The B-1B Bomber in Support of the Talisman Saber 2017 Exercise

07/24/2017

2017-07-24 Jaryd Stock has been providing coverage of Talisman Saber 2017. In his latest posting on Aviation Photography Digest provided a look at the role of the B-1 bomber in the exercise.

“The four B-1B Lancers assigned to the ‘Bats’ deployed to Guam have been upgraded to the Block 16 Integrated Battle Station which see’s the cockpit and operator station receive upgrades.

“Along with the multi function displays and digital flight instrument and various map and sensor upgrades, the B-1s also are now capable of connecting into Link-16 networks.

“Which now allow the aircraft and crew to send and receive messages, imagery, mission assignments including external target information.

“The ‘Bats’ are the first B-1 squadron deployed with the Integrated Battle Station.”

For how the B-1B has been used in the exercise, see the rest of the article.

http://aviationphotodigest.com/bones-talisman-sabre-2017/

Given the importance of the bomber and its use in the Pacific, it would make sense to accelerate the new bomber program.

The Mitchell Institute published a report in 2015 arguing the case for the bomber and certainly highlighted why accelerating the program is part of the shift to preparation for higher intensity operations, certainly evident in the Pacific.

While the importance of the new bomber, or LRSS, in supporting US national security grows, the current US bomber fleet continues to age.

It now averages 39 years of age.

The B-52Hs and B-1Bs, with service lives extending to the 2040 time frame, can continue to offer important contributions, but their survivability when operating in contested airspace grows more questionable each year.

The nation’s 20 B-2As have a projected service life out to 2058 and provide important capabilities for decades to come, but the small fleet size limits their potential contribution.

To maintain the nation’s long-range power projection capabilities, the Pentagon has concluded it needs to begin now on developing and fielding a new bomber.

MI DD Bomber final

 

USAF and USMC Combine F-35 Capabilities at Red Flag 17-3

07/22/2017

The USMC came last year with their F-35Bs; and then this year the USAF came with their F-35s to a Red Flag exercise.

Now the two are working together in training for fifth generation enabled air operations. 

The USAF perspective was provided in an article published on July 10, 2017.

NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev.— The U.S. Air Force began Red Flag 17-3, its three-week air-to-air combat training exercise, today and will conclude July 28.

Base leadership wants to remind southern Nevada residents that they may notice increased military aircraft activity.

Aircraft will depart from Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., twice daily to participate in combat training missions on the Nevada Test and Training Range north of Las Vegas in one of the Air Force’s largest joint exercises.

“For Red Flag, we bring in our joint warfighters with their capabilities and their equipment,” said Lt. Col. Mark Sadler, 414th Combat Training Squadron commander.

“We come together, fight as a team, and we get to learn from each other as we do that.”

Each Red Flag exercise is unique and Red Flag 17-3 is no different.

For the first time, there will be two F-35 Lightning II squadrons participating.

The Marine Corps’ F-35Bs will participate alongside the Air Force’s F-35As for the first time in Red Flag history.

As the F-35 mission continues to grow, so will the operators, maintainers and the system as a whole. 

We get to learn in a realistic training environment as we continue to progress down the road with this platform and other fifth-generation or fourth-generation aircraft, said Sadler.

Sadler said, having two F-35 units at Red Flag will allow us to learn about the capabilities of both the F-35A and the F-35B models from each other.

“We’re not going to go to war alone,” said Sadler.

“The more we can do joint exercises like Red Flag where we get everybody together and learn from each other, the more we can better use each other’s tactics, techniques and procedures to successfully go after whatever the problem set is.”

Red Flag consists of a variety of attack, fighter and bomber aircraft, reconnaissance aircraft, electronic warfare aircraft, airlift support, search and rescue aircraft, aerial refueling aircraft and ground based command and control, space and cyber forces.

More than 2,500 joint warfighters will participate in the multi-domain integration, Red Flag 17-3, where they will operate together and successfully defeat the threat.

“Red Flag gives our joint warfighters the opportunity to promote their readiness through innovation,” said Sadler.

“They may have to go outside their comfort zone and take risks with their innovation, but at the end of the day if they see positive, successful outcomes towards the objectives, then that’s immediate positive feedback on readiness we’re looking for at Red Flag.”

 http://www.nellis.af.mil/News/Article/1242611/red-flag-17-3-kicking-off-summer-heat-with-af-marine-f-35s/

And in an article by Sgt. Lillian Stephens, 3rd Marine Air Wing and published on July 11, 2017, the USMC perspective was highlighted.

NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nv. — 

Marines with Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 211 “Wake Island Avengers,” 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing, began participating in Red Flag 17-3 at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, July 10.

During the exercise, which will continue until July 28, VMFA-211 will conduct a variety of mission sets alongside the other services: defensive counter air (DCA); offensive counter air (OCA); suppression of enemy air defense (SEAD); destruction of enemy air defense; dynamic taskings, which involve finding a time-sensitive target or series of targets and eliminating them; electronic warfare (EW); preplanned strikes; and combat search and rescue (CSAR).

“Red Flag 17-3 is designed to be a venue for U.S. forces to integrate on a scale that’s not possible anywhere else — so Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and Army assets come from all over the United States and participate in advanced mission sets together,” said Maj. Paul Holst, VMFA-211’s executive officer.

“It’s … important to practice integrating assets from all across the [Armed Forces’] inventory because if we go to conflict, we don’t want that to be the first time we all integrate with each other.”

Red Flag is the U.S. Air Force’s premier realistic combat training exercise involving the air, ground, space and cyber forces of the United States — sometimes including assets from allied nations. This iteration includes only the U.S. Armed Forces and will focus on improving individual performance as well as interoperability between the services.

According to Holst, this is the first time the F-35A Lightning II, used by the Air Force, and F-35B Lightning II, the short-takeoff vertical landing (STOVL) variant used by the Marine Corps, will participate in the same exercise as well as the Avenger’s first time attending Red Flag.

