UK, France and Denmark Step Up Efforts for European Allies

11/16/2016

2016-11-16 According to a story published October 26, 2016 by the UK Ministry of Defence, the UK is stepping up its support for allies in Europe in the face of a more assertive Russia.

The Defence Secretary said that the UK will commit RAF Typhoon aircraft to the NATO Southern Air Policing mission to offer reassurance to the Black Sea allies. Deployed from RAF Coningsby, the Typhoons will be based at Mihail Kogălniceanu Airbase, Romania, for up to four months in 2017.

Following July’s decision that the UK will deliver one of four battalions to NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence in the Baltic States and Poland, Mr Fallon confirmed the UK will be sending 800 personnel to Estonia, with France and Denmark contributing further troops.

 Defence Secretary Michael Fallon speaks to the press ahead of NATO's meeting of Defence Ministers, 26 October. Credit: UK MoD
Defence Secretary Michael Fallon speaks to the press ahead of NATO’s meeting of Defence Ministers, 26 October. Credit: UK MoD

The deployment is likely to include armoured Infantry, equipped with Warrior armoured fighting vehicles, tactical UAVs, and a troop of our Challenger 2 Main Battle Tanks. Detailed planning with our Estonian hosts is well under way and the first deployments are expected to begin in May next year.

Defence Secretary Michael Fallon said:

Backed by a rising defence budget this deployment of air, land and sea forces shows that we will continue to play a leading role in NATO, supporting the defence and security of our allies from the north to the south of the alliance.

At the Ministerial meeting, the Defence Secretary also welcomed the signing of UK’s Instrument of Acceptance for Montenegro to join NATO – making the UK the first major ally to complete the process.

The announcement comes after the Defence Secretary confirmed at the weekend that the UK will deploy a 28-strong team to Kosovo for a year. This increase to our contribution to the KFOR Mission, NATO’s largest operation, will help to maintain a safe and secure environment for all communities in Kosovo. The UK deployment will also provide reassurance in the Western Balkan region from early 2017.

Backed by a £178 billion equipment plan and defence budget rising in real terms for the rest of this parliament, the UK is one of several countries that meets the NATO 2% spending target.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-steps-up-measures-to-reassure-european-allies

 

Enhancing Northern Tier Defense: The UK and Norway Prepare for the Coming of the P-8

2016-11-16 According to a story on the UK Ministry of Defence website, the UK and Norway have agreed on new cooperation on Maritime Patrol Aircraft.

With the coming of the P-8 to the RAF, the UK MoD is looking to ways to enhance its impact on defense in the North Sea and beyond.

Sir Michael, who visited Norway’s top military headquarters, close to the Arctic Circle on Thursday, announced that the UK and Norway would work closer on Maritime Patrol Aircraft cooperation, including in reducing costs and increasing operational effectiveness.

The UK announced that it would procure nine Boeing P8 MPA in last year’s Strategic Defence and Security Review.

The new capability, which will be based in Scotland, will allow for enhanced situational awareness in key areas such as the North Atlantic, and will also further increase the protection of the UK’s nuclear deterrent and our two new aircraft carriers.

Sir Michael also visited Norway’s Bodø Main Air Station, home of two F-16 squadrons and a squadron of Search and Rescue Sea King helicopters, where he signed a new agreement on host nation support for UK exercises in the country, further increasing the UK and Norway’s ability to exercise, train and operate together.

Mr Fallon welcomed the fact that British armed forces undertake yearly winter training in Norway, particularly 3 Commando Brigade in Harstad and Evenes and elements of Joint Helicopter Command at Bardufoss.

The Defence Secretary boards a Norwegian Maritime Patrol Aircraft with his counterpart, Ine Marie Eriksen Søreide. Credit: Norwegian Armed Forces
The Defence Secretary boards a Norwegian Maritime Patrol Aircraft with his counterpart, Ine Marie Eriksen Søreide. Credit: Norwegian Armed Forces

Defence Secretary Sir Michael Fallon said:

Britain needs Maritime Patrol Aircraft to keep watch over the seas.

As part of our £178 billion defence equipment programme, we’ve committed to new maritime patrol aircraft that are able to monitor threats to Britain and our armed forces.

By stepping up cooperation with Norway on maritime patrol, we will help keep Britain safer and more secure.

The Defence Secretary arrived in Norway following meetings with the Northern Group countries on Wednesday in Copenhagen, where he reaffirmed the UK’s commitment to European defence.

