The Third Pillar of the Italian Airpower Enterprise: The International Flight Training School

12/04/2024

By Robbin Laird

The Italian Air Force leadership saw early on that the F-35 was more than a next generation aircraft – it was a whole different way to look at airpower in the digital age and enabling multi-domain airpower.

They committed to the aircraft and have built a fifth-generation air force. The Italian government committed to building an F-35 plant and maintenance facility in Cameri with a very wide aperture to encompass other members of the F-35 global enterprise. And finally, they re-shaped their training program to shape a way ahead for a fifth generation enabled multi-domain training regime.

In 2022, a new training facility was opened on the island of Sardinia. As Lieutenant General Aurelio Colagrande, Italian Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff, started his presentation to the Williams Foundation seminar in Canberra, Australia in 2022: “We launched a very challenging operational training infrastructure program in Sardinia, an Italian island in the Mediterranean Sea where we have lot of airspace, air to air, air to ground, EW and lots of test ranges and good weather throughout the year.

“Furthermore, in Sardinia, we are setting up our international flight training school where we will train in the phase four advanced training, our future fifth generation pilots. Within the OTI framework, we are investing in connectivity network in order to offer a real effective advanced training.

“And through it, we intend to achieve one of the most challenging objectives, the integration between legacy and new generation weapon system for exploiting the main operational output of the fifth-generation assets that we believe is the ability to be task enablers and force multipliers.”

This training facility is embedded in the Italian fifth generation transition. Symptomatic of this reality is the current head of Air Force training and of the new international center, Brigadier General Edi Turco. A look at his bio highlights his early engagement with the F-35 and his deep understanding of what this new aircraft brings to driving change in air and multi-domain operations.

BGen Edi TURCO serves as Chief of Staff of the Air Education Training Command / 3rd Air Region, and Head of the International Flight Training School (IFTS) Program Office.

BGen TURCO joined the Italian Air Force in 1991 and he graduated at the Air Force Academy in 1995. He is a Master Navigator, Weapon Instructor, with more than 2200 flying hours (2000 of which on Tornado). He has served different combat tours.

BGen Turco spent most of his operational career assigned to the 154th Squadron, 6th Wing in Ghedi (Brescia – Italy) flying, as a WSO, on Tornado aircraft (reconnaissance, conventional and dual role fighter-bomber).

Between 2009 and 2012, BGen Turco was the Air System Requirements Working Group Lead and F-35 Future Requirements Deputy Lead at the JSF Program Office, in Arlington, Virginia (USA).

He, then, was Base/Wing Director of Operations at 6th Wing Ghedi (Italy), after his appointment at the ItAF HQ as Director of F-35 Air Force Integration Office, he commanded the 2nd Wing at Rivolto Air Force Base (Italy) and subsequently he was the Deputy Commander Air Staff Situational Room at the Air Operational Forces Command in Rome (Italy).

Prior to his current assignment, BGen Turco was the Air Attaché at the Embassy of Italy in Washington DC (USA), accredited both to the United States Department of the Air Force and Mexico.

I met with him to discuss the new training center on 12 November 2024. The Italians have created a cutting-edge training center looking beyond airpower muscle memory training to shaping pilots who can think and operate in the changing multi-domain combat environment. It is a very international program with pilots from several nations, including from Asia. Students have come from twelve counties, including Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Sweden, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Singapore, Austria, Netherlands, Hungary and Spain.

Because the training facility is on Sardinia, the combination of live training and be able to operate over water, land and in air-to-air engagements means that the training center pushes the envelope on advanced training, they are clearly positioned to work with the world of unmanned and autonomous systems airborne, land-based or sea based in shaping the 360 capabilities of what I originally labeled the emergence of the three dimensional warrior.

IFTS is located at Italian Air Force base in Decimomannu (Cagliari), and employs an international team of instructor pilots and technical staff, who train students on phase 4 “Lead-In to Fighter Training – LIFT“, the most advanced part of training syllabus, that prepares the way for subsequent deployment on fighter aircraft.

This graphic below from the presentation which the Turco made to me, highlights the physical nature of this facility:

The IFTS was set up as a collaboration between the Italian Air Force and the private sector. The Italian Air Force rewrites the syllabus for training, which is crucial given how dynamic the global combat situation has become. And Leonardo and the Canadian company CAE provided the private sector support in terms of managing the equipment and services for the IFTS. Leonardo and CAE are key players in providing the support for the Live Virtual Constructive systems to support the training regime.

BGen Turco underscored that the syllabus is modular so can be updated rapidly as threats change. He underscored that fifth-generation training was really about getting pilots of whatever aircraft being flown to understand the comprehensive and extended battlespace and to find their place within that battlespace. It is crucial to understand what platforms and payloads are available to deal with the threat envelope.

The M-346 training aircraft is the key element for providing live training but a focal point for bringing the constructive world into the cockpit. As Leonardo described a key aspect of the M-346:

“The M-346 – a twin-engine, tandem-seat aircraft with fully digital flight controls and avionics – is equipped with a fly-by-wire flight control system with quadruple redundancy, a modern human-machine interface with Head-Up Displays (HUD) and Multi-Function Displays (MFD), Hands On Throttle And Stick (HOTAS) controls and in-flight safety features such as the Pilot Activated Attitude Recovery System (PARS). The M-346 can operate in complete autonomy with the aid of its Auxiliary Power Unit (APU).

“The training system features integrated on-board technology to simulate tactical training – the Embedded Tactical Training System (ETTS) – allowing the aircraft to emulate sensors, weapons and Computer Generated Forces (CGF). It also enables pilots to interact in real-time, through Live, Virtual and Constructive (LVC) training that features aircraft in flight (Live), simulators (Virtual) and computer-generated force/threat generated environments (Constructive).

“The system is completed by the Ground Based Training System (GBTS), which consists of various flight and mission simulation systems, multi-media and classroom courses, mission planning and training management systems, and an integrated logistic support (ILS) service that optimises fleet and simulator management for maximum operational use.”