“This is the first time we’ve deployed on this scale … we brought 10 F-35s here with all of our maintenance equipment, all of our support equipment and personnel,” said Holst.

“For the pilots, the opportunity to participate in these exercises prepares us for combat … and the opportunity to integrate and plan with the rest of the force is something you just don’t get anywhere else.”

Maj. Chris Brandt, a pilot and administration and logistics officer in charge with VMFA-211, said Red Flag’s large-scale missions, which often involve upwards of 50 aircraft working in concert, prepare pilots for combat operations and prepare maintenance personnel for a deployed operational tempo.

“A lot of times at home station, we’re basically working just with each other or we’re doing things that are [smaller in] scale and only focusing on our specific mission sets that we do,” said Brandt.

“When we actually deploy, we’re most likely going to be part of a joint force so coming here you get that experience.

It’s not until you come to exercises like these that you get to train across services and [train] with platforms that you typically would not work with at your home station.”

Throughout the exercise, more than 50 units and more than 80 aircraft will participate in Red Flag, conducting missions in the Nevada Test and Training Range — the U.S. Air Force’s premier military training area.

It has more than 12,000 square miles of airspace, 2.9 million acres of land and has 1,900 possible targets, realistic threat systems and an opposing enemy force, a training environment that is unmatched anywhere else in the world.

According to Holst, Red Flag allows each service and subordinate unit to demonstrate their capabilities as well as understand the capabilities of other services, units and their equipment.

“For example, the E-18G exists in the Navy and the Air Force doesn’t really have a comparable asset to that.

“There may be situations where the only F-35s in theater are Marine Corps F-35s … and you have to integrate the F-35s into the entire package,” said Holst.

“It’s always going to be necessary to bring everyone’s assets together and practicing that is really important.”

From the different services to subordinate units and even to individual service members, Red Flag is an opportunity for them to experience advanced, relevant and realistic combat situations in a controlled environment, increasing their ability to complete missions and safely return home.

“I think we’ll gain a lot. We learn from them, they learn from us and at the end we come out with better tactics, better knowledge of the airplane and how to employ it,” said Brandt.

“The missions that we’ll fly here are things that many of us haven’t done in this aircraft before, especially with the number of airplanes that are out there. That will be good from a tactical and aviation perspective. It’s going to be interesting to see how everybody from all of the services work together.”

http://www.marines.mil/News/News-Display/Article/1242737/avengers-assemble-marine-corps-air-force-f-35s-come-together-for-ground-breakin/

Editor’s Note: The photos highlighting aircraft in Red Flag 2017-3 are credited to the USMC and the USAF. 

The impact of the F-35 was described in an interview with a senior RAF squadron leader earlier this year, based on his participation in Red Flag 17-1.

It is clear that the F-35 has already had a major impact on the thinking of operators and, in effect, Red Flag 17-1 saw the operators evaluating how the aircraft would work together in reshaping their operational rhythm in the combat space.

And as they did so, a way ahead in terms of Weaponization, C2 and related issues would emerge .

The F-35 has arrived and is reshaping concepts of operations as well as influencing the operational restructuring of roles and mission responsibilities of other air combat assets.

This came through very clearly in the discussion with the Wing Commander.

The RAF is in an interesting place in the reshaping of airpower.

Notably, they are carrying out an upgrade program for their Typhoons in preparation for the arrival of the F-35s, and are adding longer range strike weapons, both in terms of air to air and air to ground. 

They assume, correctly, that having longer range strike assets makes sense as simply operating aircraft like Super Hornets with short-range weapons makes little sense as the F-35 shapes the strike space for the combat fleet…..

When we discussed Red Flag 17-1, without going into any details, which might seem too specific, he described was how the F-35s operated close to the most stringent targets and organized information for others in the battlespace.

The Typhoon because of the performance of its defensive aids could operate in key areas to support F-35 operations along with the F-22.

The specialized capabilities of the two aircraft in turn determined how they were used and the F-15 and Growlers were positioned appropriate to their missions and capabilities in the battlespace.

A key question has been raised about how to handle C2 and weapons decisions across the battlespace.

The Sentinel and the Wedgetail both operated to provide a quarterbacking role, but given the fidelity with which the F-35 can see the battlespace sorting out relationships among the various C2 element is part of shaping the way ahead.

“It was great to have guys sit back in the Wedgetail and able to process quite a lot of information and actually operating as mission commanders for dynamic targeting missions with a range of strike or jamming aircraft.”

“The Wedgetail both in terms of the systems and the operators was really first rate, indeed cutting edge.

“It is the next generation of C2 and a step beyond the capabilities of AWACS.”

A key challenge as we integrate various assets is how to ensure we know who can see what.

“As we introduce the F-35, the pilots have to adjust to the fact that their machines will see and convey data that they themselves are not looking at.

“And different airplanes will have different levels of SA in the battlespace.

“How to adjust the operation of the force to meet this challenge?”

 

Red Flag 2017-1: The Perspective of the 6 Squadron Officer Commanding

The US Navy Works Directed Energy Weapons

2017-07-17 In the United States, the US Navy is the cutting edge service with regard to developing and deploying directed energy weapons technology.

In part this is because ships have enough power to generate the energy necessary to operate current and next generation DE technologies.

A laser has been deployed for some time onboard the USS Ponce, a retired MSC ship, and has been in operations downing drones in the Middle East. The CNO has made it clear that this is a technology, which will be deployed on ships in the near future.

The Afloat Forward Staging Base (Interim) USS Ponce (ASB(I) 15) conducts an operational demonstration of the Office of Naval Research (ONR)-sponsored Laser Weapon System (LaWS) while deployed to the Arabian Gulf. (U.S. Navy photo by John F. Williams/Released)

Notably, the new all electric ship, the DDG 1000 as well as the USS Ford have significant power sources. The new generation AC carrier has three times the power generation capacity of the Nimitz class and the new Queen Elizabeth as well has significant power generation capabilities, all clearly designed in part to use DE weapons for defensive capabilities onboard the ships.

