is being required from the aircraft.

And while they are doing that, in the words of Major Wright, there will be a lot of “side projects’ with regard to leveraging the F-35 for the MAGTF as well.

With regard to the Osprey, the air system has evolved from the VMX-22 role of getting the aircraft into the force, to reworking the con-ops of the MAGTF leveraging the aircraft, to modifying aspects of the aircraft and its operations to optimize force insertion, to reshaping the aircraft to become a key part of the digital interoperability effort within the USMC.

Major Duchannes and Maj. Ryan Beni, also an MV-22 operator since 2009, and a Marine I had met earlier during a visit to Marine Corps Air Station New River, noted that the MV-22 has gone through several upgrades over the past few years, including upgraded communication systems and a new defensive weapons system.

“We are now working our way into the whole digital integration realm, so that we can empower the MAGTF more effectively as well as the Joint Force.”

The Osprey pioneered what might be called digitally enabled force insertion with the introduction of the MAGTAB into the squads operating on the Osprey and having the situational awareness to understand what had changed in the objective area during a long flight on Osprey to the objective area as well.

And working that digital interoperability piece is crucial for the F-35 as well as the Marines work the gateways and message systems to get benefit from the F-35 as it operates as a forward combat system enabling MAGTF operations.

This is a work in progress but a central focus for MAWTS-1 and VMX-1.

Editor’s Note: In this 2016 USMC story about the role of Marine Operational Test & Evaluation Squadron 1 F-35B Detachment at Edwards Air Force Base, CA in 2016 testing, a good sense of what the Detachment does is provided.

Three F-35B aircraft and 75 U.S. Marines from Marine Operational Test & Evaluation Squadron 1 F-35B Detachment at Edwards Air Force Base , CA, along with 21 test personnel from the JSF Operational Test Team at Edwards deployed to Eglin AFB, FL., from August 9 to September 1, 2016  to complete Operational Test  missile shots of the AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile.

These employment scenarios differed from those conducted in Developmental Test in that they were specifically designed around operational employment scenarios with the aim of further validating and developing tactics, techniques, and procedures for all three variants of the F-35.

“Due to the commonality of the F-35 mission systems and weapons, everything we learned during this detachment directly translates to combat capabilities for the Marine Corps, our sister services, and partner countries,” Lt. Col.  Richard Rusnok, VMX-1 F-35B Detachment Officer-in-Charge, said of the test missile shoot.

The detachment completed multiple engineering runs in preparation for the expenditure of five AIM-120 missiles and one Guided Bomb Unit-12 LASER guided bomb.  The operational test team developed complex air-to-air and air-to-ground scenarios and the F-35 weapons system performed as expected to deliver weapons on target.

 On day one of live fire testing, the team was able to shoot two missiles on two separate test set-ups within 12 minutes – an exceptional level of efficiency in a test environment.   Another test mission involved an F-35B dropping a GBU-12 and supporting it with LASER guidance while simultaneously engaging a QF-16 drone.  Both weapons successfully guided to their targets.

“This was a phenomenally successful deployment that was made possible by the close coordination between the JSF Operational Test Team, U.S. Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and industry,” Rusnok said.

During the past year, VMX-1’s F-35B Detachment has been involved in multiple high profile events including:

  • Block 2B, 3i, and 3F Developmental Test support
  • Block 2B Air-to-Surface Weapon Delivery Evaluation Global Position System testing
  • A deployment to the United Kingdom in support of the Royal International Air Tattoo and Farnborough International AirshowUpcoming events for VMX-1’s F-35B Detachment include:
  • Naval Integrated Fire Control – Counter Air testing

Developmental Test Period 3 aboard USS AMERICA

“I want to congratulate the VMX-1 / JOTT team that did a magnificent job planning and executing this OT missile shoot,” Col. George Rowell, VMX-1 commanding officer said. “ It is a huge achievement for the squadron and the F-35B program.  We look forward to many more opportunities to provide positive impact.”

Marine Operational Test & Evaluation Squadron 1 is charged with testing the full range of Marine Aviation Combat Element (ACE) Operational Test and Evaluation including MV-22, CH-53E/K, F-35B, UH-1Y, AH-1W/Z, Command and Control Systems, and Unmanned Aerial Systems.  VMX-1 is headquartered at MCAS Yuma, AZ, with detachments at Marine Corps Air Station New River, NC… a nd Edwards AFB, CA VMX-1 was formerly called VMX-22. The squadron’s name changed on May 13, 2016.