According to BGen Turco, the school is built around its students. The ground-based simulators are available 24/7. This is especially important for international students whose families live in distant time zones, so that they can stay in touch with late night or early morning calls, and then go to the simulators to learn and build their muscle memory,

In short, Italy has established a cutting edge fifth generation training center which drives forward the future of developing air power-enabled multi-domain warfare in a dynamically changing world. And they are doing it with allies from the ground up.

This graphic provided an overview of the IFTS effort:

Brigadier General Edi Turco

Chief of Staff of the Air Education Training Command / 3rd Air Region, and Head of the International Flight Training School (IFTS) Program OfficeItalian Air Force

BGen Edi TURCO serves as Chief of Staff of the Air Education Training Command / 3rd Air Region, and Head of the International Flight Training School (IFTS) Program Office.

BGen TURCO joined the Italian Air Force in 1991 and he graduated at the Air Force Academy in 1995. He is a Master Navigator, Weapon Instructor, with more than 2200 flying hours (2000 of which on Tornado). He has served different combat tours.

BGen Turco spent most of his operational career assigned to the 154th Squadron, 6th Wing in Ghedi (Brescia – Italy) flying, as a WSO, on Tornado aircraft (reconnaissance, conventional and dual role fighter-bomber).

Between 2009 and 2012, BGen Turco was the Air System Requirements Working Group Lead and F-35 Future Requirements Deputy Lead at the JSF Program Office, in Arlington, Virginia (USA).

He, then, was Base/Wing Director of Operations at 6th Wing Ghedi (Italy), after his appointment at the ItAF HQ as Director of F-35 Air Force Integration Office, he commanded the 2nd Wing at Rivolto Air Force Base (Italy) and subsequently he was the Deputy Commander Air Staff Situational Room at the Air Operational Forces Command in Rome (Italy).

Prior to his current assignment, BGen TURCO was the Air Attaché at the Embassy of Italy in Washington DC (USA), accredited both to the United States Department of the Air Force and Mexico.

BGen TURCO is a graduate of the “Joint and Combined Forces Staff College” in Rome.

Featured photo: U.S. Space Force Brig. Gen. Stephen Purdy, right, Space Launch Delta 45 commander, laughs with Italian Air Force Col. Edi Turco, Italian Air Attaché to the United States, at Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Fla., Jan. 27, 2022. Leaders of the Italian Air Force, Navy, and Army visited for CCSFS the launch of the Italian COSMO-SkyMed Second Generation (CSG-2) Earth Observation Satellite aboard the American-made and launched SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. The U.S. and Italy share a long heritage of space security cooperation. (U.S. Space Force photo by Senior Airman Thomas Sjoberg)

Finnish Readiness Exercise

U.S. Marines and Sailors with 2nd Air-Naval Gunfire Liaison Company, Marine Rotational Forces Europe, under the command and control of Task Force 61/2, and members of the Finnish Defence Forces, conduct live-fire naval surface fire support training with the PGG Hamina-class missile boat during Finnish Readiness Exercise on Camp Dragsvik, Finland, Aug. 6, 2024. Finnish Readiness Exercise exemplifies the strong defense partnership between Finland and the United States through combined training activities while enhancing operational readiness and effectiveness. Task Force 61/2 commands and controls fleet Marine forces in support of the U.S. Sixth Fleet commander while synchronizing Navy and Marine Corps units and capabilities in the U.S. European Command and U.S. Africa Command area of operations.

CAMP DRAGSVIK, FINLAND

08.06.2024

Photo by Staff Sgt. Josue Marquez  

U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Europe and Africa     

The Perspective of Admiral Verissimo on the Coming of the CMV-22B to the Atlantic Naval Air Force

12/03/2024

I had the privilege of visiting Norfolk in the recent past and discussing the coming of the USS Gerald R. Ford with the first commander of Ford and then the commander of Naval Air Force Atlantic, Rear Admiral “Oscar” Meier.

Last month, I had the chance to visit Norfolk once again and to meet with Meier’s successor, Rear Admiral Doug “V8” Verissimo and discuss with him the coming of the first squadron of CMV-22Bs to Norfolk and the evolution of the fleet in the Atlantic, which now includes the Ford carrier.

Naval Air Force Atlantic is the aviation Type Commander (TYCOM) for the United States Naval aviation units operating primarily in the Atlantic under United States Fleet Forces Command. AIRLANT is responsible for the material readiness, administration, training, and inspection of units/squadrons under their command, and for providing operationally ready air squadrons and aircraft carriers to the fleet.

Both the CMV-22B and the Ford carrier bring new capabilities to naval operations in the Atlantic region, and we discussed both during our time together on Oct. 29, 2024.

We started by discussing the challenge of contested logistics and how the coming of the CMV-22B provides significant capabilities to meet this challenge. Not only does the Navy need to deal with contested logistics, but consider this challenge in an environment where the Navy is focused on distributed operations.

There are benefits when the CMV-22 is combined with the Ford. The island on the Ford has been moved towards the end of the deck, freeing up space to which an Osprey can move when it lands for offloading of weapons or supplies, not blocking the EMALS catapults. And there is a fuel capability in that area of the deck which can refuel the Osprey for its departure from the deck as well.

Verissimo also correlated the coming of the Osprey with changes the Navy is working with in regard to its carriers. For example, he underscored that “the future will likely bring smaller more agile weapons to complement the heavier more difficult weapons to transport like TLAMs.” He then argued that this shift to a different weapons stockpile would augment the utility of the CMV-22 supporting weapons re-supply in a contested combat environment.

He argued that there are specific capabilities of the CMV-22B which have a significant impact beyond logistics, namely, personnel support, notably in a medical emergency.