It is clear as well that the US Navy has scaled down the power generation requirements for the first generation deployments so that already available DE technologies can be deployed by 2019 onboard surface ships.

With the new distributed lethality concept of the US Navy, it is clear that technologies and deployability are being looked at differently.

Namely, testing is necessary but deployment of early systems is crucial to provide a distributed capability even if it is not perfected.

This means that we will see DE coming to the fleet in the next couple of years

In an interview we did with N-9 last year, this is what Rear Admiral Manazir had to say about DE weapons.

We need directed energy weapons as adjuncts to our current kinetic weapon systems in order to turn the cost curve our way. For example, we shoot down cruise missiles that cost a couple hundred thousand dollars with $3 million defensive missiles. 

Our weapons are very effective, but we shoot a $3 million round every time we use them.

We are working to build synergy among electronic attack, directed energy and kinetic weapons to shape an interactive and integrated capability for the distributed force.

We are moving towards funding a directed energy plan which would enable us to move towards implementing interim directed energy laser capability between now and 2020.

There’s a 30-kilowatt laser on USS PONCE right now.

It’s in the Arabian Gulf and it works.

It works very well.

As you know, lasers can be used for communications. They can be used for ISR.

They can obviously be used for non-kinetic effects.

In order to have the higher-end kinetic effect, you have to have the space for the weight of the laser itself, the power for it, and then the cooling-wherever the source.

Obviously, with a ship in the water, you have an unlimited source of cooling water.

Then, in order to have a very, very deep magazine for a laser shot, you either have to have a constant source of fairly high electrical power, or you have to have a very large battery.

We are not waiting until we have what many see as the ultimate goal, a one megawatt laser weapon; we would like to build capability incrementally.

Over time we will be able to field higher and higher power laser weapons.

It is about putting it into the fleet and evolving the capability; it is not about waiting until we have the optimal weapon.

We need not just the weapon, but the training and the tactics shaped by the fleet to provide inputs to how best to integrate the capability into the force.

 In a later interview, the Vice Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Moran, underscored the way ahead as follows:

 The Navy is “fully committed” to developing and fielding advanced directed energy weapons to deal with emerging threats and to reduce the cost per shot, the Navy’s number two officer said today.

 “We need to push technology forward” and do it faster than historic advances in fielding new weapons capabilities, Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. William Moran said at the Directed Energy Summit, cohosted by Booz Allen Hamilton and the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment.

Moran noted that the Navy had “already authorized a defensive weapon” and deployed it, citing the laser system mounted on the USS Ponce (AFSB(I)-15), which is on station in the U.S. Central Command theater.

The 30 kilowatt solid-state XN-1 laser on Ponce has been authorized for use as a defensive weapon, he said. The Navy “will field a 100-kilowatt system in the near future,” he added.

The Navy also is working to field high-power microwave systems, which can create unbearable heat on a person without lasting injury, to provide “enhance self-protection” with non-lethal system, Moran said. And, he warned, “these technologies are being developed and fielded by a lot of countries. If we don’t go forward, we will fall behind.”

Listing some of the advantages of directed energy weapons, Moran said they could provide “deep magazines” on warships so they do not have to use expensive and limited numbers of conventional weapons “on targets that you can handle with directed energy.”

Using directed energy weapons, which only require powerful burst of electrical power, also can reverse the negative cost-per-kill ratio of using multi-million-dollar defensive missiles against relatively cheap anti-ship cruise missiles, he indicated.

They would mean “spending pennies on the dollar” for defense, he said.

“Low-cost directed energy weapons have to be part of our future” and are being designed for use in the fleet today, Moran said.

“If we have to continue to rely on projectiles, we will run out of the ability to defend ourselves in the future,” he said.

“We are fully committed to taking this into the future.”

 And earlier this year, John Joyce from the Naval Warfare Center Dahlgren Division published a story on April 21, 2017 which highlighted progress on directed energy weapons.

DAHLGREN, Va. – The Navy’s top laser experts transformed a tunnel crucial to gun range operations during World War II into a vital new capability for testing laser technologies, Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division (NSWCDD) announced April 21.

For years, civilian scientists – including those who developed and installed the Laser Weapon System aboard USS PONCE (AFSB[I] 15) – speculated about the long dormant 100-meter tunnel and its potential for laser lethality and system testing.

Could it be converted to research, test, develop, and evaluate a new generation of laser weapon systems for integration aboard warships?

Eventually, their question was answered and the old tunnel was upgraded. Now, it’s integral to the Navy’s state-of-the-art Laser Lethality and Development Laboratory.

“Our scientists and engineers are taking advantage of the Laser Lethality and Development Lab’s capabilities – including the above-ground tunnel – to innovate and evaluate high energy lasers that are interoperable with Navy ships and electric weaponry,” said Capt. Godfrey ‘Gus’ Weekes, NSWCDD commanding officer. “As we continue to develop and deploy laser weapons to the Fleet with the inherent advantages of directed energy – speed-of-light delivery, engagement precision, magazine depth, and scalable effects – our warfighters will have significant technological advantage over our adversaries.”

Navy leaders have made directed-energy weapons a top priority to counter asymmetric threats. In fact, Navy Sailors – trained by the NSWCDD Laser Weapon System team – proved how precise and effective a High Energy Laser weapon system can be during testing in the Arabian Gulf against small attack boats, unmanned aerial vehicles, and other moving targets in various weather conditions.

Meanwhile, the laser experts are using the Laser Lethality and Development Facility’s capabilities to support emerging initiatives to integrate future laser weapon systems aboard Navy ships. The facility features two labs where high power laser testing of materials, components, and sub-systems are conducted. The labs are connected by the above-ground tunnel which provides for the safe conduct of indoor testing at significant ranges while removing the effects and limitations of the highly variable outdoor environment.

“The facility, which is unique within the Navy, along with its suite of analysis tools are essential for designing, developing, and integrating laser technology into existing and future fighting forces and platforms,” said Frank Dixon, NSWCDD Directed Energy and Pulsed Power Division head.

