“Our excellence is a key part of deterrence.”

11/27/2023

By Robbin Laird

During my November 2023 visit to MAWTS-1, I had a chance to talk with Major Kyle “Elton” McHugh, tactical air department head at MAWTS-1. McHugh was originally a Harrier pilot who transitioned to the F-35B and served for three years with the first forward deployed F-35B squadron, VMFA-121.

The F-35 is a key part of answering the question of the how the USMC integrates with the joint force and supports the maritime fight. The Marine Corps F-35Bs in Japan provide fifth-generation aircraft to the Marine Corps and Joint Force in the first island chain, operating off a variety of basing options, and work closely with the USAF, USN, and allied Pacific Air Forces.

The aircraft shares common sensors, decision making systems, weapons and so on with a common U.S and allied combat fleet. In discussing the way ahead for USMC integration with the joint force, both the F-35 and the Osprey are often overlooked as key stakeholders in both current capabilities and the future force.

I asked him about his time in Japan and his perspective on working with the Japanese. He commented: “I think our enemies fear our excellence and that is a key part of deterrence. Working with the Japanese as they stood up their own F-35s, we shared a common mission and a common passion to defend our nations and our way of life. Our adversaries cannot ignore that commitment and the quality we bring to the fight.”

Throughout our discussion, Major McHugh emphasized how the Marines have worked with the joint and coalition force on integratability of the F-35, enabling a more lethal and capable F-35 enterprise. He noted that “there has been a concerted effort by MAWTS-1 to work with the Navy and Air Force weapon schools on F-35 integration. All the weapon school instructors meet in person twice a year. The goal is to standardize and shape a tri-service TTP manual, including Australian and British partners as well.”

We also discussed the coming of the Reaper and he emphasized how its inclusion is helping to learn about and shape operations in the challenging maritime environment. He noted that many of the students who come to WTI do not have deep knowledge of the maritime environment and Reaper data is helping in that learning process.

He noted the last Harrier class came to this year’s WTI and the Hornets are soon to follow. The all F-35 Marine Corps TACAIR element will be a key part of the joint and allied integration efforts as evidenced by the work on a common training manual by the weapon school instructors.

Major McHugh concluded: “At MAWTS-1 we are focused on tactical excellence. That level of competence is critical to deterrence. The events we do at MAWTS-1, both live and simulated, are executed with distributed joint partners, empowering mission commanders to compete against the evolving threat.”

Featured Photo: U.S. Marine Corps Maj. Kyle McHugh, a pilot assigned to Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 121, currently attached to Marine Medium Tilt-Rotor Squadron 265 Reinforced, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), departs the flight deck of amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6), in the East China Sea, June 24, 2021. The F-35B is launched in support of the 31st MEU’s unit level training to maintain proficiency in air-to-surface attacks, tactical intercepts, and other critical skills. The 31st MEU is operating aboard ships of the America Amphibious Ready Group in the 7th fleet area of operation to enhance interoperability with allies and partners and serve as a ready response force to defend peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. U.S. Marine Corps Staff Sgt. John Tetrault.

The following story published on 1 April 2014 highlights the coalition aspect of McHugh’s career but as a Harrier pilot.

U.S. Marine Corps AV-8B Harrier pilots with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 263 (Reinforced), 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), conducted a bilateral aviation exercise with French air force fighter pilots in Djibouti, Africa, March 26 to April 2, 2014.

The weeklong exercise was intended to maintain proficiency and learn new tactics while building lasting relationships between allied nations.

“This has been a great experience for us,” said U.S. Marine Corps Capt. Kyle McHugh, VMM-263 (Rein.) Harrier pilot and native of Aberdeen, Md.

The MEU’s pilots flew air-to-air missions, dogfighting French Mirage 2000 pilots; as close air support, striking and bombing ground targets; combat search and rescue; tactical recovery of aircraft and personnel; and strike coordination/armed reconnaissance.