As part of this, the Defence Secretary announced that 5 Battalion The Rifles would lead the UK’s battalion in Estonia next year, part of NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence in the East.

Work on the UK’s MPA programme is progressing well, including the investment on infrastructure in Lossiemouth in Scotland, where the planes will be based.

Former armed forces personnel who previously served on UK Nimrod are also re-joining the RAF to help operate the future P-8s.

12 have recently re-joined and more will re-join in the future

 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-and-norway-agree-new-cooperation-on-maritime-patrol-aircraft

And the Norwegian Ministry of Defence website added this with a November 10, 2016 article with regard to the Northern Headquarters’ Conference conducted at the 8-9 November meetings at the Norwegian Joint Headquarters in Bodø, Norway:

As a security forum for operational-level headquarters within the Joint Force Command Brunssum (JFCBS) Area of Responsibility (AOR) in the north-eastern part of the Alliance, the forum enables Commanders from NATO and partner nations to discuss areas of common regional interest, and to raise NATO’s profile within, and on the periphery, of Alliance territories.

In his opening remarks, General Salvatore Farina, Commander JFC Brunssum, emphasized the opportunity to discuss operational challenges, and to find practical solutions focusing on our area of responsibility “where we are working closely together”.  

He thanked Lieutenant General Rune Jakobsen, Commander of the Norwegian Joint Headquarters, for his hospitality, and expressed his appreciation for the close links to NATO’s partners from Finland and Sweden – “who have a significant contribution to make to security in the strategically important northern region”, Farina added.

With the outcomes of the Warsaw Summit fresh in everyone’s minds, this year’s event was an ideal platform to discuss selected outcomes affecting the AOR, to focus on NATO’s High North and parts of the long term Adaptation Measures of the Readiness Action Plan, including the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF), NATO Force Integration Units (NFIU) and the establishment of an enhanced forward presence in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland in early 2017.  

General Farina underlined the important role of the Multi National Corps North-East, Stettin, Poland, in implementing and conducting the enhanced forward presence drawing upon its expertise in land operations.

 https://forsvaret.no/en/newsroom/news-stories/third-northern-headquarters-conference-takes-place-in-norway

About Europe’s Northern Group:

By Elisabeth Braw, June 11, 2015

Under ordinary circumstances, the Northern Group would hardly be headline news. The association of northern European countries holds regular ministerial meetings, strategic meetings, and expert-level meetings, but so do many other intergovernmental outfits. Lately, though, Russian analysts have been watching this very vanilla-sounding Nordic association carefully.

That’s because while its member states may consider themselves very peaceful indeed, the five-year-old Northern Group is a military alliance. Take a look at the group’s members: Britain, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the Nordic states, the Baltic states. Only two countries in this 11-strong congregation are not NATO members: Sweden and Finland. And there they are, collaborating with their northern neighbors on defense issues and participating in talks held by the Northern Group’s NATO members.

“The Northern Group provides a key platform to help shape and deliver Europe’s and NATO’s response to the security implications of Russia’s indefensible actions in Ukraine and whose incursions of European air and sea space have increased,” Britain’s defense secretary, Michael Fallon, said ahead of the group’s meeting in November last year, at which point annual air incursions into the members’ territory had reached 100—three times as many as during all of 2013. Not bad for an alliance conceived by then Defense Secretary Liam Fox essentially to keep Britain engaged with its NATO allies.

Sure, the Northern Group is hardly essential to its members who also belong to NATO. It’s a complement, not an alternative, said Norwegian State Secretary Roger Ingebrigtsen at an earlier meeting. But for Sweden and Finland, who are still vacillating about NATO membership, it provides a convenient partial solution that, handily enough, doesn’t require a major political debate.

Though Finland’s new government has said that it will conduct a study on NATO membership, the step in no way indicates that Finland will eventually apply to become a member.

Besides, it would have to join with Sweden, whose government has not embarked on a similar fact-finding mission, though in April it announced that it wants to strengthen cooperation with NATO. Even if the pair would apply for NATO membership, it would be a long process before they formally joined.

By contrast, Sweden and Finland are already full members of the Northern Group.

That’s good news as far as their defense capabilities are concerned, one might argue. But it’s no surprise that Russian officials suspect the group of really being a mini-NATO. And the Russian military correctly judges that in a crisis situation, NATO would come to Sweden and Finland’s aid.

http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/elisabeth-braw/europe%E2%80%99s-northern-group

The slideshow shows the Minister of Defence visiting Jax Navy last year and the photos are credited to the US Navy. 