He put it this way: “If I have a medical emergency, I’m not trapping and catapulting the human body that’s already injured. I can softly land and softly take off so I can take care of my people in a medical emergency.”

Throughout much of our discussion, the Admiral emphasized the evolution of the carrier for the new strategic situation and the flexibility it brings to the fight. The assets assigned to the Ford carrier, that contribute to the fight, will change as future payloads and platforms emerge.

He also underscored the unique features of the Ford design, notably the significant enhanced power generation capabilities which enable the ability to use future payloads, weapons and platforms which leverage that enhanced electrical power generation capacity.

The Admiral emphasized that the carrier brings unique capability to a blue water navy, and that the flexibility demonstrated through the life cycle of the Nimitz-class carrier and built into the Ford class is crucial for the fleet to adapt to evolving warfighting operations.

He argued: “The carrier and the carrier strike group is one of the only integrated forces which brings the core seven joint warfighting functions to the fight wherever it is operating. And with the Ford class, and its ability to generate electric power, it enhances those capabilities as well.”

Rear Admiral Douglas Verissimo

Rear Adm. Doug “V8” Verissimo, is a native of Falmouth, Massachusetts. He is a 1987 graduate of Cape Cod Community College with an Associates in Arts and Science. Immediately following graduation, he enlisted with the Naval Aviation Cadet (NAVCAD) Program.

Upon completion of flight training, he earned both his commission and designation as a naval aviator in July 1989. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics from California State University, Fresno, California and a Master of Science in Campaign Planning and Strategy from the Joint Forces Staff College. He is also a graduate of the Navy’s Nuclear Power Program.

His operational assignments include Fist of the Fleet, Fighter Attack Squadron (VFA) 25, catapult and arresting gear officer aboard USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74); department head for the Blue Blasters of VFA-34, command of the Gunslingers of VFA-105; executive officer aboard USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71), and commanding officer of USS New Orleans (LPD 18) and USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70).

Verissimo’s shore duty assignments include instructor duty at VFA-125, a demonstration pilot for U.S. Navy Flight Demonstration Squadron, Blue Angels; executive assistant to Commander, Naval Air Forces Atlantic and Joint Staff J3, where he served as joint force coordination/strategic plans division chief.

Verissimo’s flag tours include deputy director for operations, Operations Team 2 (J3), Commander Carrier Strike Group 9, Director Assessment Division (N81), and Director, Maritime Operations, U.S. Fleet Forces Command.

He assumed his duties as Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic on Aug. 17, 2023.

The Italian Fifth-Generation Airpower Enterprise: An Update from Italian Air Force Chief of Staff Lt. General Luca Goretti

12/02/2024

By Robbin Laird

On 11 November 2024, I was in Rome and meeting with the Air Force Chief of Staff. Lt. General Luca Goretti.

When I entered the building and walked to his office, the memory of my last visit to that office and with then COS Lt General Preziosa flooded into my mind.

My last visit was on September 29, 2015 which was third time I had the opportunity to meet with the Italian Chief of Staff, and to engage in a brisk dialogue on the way ahead for 21st century airpower.

The Italians had made the commitment to become a fifth generation Air Force and unique in Europe they were building a factory to assemble their own F-35s and with F-35 European partners.

So it was a return to a country where I had been engaged in the effort to support the Italian Air Force in its vision, but now NINE years later I was back to see the future efforts of 2015 in terms of the present of 2024.

I can frankly say that this story is dramatic and amazing and underscores that when the foundations for an enterprise are laid effectively, success will follow.

Italy now has the most advanced air force in Europe which has operated with global reach. Italy’s Cameri facility not only assembles more combat aircraft than any other European facility but is the home to heavy maintenance for multiple European air forces and now has the most advanced training facility in Europe for fifth generation airpower.

I watched with Ed Timperlake, the Italian first of flying from Italy to the United States in the midst of winter of 2016.

As I wrote with Ed Timperlake at the time: “On Feb. 5, the Italian Air Force’s first F-35, AL-1 with code “32-01” and markings of the 32 Stormo Wing landed at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland, at the end of the JSF’s first ever transatlantic flight.

“The aircraft was piloted by “Ninja,” an Italian Air Force test pilot, belonging to the Reparto Sperimentale Volo (Test Wing) from Pratica di Mare, and who had successfully completed his initial F-35 flight training at Luke AFB in November 2015.

“To put this in perspective, the pilot had only 50 flight hours of F-35 flying experience.

“And the Lightning II which Ninja flew across the North Atlantic in winter had only 15 flight hours on before he took off on his historic flight. 32-01was the first plane to came off of the Italian assembly line at Cameri Italy.

“And this was done in the middle of winter, flying in and out of cloud layers over the turbulent North Atlantic against 120-knot headwinds. It was remarkable flying.”

Ed and I were two of the four outsiders there at Pax River. Not exactly a rush of interest. And from the lack of stories about the past nine years in Italy’s journey to shaping the most significant fifth generation enterprise in Europe is probably not surprising.

We have a lot of big talkers in the discussion about the future of European defense. The Italian Air Force and MoD and the current government certainly have a sense of the importance of creating actual capability for Europe’s defense.

It is a journey which the incoming Trump Administration might notice in its desires to see greater European defense capability – build industrial alliances and respect European sovereignty is not a bad formula for shaping a way ahead. It might be noted that the current Minister of Defence in Italy, earlier in his career, was a key player in ensuring that the Cameri facility became a successful reality.

The author meeting with Lt. General Goretti.

Lt. General Goretti: “When we started our F-35 program, our focus was upon how we could build an effective enterprise which would significantly advance our capabilities. It was not a narrow approach on just buying a new platform. It was a new way of thinking. A new way of working that was required and provided us with an opportunity to shape something really new, dynamic and effective”

He then underscored that they did this in stages of building from the initial air wing and lessons learned and then applied them to the next and so on. And from the beginning, the F-35 was not viewed as a niche aircraft but a foundational element for rethinking the way ahead for Italian defence approaches.