A French air force Mirage 2000 fighter jet with Fighter Squadron 03/011 Corsica taxis to a runway at French Airbase 188 during an air-to-air combat exercise with AV-8B Harriers from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 263 (Reinforced), 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU). The 22nd MEU is deployed with the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group as a theater reserve and crisis response force throughout U.S. Central Command and the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Austin Hazard/Released)

“Within the large air war, we flew those different roles and got to be a piece of the puzzle and see how the whole picture worked in actual execution,” explained McHugh, who also serves as the squadron’s assistant logistics officer. “It’s the most challenging environment we’ve had a chance to train in.”

The MEU’s pilots flew approximately 35 sorties and accumulated approximately 40 flight hours, flying missions with and against the Mirage pilots. The Mirage pilots were assigned to local French air force Fighter Squadron 03/011 Corsica, as well as visiting French air force Fighter Squadron 02/005 Ile de France.

“The missions we do here are very complex with very little time to prepare and coordinate,” said French air force Capt. Joan Dussourd, Fighter Squadron 02/005 Mirage 2000 fighter pilot. “It forces us to be very efficient.”

Each mission included several aircraft with different tasks, such as Harriers flying close air support while Mirages provide fighter support and dogfight against role player enemy Mirages. Throughout the week, there were as many as 12 aircraft participating at any given moment.

“They’re very tactically proficient in air-to-air and we consider ourselves to be very tactically proficient in an air-to-surface environment,” noted McHugh. “The ability to learn from one another in a combined forces environment, we’d be very lucky to ever have this experience again.”

In the end, the exercise helped both forces learn the other’s mindset, said Dussourd.

“I think when you fly the same missions with someone, you learn about them,” added Dussourd. “We’ve gotten to know the Marines and learned their mindset, which is very flexible. Ours is also, so we work well together.”

The squadrons and individual pilots established good working relationships throughout the exercise and built a strong foundation for other U.S. military squadrons to train or work with the French squadrons in the future.

“I’ve already seen how well trained and skilled they are in air-to-surface missions, but I was not in the air when they fought air-to-air, so I’m very interested to see how they did,” said Dussourd, who had never flown with Harriers before this exercise. “It’s important that we have chances like this in the future, to mix our knowledge. We appreciate the way the Harrier pilots work: very professional and skilled.”

The 22nd MEU is deployed with the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group as a theater reserve and crisis response force throughout U.S. Central Command and the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility.

CAS Training WTI-1-24

U.S. Marines assigned to Tactical Air Control Party, Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One, participate in a close air support exercise during Weapons and Tactics Instructor (WTI) course 1-24 at WISS Airfield, near Indio, California, Oct. 6, 2023.

WTI is an advanced, graduate-level course for selected pilots and enlisted aircrew providing standardized advanced tactical training and assists in developing and employing aviation weapons and tactics.

10.06.2023

Video by Lance Cpl. Elizabeth Gallagher

Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron-1

Operating in Contested Environments: MAWTS-1 Works the Spectrum Warfare Challenge

By Robbin Laird

During my visit to MAWTS-1 in 2018, the shift from operating in the land wars to dealing with challenges which could be posed by peer competitors was clearly underway. At the center of the shift was clear recognition of the need to deal with the ongoing challenge of operating in contested electro-magnetic environments.

In my meetings with PACFLEET this past April, a key aspect of the challenge facing the force is clearly spectrum warfare or signature management and deception. My takeaway from discussions at PACFLEET was very clear. Success for distributed maritime operations requires not only assured command and control but the tissue of ISR systems enabling distributed fleet operations and adding the key element of deception through various counter-ISR systems as well. In effect, fleet distribution built on a kill web effects infrastructure is being combined with what me be called a wake-a-mole operational capability. You can’t target me, if you can’t find me.

As one key Navy leader put it to me: “Counter-ISR is the number one priority for me, to deny the adversary with to high confidence in his targeting capabilities. I need to deceive them and to make a needle look like a needle in a haystack of needles. It is important to have the capability to look like a black hole in the middle of nothing.”

MAWTS-1 with its work on FARPs, force distribution, new ways to do C2 such as from systems operating out of the back of Ospreys, signature management and deception is clearly working along the same lines as PACFLEET.

I had a chance to discuss this approach with Major John Edwards, the Spectrum Warfare Department Head, when visiting MAWTS-1 in November 2023. Edwards highlighted their work in preparing the force for the spectrum management challenges they experience and will experience within a contested electronic warfare environment. Their focus is upon ramping up the “red” threat against blue to prepare the force for the experience they have when operating in a contested environment.