The lab – primarily dedicated to performing laser effects testing – supports programs sponsored by the Office of Naval Research, Joint Directed Energy Transition Office, and Program Executive Office for Integrated Warfare Systems, among others. The testing determines environmental effects on laser performance, the response of target materials to laser energy, and provides input to the characterization of laser weapon system requirements.

“A capability such as this allows us to stay in front of high energy laser weapon lethality testing and modeling and simulation to support the current and growing number of Navy laser weapon programs,” said Dr. Christopher Lloyd, NSWCDD’s High Energy Laser Lethality lead.

“We’ll be able to expand the tunnel’s range further – up to 300 meters – with some unique test configurations,” said Lloyd. “It will soon enable testing in controlled environmental conditions to better replicate weather conditions in regions where deployed high energy laser systems may operate. We’ll be able to study aspects such as beam propagation effects from turbulence and scattering/absorption and how that affects overall system performance.”

Currently, the laboratory’s roof-top platform allows for operation and testing of laser systems across the Potomac River Test Range where naval guns have been tested since 1918. From this platform, high energy laser operations can be conducted over to the Combined Experimental Test Facility, a two story laser backstop located two to three kilometers across the water.

“The facility – coupled with our indoor and outdoor laser test capabilities – enhances the command’s ability to design, develop, test, and integrate next generation laser weapon systems for the Navy and is critical to the transition of these systems to the Fleet,” explained Dixon.

Environmental controls and a test and diagnostics facility will be added to the laboratory this year. The test and diagnostics facility will be capable of supporting more system-level tests. Future upgrades include installation of a wind tunnel to study laser/material interactions of components under higher wind speed conditions.

NSWCDD has provided leadership and technical expertise in the design, development, integration, and testing of directed energy systems for more than 15 years. The premier research and development center that serves as a specialty site for weapon system integration. The command’s unique ability to rapidly introduce new technology into complex warfighting systems is based on its longstanding competencies in science and technology, research and development, and test and evaluation.

 

RAAF Amberley in Support of Talisman Saber 2017

2017-07-22 Second Line of Defense has visited RAAF Amberley several times and has published several interviews of RAAF personnel operating from the base.

This includes the KC-30A and C-17 as well Super Hornet and now the Growler leadership.

During the last visit, we interviewed Group Captain Braz about the coming of the Growler to the Australian Defence Force.

And in an article published by Aviation Photography Digest, Jaryd Stock provided a look at the role of RAAF Amberley in the current Talisman Saber 2017 exercise.

He quoted Group Captain Braz about that role.

“Amberley plays a huge role in Talisman Saber 2017…(there are) over one thousand personnel on the base who are focused on Talisman Saber.

“And of course we bring the assets that are normally based here with visiting U.S. Navy Super Hornets and Growlers.”

“And what that brings is interoperability and that interoperability with the United States is fundamental to the Australian way of doing business and we value that very highly.”

The article includes a video by Joel Thomas which can be viewed within the article.

And below is a recent US Navy look at their participation in Talisman Saber 2017.

US Growler Operating at RAAF Base Amberley from SldInfo.com on Vimeo.

Allies and 21st Century Weapons: The Maritime Domain Strike Enterprise

07/19/2017

2017-07-19 Recently, the UK, Norway and the US signed an agreement to work together on ASW in the North Atlantic, which will leverage the joint acquisition of the P-8 aircraft.

This agreement and the evolution of the aircraft is yet another example of the US and its allies standing up at the same time an evolving defense capability in which allies are clearly key partners in shaping the evolution of a core combat capability.

To lay down a foundation for a 21st century approach, the US Navy is pairing its P-8s with a new large unmanned aircraft, and working an integrated approach between the two.   In a very narrow sense, the P-8 and Triton are “replacing” the P-3.

But the additional ISR and C2 enterprise being put in place to operate the combined P-8 and Triton capability is a much broader capability than the classic P-3. Much like the Osprey transformed the USMC prior to flying the F-35, the P-8/Triton team is doing the same for the US Navy as the F-35 comes to the carrier air wing.

The team at Navy Jax is building a common Maritime Domain Awareness and Maritime Combat Culture and treats the platforms as partner applications of the evolving combat theory. The partnership is both technology synergistic and also aircrew are moving between the Triton and P-8.

The P-8s is part of a cluster of airplanes which have emerged defining the way ahead for combat airpower which are software upgradeable: the Australian Wedgetail, the global F-35, and the Advanced Hawkeye, all have the same dynamic modernization potential to which will be involved in all combat challenges of maritime operations.

It is about shaping a combat learning cycle in which software can be upgraded as the user groups shape real time what core needs they see to rapidly deal with the reactive enemy.

All military technology is relative to a reactive enemy.

As Ed Timperlake has noted “It is about the arsenal of democracy shifting from an industrial production line to a clean room and a computer lab as key shapers of competitive advantage.”

https://sldinfo.com/the-arrival-of-a-maritime-domain-awareness-strike-capability-the-impact-of-the-p-8triton-dyad/

And from the ground up, the US Navy is doing this with the Brits, the Australians, and soon the Norwegians will join into the effort.

Canada is a key player in the North Atlantic ASW effort.

There is a great deal of respect by the Brits, the Australians and Norwegians for the professionalism and competence of the Canadian ASW forces.

But there is concern with the level of funding effort which the Canadian government makes to this effort and to the uncertainty about the Canadian modernization path.

The Royal Australian Air Force’s first P-8A Poseidon, A47-001 fly’s in formation with a current AP-3C Orion over their home Base of RAAF Base Edinburgh in South Australia.Credit: Australian Department of Defence

Much like the F-35 pilots and maintainers for allies are being trained initially in the United States and then standing up national capabilities, the same is happening with the P-8/Triton allies whereby the Brits and Australians are training at Jax Navy and this will most certainly happen with the Norwegians as well.