Trump, Canada and the Way Ahead

2016-11-16 By Danny Lam

S-Canada relations are one of the world’s strongest, most extensive and enduring partnerships between two major nations in the world. This historically close relationship is based on shared values, temperament, ideals, and outlook developed over two centuries of peace after the War of 1812,

After that war, Americans and Canadians made a conscious choice to become fast friends and close partners. This alliance was cemented in the 20th century, beginning with Great War and then WWII. Canada’s major contributions ensured that Canadians had an outsized influence on the formation of the post-war order that has endured to this day.

Liberal Internationalism, which advances the doctrine that liberal states intervene in other sovereign states in order to pursue liberal (democratic) object was the basis of the post-war order. It was dominated by the United States, a mostly benign hegemon that played an outsized role in maintenance of world peace, ensuring international security and enabled the expansion of world trade that enriched the world.

Canadians participated in the creation of this new world order with gusto. Beginning with Louis S. St. Laurent and Lester B. Pearson, Canadians became the key architects behind institutions like the United Nations and NATO, and led initiatives like establishment of diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China in 1970.

Trade deals, like the US-Canada Auto Pact and NAFTA that improved access to the US market for Canadian manufactures and resources, formed the basis for Canadian prosperity – until recently.

But Liberal Internationalism is obsolete in the 21st Century, as Mercantilism was in the 18th Century.  

At the turn of the 21st century, Canadians began to lose their way. Successive Canadian governments pulled back from sponsoring major international initiatives that in the past, defined Canadians.

Formerly unthinkable moves, like Canada withdrawing from Kyoto Protocol obligationsdeep cuts to Canadian defence spending by successive governments, and Canada reneging on commitments and being tone deaf to public criticism, have come to define Canada of the 21stcentury in the eyes of the international community.

With this recent track record, is it a surprise that Canadians reacted with trepidation, fear and loathing to President Elect Trump’s mission to craft a new international order and strategy for the 21st Century?

America is in the early stages of re-imagining the international system and architecture of a new international order aimed at solving the new and emerging issues of the 21st century.

The Trump Administration’s concern with Canada will revolve around issues like border security, trade, domestic and international security, jobs, economic growth, and ultimately, alignment of foreign and defense policies as the US develops a new approach to the world.

The importance of these issues dwarf longstanding irritants like softwood timber tariffsagricultural trade, and Keystone XL.

Canadians cannot be passive players as the US transforms institutions like NAFTA, NATO, NORAD, Kyoto Protocol, etc. In order to have a respected and influential voice at the table, Canada must come to the table as a major contributor to the new architecture – as it did after WWII.

How can Canada contribute? A deficiency in the areas of security and defence can be turned to advantage as the sector presents ample opportunity for growth to quickly move towards the NATO spending goal of 2% GDP, which the US has long criticized Canada for not meeting.

There are many areas of domestic security in which Canadians have done well and can put more effort into developing further.

A small defense industrial base will allow Canada to rapidly build up a state-of-the-art dual-use technical capacity that, thus far, has been lagging behind the global standard.

This is particularly the case for new and emerging threats like ballistic missile defence against North Korean missiles; and, wide area, multi domain sensor networks for the Canadian Arctic.

Both of these offer opportunities for Canada to focus on the development of technologies that have broad military and civilian applications that will find markets in an insecure and shrinking world.

Long neglected and delayed programs like acquisition of replacement fighter aircraft and Canadian surface combatants can be accelerated; and importantly, Canada’s NATO commitments fully funded beginning 2017.

Rather than applying obsolete and ineffective seeking 100% offset contracts, Canada can use defence procurements to acquire favorable licenses and access to key technologies to stimulate Canadian industry.

With preferential access to tightly held US technologies and improved access to the US market under a revitalized NAFTA, Canada can potentially build and market truly innovative products.

The US is about to redefine itself in relation to the world, and Canada has a chance to return to the table as one of America’s closest allies and work together to craft the 21st century’s institutions.

Such an opportunity may not come again in our lifetime.

Editor’s Note: Just returning from Europe, one can not but notice the complete lack of anticipation of a Trump Administration.  One can ask what Europeans are paying their embassies to do if they can not at least fathom that in a two person race, one will win and one will not.