They focus on showing the operational elements of the force the kind of spectrum signature they are creating when they operate to better understand the nature of spectrum warfare and how that affects their lethality and survivability in operations. And by knowing that one can create ways to think about signature deception as well as pointed out by PACFLEET.

Edwards background is from operating in the last remaining specialized USMC airborne electronic warfare platform, the Prowler. The focus now is upon having the entire operational force “electronic warfare” ready, which requires consideration as well for bringing the kind of threats which red forces can be brought by an adversary to contested operations. This is always going to be a work in progress as both blue and red work the dynamically changing electronic magnetic spectrum embodied in the operating forces.

We discussed an issue as well which I have observed in both allied and U.S militaries, namely the paring down of specialized aircraft to perform the EW mission and the question of whether or not there is enough capability remaining for the specialized domain which EW or tron warfare really constitutes.

Major Edwards thought this was a valid concern and observed that the Navy currently through its Growlers provides a joint capability. He noted the USAF has officers involved with Growlers and Growlers come to MAWTS-1 as well to work with the range of capabilities which the USMC deploys. But he felt that there needs to be a joint force commitment to expertise in this area beyond simply relying on the Growler community.

Part of the problem is simply the need to have a robust capability in this area which can inform the force with regard to training standards necessary for effective operations. If it was felt correctly that spectrum management is now a thread running through offensive and defensive operations, where will the expertise be to inform the operational and training requirements?

Featured Image: U.S. Marine Corps aircraft assigned to Marine Operational Test and Evaluation Squadron One takeoff from a landing zone during a Spectrum Warfare Department (SWD) training event near Yuma, Arizona, Aug. 23, 2023. SWD Marines conducted a training to intercept, identify, and locate or localize sources of intentional and unintentional radiated electromagnetic energy for the purpose of immediate threat recognition, targeting, planning and conduct of future operations. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Ruben Padilla)

The Way Ahead for Western Fighters

11/23/2023

By Robbin Laird

I have attended the International Fighter Conference in the past but missed this year’s offering. This year’s conference was held in Madrid, and I was interested in what was discussed at the conference as I am focused on the way ahead for Western air combat forces in the decade ahead.

First, I scanned recently press reports on the conference and really found two news threads. The first involved the Swedes and the fact that they had dropped out of the British led Tempest program and were now looking at their own requirements for their next combat jet. I am deliberately not using the characterization of next generation fighter for they may not indeed do such as my own view is that the air combat domain is changing way beyond consideration of a next generation fighter.

Gareth Jennings reported that Sweden had dropped out of the British led program.

“Speaking at the IQPC International Fighter Conference (IFC) 2023 under the Chatham House Rule, an official said that the national work followed the official termination of the country’s participation in the UK-led Future Combat Air System (FCAS) in 2022.

“We walked away from trilateral studies with [the] UK and Italy about a year ago, and launched a national study. I will not answer questions why it didn’t work with the UK and FCAS,” the official said on 7 November at the event in Madrid, adding only that had Sweden known in July 2019 when it signed up to FCAS what it knows now about its requirements, it would not have joined.”

Tim Martin in Breaking Defense also focused on the Swedish presentation.

“After joining and then leaving the UK-led Future Combat Air System (FCAS), the Swedish military is now holding off on deciding its path to a next-generation fighter jet until 2031, after it can assess the “risks and possibilities” with different approaches, an official said today.

“Three options are on the table for Stockholm: Either “build a system, develop a system with someone, or… acquire a system,” said the official, speaking under Chatham House Rules at the International Fighter Conference here in Madrid. “It’s an open question.”

“We did have both bilateral and trilateral cooperation with Britain and also with Italy on the FCAS program,” said the official. “We walked away from that about a year ago and started some national studies… connecting to what capabilities are needed for the future.” The official declined to comment on the reason behind Sweden ending collaboration with the UK and Italy.

“A decision has not been made by authorities so far on an Initial Operating Capability (IOC) date for whatever it chooses for a next-gen fighter, but a wide range of planning activities will inform the 2031 procurement decision.”