In fact, recently an RAF pilot has gone beyond 1,000 flight hours on the P-8 at Jax Navy.

And the allies are doing training for the entire P-8 force as well.

The Australians are buying the P-8 and the Triton and the Brits and Norwegians the P-8s but will work with the US Navy as it operates its Tritons in the North Atlantic area of interests.

These allies are working key geographical territory essential to both themselves and the United States, so shared domain knowledge and operational experience in the South Pacific and the North Atlantic is of obvious significance for warfighting and deterrence.

And given the relatively small size of the allied forces, they will push the multi-mission capabilities of the aircraft even further than the United States will do and as they do so the U.S. can take those lessons as well.

There is already a case in point.

The Australians as a cooperative partner wanted the P-8 modified to do search and rescue something that the US Navy did not build into its P-8s. But now that capability comes with the aircraft, something that was very much a requirement for the Norwegians as well.

And the US Navy is finding this “add-on” as something of significance for the US as well.

I have visited the Australian and British bases where the P-8s and, in the case of the Aussies, the Triton is being stood up. And I have talked with the Norwegians during my visit in February about their thinking with regard to the coming MDA enterprise.

It is clear from these discussions, that they see an F-35 like working relationship being essential to shaping a common operational enterprise where shared data and decision making enhance the viability of the various nation’s defense and security efforts.

During my visit to RAAF Edinburgh, which is near Adelaide in South Australia where the Aussies will build their new submarines, I had a chance to discuss the standup of the base and to look at the facilities being built there.

As with the F-35, new facilities need to be built to support a 21st century combat aircraft where data, and decision-making tools are rich and embedded into the aircraft operations.

At the heart of the enterprise is a large facility where Triton and P-8 operators have separate spaces but they are joined by a unified operations center. 

It is a walk through area, which means that cross learning between the two platforms will be highlighted.

This is especially important as the two platforms are software upgradeable and the Aussies might well wish to modify the mission systems of both platforms to meet evolving Australian requirements.

The P-8 and Triton integrated facility being built at RAAF Edinbourgh, near Adelaide in South Australia. Credit: Australian Ministry of Defence

And in discussions with senior RAAF personnel, the advantage of working with the US Navy and other partners from the ground up on the program was highlighted.

“In some ways, it is like having a two nation F-35 program. Because we are a cooperative partner, we have a stake and say in the evolution of the aircraft.

“And this is particularly important because the aircraft is software upgradeable.

“This allows us working with the USN to drive the innovation of the aircraft and its systems going forward.”

“We’ve been allowed to grow and develop our requirements collectively. We think this is very far sighted by the USN as well. I think we’ve got the ability to influence the USN, and the USN have had the ability to influence us in many of the ways that we do things.”

“We will be doing things differently going forward. It is an interactive learning process that we are setting up and it is foundational in character. We’re generating generation’s worth of relationship building, and networking between the communities.  We are doing that over an extended period of time.”

“For about three years we have been embedding people within the USN’s organization. There are friendships that are being forged, and those relationships are going to take that growth path for collaboration forward for generations to come.

“When you can ring up the bloke that you did such and such with, have a conversation, and take the effort forward because of that connection. That is a not well recognized but significant benefit through the collaborative program that we’re working at the moment.”

“We are shaping integration from the ground up. And we are doing so with the Australian Defence Force overall.”

I visited RAF Lossiemouth as well where the Brits are standing up their P-8 base.

With the sun setting of the Nimrod, the RAF kept their skill sets alive by taking Nimrod operators and putting them onboard planes flying in NATO exercises, most notably the Joint Warrior exercises run from the UK.

This has been a challenge obviously to key skill sets alive with no airplane of your own, but the US and allied navies worked collectively as the bridge until the Brits get the new aircraft.

https://sldinfo.com/keeping-skill-sets-alive-while-waiting-for-a-replacement-aircraft-from-nimrod-to-p-8/

And the base being built at Lossiemouth will house not only UK aircraft, but allow Norwegians to train, and the US to operate as well.

Indeed, what was clear from discussions at Lossie is that the infrastructure is being built from the ground up with broader considerations in mind, notably in effect building a 21st century MDA highway.

The RAF is building capacity in its P-8 hangers for visiting aircraft such as the RAAF, the USN, or the Norwegian Air Force to train and operate from Lossiemouth. In many ways, the thinking is similar to how building the F-35 enterprise out from the UK to Northern Europe is being shaped as well.

https://sldinfo.com/the-p-8-coming-to-raf-lossiemouth-shaping-the-infrastructure-for-uk-and-nato-defense-in-the-north-atlantic/

In effect, an MDA highway being built from Lossie and the F-35 reach from the UK to Northern Europe are about shaping common, convergent capabilities that will allow for expanded joint and combined operational capabilities.

At this is not an add on, but built from the ground up.

Flying the same ISR/C2/strike aircraft, will pose a central challenge with regard to how best to share combat data in a fluid situation demanding timely and effective decision-making?

The UK is clearly a key player in shaping the way ahead on both the P-8 and F-35 enterprises, not just by investing in both platforms, but building the infrastructure and training a new generation of operators and maintainers as well.

At the heart of this learning process are the solid working relationships among the professional military in working towards innovative concepts of operations.

This is a work in progress that requires infrastructure, platforms, training and openness in shaping evolving working relationships.

Having visited Norway earlier this year and having discussed among other things, the coming of the P-8 and the F-35 in Norway, it is clear that what happens on the other side of the North Sea (i.e., the UK) is of keen interest to Norway.

And talking with the RAF and Royal Navy, the changes in Norway are also part of broader UK considerations when it comes to the reshaping of NATO defense capabilities in a dynamic region.

In my interview with the new Chief of Staff of the Norwegian Air Force, Major General Skinnarland, she underscored how important she saw the collaborative from the ground up approach of operating new systems together.