When I was last there, there was a lot of tension among the services about the impact of the F-35, but the aircraft is a multi-domain flying combat system, and it is now having an impact on overall Italian defence thinking.

The recent engagement of the Italian Air Force and Navy with Australia is a case in point. Not only did the Air Force participate in the RAAF-led Pitch Black exercise, but the Italian Navy was engaged with its air wing as well operating off the Cavour. Indeed, what Pitch Black showed was the global reach of the Italian Air Force which Goretti discussed in some detail. For example, he noted that the Italian Air Force deployed to Japan with their F-35s while deploying other aircraft for exercises in the United States. They were the first to deploy F-35s to Iceland for air defence and to Estonia as the first F-35s to be deployed on the Russian border.

One source noted: “From August 6 to 8 2024, the Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF, Koku Jieitai) and the Italian Air Force (ITAF, Aeronautica Militare) conducted their second consecutive bilateral exercise, dubbed Rising Sun 24, at Misawa Air Base in northern Japan.

“The training focused on enhancing tactical skills through the integration of advanced aircraft, including the JASDF’s F-35A and the ITAF’s F-35A, EF2000 Typhoon, G-550 CAEW and KC-767 tanker. In a further display of strengthened military cooperation, the United States Air Force (USAF) also participated in the exercise, contributing to the deepening of trilateral operational ties between Japan, Italy, and the U.S. The joint activities focused on interoperability between air units, with an emphasis on refining strategic capabilities in aerial combat and refueling operations.”

In addition to the Italian Air Force’s operational development, the Cameri facility is assembling F-35s in Europe for Italy and several European partners. And the facility is operating as a significant maintenance facility as well for allied air forces.

An Italian Navy Flight Deck Officer signals an F-35B Lightning II from the flight deck of ITS Cavour during a VIP capability display as part of Exercise Pitch Black 24. The new is coming in while the old (the Harrier) is on the deck. Credit photo: Australian Department of Defence. 1 August 2024.

We then moved to the third pillar of the Italian fifth generation enterprise – the first being operational capability and the second the Cameri sustainment capability – the creation of fifth generation airpower capability. In 2022, the Italians established a new training facility in Sardinia, the International Flight Training School (IFTS). This facility has been created from the ground up for the Italians and the allies who are coming to the new facility to train together in shaping new ways to operate in a multi-domain environment.

As Lt. General Goretti put it: “The attitude of a modern air force is to look around, see the change in of the geopolitical situation, consider what you have in your inventory, and then try to think and reconsider the way of training to maximize your mission success. To follow this path, we saw the necessity of building a new kind of training facility.

“We decided upon working with our Italian company Leonardo, to establish a new international flight training school. After only 16 months from concept to execution, we held our first class at the new training facility. We have more than 13 allied air forces already engaged in our program. This is a significant achievement which we have been able to do in only two years since the flight school opened in 2022.”

We concluded by looking back at the journey since 2015. As Lt. General Goretti eloquently underscored:

“You need to have a vision. You need to consider the opportunities and go for them despite the many, many issues that will be against you. We were lucky enough that our Air Force chiefs throughout this period were committed to the journey. Now Cameri is an awesome place where you can easily see the commitment of a nation.

“And everybody who visits the FACO, they note what a huge program Italy has built. And the lesson learned is that if you are positive want to succeed on a key program and you have to fight in order to keep the program alive without any hesitation.”

Also, see the following: 

Shaping a Way Ahead for the Networked Integrated Force: An Italian Air Force Perspective

Featured photo: Chief of Air Force, Air Marshal Stephen Chappell, DSC, CSC, OAM conducts a gift exchange with the Itatlian Air Force Chief of Staff, Lieutanant General Luca Goretti for bilateral engagements during Exercise Pitch Black 2024 in Darwin. Credit: Australian Department of Defence. July 30, 2024.

31st MEU Conducts en-route Care Exercise

U.S. Marines and U.S. Navy corpsmen with the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, conduct an en-route care exercise aboard a UH-1Y Venom helicopter, off the coast of Okinawa, Japan, July 25, 2024. The exercise was conducted to evaluate Marines and Navy corpsmen on their ability to effectively evacuate the combat casualty to a higher echelon of care. The 31st MEU is operating aboard ships of USS America Amphibious Ready Group in the 7th fleet area of operations to enhance interoperability with allies and partners and serve as a ready response force to defend peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.

OKINAWA, JAPAN

07.25.2024

Video by Lance Cpl. Peter Eilen

31st Marine Expeditionary Unit

Understanding the U.S. Navy’s New Navigation Plan

11/29/2024

By George Galdorisi

The U.S. Navy has been forthcoming and transparent in its strategies designed to ensure peace and stability on the global commons working with allies and partners. These strategies have contributed to the security and prosperity of all nations touched by the oceans.

Whether manifested in documents such as the Department of the Navy Strategic Guidance, Advantage at Sea: Prevailing with Integrated All Domain Naval Power, or Americas Warfighting Navy, these high-level documents provide a clear vision of how the U.S. Navy intends to accomplish these goals.

While these strategic visionary documents remain important, achieving these goals requires documents with more granularity that describe ways, means, and ends to achieve the desired outcomes.

Over the past decade, these ways, means, and ends have been articulated in Navigation Plans issued by successive U.S. Chiefs of Naval Operations. These Navigation Plans serve two purposes. One is to be transparent to the nation and to U.S. Congress regarding the Navy’s goals and objectives. Another is to assign responsibilities to senior flag officers on the CNO staff, as well as to other commands and commanders throughout the Navy.

The New Navigation Plan

In September 2024, the 33rd Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Lisa Franchetti, issued her Chief of Naval Operations Navigation Plan for America’s Warfighting Navy. Admiral Franchetti describes this Navigation Plan as the strategic guidance to the U.S. Navy that builds on the one-page document, America’s Warfighting Navy issued in January 2024 that describes who we are, what we do, and where we are going as the U.S. Navy.