An additional story published by the USMC which highlighted comments made by Major Walsh revolved around the participation of VMFA-121 in a 2016 Red Flag.

Six F-35B Lightning IIs with Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 121 participated in Red Flag 16-3, making it the first time in history that the fifth generation fighter has taken part in the three-week long exercise at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada.  

Red Flag is a multiservice air-to-air combat training exercise including the Army, Navy, Air Force and the Marine Corps.

According to Lt. Col. J.T. Bardo, commanding officer of VMFA-121, this is the first exercise of this magnitude that the F-35 has participated in and serves as a valuable training opportunity for the squadron. 

During the training, VMFA-121 conducted defensive and offensive counter air exercises, strategic attacks, targeting, and combat search and rescue training. 

“We’re really working on showcasing our surface-to-air capabilities,” said Maj. Brendan Walsh, an F-35 pilot with VMFA-121. “The F-35 is integrating by doing various roles in air-to-air and air-to-ground training.”

The F-35 is equipped with an integrated sensor package more powerful than any fighter aircraft, also combining radar-evading stealth with speed and fighter agility.

“With the stealth capability, the biggest thing that this aircraft brings that the others do not is situational awareness,” said Walsh. “The sensor sweep capability that the F-35 brings to the fight, not only builds those pictures for me, but for the other platforms as well. We’re able to share our knowledge of the battle space with the rest of the participants in order to make everyone more effective.”

Red Flag 16-3 has roughly 3,500 service members involved for the entire exercise. The training scenarios require all the branches to come together, which is extremely common in real-life battle scenarios. 

“These opportunities to operate in a joint environment with our partner services are rare,” said Bardo. “We’re excited to be here, to bring the F-35 to the exercise and capitalize on all its strengths and integrate with the other players out there.”

The featured photo shows VMFA-121 bringing F-35B to Red Flag 16-3 for first time.

Pilots with Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 121 exit F-35B Lightning II’s after conducting training during exercise Red Flag 16-3 at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, July 20, 2016. This is the first time that the fifth generation fighter has participated in the multiservice air-to-air combat training exercise

The first slideshow highlights the Marines working distributed STOVL operations. The second slideshow highlights VMX-1 supporting training for night operations.

The Coming of the CH-53K from the Standpoint of the Transformation of the MAGTF

06/20/2018

By Robbin Laird

The CH-53k will replace the CH-53E.

It will be the premier heavy lift helicopter.

It has a number of key performance characteristics which make it a significant upgrade over the CH-53E, notably, an ability to carry three times of the external load of the CH-53E.

There are a number of key enhancements of the K over the E understood as a platform.

Certainly important, but the overall impact of the new aircraft would be missed unless, its coming to the MAGTF is best understood in the context of the transformation of the MAGTF itself.

Put in other words, the CH-53K is entering USMC operations when those operations are being fundamentally reworked to operate in a new strategic context and in the context of fundamental change for the MAGTF itself.

There is a strategic shift underway from the primary focus on counter-insurgency to crisis management in contested operational environments against peer adversaries.

The experience of the counter-insurgency years has little relevance to how to generate forces which can prevail in a force-on-force conflict and notably to be central to how to ciris manage in such situations.

The Marine Corps clearly gets this point.

My recent visit to MAWTS-1 and to discuss their recent work during their WTI exercise underscores the transition.

Across the board, the Marines are working the challenge of operating in a force-on-force contested environment.

And the skill sets of the counter-insurgency years in many cases have to be unlearned and replaced with the skill sets of operating in a strategically different environment.

There is little time to lose in making the transition and learning the appropriate skill sets.

And the Marines are looking to leverage new capabilities to enhance their transition as well. 

As noted in a recent article on WT1 2-18 by Steve Valinksi,:

“A major focus in the past two WTI iterations has been Digital Interoperability (DI) which is an integral component of the Marine Corps goal of having every airframe capable of being a sensor, shooter and sharer.

“DI continues to be a major focus throughout flight phase.

“Multiple Assault Support T/M/S are able to increase their SA through rapid information sharing, Major Miller told APD.”

The CH-53k is built from the ground up to be a DI aircraft.

It will both benefit from and contribute to the overall transformation of the USMC.