Referring to the F-35, she argued that “With the UK, the US, the Danes and the Dutch operating the same combat aircraft, there are clear opportunities to shape new common operational capabilities…

“And with the P-8s operating from the UK, Iceland, and Norway can shape a maritime domain awareness data capability which can inform our forces effectively as well but again, this requires work to share the data and to shape common concepts of operations.

“A key will be to exercise often and effectively together. To shape effective concepts of operations will require bringing the new equipment, and the people together to share experience and to shape a common way ahead.”

In effect, a Maritime Domain Awareness highway or belt is being constructed from the UK through to Norway. 

A key challenge will be establishing ways to share data and enable rapid decision-making in a region where the Russians are modernizing forces and expanded reach into the Arctic.

Obviously a crucial missing in action player in this scheme is Canada. And in my discussions with Commonwealth members and Northern Europeans there is clear concern for disappearing Canadian capabilities.

Perhaps one way to enhance modernization of Canadian forces along with the Brits and the Norwegians would be to shape a joint buy with the UK and Norway to procure a set of Tritons in common and work common data sharing arrangements.

Or perhaps a model to sell data rather than buy aircraft might be considered as well which has been the model whereby Scan Eagle has operated with the USMC.

As the COS of the Norwegian Air Force put the challenge:

“We should plug and play in terms of our new capabilities; but that will not happen by itself, by simply adding new equipment.

“It will be hard work.”

And that will include the possibility of an expanded relationship with India as well.

The Indians have purchased P-8s as well but have put unique systems on the aircraft to do many of the missions.

There is an inherent potential for India to work with the other P-8 partners as well but full cooperation will require reaching a number of data sharing agreements with the other P-8 partners.

In effect, the P-8 will be part of the evolving naval collaborative framework between the Indians and the U.S. as well as with other allies. 

What makes the P-8 an especially interesting platform is that it is a shared platform between India and the U.S. with others (such as Australia) likely to join in and this sharing of a platform can provide a tool for enhancing collaboration in the daunting task of shaping effective ISR for 21st century maritime missions.

The opportunity is inherent in the technology; the challenge will be to shape the collaborative approach and shared concepts of operations.

The threats require nothing less.

Editor’s Note: This piece was first published by Breaking Defense.

Allies And The Maritime Domain Strike Enterprise

Also, see the following pieces as well:

North American Defense and the Evolving Strategic Environment: Admiral Gortney Focuses on the Need to Defend North America at the Ten and Two O’clock Positions

Shaping a 21st Century Base: RAF Lossiemouth and the Coming of the P-8

Preparing the Way Ahead: Joint Warrior 2017

RAF Lossiemouth and the P-8: Center of Coalition Maritime Domain Awareness Strike Capability

Keeping Skill Sets Alive While Waiting for a Replacement Aircraft: From Nimrod to P-8

Standing up the P-8/Triton Maritime Domain Strike Enterprise in Australia: Visiting RAAF Edinburgh

Recrafting the Surveillance Response Group for the Extended Battlespace: An Interview with Air Commodore Heap, Commander of the SRG

Shaping a Way Ahead for Norwegian Defense

Airbus Shapes a New Business Model for the C295: Expand the Global Fleet Through Working with a Leasing Company

07/18/2017

2017-07-13 By Robbin Laird

The C295 has become a global asset.

With nearly 200 aircraft already sold and operating worldwide, the C295 is gaining traction as a global aircraft.

This is in significant contrast to the C-27J, which has been purchased by a much smaller number of nations and therefore does not have the same kind of global presence.

Now with a new business model, namely selling the aircraft to a leasing company, the number of global users will expand and current users could add operating hours through a lease option.

The leasing company involved is Acasta Enterprises Inc., which is a Canadian public company and has signed a firm order for 12 C295 transport aircraft.

One of the key elements within Acasta is the Stellwagen Group which is described by the Acasta website as a “fully-integrated provider of asset management, technical management and fleet and capital financing solutions to the global aviation industry and its investors.

Stellwagen was formed in 2013 to fill a gap in the aviation finance market following the financial crisis. Since then, Stellwagen has also expanded into aircraft servicing and investment management.”

http://acastaenterprises.com

http://www.stellwagengroup.com

Geoff Beattie, Chairman of Acasta, said: “This game changing agreement with Airbus for the unique C295 will transform Stellwagen, it also validates its business plan, demonstrates continued industry innovation and leadership and positions the Group to further develop the commercial market.”

Stellwagen Chief Executive Officer, Douglas Brennan said: “The C295 is a remarkably capable and versatile aircraft.

We have intensively studied the potential for its use in all civilian and humanitarian operations and we look forward to working with Airbus and operators throughout the world.”

http://www.deagel.com/news/Stellwagen-Orders-12-C-295-Transport-Aircraft_n000016639.aspx

Last year, Stellwagen hired the former Rynair deputy CEO to become the CEO of the Group.

According to The Irish Times:

The former deputy chief executive of RyanairHoward Millar, is set to join aviation financing group Stellwagen with plans to raise $1 billion in capital to provide secured aircraft financing to airlines across the globe.

Mr Millar will take up the position of chief operating officer of the Stellwagen Group, which includes the Dublin based Aviation Finance Company as well as Seraph Aviation Management . Mr Millar will also serve as chief executive of Stellwagen Capital, the credit investing arm of the group, focused on credit-oriented investment strategies in industries. 

Mr Millar spent almost 23 years with Ryanair as deputy chief executive and chief financial officer before stepping down in October 2014.

Douglas Brennan, chief executive, said that Mr. Millar will work closely with him “to drive the operating and financial performance of the group”.

“As CEO of our new subsidiary Stellwagen Capital, Howard will lead this innovative financing vehicle in raising capital from both the debt markets and from large institutional investors mainly, in Europe and the US. This capital will enable the group to provide secured aircraft financing to airlines across the globe. This is a big step forward in the evolution of the group and we expect Stellwagen Capital to launch its initial capital raise of $1 billion in Q4 2016.”

Mr Millar said he was “delighted” to join the Stellwagen Group, pointing to a “great opportunity” to raise significant amounts of capital to finance the world’s growing fleet of aircraft.