This Navigation Plan embodies “Project 33” in recognition of the fact that Admiral Franchetti is the 33rd Chief of Naval Operations. Project 33 articulates two overarching objectives: an imperative to be ready for the possibility of war with the People’s Republic of China by 2027 and enhancing the Navy’s long-term advantage. The CNO describes how the Navy will work toward these objectives through two mutually reinforcing ways: implementing Project 33 and expanding the Navy’s contribution to the “Joint Warfighting Ecosystem.”

Indeed, Project 33 sets the targets for making strategically meaningful gains in the fastest possible time with the resources that the Navy can influence.

The Project 33 targets are:

  • Ready the force by eliminating ship, submarine, and aircraft maintenance delays
  • Scale robotic and autonomous systems to integrate more platforms at speed
  • Create the command centers our fleets need to win on a distributed battlefield
  • Recruit and retain the force we need to get more players on the field
  • Deliver a quality of service commensurate with the sacrifices of our Sailors
  • Train for combat as we plan to fight, in the real world and virtually
  • Restore the critical infrastructure that sustains and projects the fight from shore

These targets can be grouped into several areas, each representing important initiatives for the U.S. Navy

From a readiness perspective, the goal of eliminating ship, submarine and aircraft maintenance delays and restoring critical infrastructure that sustains and projects the fight from shore are areas that require attention from the Navy shore establishment.

The goals of recruiting and retaining the force needed to fill officer, chief petty officer and enlisted ranks and delivering a quality of service for Navy personnel shows a strong focus on balancing quality of life and quality of work for all Navy people.

Creating upgraded command centers for the Navy Fleet Commanders and training for combat seeks to ensure that the Navy has a warfighting advantage over its adversaries.

Finally, the goal to scale robotic and autonomous systems to integrate more platforms at speed focuses on capitalizing on the inherent advantages that uncrewed systems bring to any navy.

Admiral Franchetti notes that absent a large infusion of resources, it will not be possible to build a bigger traditional navy in a few short years. Therefore, the Navy needs to prioritize readiness, capability, and capacity in that order. The CNO identified the goal of fielding mission capable ships, submarines, and aircraft as the top priority, and as she put it, the goal is to put more mission ready players on the field in the shortest possible time.

All of that said, perhaps the most intriguing part of the CNO’s Navigation Plan for America’s Warfighting Navy is the goal of scaling robotic and autonomous systems to integrate more platforms at speed.

Momentum to do this has been building for almost two decades, beginning with the Navy’s Strategic Study Group report titled The Unmanned Imperative and other reports and studies up to and including the Navy’s UNMANNED Campaign Framework with its overarching guidance for how unmanned systems might help the Navy achieve its warfighting goals.

These aspirational documents have now found purchase in the Navigation Plan for America’s Warfighting Navy with specific goals and objectives for inserting unmanned and autonomous systems into the Navy inventory.

A huge factor driving this initiative harkens back to what was mentioned a few paragraphs above: the difficulty in fielding more increasingly expensive crewed vessels in a budget constrained environment.

Admiral Franchetti’s predecessor, Admiral Michael Gilday, articulated the goal of a “500-Ship Navy,” which includes 350 crewed vessels, and 150 uncrewed vessels. Admiral Franchetti has embraced this goal of a “hybrid fleet” and her plan to scale robotic and autonomous systems and integrate them with crewed platforms points directly to the goal of a 500-ship hybrid fleet.

The Navigation Plan provides a great deal of granularity regarding the Navy’s ongoing commitment to uncrewed vessels. For example, to be prepared for a potential conflict with China in the Pacific, the Navy is emphasizing a new class of uncrewed systems in line with the Pentagon’s Replicator initiative to create low-cost lethal air and surface systems that would disrupt a cross Taiwan Strait invasion. This “hellscape” concept was born from experimentation and is driving the first tranche of Replicator investment.

Two recent real-world events have worked to accelerate the U.S. Navy’s development and fielding of uncrewed vessels. The first is the Ukrainian Navy’s use of uncrewed surface vessels to deny the Russian Navy the use of the Western Black Sea, as well as threaten Russia’s supply lines to occupying forces in Crimea. The second is Yemen’s Houthi rebels use of drones against commercial vessels as well as against U.S. and partner navies in the Red Sea.

Additionally, the U.S. Navy is embarking on a new effort which will update the Navy’s planned investment in large uncrewed surface vessels and medium uncrewed surface vessels. This initiative will likely involve changes in existing programs of record for uncrewed vessels based on lessons learned from ongoing experimentation with uncrewed vessels of various sizes and capabilities.

The U.S. Navy’s Commitment to Uncrewed Systems

Uncrewed capabilities not only keep sailors out of harm’s way, but they provide opportunities to greatly expand the sea service’s warfighting capacity at less cost than traditional Navy vessels. Like their air and ground counterparts, these uncrewed surface vessels are valued because of their ability to reduce the risk to human life in high threat areas, to deliver persistent surveillance over areas of interest, and to provide options to warfighters that derive from the inherent advantages of unmanned technologies.

The Navigation Plan for America’s Warfighting Navy adds more granularity to the “why” behind the Navy’s commitment to uncrewed surface vessels. It notes that robotic and autonomous systems, by augmenting the multi-mission conventional force, will provide opportunities to expand the reach, resilience, and lethality of the combined crewed-uncrewed Navy team. The Navigation Plan goes on to explain that as the Navy builds that team for the future, work is progressing on concept and requirements analysis for larger uncrewed systems, as well as the artificial intelligence applications that help sense and make sense of a complex, information-centric battlespace.

As noted earlier, the Navigation Plan leverages operationally relevant events over the past year. The document explains how, based on extensive learning from fleet experimentation and real-world developments in the Black and Red Seas, the Navy has an opportunity to expand, extend, and bolster the reach, resilience, and lethality of the conventionally manned fleet through new disruptive and emerging technologies, especially uncrewed surface vessels.