The shift from legacy to a 21stcentury system characterizes the movement from legacy heavy lift helicopters, like the Chinook or the CH-53E to the CH-53K.

The CH-53K as a fly-by-wire aircraft is built around digital systems.

In effect, modernization is built into to the architecture, which allows for upgrades through a software evolution process, one informed by the operational experience of the combat force and that learning then informing the code rewrite process.

The CH-53K is a complete fly-by-wire architected platform.

The cockpit is operating within an electronic environment which the flight control is run through the fly-by-wire electronic environment architecture.

The manufacturer can make a lot of changes along the way and given the different layers of flight control authority which is built into the architecture they can provide options for the pilots as well that allow them to mission managers or flight controllers dependent on where they are in the mission.

And these capabilities evolve over time along with the software upgrades and changes.

When I visited the West Palm Beach facility last year of Sikorsky, I saw this digital migration process underway.

As one engineer commented:” As you saw, the ground test vehicle is a fully functional K but it simply does not do one thing – which is to fly.

“As you saw during the testing and training going on, the aircraft was working through a lift cycle but on the ground.

“The test vehicle has seen every single software drop since the beginning of flight test. The test vehicle has seen both hardware and software upgrades.”

“The ground test vehicle and the Engineering Demonstration Models or EDMs are key platforms, which enable testing of the block upgrades within the program itself.

“They are not prototypes.

“These aircraft have had every single upgrade along the way.

“This means that the first four EDMs will be able to be used by the government to continue to the ongoing software development effort, which will then inform the modernization of the operational aircraft.”

“This is a very different process from how the Es were designed and modernized for sure.”

This means that the DI capabilities of the K, combined with software upgradeability built into the aircraft allows the K to evolve along with the transformation of the MAGTF as a DI force as well as to be a key contributor to the process.

I will deal with additional aspects of the coming of the CH-53k and its intersection with USMC transformation in a later article.

For an overview on the CH-53K, see the following:

https://defense.info/system-type/rotor-and-tiltrotor-systems/ch-53k/

 

Shaping the Way Ahead for Australian Defense: What Role for Independent Strike Capabilties?

Australia is engaged in a significant process of defense modernization and working closely with its closest allies in this process.

But looking beyond what the current trajectory of modernization, what course might Australia follow going forward?

We have published a look at paths which Australia might take going forward.

The Future of Australian Defense in a Dynamically Changing Region

The next Williams Foundation Seminar to be held in Canberra Australia on August 23, 2018 will address the core question of what role for independent strike for the Australian forces?

This seminar seeks to build a common understanding of the need for an independent joint strike capability to provide Australia with a powerful and potent deterrent and a means of demonstrating strategic intent.  It will highlight the impact on the national, campaign, operational and tactical levels, and discuss the ways joint strike can add a further dimension to future Australian Defence and national security policy.

And Central Blue, the Williams Foundation op ed, on the Williams Foundation website, is asking for submissions to their analytical efforts to understand the dynamics of change and options for Australia.

With this background and intent in mind, the editors at The Central Blue have come up with a number of topics to provoke your thinking in the lead up to the seminar. This is by no means an exhaustive list but we hope it prompts mental contact!

Questions to :

  • What is the impact of #jointstrike on the national, campaign, operational and tactical levels?
  • Can #jointstrike bring a new dimension to future Australian defence and national security policy?
  • How have partner forces developed and employed #jointstrike capabilities in recent campaigns?
  • What can surface forces bring to the #jointstrike capability
  • What does multi-domain #jointstrike look like and how would it work?
  • How does Australia’s emerging amphibious capabilities contribute to #jointstrike?
  • How do we best understand the #jointstrike options available and of the best way of delivering a balanced range of strike capabilities across the Australian Defence Force?
  • What emerging technologies should be considered to enable support, planning and targeting systems?
  • How do emerging #jointstrike options such as cyber and electronic warfare affect traditional notions of warfare and combat?
  • What are the impacts of emerging #jointstrike capabilities on training and exercise regimens?
  • What is the role of modelling and simulation in optimising and developing a mature and sophisticated #jointstrike capability?
  • Should Australia consider a nuclear #jointstrike option?
  • How would an nuclear strike capability in Australia’s region impact the power structures and relationships?
  • What impacts would prioritising #jointstrike have on Australia’s existing and future force structures?