“ The initial capital raise of $1 billion is slated for Q4 2016, and we expect to raise up to $5 billion over the next three years. We will use innovative and highly efficient structures to raise capital for secured financing of both new and delivered aircraft, and generate significant returns for our investors.”

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/financial-services/former-ryanair-deputy-ceo-joins-stellwagen-group-1.2651685

And now with this new agreement, the Group is reaching into the security and para-military market with a leasing approach.

As mentioned in the press release, a natural client might well be organizations involved in humanitarian operations, such as the United Nations, which need to use aircraft for core missions but do not operate those aircraft themselves.

By setting up a leasing arrangement, then operations and support can be provided to the client on a long term lease or perhaps fly by hour agreements with an overlapping set of clients with common operational needs.

This fits the core business of Stellwagen in a way that it would not for the current structure of Airbus Defence and Space.

C-295 North American Tour, 2017 from SldInfo.com on Vimeo.

Airbus has sold two aircraft to Ghana and one to Mali but with the new lease approach those African countries, which bought the aircraft as much to work with the UN as to serve national needs can expand their access to broader fleet operations through leasing opportunities.

The expanding capability of the C295 into the search and rescue area such as demonstrated in the Canadian and Brazilian sales can also provide a para-military or security market opportunity for the leasing approach as well.

If a fly by hour approach could be shaped for a consortia to meet additional surge requirements might be met by a leasing agreement as well.

In short, this is an exciting development for the para-military and military market, which can expand the global presence of a flexible multi-mission aircraft, namely, the C-295.

And the new model will enhance the numbers of C-295s in the global operating environment, which in turn can help strengthen the overall sales and support approach for Airbus Defence and Space as well.

Editor’s Note: The slideshow highlights the delivery of the C-295 to Brazil and the photos are credited to Airbus Defence and Space. 

For a look at the Canadian C-295 acquisition, see the following:

Canada and Solving a Core Security Need: The Selection of the C-295

UK, French and Partner Nations’ Joint Training From a French Sea Base

07/17/2017

2017-07-17

The UK Royal Navy and Marines have trained alongside partner nations’ navies during a deployment on board a French amphibious ship.

And they have done so in the Pacific where there is a growing amphibious capability being created by partner nations.

According to an article published by the UK Ministry of Defence on July 14, 2017:

Around 60 Royal Navy and Royal Marines personnel exercised with their counterparts from other countries during the five-month annual French naval deployment to the Indian Ocean and Far East, including the first ever four-part maritime exercise involving France, Japan, the UK and US.

The two-staged exercise named Forager Deux and Arc 17 took place in the sea and in the skies near to Japan, Guam, and Tinian, with the purpose of enhancing joint operating between the UK and international partners and deepening Defence cooperation.

In addition to UK maritime personnel, the exercise also included two Royal Navy Merlin Mk3 helicopters from the UK’s Commando Helicopter Force, which as part of a week-long practice assault moved 330 French, Japanese and American troops to and from Tinian.

Pictured with FS Courbet is a Merlin Mk3A helicopter of 845 Naval Air Squadron (NAS) working from the flight deck onboard FS Mistral in the Far East.

Two Merlin Mk3A helicopters and personnel 845 NAS are embarked on FS Mistral as part of the French Jeanne D’Arc 17 (JDA 17) task group in the Far East. 845 NAS, part of Commando Helicopter Force are based at RNAS Yeovilton, Somerset are embarked on the French Ship to provide aviation support for duration of the deployment. May 23, 2017.

UK forces have been on board French assault ship FS Mistral since March as part of the Jeanne d’Arc 2017 French task group, which has visited Singapore, Sri Lanka, Japan, Guam, Australia and Vietnam.

Minister of State for the Armed Forces Mark Lancaster said:

“Working shoulder-to-shoulder with French forces, as well as personnel from other partners’ navies, shows the flexibility of our world class Armed Forces.

“The Royal Navy and Royal Marines play an important role carrying out Britain’s commitment to international maritime security, as well as protecting our own shores.”

Several instalments of training and Defence Engagement have taken place as part of this deployment.

This week, UK personnel worked alongside French and Egyptian armed forces when the Jeanne D’Arc task group arrived in Egypt to take part in Exercise Cleopatra. The cross-decking exercise, which saw UK Merlins land on the Egyptian warship ENS Nasser, was the latest in a series of multilateral amphibious exercises that the UK has taken part in throughout the five month deployment.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/royal-navy-and-royal-marines-train-alongside-partner-naval-forces

Assessing Russian Military Power in East Asia

2017-07-18 By Richard Weitz

The Western media has recently highlighted the Russian military buildup in Asia, which generally receives less attention than Russian defense activities in Europe and the Middle East.

Russia’s Far Eastern armed forces have benefited from the country’s overall military modernization program.

During the past decade, the forces in eastern Russia have been modernizing their technologies, raising their combat readiness, and elevating their regional presence.

They have therefore improved their ability to deter and, if necessary, win wars against China and Japan; prepare for security contingencies on the Korean Peninsula; and assure Russia’s control over its land and maritime territories

The newly released Defense Intelligence Agency Russian Military Power report attributes Russia’s general defense modernization to a desire to expand Russia’s power projection capabilities, give credibility to Russian diplomacy, and make Russia’s presence too visible to ignore.

The forces deployed in Russia’s large Joint Strategic Command “OSK East” (more commonly referred to as the “Eastern MD”), headquartered in Khabarovsk, are more specifically tasked with ensuring the defense of the Russian Far East/Siberia/Arctic territories, maintaining strategic deterrence with China and the US, winning regional conventional wars, giving Russian leaders options to respond to Asian contingencies and crises, engaging with foreign militaries, making Moscow a player on Asian security issues, and serving as a force provider for other regions, including rotations in Syria, the Indian Ocean, and the Mediterranean Sea.