Apparently, Canada needs to take a good look at its Embassy as well, but since the Ambassador seems to have decided to become a seminar leader for “educating” the President Elect, one could ask who is going to be in place to actually understand the shift in Teutonic plates in global politics.

It is beyond belief but here is a report about the Ambassador’s recent musings:

Canada must put together a team to educate Donald Trump and other Americans on the benefits of free trade, the country’s ambassador to the United States said Wednesday.

Trade has become a “dirty” word south of the border and protectionists feel emboldened by the election of Trump, David MacNaughton told a business lunch crowd in Montreal.

President-elect Trump consistently criticized the North American Free Trade Agreement between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico, during the campaign.

It is unclear, however, what steps he will take to address discontent with the agreement once he takes office.

“This is about education,” MacNaughton said, adding nine million jobs in the U.S. directly depend on trade with Canada and 26 states have Canada as their leading trade partner.

He said business, labour and all the provinces must come together and show a common front as Trump takes office.

“We need to be able to put a team together that is broad-based and part of that will be the education not just of Donald Trump’s people but the American people — on a scale that we haven’t done before,” MacNaughton said. “I think we have to work harder at it.”

Canada’s softwood lumber trade negotiations with the U.S. will also likely become more difficult when Trump takes office, MacNaughton said.

Forests in Canada are managed by governments as opposed to the private sector like in the U.S., and therefore American producers have long complained that Canada is unfairly subsidizing its lumber products.

MacNaughton said the real issue is that the Americans don’t really care about Canada’s subsidies.

“They want to manage the trade,” he told reporters after his speech. “And they want to manage it to a market share instead of some open market system, even with tariffs.”

http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/canadas+ambassador+says+protectionists+feeling+stronger+with+trump/12395246/story.html

 

 

Leveraging the Legacy of the Tornado: The Perspective of Wing Commander Paul Froome

11/15/2016

2016-11-15 By Robbin Laird

During my visit to RAF Lossiemouth in late April 2016, I had a chance to meet with the Officer Commanding and members of the Tornado Operational Conversion Unit, XV(R) Squadron.

When one looks at the end of an era, in this case the sun setting on the Tornado in the RAF, one can look backwards or forwards.

Looking backwards, there is the legacy and history of the squadrons and of a core-fighting platform in the history of the RAF. Here the plane and the crews have a distinguished record in all of the RAF operations since the plane became operational in the early 1980s. The Tornado GR1 and subsequently the GR4 has been deployed successfully in operations since 1990 and has seen action in various operations in Iraq, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Operation ELLAMY over the skies of Libya in support of the UN Security Resolution 1970 and is currently in operations in the conflict against D’aesh.

According to the RAF website:

Still one of the very few aircraft in the world that is able to operate at low level, day or night and in poor weather, the Tornado is now equipped with a modern precision-guided weapons suite and world-class reconnaissance sensors such as the Reconnaissance Airborne Pod for Tornado (RAPTOR). The aircraft also carries the Litening III Advanced Targeting Pod, which is used in both attack and reconnaissance roles.

 http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/tornado.cfm

Looking forward is really about the fusion of technology with crew competencies carrying forward to the Typhoon and F-35 fleets of the decade ahead.

The GR4 is a two-seat, all-weather, day/night attack and reconnaissance aircraft, and its pilots and weapons systems officers have pioneered a unique contribution of the RAF in terms of introducing Brimstone and Storm Shadow to the fight and evolving those systems over time into the newly emergent Spear 3.

A walk around the hanger with some of the members of the Squadron highlighted their accomplishments. The planes have been pushed hard beyond any realistic expectation of their service life. Yet upgrades have kept the plane relevant to evolving combat needs, but the age of the aircraft and its complexity has been a maintenance challenge.

As one member of the Squadron noted, “We sent 10 Typhoons and 10 Tornados to the Libyan operation. We had to swap out 18 engines during our time operating the Tornado, but only one Typhoon engine, and that was simply for precautionary measures, but turned out that it did not need to have been replaced.”

The complexity of the aircraft is a significant challenge for maintainability.

It is the very opposite of the digital aircraft, and they noted that the Typhoon maintainers live really in a different world from the wrench turners of the Tornado era!

But the crews have been able to maintain an effective ops tempo for Tornado, which attests to their skills and to the effectiveness of the sustainment approach which the RAF has with industry. Tornado is maintained through the ATTAC contract with BAE Systems.