The only other story I found focused on Poland. There the emphasis was on the Polish air force looking at autonomous systems that would fly with the F-35 enabled Polish Air Force.

According to Shephard News:

“The Polish MoD has been evaluating the UAS market in search of a loyal wingman platform to work alongside its future fleet of Lockheed Martin F-35A fighter jet, the Deputy General Commander of the Polish Armed Forces has revealed.

“Addressing the International Fighter Conference 2023 in Madrid on 6 November, Maj General Cezary Wisniewski disclosed that the Polish Ministry of National Defence (NMD) was engaged in a comprehensive market assessment of the emerging loyal wingman uncrewed combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs) capability. The evaluation has formed part of the ministry’s efforts to meet the requirements of the Harpii Szpon (Harpy’s Talon) adjunct programme for the F-35 fighters.

‘We are not yet at the point of an acquisition,’ Maj Gen Wisniewski said. ‘We are [now] just waiting for more information to be sure that we don’t make a mistake – we just want to join the mainstream approach, [but] we think that industry is not ready to provide the capabilities yet.’

My own sense is that discussions of next generation fighters although interesting are a bit premature.

First, the dominance of the F-35 within Western nations will provide a significant input to redefining air combat going forward. And the United States will face a major challenge of adapting its legacy mindset on security to the technological realties of a fleet of aircraft that can move vast amounts of data within a combat area to shape the kind of multi-domain warfare capabilities which are often highlighted but ignoring what the arrival of a F-35 global enterprise could enable.

The key is sensor fusion and the ability to do this as a wolfpack. I was in England for the DSEI conference held in London in early September. One of the discussions highlighted by the DSEI organizers on their content hub was with my guru and guide for many years in the UK’s process of adopting the F-35, then Group Captain Paul Godfrey and now Air Vice-Marshal Godfrey. He has moved from dealing with combat air to the new space efforts being worked by the UK Ministry of Defence.

Air Vice Marshal Gary Waterfall (Retired) interviewed “Godders” about the challenges of setting up the new UK space command. As the first commander of UK space command, Godders has brought a wide range of experience in terms of working combat air with the broader force transformation effort being pursued by the UK, through the difficult periods of the Brexit transition.

A key theme which was discussed was the focus on being able to access space to deliver the kind of ISR-T and C2 information to a deployed force. Godders made a key point that sensor fusion from space assets was a key challenge facing the force and in doing so he highlighted a key point often neglected when talking about the F-35 and its impact on force transformation, namely, its revolutionary impact on sensor fusion in the cockpit of F-35s operating as a wolfpack.

This is what Air Vice-Marshal Godfrey highlighted:

“Data validation is key. If we both go back to a previous platform that we both worked with, the F-35, it shows one how it can be done. The data from the various sensors around the airplane are fused in the fusion engine. The radar might think that there’s a 70% chance it is x. Another sensor might indicate that it is 100% chance, or 99.9%. chance that it’s x. And data fusion then can present the pilot with that answer that it is 98% certain that it is x. The legal people have had a look at it and that might be enough for you to shoot at the target.

“That’s what I’m looking for in terms of how we bring data together or how we fuse it. When you scale that across the enterprise and pair data sources, where is that done? Do you do all of that at the source on a satellite? That’s why we’re doing this with some of our operational capability demonstrators. Or do you wait for that information to be sent down? Is your F 35 brain in the Space Operations Center? Is it done at edge processing?

“To provide answers, we’re doing experiments over the next couple of years to see what works, what doesn’t work for sensor fusion from our space data.”

What Godders is talking about is the data ecosystem which is being worked to deliver the kind of ISR-T and C2 capabilities necessary for the kind of force transformation underway. And it should not be forgotten what the F-35 as a global enterprise can provide.

Second, next generation UAVs, autonomous systems, are the other major driver of the dynamics of change for the air combat force. Although referred to as wingman they are not that at all. No fifth-generation pilot wants a wingman, that is legacy thinking par excellence.

The new generation of longer-range UAVs provide significant force multiplier capabilities for the outside force, and with ISR and C2 payloads to the inside force as well. It is not so much manned-unmanned teaming as it is filling gaps that currently cannot be filled or as complements to the crewed platforms in the current force.