The Navigation Plan explains how, as the Navy works on delivering a truly hybrid fleet to capitalize on programs of record for uncrewed systems, nearer term operational challenges demand that the Navy integrate proven robotic and autonomous capabilities as soon as possible. Indeed, the document highlights how choosing the best-of-breed uncrewed systems will be done with a focus on how the Navy and the Joint Force will use these systems in war.

A short-term goal, articled in the Navigation Plan is to integrate proven robotic and autonomous systems for routine use by the commanders who will employ them. The overarching goal is to integrate mature uncrewed capabilities into all deploying carrier and expeditionary strike groups by 2027. The anticipated use of these uncrewed capabilities will focus on key operational challenges across critical mission areas such as surveillance, fires, networking, logistics, and deception.

A Focus on the Hybrid Fleet

The Navigation Plan puts special emphasis on the Hybrid Fleet. As Admiral Franchetti noted, absent a large infusion of resources, it will not be possible to build a bigger traditional navy in a few short years. Therefore, the hybrid fleet concept explained above is seen as a viable path to put enough hulls in the water to accomplish the Navy’s myriad global missions.

Juxtaposed against this aspiration is the fact that the U.S. Congress has been reluctant to authorize the Navy’s planned investment of billions of dollars in USVs until the Service can come up with a concept of operations (CONOPS) for using them. Congress has a point. The Navy has announced plans to procure large numbers of uncrewed systems—especially large and medium uncrewed surface vessels—but a CONOPS, one in even the most basic form, has not yet emerged. Additionally, while the composition of the future Navy’s crewed vessels is relatively well understood—based on ships being built and being planned—what those uncrewed maritime vessels will look like, let alone what they will do, has yet to be fully determined. This helps us understand why Admiral Franchetti has placed such an emphasis on a disciplined and focused introduction of uncrewed surface vessels into the Navy Fleet.

The Hybrid Fleet is moving forward. Navy officials have been laying the keel for the future hybrid fleet via experimentation and other efforts, such as standing up Task Force 59 and Task Force 59.1, establishing the Disruptive Capabilities Office, and “operationalizing” the integration of uncrewed platforms into numbered fleets beginning with the U.S. 4th Fleet. Importantly, the Navy is moving from experimentation to integrating robotic and autonomous systems across numbered fleets and Navy Special Warfare to accelerate their integration into the Fleet.

The Navigation Plan describes how the Navy is looking to get many more robotic systems into the water in the next three years in operational settings, noting that Navy officials also recognize the value that can be derived from employing commercial robotic and autonomous systems in sea-denial missions.

The Navigation Plan also explains that officials are also working now on concept and requirements analysis for larger robotic systems, as well as AI applications and other software that help commanders better understand complex, “information-centric” battlespaces.

Importantly, Admiral Franchetti has tapped the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfighting Requirements and Capabilities (OPNAV N9), Vice Admiral James Pitts, to be the “single accountable official” for accelerating the push to operationally integrate robotic and autonomous systems into the Fleet.

Indeed, in a presentation at a recent Center for Strategic and International Studies/U.S. Naval Institute forum, Admiral Pitts put the Navigation Plan’s focus on uncrewed surface systems in these terms: “We are leading the way with uncrewed systems. We are leveraging the success of the Navy’s unmanned task force as well as the disruptive capabilities office. Our goal is to get uncrewed surface system solutions to the Fleet within the next two years.”

As the Navigation Plan notes, and as Admiral Pitts emphasized, the Navy now leads the Joint Force in operationalizing robotic and autonomous systems. This has implications for everything from how the Navy fights, to what the Navy buys, to how the Navy trains, recruits, and retains the talent that operates new technologies.

Getting Uncrewed Systems to the Fight

One of the reasons that the Navigation Plan describes the Navy’s confidence in the ability of uncrewed surface systems to perform as expected next to the Navy’s crewed vessels is the fact that over the past decade, the U.S. Navy, along with allied and partner navies, have inserted commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) uncrewed systems into Navy and Marine Corps events to perform a wide range missions. Events such as the COMPACFLT-led Integrated Battle Problem series of exercises, the Integrated Maritime Exercise series held under the auspices of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/Commander Task Force 59 in the Arabian Gulf, NATO exercises REPMUS and the follow-on Dynamic Messenger, Australian Defence Force Autonomous Warrior exercises, and many others too numerous to describe here, put USVs—primarily small and medium uncrewed surface vessels—into the hands of U.S. Sailors and Marines, as well as sailors and marines of other participating nations.

That said, small and medium uncrewed surface vessels (along with their air and undersea counterparts) must get to the area of operations in order to perform their various missions. Given that there is limited space aboard Navy ships already loaded with systems, sensors and weapons, another means must be found. This requires a large uncrewed surface vessel. The Navy wants LUSVs to be low-cost, high-endurance, reconfigurable ships based on commercial ship designs, with ample capacity for carrying various modular payloads. Some potential candidates for this mission include the Navy’s program of record LUSV, the MARTAC T82 and the Ranger and Nomad USVs operated by Unmanned Surface Vessel Division 1.

The concept of operations for employing various size unmanned surface, subsurface and aerial unmanned vehicles to perform missions that the U.S. Navy has—and will continue to have—is to use an evolving large, unmanned surface vessel as a “truck” to move smaller USVs, UUVs and UAVs into the battle space in the increasingly contested littoral and expeditionary environment.

If the U.S. Navy wants to keep its multi-billion-dollar capital ships out of harm’s way, it will need to surge uncrewed vessels into the contested battlespace while its crewed ships stay out of range of adversary A2/AD systems, sensors and weapons. This is precisely why the CNO’s Navigation Plan emphasizes the teaming of uncrewed surface vessels with deploying carrier and expeditionary strike groups.