 

Drone Shield: A Case Study of the Impact of the New Australian Defense Export Strategy

06/19/2018

Recently, we received a note from a company called DroneShield which highlighted not only its product but its assessment of the importance of the new Austrian defense export strategy in supporting its efforts.

The note follows:

8 June 2018, Sydney Australia – The Australian developer and manufacturer of cutting-edge high technology counter-drone products DroneShield Ltd (ASX:DRO or DRO.AU) (DroneShield or the Company) today released the following statement on the practical application of the Turnbull / Pyne Defence Export Strategy.

On 29 January 2018, The Hon Christopher Pyne MP, Australian Minister for Defence Industry, announced the new Defence Export Strategy (the Strategy) of the Turnbull Government. After a careful review of the strategy, in late February 2018, DroneShield released its analysis of the Strategy and its conclusion that the Strategy was not an aspirational theoretical policy, but rather is a carefully thought-through and practical roadmap to attaining ambitious but perfectly achievable goals that will benefit Australia.

On 14 June 2018, DroneShield announced a $3.2 million sovereign order for 70 units of its DroneGun™ tactical jammer product for a Middle Eastern Ministry of Defence allied with the Western countries. 

This is not only the largest order in DroneShield’s history but also the largest known order for tactical drone mitigation equipment of this kind globally in the history of the nascent counter-drone industry. 

The order firmly establishes DroneShield as the leader in the space and is expected to pave the way for substantial additional orders for DroneShield’s products from a number of other allied foreign governments.

DroneShield would like to acknowledge that, consistent with the “whole of government” approach employed by the Strategy, DroneShield has been receiving valuable assistance from Australian Defence Attaches in several locations in Europe and the Middle East. 

This assistance, which lends weight and credibility to a small company like DroneShield has been very valuable for the Company, and DroneShield expects that it will continue to prove important, in securing substantial further orders globally.

Further, DroneShield would like to acknowledge the assistance provided by the staff of the MENA (Middle East and North Africa) section of the Australian Trade and Investment Commission (Austrade) to DroneShield this year.

Additionally, since late 2017, DroneShield has been a member of Team Defence Australia, a join initiative with Austrade and the Department of Defence. Participation in Team Defence Australia has enabled the Company to showcase its products at a range of key defence and security events globally, something that would not have happened in the absence of the Team Defence Australia initiative.

Peter James, DroneShield’s Chairman, commented, “In February 2018 we were the first, if not the only, Australian company to publicly come out and say that the Strategy will make a difference for Australia. 

“Now, less than six months later, it has already made a difference. With the initial orders for DroneShield’s cutting-edge anti-drone products DroneGun™, DroneSentinel™ and DroneSentry™ now coming in, the help provided by the government to DroneShield (all of it non-financial) will provide the Australian public with a multiplier effect in employment, domestic manufacturing, cash in-flows for the economy, innovation, and our domestic ability to defend Australia without relying on others.”

The featured photo shows a Queensland Police Service officer with DroneGun MKIITM during Commonwealth Games in Brisbane in April 2018

USMC WTI 2-18

On June 17, 2018, Steven Valinski provided his latest article covering USMC developments at Marine Corps Air Station Yuma.

In his latest piece he highlighted the most recent MAWTS-1 training event, WTI 2-18.

While the main objective is to provide advanced aviation tactical training and certification of unit instructors, USMC Weapons and Tactics Instructor Course (WTI) 2-18, hosted by Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One (MAWTS-1) aboard USMC air Station Yuma showed that WTI is much more than training.

It is research, testing, development and perfecting….where ‘proof of concept’ become a realty and new technologies and tactics evolve to support the Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF)…..

The WTI curriculum is constantly evolving under MAWTS-1, incorporating new tactics, procedures and technologies across all spectrums of 21st century warfare…

“The WTI 2-18 Period of Instruction underwent minor changes from the previous class. There were no new events, but events were modified to incorporate a more aggressive focus on contested domains,” accoring to Major Tim “Monk” Miller, MAWTS-1 Operations Officer.

“MAWTS-1 has adapted by leaning on the unique capabilities of the F-35 and also incorporating joint assets, like the U.S. Navy’s EA-18G Growler,” Major Miller added.

For the rest of the piece, see the following:

http://aviationphotodigest.com/usmc-wti-2-18/

An Update on Leveraging the F-35 in Shaping a Way Ahead: The Perspective of Air Commodore David Bradshaw

By Robbin Laird

Air Commodore Bradshaw was appointed as Lighting Force Commander, Royal Air Force Marham in April 2017 and he succeeded Air Commodore now Air Vice-Marshal H. Smyth.