With the growing impact of the global F-35 force, the next big thing is almost certainly going to be building up a next generation UAV force that fills the gaps and complements the force.

To get an update on what the news stories from the conference did not focus on, I talked with my colleague Billie Flynn who attended the conference to get his take on the way ahead for the fighter world and how the conference addressed this.

First, Flynn underscored his concern with regard to the future of the Royal Canadian Air Force in which he served for many years. Given the atrophy of Canadian airpower, the number of pilots has been significantly reduced. This means that although the CAF is finally to acquire the F-35, the CAF is facing a significant pilot shortfall. He raised these questions with the Canadian speaker who really had no answer as to how they were going to deal with this challenge.  There does not appear to be a solution on how to produce enough fighter pilots to man the F-35s when they arrive in Canada which will have implications for NORAD and NATO alliances.

Second, he emphasized that the F-35 global enterprise was gaining momentum in ways that most European political leaders simply did not anticipate. But he saw a divide between the AUKUS three – the U.S., Australia, and the UK – and the rest of the F-35 global enterprise with regard to the kind of collaboration which the jet clearly empowers.

Third, he was very skeptical with regard to the European programs which have been generated, whether the British-led one or the French-led one. Much like the Tornado and Eurofighter programs of the past, the emphasis was on workshare and investment distribution, not lethality, effectiveness, or advanced technology integration. Where are the export opportunities? And what is their relationship to what the F-35 dominance in European air forces will yield in terms of change in air combat?

And he agreed that the priority impact of figuring out how to use the F-35 and the coming of autonomous air systems would predominate operational realities over projected new fighter projects.

Of course, a major impact will come from the B-21 and the entire process of weaponization which will have a decisive impact certainly on the way ahead for the USAF. A fifth generation fighter global enterprise plus autonomous air systems plus a new bomber plus new weapons will almost certainly dominate the real world of air combat evolution much more than development and acquisition of a new fighter.

Featured Photo: Royal Australian Air Force F-35A Lightning II and Republic of Korea Air Force KF-16U Fighting Falcon aircraft conduct air to air refueling with a Royal Australian Air Force KC-30A Multi-Role Tanker Transport and a Republic of Korea Air Force Multi-Role Tanker Transport in the skies around Darwin as part of Exercise Pitch Black 2022. Credit: Australian Department of Defence.

WTI-1-24: Working TRAP Missions at Sea

11/22/2023

One of the training missions being worked at MAWTS-1 with the increased focus on maritime operations has been upon the TRAP mission.

Already in the Libyan operations, the Osprey demonstrated its unique qualities in performing this mission.

Now MAWTS-1 is working to standardize the training for this important mission set.

The Execution of the TRAP Mission Over Libya

09/25/2011

During a Second Line of Defense visit to New River to discuss Osprey operations and experiences with the Osprey Nation, we had a chance to discuss the TRAP mission over Libya with the ACE commander and with one of the Osprey operators involved in the mission. Earlier we discussed this mission with the MEU commander.

In this interview Maj. B.J. Debardeleben discussed the mission after take off from the ship off of the coast of Libya.

Major Debardeleben during the Interview (Credit: SLD)

After we took off, the autopilot took over.  That is one of the great things on this plane versus the SEA KNIGHT is that it can fly itself through part of the operation. In a car, if you can set speed control, you can now be able to use your mind and do something else and focus on the road. And it’s exactly what we did on the plane and you’re monitoring the flying, but now you’re able to manage the mission better.

We were focusing on shaping our way to the moving recovery zone.  We compared the mission plan to the unfolding operation. Let’s look at this, figure out some more things, and to make sure everything’s right that we did with our mission planning before we left the boat. So it gave us time to assess everything with the radio, talk to people we needed to, and build our situational awareness.

We immediately started talking to the Harrier operating above us. And he starts talking with the pilot and we can hear one side of the conversation and I can tell that things are getting worse on the ground.

We made the judgment that we had to accelerate the mission. We moved towards our top speed as the pilot was moving to a new location on the ground.

The pilot on the ground indicated that “they’re still going at us, and things are getting worse.” And he is clearly on the move.