Rather than speak in hypotheticals, since it will be in the water next year and will be built from the keel up to transport, launch and recover smaller uncrewed surface vessels of various sizes, the Devil Ray T82 is likely a leading candidate to serve as the truck most capable of carrying, launching and recovering smaller uncrewed craft. With a maximum payload of 35,000 pounds, the T82 could carry eight eighteen-foot T18 USVs configured for various Navy missions such as intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) and mine countermeasures (MCM).

A Bright Future for Uncrewed Surface Vessels

This is not a platform-specific solution, but rather a concept. When Navy operators see a capability with different size uncrewed COTS platforms in the water successfully performing the missions presented in this article, they will likely press industry to offer even more-capable platforms to perform these tasks.

The U.S. Navy’s commitment to develop, test and field uncrewed surface vessels at an accelerated pace has profound implications for the maritime community. The need to field a hybrid fleet not at some distant time, but this decade, will likely mean that the Navy can’t wait for uncrewed surface vessels that are developed via the DoD’s often tortuous acquisition process.

What this means for industry is that commercial-off-the-shelf uncrewed surface vessels will likely receive a favorable hearing from Navy officials who increasingly recognize that the need for a hybrid fleet to emerge as soon as possible is compelling. The first step for industry should be to embrace this new security paradigm and think outside the box as to how their COTS uncrewed systems can fulfill a range of Navy mission requirements.

Featured photo: Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti discusses her recently released Navigation Plan for America’s Warfighting Navy 2024 at Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, Sept. 19, 2024.

31st MEU FARP Operations

U.S. Marines with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 262 (Rein.), 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, conduct a forward arming and refueling point exercise at Ie Shima, Okinawa, Japan, Aug. 21, 2024. A FARP is a multi-discipline operation that increases the speed of maneuver for aerial operations, utilizing expeditionary advanced base operations, enhancing strike capabilities by decreasing the distance required for refueling and rearming while increasing the range of combined-joint all domain operation capabilities. The 31st MEU is operating aboard ships of the America Amphibious Ready Group in the 7th Fleet area of operations to enhance interoperability with allies and partners and serve as a ready response force to defend peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific Region.

OKINAWA, JAPAN

08.21.2024

Video by Cpl. Apollo Wilson 

31st Marine Expeditionary Unit 

General Jérôme Bellanger, the Chief of Staff of the French Air Force Provides an Update: November 2024

11/27/2024

By Pierre Tran

Paris – The French Air Force has requested a faster delivery of Rafale jets to replace the Mirage 2000-5 fighters due to be sent to Ukraine, the air chief of staff, General Jérôme Bellanger, told the Association des Journalistes Defense, a press club, on November 20, 2024.

The despatch of an undisclosed number of Mirage 2000-5s to help the Ukrainian service could be offset by shipping Rafales built for export clients to the French service, he said.

“We would take the exports which have not been signed,” he said.

The speeded up delivery depended on Dassault Aviation, the prime contractor which has increased production of the Rafale for client nations such as India, he said. A faster shipment of the Rafale to the French air force was possible as Dassault was increasing production to three units per month due to the export deals.

The company has previously said it took three years to build a Rafale once an order was confirmed with payment of a deposit.

The Indian authorities in July 2023 granted approval for negotiations for 26 Rafale M, the aircraft carrier version of the twin-engine fighter. That authorization also included talks for an order for three Scorpene attack submarines from Naval Group, a French shipbuilder.

France was due to ship the first batch of three Mirage 2000-5s to Ukraine in the first quarter 2025, the armed forces minister has said, an air force spokesman said.

A faster shipment of Rafale to replace the Mirage would allow deliveries to be brought forward to 2025 and 2026 from the planned delivery in 2027, the air force spokesman said.

There were already new Rafales due to be delivered to the French service in 2025, replacing the 12 Rafale fighters Paris has sold second hand in the export market to allied nations.

France signed in December 2023 an order for a 42-strong, fifth batch of Rafale, with delivery between 2027-2032, Dassault said July 23 in a statement on its 2024 first-half results. That order has long been awaited, but the military budget has been tight for quite some time.

The U.S. was sending over the F-16 fighter to boost the Ukrainian air force as a time when the exchange of fire has risen sharply.

Russia fired Nov. 21 a new intermediate range ballistic missile, the Oreshnik or Hazel Tree, at a military target in Dnipro, central Ukraine, and the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, went on television to warn Ukraine and Western allies more strikes could follow.

That Russian hypersonic missile came in response to Ukrainian forces firing long range weapons at military sites inside Russia, namely the U.S.-supplied army tactical missile systems (ATACMS) and U.K. Storm Shadow cruise missile. France has shipped to Ukraine the Scalp, its version of the cruise missile.

The Western allies had granted permission for Kyiv to use those missiles against targets inside Russia, after previously denying that authorization.

Moscow and Kyiv were seeking to win the most territory ahead of negotiations expected for a ceasefire next year, media reports said, with the U.S. president elect, Donald Trump, due to return to the White House in January for a second term.

Rafale To Maintain Capability

Meanwhile, in France, the despatch of those Mirage fighters will reduce French capability if there were not a faster delivery of the Rafale.

“That necessarily has an impact on the fighter fleet,” the air chief said when asked about the fighter deal with Kyiv.

Those Mirage 2000-5s would have flown in the French air force until 2030, he said, and there was need to smooth the transfer of the fighters to Ukraine. The armed forces minister fully understood that, he added.

The transfer of the Mirage will speed up the rate at which the Rafale will wear out, with increased orders for spare parts, he said. The service could handle that, but the long term solution was to speed shipment of new Rafale fighters.

Payment had been made for those Rafale due for delivery in 2027, the air chief said.

“It’s these aircraft ordered that we are trying to speed up and have as soon as possible,” he said, “and not necessarily wait until 2027. That compensates for the transfer.”