Earlier, I have had the chance to discuss the standing up of the F-35 within the RAF with Air Vice-Marshal Smyth and that conversation in 2016 highlighted the core significance of RAF and Royal Navy collaboration in standing up the F-35 as a carrier based aviation system.

“As an RAF pilot with significant maritime and carrier operational experience, we are shaping a collegiate and joint way ahead with the Royal Navy which brings the RAF domain knowledge of ways to operate in the extended battlespace with the coming of the F-35B to the new Queen Elizabeth class carrier.

Being radical, I think it would make sense to put a picture of the Queen Elizabeth class carrier on our RAF recruiting poster;the RAF and the RN are jointly delivering the UK’s future Carrier Strike capability, and a all RAF Lightning pilots will spend some of their time at sea, as I did throughout my 16-year career in Joint Force Harrier – we are forging an integrated approach together, which is incredibly exciting.”

This collaborative aspect was driven home during the May 1 2018 visit to RAF Marham by having a chance to talk with both the RAF Lighting Force Commander and his deputy, Captain Adam Clink, Royal Navy.

Air Commodore David Bradshaw is a fast jet pilot with almost 3000 hours flying experience of which 2000 hours were in Harrier GR7 / 9 as a front line pilot, Qualified Weapons Instructor and Display Pilot. 

He has seen operational service over the Balkans and Iraq, the latter from both land and HMS Illustrious.

As a group captain, he commanded 904 Expeditionary Air Wing (EAW), Kandahar, followed by RAF Leeming and 135 EAW. Staff roles have included: Group Captain Lightning; Assistant Director (Integration) within the Directorate of Equipment Capability, Deep Target Attack; Chief-of-Staff Strategy within the Air Staff; and as the MoD member of the Prime Minister’s Strategic Communications Team during the 2011 NATO intervention in Libya.

Air Commodore Bradshaw assumed command of the UK Lightning Force in spring 2017 and is responsible for generating an Initial Operational Capability in 2018 with an embarked operational capability from HMS Queen Elizabeth in 2020.

 The discussion with Air Commodore Bradshaw focused on standing up the Lightning Force at RAF Marham but in such a way that the RAF and Royal Navy could work together to shape innovative ways to pursue combat innovation in the period ahead.

This image shows the Lightning Operations Centre at RAF Marham. UK Mod.

Much of the effort currently under way at RAF Marham is to set up the F-35 while continuing to operate two squadrons of Tornados, but the infrastructure is being put in place to reach beyond that point and to shape the kind of multi-domain combat learning essential for effective 21st century operations.

Recently, I visited RAAF Williamtown and talked with Air Commodore Kitchner about the RAAF rebuild of the base and the transition in the next couple of years from Hornets to F-35s. My conversation with Air Commodore Bradshaw started with his comparing the RAF approach to that of the RAAF.

Air Commodore Bradshaw: “The RAAF at Williamtown have carved out an entire part of their airfield and have created a hugely impressive F-35 enclave in which everything needed to support the air system is clustered.

“We have taken a different approach, in part because we are operating two squadrons of Tornados at RAF Marham through the transition period but mainly to make best use of existing infrastructure to keep costs as low as possible while still delivering a Main Operating Base fit for the future.

“You can see going around the base the build up of our new F-35 infrastructure but see the Tornados flying over head.

“We need to manage both and we are leveraging Tornado infrastructure in part as well as we draw down the Tornado Force.

“For example, we are reusing Tornado hardened aircraft shelters from which to operate F-35s in the future.”

The Dambuster squadron arrived on June 6, 2017 and thereby began its operational life at RAF Marham. As Air Commodore Bradshaw noted: “We are building out a standard squadron infrastructure that you expect but one modernized to exploit the best of F-35 and meet the security requirements as well.”

Aerial imagery of the first of the new RAF fighter Jets flying across the Atlantic and tanked by the Voyager prior to their arrival at RAF Marham. Credit: UK MoD

They are also building what they call “Freedom of Action” facilities to ensure UK sovereignty over their operational aircraft. Such a facility is the stealth finishing facility to ensure maximum stealth performance of the aircraft in operational conditions.

But the UK is building out from outset an approach to leverage the F-35 as a driver of combat innovation, something I like to call F-35 2.0.