We had the grid of the plane crash site and we got a new grid and realized that it was much further away from where the original crash site was. So he’d been on the move the whole time.

If I had been flying a SEA KNIGHT, by the time I had gotten the new information with regard to the shift in the grid, and flown for the 40 minutes under those conditions, I would have been relatively exhausted by the time I got there because you’re holding the controls, and you’re getting shaken the whole time.

On the Osprey, I am on autopilot. So I can take a sip of water, I’m assessing everything, and I’m listening to what’s going on very clearly. The V22s very quiet in airplane mode so we can hear the radios very well, but if I was in a SEA KNIGHT the noise would make it difficult to hear. The grunts in the back were able to look at a moving map that they can look at to have both SAs when we’re getting closer and closer to coast line.

And so in that flight task now they’re relaxed and comfortable instead of them shaking in the back because usually with all the shaking makes you groggy you sleep, so you have to wake them up when you land. So they’re in the back at least relaxed and calm before we drop them off.

We zoom all the way in, we get about ten miles off the coast, I drop down from 500 feet to about 200, 300, feet just to stabilize radars. Looking at the coastline, and I was expecting Libya to look Djibouti which presents a very dark profile. But it was light up, with the electricity grid.

And so we just picked a dark spot. We also had a visual map. So now I’m looking at where I’m going to fly, I look at it on the map and I say, “I’m going through there.”

Another thing I didn’t have in the SEA KNIGHT was that actual navigation. I had been holding a map with a flashlight trying to figure stuff out while the other person’s flying and shaking and you got to be able to do this without knowing where you’re going.  With the terrain guidance you can make a rapid assessment of the terrain and how you are going to fly over that terrain.

Where you’re in a V22 you look at it and you get all the data right in front of you. It’s basically like having a smart phone versus using a dial telephone. All these things are helping you out in a difficult situation.

So they give me a new grid, and I’m looking for my needle, to where I’m supposed to go, a large town, and then I’ll look outside and I see a large town full of lights and probably that was an area the downed pilot was running from.

So I adjust my course a little bit to the left, go through the dark area, and then come through. I’m seeing pilot lines; I can mark all sorts of things on my map.

I’m flying inbound, the Harrier has built a picture for me, and he’s talking to me, telling me what I’m going to see, what the road looks like, where he is. Gives me that updated grid.

The F15 and F16 are now back on station and they start talking. They’re doing a good job of talking to the downed pilot and they know who he is, you know, they’re friends with him. They encourage him to have a drink of water and to calm down and to just stay where we was now.

Earlier, there was commotion going on at the response station, there’s people chasing him, and there’s cars chasing him.  The Harrier used various means to kind of scare people away from him. That’s when he said,” say good bye to my wife”. I could hear in my guy’s voice that things were getting more serious.

One nice thing also about having people overhead is that they are in calmer environment able to look at the situation and give you more information. “Hey Ospreys, you guys have DF?” They said “ we have DF,” so they put it up, and cue somebody one, two, three, four, five, that other needle swings over on top of my navigation needle, now saying that he’s generally in that area that you’re headed towards.

The joint quality of the operation is important. One of the best things I think about it is, that we are joint enough in terminology and techniques and everything all relatively the same. You know, we may have differences that are minute, but our terminology is all the same and we can interop wherever we have to in such a situation

In fact, I learned later that we went to introductory aviation school together in Pensacola. When I went down to visit him in the hospital, we realized that we went to school together at Pensacola. You just never get how small the world’s going to get when somebody comes back from 11 years ago.

So we’re coming in. One of the other best things about the Osprey is so, besides it being comfortable for us, it is quiet on the outside in airplane mode. Nobody’s going to hear us until we’ve gone past them. And it just sounds like a whisper rush. And at night you’re not going to know anything about it.  The SEA KNIGHT or any helicopter, you are hearing it from 10 to 15 miles away, you’re not going to hear anything from us until we’re at least beyond you.

But as I’m coming in, I hear him, he’s very quiet at this point, and I can hear the dogs barking in the background starting in my mind to envision where he is and what’s going on. And they’re talking about the vehicles pushing northwest and nobody knows where he is at that point, so it’s looking good. And so we’re all starting out thinking about where we’re going to land. And that zone wasn’t described as to what the surface was. He just said land it by this road.