The air chief was confident Dassault would hit the production target of three per month, and the only problem was going above that output rate.

The Mirage deal with Kyiv was a “package,” he said, with support in France rather than in Ukraine. Training pilots and mechanics, and supply of spares and aircraft were part of that package. The U.S. would be supplying a similar package for the F-16, he said.

Saturate Skies With Threat

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy welcomed in August the arrival of the long awaited Lockheed Martin F-16, intended to help even the odds against the larger and highly capable Russian air force.

The plan was to fly the F-16 in longer range missions, seeking out air threats at greater distance rather than air-to-ground missions, the air chief said. They would intercept kamikaze drones, cruise missiles, and other air threats.

It was “still early days,” he said, with many lessons to be learnt.

Meanwhile, the Mirage 2000-5 had yet to be converted to air-to-ground strike mission for Ukraine. “Not yet,” he said.

The Mirage to be sent to Ukraine will be adapted to air-to-ground missions and a boosted electronic warfare capability, the French armed forces minister, Sébastien Lecornu, has said, Opex 360, a specialist website reported Nov. 11.

On combat conditions, the more the sky was saturated when there was a Scalp cruise missile attack, the greater the chance of success, the air chief said. If there were only one Scalp missile flying in the Russian air defense system, there was less chance than if there were several missiles or drones, which could also be kamikaze drones.

The “big lesson” learnt was the saturation of airspace with low cost weapons, he said.

The French service had defensive electronic countermeasures, he said, but lacked an offensive capability, such as fielded in the 1980s with the Anglo-French Jaguar fighter and Martel missile. Although there were a few S300 missiles in Libya, there was little air defense, he said. There was some American support with the Prowler, but not much.

The French service used the Martel anti-radar missile in the 2011 Western allied operation  against Libya, then led by the late Muammar Gaddafi.

The Israeli air attack was a case study in electronic warfare, the air chief said, with some 20 Israeli fighters flying, yet showing up as around 120 signals on the radar of the Hezbollah in  Lebanon.

The U.S. fielded the Harm missile for that anti-radar capability, but rather than France buy the weapon off the shelf, it was better to wait for the MBDA RJ 10 weapon, he said. Funds for the RJ 10 project were in the multi-year military budget law, he added.

“My main point is there is need for a stand-off missile to hit enemy surface-to-air systems,” he said.

The supersonic ramjet RJ10 and subsonic stealthy TP 15 are the missiles MBDA is developing for the future cruise/anti-ship weapons (FC/ASW) project for France and the U.K. The European missile company displayed life sized models of the two weapons at Euronaval, a trade show which ran Nov. 4-7 in Villepinte, just outside the capital.

2035 Will Be Milestone Year

The European project for a future combat air system (FCAS) was going well, the air chief said, adding that a meeting had been held a couple of weeks ago with his German and Spanish counterparts.

A model was due to undergo the first wind tunnel tests to define the architecture as part of phase 1B, he said. The partners would decide at the end of 2025 or early 2026 to move on to phase 2 to build the FCAS technology demonstrator, with the new generation fighter (NGF) at the heart of the system.

The general election to be held in Germany would slow the project, he said. The key dates for service for FCAS were 2040-2045, while 2035 marked a “key milestone.”

The latter date drove a planned Rafale upgrade to an F5 version that would carry the ASN4G missile, he said. That will be a “game changer,” a project which “prefigures” the FCAS.

The ASN4G will be a fourth-generation, air-to-ground nuclear-tipped missile to replace the ASMPA supersonic missile, which is undergoing a midlife upgrade with the ASMPA-R (Renové) version.

The plan was for delivery of the Rafale F5 in 2033 and qualification tests for two years, with the upgraded fighter entering service in 2035 with a hypersonic nuclear weapon, the air chief said.

A Rafale B of the French air force test fired May 22 for the first time an ASMPA-R missile, without a nuclear warhead, the Direction Générale de l’Armement procurement office said in a statement.

That test fire was part of the Durandal exercise for an airborne nuclear raid, the DGA said, with the Rafale supported by A330 Phénix air tankers, pitched against an air defense consisting of air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles of the French air force.

The Rafale F5 will also fly with an uncrewed combat aerial vehicle (UCAV), the air chief said.

The UCAV will be based on a French-built stealthy demonstrator, dubbed Neuron, which was partnered by Italy, Greece, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.

The UCAV will be an “airborne sensor,” supporting the Rafale F5, which will carry the “real nuclear weapon,” to penetrate enemy airspace.

The work on the F5 version would help prepare ground for the FCAS – or not, he said.

There has been conjecture that an upgraded Rafale F5 and its UCAV loyal wingman could be a plan B substitute for the European FCAS, which includes remote carriers or combat drones, and a combat cloud for a communications network.

That fall-back to an all-French project was due to a previous bid by Airbus Defense and Space to claim a joint prime contractor status on the fighter project rather than accept Dassault as the lead actor.

Russia Mass Produces Drones

The Russian war economy was building large volumes of low-cost kamikaze drones and also high-cost Kinzhal air-launched missiles, the air chief said.

“The concept of operations has changed and has become effective,” he said. They saturated the Ukrainian airspace with cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, laser-guided bombs, and used electronic warfare.

The Russians were dropping 1,800 bombs a week over Ukraine, and that was separate from the cruise and ballistic missiles, and drones, he said.

Featured photo: This photos is from 2023 prior to General Jérôme Bellanger becoming Chief of Staff.

U.S. Air Force Maj. Gen. Andrew Gebara, left, Eighth Air Force and Joint – Global Strike Operations Center commander, speaks with French Air and Space Force Lt. Gen. Jérôme Bellanger, commander of French Strategic Air Forces Command, during a visit to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., May 30, 2023.

BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, LOUISIANA

05.30.2023

Photo by Staff Sgt. Codie Trimble 

8th Air Force/J-GSOC