According to BAE Systems:

We provide the Royal Air Force with a guarantee that their Tornado aircraft’s availability, capability and effectiveness will be maintained throughout its service life. This enables the RAF to perform their duties. We have a commitment to supporting and maintaining the fleet; with a responsibility of ensuring that enough aircraft are available for the squadrons to fly, making them easily deployable on operations.

 According to David Ward, head of UK Fleet Operations, Tornado:

We have a 250 strong team that works alongside the customer in order to deliver this service mainly from RAF Marham in Norfolk. To cut out any delays in the decision-making process there are communications links to the supply chain and project management teams at our Warton and Samlesbury sites also.

It is incredibly important that we perform for the RAF for the security of the nation, but it’s also important from a business point of view because around the world we have to deliver on our commitments here in the UK.

The benefits of the contract are as follows: 

  • Guaranteed availability of the aircraft – UK Tornado fleet is able to rapidly deploy on operations. Recent deployments include Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan.
  • Capability upgrades and maintenance – capability upgrades are scheduled around servicing to cut down on lost time and increase aircraft availability.
  • Prompt joint decisions – through working side-by-side with the customer and using camera links to team members at other locations.

The contract delivers significant savings by combining the skills and expertise of our employees and the RAF. RAF officers and BAE Systems personnel stand shoulder to shoulder each day to enable the Tornado fleet at RAF Marham to complete successful operations. It’s a partnership that has been so successful it has led to similar contracts most notably on the RAF Typhoon and Hawk fleets.

http://www.baesystems.com/en/product/tornado-attac

In a discussion with Wing Commander Paul Froome OC XV(R) Squadron we discussed the way ahead. The Wing Commander has been operating Tornados since the late 1990s and has worked with the aircraft and the squadrons in virtually every capacity and in multiple operations.

He noted that with the decision by the government to stand down the Tornado by 2019, they had the twin challenge of maintaining the operational readiness of an aircraft still in high demand for operations while preparing to stand down the aircraft and its crews.

“The SDSR15 just confirmed that the Tornado will go out of service in March 2019. You work back from that date. Once your kids are at what we call secondary education, high school, then you don’t need a kindergarten. The kindergarten is going to close, the force will then be set for its last few years.

But the Squadron’s output over the next year is critical to that force being capable to reach 2019. If I don’t get all of my students out — the basic students who’ve never flown the Tornado before, or those who have been away and come back to refresh on the Tornado- then we quite simply won’t have enough people to operate the aircraft, which remains a high demand combat asset.”

We discussed Brimstone and its evolution into Dual Mode Seeker Brimstone and the key role of the Tornado fleet in operating the weapon and shaping its concepts of operations.

The Brimstone program has delivered a unique and very effective close proximity weapon which is the weapon of choice by ground commanders in the kind of operations characterized by operating forces against combatants mixed with civilians. Although it started out to replace cluster bombs and to destroy tanks, it has become a very effective anti-personnel, anti-boat, and anti-vehicle weapon.

The crews evolved the tactics of the missile and its evolution and working closely with the weapon’s designers, MBDA, shaped further capabilities with the weapon as it evolved as well.

The basic approach is for the weapon systems officer to laser designate the key moving target, and then the weapon using its on-board radar to refine the aim point with significant precision on the desired target.

And this is a uniquely UK experience.

“With Paveway IV for example we can talk to other national users. With Brimstone we can talk to our industry and ourselves. It was so successful in Afghanistan and was the weapon of choice for a ground commander. He knew that is was so low collateral damage, very accurate and very, very quick.”

The weapon has been used in trials against fast attack craft with Royal Navy assets as well. It can provide for a capability to destroy fast attack boats coming against the Navy and obviously a useful weapon in many parts of the world.

The OC discussed as well the importance of the working relationship among the Tornado pilots, weapons systems officers and MBDA in shaping the evolving Brimstone weapons portfolio.

“We had MBDA up recently, and they came up to chat to my weapons instructors course about Brimstone 2, and how it’s developing and they are receiving feedback from operational experiences as well.”

The weapons aboard Tornado are transitioning to Typhoon and to the F-35, but the operational envelope of the Tornado is different and it is a two seat aircraft with a weapons systems officer in the second seat.

Here the CO saw the importance of the enhanced cockpits on the Typhoons and F-35s as crucial to enable the pilots to operate weapons while flying the aircraft. “It is not just about adding technology; it is about how to operate it from the cockpit.”