We have an inertial navigation system, so get when I say plot of our plane in time and space. And so if we set up to land, we get a velocity vector that shows our movement on the earth and you don’t have to look outside to land.

And it’s an awesome capability because when the helo goes up, if you look at it and you look at gusts and the way it flows, it looks like it’s moving. Your helo is going backwards and it becomes very confusing for the helicopter pilot. And it’s always been one of the hardest things for us to do is land in the desert safely.

And in the Osprey they have fixed it. We can do this manually looking at the system, or the plane can fly itself to hover, and land directly down, you know, no questions asked, and it is amazing; both ways work 100 percent of the time.

As we’re coming to land we start to turn into a helicopter and we’re setting up to land. And as soon as we speed the motor blades up and then started bringing out, the noise comes on. And it is loud.

And as soon as I do that, the downed pilot starts yelling on the radio, he’s like “Don’t leave me, I hear you.” And I was like, “Hey we got it, we know where you are, we’re coming, you know, send your flare up.”

So he sends his signal early, it’s a high light night, very bright, a few clouds in the sky; it was just really not good for such a mission to go down. I get over him as he’s starting to talk as my crew chief finally says, you know, “I see him.”

We get a sparkle of the F16 and marks the spot. My guy comes in and lands right beside him, we’re pretty much about 20 feet away from him. He jumps up, hands up, you know, no sign of radio or pistol or anything, he said he never even pulled his pistol out of his holster the whole time.

He runs to the plane, pretty much jumps on, and sits down and puts on his seat belt and he’s like, “I’m ready to go.” The grunts spread out, to secure the zone for a second. Crew chief runs out there and grabs him, says everybody get back on the plane.

As I’m coming around I ask, “Do you have him on board?” I am told “Yup, my guy’s on.”

Because I am the second Osprey accompanying the one, which landed, I don’t even land I kind of come up beside him, I keep going, they pick up and then all together we leave.

The success of the mission was due in part to significant training. We trained for seven months as a team to do this. And then every time we had a chance on a boat in Djibouti or wherever we were, we trained to TRAP also. Because it’s the one way we can get the grunts on the back of the plane where we can use the jets overhead to work together and then land in the zone.

The Coming of the CH-53K to the USMC: The Perspective of the CO of MAWTS-1

By Robbin Laird

During my visit to MAWTS-1 during the first week of November 2023, I had a chance to talk with Colonel Eric Purcell, the CO of MAWTS-1 about the coming of the CH-53K to the USMC. This is the third new air system I have seen come to the USMC since I have been coming to Yuma, but because it doesn’t look as different as the other two did from their legacy ancestors, it is often not fully realized how important it will be for the USMC and the joint force.

Purcell is the first CH-53 pilot to be the CO of MAWTS-1 which is propitious as the CH-53K has been part of this year’s WTIs at MAWTS-1. He has more than 3000 hours on the CH-53E and 130 hours on the CH-53D. He has had two deployments to Afghanistan and two to Iraq, and additional visits to both countries as well.

He noted that he wished they had not called it the CH-53 for the CH-53K is so different from the legacy aircraft. It is designed to fit into the deck space of an CH-53E and to have a reduced footprint for its maintenance as well.

But the big difference is associated with the broader changes across the Marine Corps. When I was last at MAWTS-1 in 2020, they were starting to work on how to enhance the deployability and mobility of the Marine Corps and to do so in formations smaller than the traditional MAGTF. During this visit, my discussions with the department heads underscored how much work they have done in terms of doing expeditionary basing, innovations in Forward Refueling and Re-Arming points and ways to reduce the signature of the deployed force.