The units in the Eastern MD have increased their activities, with more frequent and larger military exercises to improve readiness, enhance intra-branch jointness, show strength and resolve to other countries, and encourage the sale of Russian weapons.

During the past decade, other Asian countries have bought some $30-billion worth of Russian missiles, tanks, warplanes, helicopters, armored vehicles, artillery pieces, and other defense items.

Although China and India have been the main buyers of Russian weapons, Moscow has been making a sustained effort to sell more arms to ASEAN members, including some traditional allies like the Philippines and Thailand.

The main ground forces in the Eastern MD include several combined-arms armies of varying sizes and capabilities as well as smaller ground units and formations, such as the 68th Army Corps (responsible for defending the Kuril Islands).

The units assigned to the Russian Aerospace Forces (established in 2015 from a merger of the Russian Air Force, Air Defense Troops and Space Forces) include two fighter regiments, a fighter/ground attack regiment, two ground attack regiments, one intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) regiment, and transportation and naval aviation squadrons.

These units operate Su-30SM, Su-30M-2 and Su-35S fighter planes; Mi-8, Mi-24, and Ka-52 helicopters; and S-300 and S-400 surface-to-air (SAM) missiles, and Tor-M2U anti-air systems.

The Russian Pacific Fleet is the second largest of the Russian Navy’s four fleets, headquartered in Vladivostok with an additional flotilla base in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy. The Pacific Fleet has more than 70 combat vessels, including some 50 warships, about two-dozen submarines of various classes, plus several nuclear icebreakers.

lts Borei-class and Delta-III class SSBNs, based in the Krashennikov Bay on the Kamchatka Peninsula play an important role in sustaining Russia’s nuclear deterrent as they patrol under the Sea of Okhotsk protected by a bastion of other ships, including Oskar-class and Akula-class attack submarines, and land-based air and missiles.

Other nuclear forces in the Eastern MD are Russia’s long-range ballistic missiles and strategic aviation consisting of the Tu-160 Blackjack and Tu-95MS Bear H. Some of the Iskander-M missiles in the Eastern MD, which can deliver nuclear as well as conventional warheads, can hit targets in Central Asia as well as China.

As part of the Russian military buildup in Asia, the ground forces in the eastern MD are receiving the Armata family of armor, which includes a main battle tank (T-14), a heavy IFV (T-15), and other variations.

The Eastern MD has been receiving more advanced aircraft like the Su-34 and Su-35S. Furthermore, the district’s Mi-8AMTSh and Mi-24 helicopters are being modernized with the new Vitebsk EW complex designed for protection against anti-aircraft missiles and radars.

The Pacific Fleet is acquiring multi-purpose Steregushcy-class corvettes for littoral zone operations, upgrades to its Oscar-class SSGN that will extend their service lives at least another decade, and next-generation multi-mission ultra-quiet Yasen-class SSGN.

The Eastern MD is also obtaining new UAV systems and that can undertake long-range surveillance over vast normally inaccessible Arctic regions.

The new Boomerang amphibious personnel carrier would prove useful for fighting over disputed Pacific islands.

As for air-defense capabilities, the Eastern MD is deploying additional S-400s on the Kamchatka Peninsula. Meanwhile, the forces on the Kuril Islands are obtaining new coastal and air defense systems as well as modernization of their facilities and logistics.

Thanks to their modernization and already strong anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities, Russian forces in the Eastern MD should prove capable of repelling any unlikely attack from either a state or non-state actor in the region.

Though it is hard to picture the outbreak of an actual war in Asia that would involve Russia, the augmented Russian forces could offset their conventional disadvantages through using, or threatening to apply, warfare above (nuclear) as well as below (hybrid) the conventional level.

The main uncertainty in projecting future Russian military power in East Asia is foreseeing how significantly Russia’s economic challenges will disrupt the planned modernization.

Thus far, the government has generally sustained the elevated defense spending of recent years despite cutbacks in other public spending sectors.

Yet, shortfalls in energy revenue, currency depreciations, Western sanctions, and other challenges could cause major delays and cutbacks in future defense programs aimed at Asia, especially if Moscow protects other military modernization priorities in the Arctic as well as European and Southern Russia.

APPENDIX: Russia’s Order of Battle in the Eastern Military District

Major Ground Forces

Major Aerospace Forces

The Russian Pacific Fleet

SOURCES: The data in this paper comes from various public sources; when they contradict, which they often do, the author made his best assessment of their accuracy.

“Russia and Eurasia,” The Military Balance 2016, Vol. 116, Issue 1 (London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2016), pp. 163-210;

“Russian Army Order of Battle,” Global Security, http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/army-orbat.htm#voeastern;

“Russian Defense Ministry to build up strength of airborne assault divisions,” TASS, July 30, 2015, http://tass.com/russia/811613;

“Войсковые Части России,” https://voinskayachast.net; “Восточный военный округ,”

Milkavkaz, archived screenshot dated April 18, 2017, http://archive.li/Z0h38#selection-441.1-441.25;

Oleg Mukhin, “20-я армия нашла командующего на Сахалине,” Kommersant, February 3, 2017, http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3207955;

Denis Mokrushin, “36-я мотострелковая бригада“, livejournal, February 26, 2011, http://twower.livejournal.com/499098.html;

“35th Red Banner Combined Arms Army,” ww2.dk, http://www.ww2.dk/new/army/armies/35oa.htm;

U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, “Russia Military Power: Building a Military to Support Great Power Aspirations,” DIA-11-1704-161, 2017, http://www.dia.mil/Portals/27/Documents/News/Military%20Power%20Publications/Russia%20Military%20Power%20Report%202017.pdf.;

and Dmitry Boltenkov, Aleksey Gayday, Anton Karnaukhov, Anton Lavrov, “Eastern Military District – OSC East,” warfare.be, http://archive.is/zTy8s;

and Vyacheslav Tseluiko, Russia’s New Army (Moscow: CAST, 2011), http://www.cast.ru/files/book/NewArmy_sm.pdf.