This is how Air Commodore Bradshaw put it. “The F-35 Integrated Training Center is the jewel in the crown of the F-35 effort at RAF Marham.

“We are working from the start to leverage the synthetic training environment enabled by the ITC, to provide a foundational capability that can empower our broader effort.

“We call this broader effort the Defence Operational Training Capability (Air) Core System.

“This approach will be to link the various key warfighting elements together to innovate and train for the evolving 21st century battlespace.”

“With the DOTC system, we are looking to work F-35 with Typhoon, with AWACs, with Type 45 Air Warfare Destroyer and our JTACs, to shape a multi-domain warfare approach.

“We are building the ITC as a key element not just to empower our use of the F-35 but to leverage its information and C2 capabilities to drive change throughout the force.”

The UK has built an all-F-35 fast jet carrier. This makes it the only one in the world.

Although the US carrier community has certainly been a key partner in helping the UK stand up its new carriers, a point made often in discussions with the RAF and the Royal Navy, they are clearly going down a path of doing something a bit different.

This is how Air Commodore Bradshaw put it:

“We have designed the Lightning Force from the very beginning to be joint. My deputy is a Royal Naval officer. The entire Lightning Force is a mix of light and dark blue.

“From the outset, we have a different view to many other Air and Naval forces about how we will use our F-35s.

“Taking our unique joint approach either to a deployed operating location or onto the Queen Elizabeth Class carrier, we need to exploit the opportunity to do it the right way for the UK and not necessarily slavishly follow another model that might exist elsewhere in the world.”

Obviously, with the political changes underway in Europe and elsewhere, the UK is looking to shape partnerships which protect its interests and provide strategic opportunities to shape its capabilities going forward.

And flying a force of F-35s and Typhoons provides them with an interesting opportunity to work with Europe going forward.

“With the F-35, we will have unique opportunities to work with our Northern European allies, including the Norwegian, Danish and Dutch Air Forces as well as out USAF neighbors at RAF Lakenheath.

“And with the Typhoon, we have good opportunities to work with the Germans, Spanish and Italians.

“And with the Italians flying a mixed force of F-35A, F-35B and Eurofighter, we have great opportunities to work together as well.”

In short, shaping a new operating base at RAF Marham and working with the two Queen Elizabeth carriers provides a significant opportunity for shaping air combat innovation, including in the sustainment area.

The featured photo was taken during a 2017 visit to RAF Marham and showed the building of the new Maintenance and Finishing Facility. Pictured FLtoR Dean Burgess( Balfour Beatty) David Bradshaw RAF Marham Air Commodore.Rich Davies then RAF Marham Base Commander Group Captain. David Baird BAE. Richard Bannon

Working F-35-HIMARS Integration: Shaping a Way Head for a 21st Century Distributed Shooter-Sensor Capability

By Robbin Laird

During my latest visit to MAWTS-1 in May 2018, the work of the MAWTS-1 team during WTI-18-2 was the focus of attention.

MAWTS-1 is working on reshaping Marine Corps approaches to moving forward from a primary focus on counter intersurgency.

The strategic shift from counter-insurgency to contested operations was the focus of the most recent seminar of the Williams Foundation provides a baseline examination of the strategic shift.

At MAWTS-1, one can see the focus on the key building blocks for shaping a capability appropriate to mastering the strategic shift.

The shift is a significant one, which requires reshaping approaches, leveraging new capabilities, and integrating those capabilities into the overall evolution of the MAGTF.

It is a work in progress, and one driven by technology, combat experience and cross-learning from other US services as well as allies.

An example of the work in progress is providing a capability for an advanced ground based strike missile to operate with greater lethality when guided by a low observable air combat system which identifies targets beyond range of sight and not identified by the systems organic to that ground based strike system.

This is an example of how the sensor-shooter relationship needs to evolve when operating at greater distance and in a contested battlespace.

F-35 Integration with Ground Fire Systems: The Case of HIMARS from SldInfo.com on Vimeo. October 19, 2017.

The core approach is to find ways to leverage the F-35 to provide an expanded aperture of support for the Ground Combat Element when executing the ground scheme of maneuver in a peer-to-peer conflict.

As the F-35 operates in its low observable mode and generates through its DAS and integrated sensors a battlefield situational awareness ‘map,’ targets can be identified deep within the enemy’s operating area.