One challenge is that the Tornado crews have combined a wide range of operational experience, ground attack, day-night operations, electronic warfare, and reconnaissance and the question is where those skill sets will migrate within the RAF.

With regard to EW, Wing Commander Froome argued that there has been an atrophy of the Wild Weasel like skill sets in favor of what became a more pressing need, namely to combat manpads.

“Earlier, we had two squadrons of Tornados that were effectively Wild Weasel squadrons with our ALARM or air-launched anti-radiation missile, similar to HARM. As we fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, some skill sets began to fade, and this was one of them. The threats there were MANPADS, so our EW system developed a very capable counter-MANPAD capabilities.”

What will happen to the Electronic Warfare competence as the Tornados are retired?

“Good question. They can provide support for a number of the new platforms like F-35 and P-8. The RAF tends to be good at carrying forward core capabilities and sorting out how best to evolve them with new platforms coming in. I think we’re very good, historically, on recognizing people with those competencies, and their skill-set, and using them in the best place.”

He did issue a caution with regard to the coming of the P-8 and the need to evolve the skill sets.

“The P-8 is clearly not Nimrod. If we think that we’re going to take an old-fashioned air electronics operator, and use him in the same way on the P8, we’re missing a trick.

We need to be developing the crews now to be maritime warfare operators, not electronic operators, and radar, and wet and dry, we need to be thinking bigger than that. If we don’t, then you end up making problems for your F-35, your Typhoon, your P8, your Reaper, your Son of Reaper.”

In short, sun setting one platform requires a shift to shape an effective sunrise of the next. It is about the challenge of managing an innovative transition.

For the military, which is often accused of not being innovative, it is clear that at XV Squadron that is not the case.

History of XV Squadron:

Key Dates:

1915 – Formed at Farnborough.

1938 – One of the first squadrons to receive the Fairey Battle.

1955 – Took part in the Suez crisis.

1983 – First RAF Germany squadron to receive the Tornado GR-1.

Current Aircraft and Location:

Current Aircraft: Tornado GR4

Current Location: RAF Lossiemouth

Battle Honours:

Western Front 1915-1918*,

Somme 1916*,

Arras, Cambrai 1917*,

Some 1918, Hindenburg Line*,

France and Low Countries 1939-1940, Meuse Bridges*,

Dunkirk, Invasion Ports 1940, Fortress Europe 1941-1944,

Ruhr 1941-1945*,

Berlin 1941-1945*,

Biscay Ports 1941-1945,

France and Germany 1944-1945,

Normandy 1944*,

Gulf 1991*.

(Honors marked with an asterisk, may be emblazoned on the Squadron Standard.)

The History of XV Squadron:

Formed as a training unit at Farnborough on 1 March 1915, No. 15 Squadron crossed to France in December of that year equipped with BE2Cs for corps-reconnaissance duties.

One unusual task the unit undertook was the dropping of ammunition by parachute to troops on the front line during 1918. After the War, the squadron succumbed to the inevitable disbandment.

The Squadron reformed at Martlesham Heath in March 1924, but it was little more than in name, as their aircraft were part of the A&AEE trial fleet.

This arrangement continued until 1934 when the squadron was reformed at Abingdon with Hawker Harts. It was shortly after this, that on the insistence of its Commanding Officer, Squadron Leader TW Elmhirst DFC, that the Squadron became known as XV Squadron.

During 1938, the Squadron was one of the first to receive Battles, and it was with these that XV Squadron flew to France in September 1939. In early 1940, the Squadron returned to the UK and re-equipped with Blenheims flown in the ground attack role. By the turn of the year, these had been traded in for Wellingtons, and shortly after that XV Squadron became one of the first Stirling heavy-bomber units.

One famous aircraft flown by XV Squadron was named ‘MacRobert’s Reply’, an aircraft donated by Lady MacRobert in memory of her three sons killed in RAF service. Lancasters arrived during 1943, and the Squadron remained part of No. 1 Group’s main force for the remainder of the war.

Other heavy bombers were flown in the shape of Lincolns and Washingtons, but in 1953, XV Squadron moved into the jet age with Canberras. During the Suez crisis, the Squadron dropped more bombs than any other Canberra unit, but was disbanded in 1957. In September 1958, the Squadron reformed at Cottesmore as the second Victor squadron, but six years later was again disbanded.