U.S. Marine Corps Col. Eric. D. Purcell, Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One (MAWTS-1) commanding officer, conducts an operations brief in support of a salvage and recovery exercise during Weapons and Tactics Instructor (WTI) course 2-23, at Auxiliary Airfield II, near Yuma, Arizona, March 17, 2023. WTI is a seven-week training event hosted by MAWTS-1, providing standardized advanced tactical training and certification of unit instructor qualifications to support Marine aviation training and readiness, and assists in developing and employing aviation weapons and tactics. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Ruben Padilla)

The CH-53K, in Col Purcell’s view, contributed to that in a significant way. He focused on the ability of the King Stallion with its triple hooks to carry significant loads to operating locations without having to land and be on the ground for the time necessary to unload from the interior of the aircraft. He pointed out that the aircraft could carry significant fuel loads – 54,000 pounds of fuel — to locations the F-35B might operate from and could do so with external lift rather than having to land.

Both the Osprey and the heavy lift helo could carry fuel inside and work as fuel providers to aircraft at a FARP. But being on the ground for significant time to do this exposed the aircraft to much greater risk than coming in and dropping off fuel from their external three hook system.

He pointed out that the legacy aircraft two hook system could lead on occasion to “uncommanded” load releases whereby the system on the aircraft would not be able to judge correctly whether loads on the hooks were compromising the safety of the aircraft. Systems on the aircraft prioritized aircraft safety over carrying loads and might jettison a load.

The CH-53K’s systems can correctly determine whether the load being carried by the aircraft affect the center of gravity of the aircraft, which is central to its security, and can make more accurate decisions with regard to the safety of the aircraft.

He noted that the load carrying capacity of the aircraft meant that it could carry an Osprey which might be in a location where it could not get repairs needed to fly safely to a location where it could be repaired. Some of the weight, such as the seats, would have to be removed to do so, but it could be done.

Col Purcell underscored that in Afghanistan and Iraq many of the missions which the CH-53E did were medium lift. The CH-53K is optimized for heavy lift and both the Marine Corps and the joint force need to focus on its unique capabilities to support distributed logistics as no other rotorcraft can do in the force. It is optimized for heavy lift, and it is important to capitalize on its unique capabilities.

The CH-53K can be part of a logistic chain involving cargo aircraft like the C-17, the C-5 and the C-130, in that it can carry 463L pallets and work with fixed wing cargo aircraft to transfer their pallets to the Super Stallion and then deliver them in places only a rotorcraft can go.

The new motors on the King Stallion allow it to operate in conditions where one would not want to operate an aging CH-53E fleet. The power margins of the new aircraft are much greater than the legacy aircraft.

He concluded: “The force will see the impact of the revolutionary design of the CH-53K to carry heavy loads long range and to enhance significantly the logistical capability of the force and to move in and out of objective areas more rapidly than the legacy system.”

Featured Image: A U.S. Marine Corps CH-53K King Stallion helicopter, assigned to Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One, executes an external lift of a High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle during Weapons and Tactics Instructor (WTI) course 1-24 at Auxiliary Airfield II, near Yuma, Arizona, Oct. 3, 2023. U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Elizabeth Gallagher.

VMFA-211 Operates on USS Tripoli: 2022

F-35B Lightning II aircraft attached to Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 211 conduct flight operations on the flight deck aboard amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli (LHA 7), April 2. VMFA-211 is embarked aboard Tripoli as part of the U.S. Marine Corps’ Lightning carrier concept demonstration.

The Lightning carrier concept demonstration shows Tripoli and other amphibious assault ships are capable of operating as dedicated fixed-wing strike platforms when needed, capable of bringing fifth generation Short Takeoff/Vertical Landing aircraft wherever they are required.

04.02.2022

Video by Petty Officer 1st Class Peter Burghart

USS Tripoli (LHA 7)

End of Course Video: WTI-1-24

11/21/2023

U.S. Marines along with coalition service members, foreign and domestic, all assigned to Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One participated in Weapons and Tactics Instructor (WTI) course 1-24 at Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona, Sept. 10, through Oct. 29, 2023.

WTI is an advanced, graduate-level course for selected pilots and enlisted aircrew providing standardized advanced tactical training and assists in developing and employing aviation weapons and tactics.

U.S. Marine Corps video by Cpl. Gideon Schippers, Sgt. Samuel Fletcher, Lance Cpl. Brian Bullard, Cpl. Ruben Padilla, Cpl. Alejandro Fernandez, Cpl. Tyler Raab, Lance Cpl. Emily Hazelbaker, Lance Cpl. Elizabeth Gallagher.

November 2, 2023