Targeting information can be generated to the Marines or to other joint forces to provide for precise fires targeting.

It is clear that the F-35 has an extraordinary sensor capability and sensor system integration, which can empower C2 in the operational battlespace.

In visits and discussions I have had with allied air forces flying the F-35 the use of the new systems was already evident.

In one case, an Air Force was using sensor data from its aircraft to provide significant SA to that ally’s navy as well as other capabilities for the fleet as well.

In another case, an ally is flying a single F-35 along a border where low flying threats are crossing the border regularly with drugs, weapons and other undesirable deliveries onto that ally’s territory.

The F-35 is providing coverage of the entire border area and delivering that information including guiding border forces to mission success.

The aircraft qua aircraft is part of the “renorming of airpower,” but the capability of the aircraft’s ultimate benefit is to leverage it as part of an information dominance capability, which is what I am calling F-35 2.0.

The Marines are clearly among the most inventive of forces in pursuing ways to leverage the F-35 as a multi-domain flying combat system.

But this is not simply going to happen without work of the aviation with the ground communities working closely together as they do at MAWTS-1.

For the Marines, working F-35 integration with HIMARS as one of the building blocks in F-35 2.0.

Last Fall, I discussed progress on this effort with the then Commanding Officer of MAWTS-1, Col Wellons, and one of his officers involved in the WTI course.

Question: Can you now describe the HIMARS integration with F-35?

Col Wellons: “This class we continued the learning process.

“We were able to validate and verify, via ground testing, the ability of the F-35 to share digital targeting information with a ground node

“But I will ask my Aviation Development, Tactics and Evaluation Department Head, LtCol Ryan Schiller, to further discuss the process.”

LtCol Schiller: “Utilizing the targeting capabilities of the F-35 and its inherent survivability as a 5th-gen fighter combined with the standoff range and capability provided by HIMARS gives us a key capability to fight and strike in the A2/AD environment.

“We are clearly expanding the aperture of our focus on how to leverage the F-35 for the MAGTF.

“With regard to HIMARS we are looking to shipboard use in certain scenarios as well.

The progress continued at WTI-2-18 and I had a chance to discuss the way ahead with Major “Doctor: Buxton, MAWTS-1 Air Office Department, Major Andrew Crist, Fixed Wing Offensive Support Specialists, and Major Joshua Freeland, a Direct Air Support Control Officer.

What these officers described was a clear work in progress, one which will relied on leveraging software upgrades on the F-35 but concurrent progress with regard to the software and hardware evolutions of the data link systems as well.

From this point of view, the F-35, much like the Osprey before it, is playing a forcing function within the USMC for change.

With the Osprey, significant change was driven in how the Marines operated in the land wars, and in how they approached counter-insurgency operations.

The F-35 has come precisely at the point when the strategic shift is underway and it is clear that the US and the allies are using the F-35 as a trigger point for broader transformation as well.

And through this effort, the Marines are looking at broader issues of the F-35 and its role within the overall effort to shape greater digital interoperability for the force as well.

The GCE fires elements use a data link communication system, which operates by sending what is called K messages.

The immediate challenge was to find ways to work the F-35 systems with an ability to work with the data links used by the GCE.

The data links for the GCE are being reworked to be more effective in its operational integration with the Air Combat Element.

As the GCE receives new software and hardware systems and as the F-35 evolves to its 3-F configuration an ability to link systems more effectively in the distributed battlespace will be possible.

But the Marines are working the opportunity to do so prior to arrival of the optimal situation.

As one Marine put it: “We are looking to build in surface fires capability into the F-35.

“We started by looking at ways we could use CAC2S as a gateway to enable us to move in this direction.”

CAC2S is the USMC’s C2 system designed to provide for integration between the ACE and the GCE. It like the F-35 is a work in progress

As the Marine Corps has defined CAC2S:

CAC2S will provide a complete and coordinated modernization of Marine Air Command and Control System (MACCS) equipment.

CAC2S will eliminate current dissimilar systems and provide the MAGTF Combat Element with the hardware, software and facilities to effectively command, control and coordinate air operations integrated with naval, joint and/or combined C2 units.

CAC2S will comprise standardized modular and scalable tactical facilities, hardware and software that will significantly increase battlefield mobility and reduce the physical size and logistical footprint of the MACCS.  CAC2S Phase 1 successfully completed its Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) in 2011. 

Subsequently, Phase 1 received its full deployment decision on 25 Oct 2011 and limited deployment capability in February 2012. 

Phase 2 successfully achieved Milestone C decision in 31 Mar 2015 and IOT&E in Apr 2016. 

A Fielding Decision Review (FDR) was conducted on 11 Aug 2016 and ADM signed on 25 August 2016.

 As the Marine Corps gets its updated versions of CAC2S, they are looking to the new capabilities to provide an effective gateway between the message set capabilities of the platforms.

The DASC or the Direct Air Support Center is where the translation and validation occurs on the battlefield and where Link 16 messages from the F-35 would then be translated into K messages for the GCE.

As another Marine put it: “Link 16 J series messages received by the DASC will then be translated into the K series format which the GCE utilizes to generate fire missions and is passed along to fires approval authorities with airspace clearance”

During WTI-2-18, the Marines used a new VIASAT radio as part of the firing sequence for the F-35/HIMARS tandem.

And with a handheld radio able to handle Link 16 messages, and the team was able to use a Link 16 data link from the F-35 to enable a HIMARS firing.

But it was clear that working the integration was a hard task, one that needs to become much simpler to be effectively operational on the battlefield.

What is impressive for sure is seeing the Marines work the process and in a way that can inform both the upgrade processes on the F-35 as well as with regard to HIMARS and related equipment.

Clearly, working the data links and communications is a key part of being able to operate on the distributed battlefield. 

Although a work on progress, it is clearly working in the right direction towards the threat envelopes central to the nation.

Editor’s Note: in the 2017 USMC Aviation Plan, the way ahead for the ACE/GCE enablers was outlined.

As outlined in the 2016 Marine Corps Operational Concept (MOC) and throughout this year’s Marine Aviation Plan, the operating environment is evolving and our next conflict is largely unpredictable.

What remains constant though is the role of aviation’s enablers – the ability and credibility to control our own airspace and operate from expeditionary sites equates to MAGTF freedom of action.

As we field exponentially more capable systems, the ways in which the MACCS enables MAGTF freedom of action must evolve as well.

We now must refocus, innovate, and exploit the future of warfighting across the MAGTF in ways that are different from what has been done in recent history, such as recognizing the role information as a weapon and manning, training, and equipping a force where digital interoperability in the norm.

This transformation is what the aviation expeditionary enabler community has embarked upon.

The future MACCS and AGS communities will be highly expeditionary; operate in a distributed manner; and be capable of fusing and integrating MAGTF aviation command and control, sensor input and weapons data across the joint force to provide shared situational awareness and increase the decision space for the MAGTF commander.

Because of the unique position as the integrator between the ACE and GCE, the aviation enablers must ensure the ability to bridge divergent communication efforts within the MAGTF and joint force by providing beyond line‐of‐sight

(BLOS) tactical data links (TDLs), data forwarding, radio relay, tactical gateways, and ground‐based air defense (GBAD) capable of engaging low radar cross section targets.

The most critical resource is the individual Marine.

As we transition to a common set of equipment, new operational concepts, and operations in complex battle spaces, we must transition to a training paradigm that provides baseline knowledge for all AC2 operators to excel.

The goal for MACCS operators is to become air command and control experts who will assist the commanders and decision makers in receiving and interpreting operational information and translating this information into effective direction and control for Marine aviation.

The primary missions for our tactical agencies will remain throughout our MACCS modernization. As new common sets of equipment are fielded, the ability to employ future hybrid agencies becomes relevant.

For example, the clearance requirements for extended range munitions have made knowledge of the ground situation and MAGTF fires critical for all MACCS agencies.

The proliferation and persistent presence of UAS and civilian aircraft through the AO require all MACCS agencies to have access to an air picture.

Integration with special operations forces and the increased capabilities of new MAGTF platforms, such as the F‐35 and MV‐ 22, will enable hybrid employment options for MACCS agencies as we modernize and align our equipment and personnel.

We must recognize the significant challenges of the future operating environment and develop an aligned approach to fight and win.

The MACCS and AGS communities enable the MAGTF commander to maintain control of the battlespace, maximize effects, and shorten the kill chain.

The next generation of aviation expeditionary enablers are approaching Initial Operational Capability (IOC) of our AC2 family of systems (CAC2S, TPS‐80 G/ATOR, and CTN) and we are on pace to provide game‐changing capabilities to the MAGTF ensuring continued freedom of action.