On 01 October 1970, the Sqn was reformed at Honington, before moving to Laarbruch in January 1971. After the Gulf War, three Tornado Squadrons at Laarbruch were disbanded, XV Squadron being one of these, at the end of 1991. On 1 April 1992, the XV (Reserve) number plate was given to the Tornado Weapons Conversion Unit at Honington. XV(R) Squadron remained at Honington training Tornado aircrew until November 1993, when it moved to Lossiemouth, its present home.

XV Squadron has approximately 175 permanent personnel, and up to 20 aircrew students at any one time. As the Tornado GR4 Operational Conversion Unit its main commitment is to the training of Pilots and Weapon Systems Operators before sending them onto front-line squadrons.

The Tornado GR4 is a multi role ground attack and reconnaissance platform. It is capable of performing a variety of day and night, all-weather operations.

These include: Airborne Interdiction using precision ground attack munitions;; Close Air Support for coalition troops; Air-to-Air refuelling and Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance. The Tornado GR4 is currently deployed on operations over Iraq in support of Operation SHADER.

XV Squadron teaches ab-initio aircrew straight from their advanced flying training at RAF Valley, as well as conducting Refresher Courses for experienced operators returning back to the Tornado GR4 following other tours of duty; additionally, XV Squadron trains aircrew officers from other nations Air Forces who are posted to the UK on an overseas 2-3 year ‘exchange tour’ flying the Tornado GR4 with the Royal Air Force.

XV Squadron also conducts post-graduate courses. The Squadron is the home to the Qualified Weapons Instructor Course, the Electronic Warfare Instructor Course and the Instrument Rating Examiner Course; each of these courses provides advanced qualifications to front line aircrew. Additionally, XV Squadron provides both aircrew and ground crew support to RAF operations around the globe when required.

http://www.raf.mod.uk/raflossiemouth/aboutus/xvrsqn.cfm

For a look at “MacRobert’s Reply,” see the following:

https://sldinfo.com/visiting-raf-lossiemouth-macroberts-reply-and-tornado-thunder/

The slideshow highlights Tornados at RAF Lossiemouth and the photos are credited to the RAF.

 

President-Elect Trump: An Opportunity to Make History

2016-11-12 By Kenneth Maxwell

One thing is certain: none of the pundits predicted the victory of Donald Trump.

As one stunned commentator said when Trump passed the 270 barrier of electoral college votes, guaranteeing his victory during the early morning of November 9th:

They were all “spectacularly wrong.”

So was Hilary Clinton and her supporters. They thought, even as the results were beginning to be tabulated, that they would win.

But this was a repeat performance.

The same “experts” had also got the result of the UK referendum on membership of the EU wrong earlier in the year. Donald Trump had already said on the campaign trail that the US presidential election was “Brexit, plus, plus, plus.”

It was.

And the result has produced the biggest political upset in recent U.S. history.

Trump has never held any public office.  He has not been elected anywhere. He has no government experience at all.

He will assume the presidency without any political obligations to anyone or to any special interests. This terrifies the political and economic establishment that he so effectively railed against during a very ugly and divisive presidential campaign where he consistently called Clinton “Crooked Hillary” and his supporters chanted “lock her up.”

But a politically unencumbered Donald Trump also has the opportunities to make history.

Will he?

It is much to easy to dismiss Trump’s supporters, as Hillary Clinton did, as being “deplorables” as she called Trump’s noisy and boisterous crowds, in one of her less felicitous observations.

And especially to dismiss those who turned out in absolutely record numbers to support him on Election Day as all being older white men, all of them backwoods racially and ethnically prejudiced neo-nationalist extremists.

They were not.

In fact, even 30% of Latinos, seen by the pundits as being overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton, voted for Donald Trump. And although Clinton won in 31 of 35 cities, Trump won statewide in Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and in Wisconsin.

He even won in Utah where the pundits had predicted that the large Mormon population would reject him.

It is true that his supporters included a wide range of people dissatisfied and angry with the metropolitan and globalized elites which have dominated both political parties. 

Hillary Clinton was seen as representing the political status quo. As indeed she did.

And the wiki leaks revelations of the apparently shady dealings of the Clinton foundation, where Bill (And Hillary) had gained mighty fees for speeches (including from the Brazilian banco Itaú)  which had more to do with gaining influence, than for the content of the Clintons discourse, as well as the saga of the congressional and FBI on-and-off investigation of her use of a private email server while she served as President Obama’s Secretary of State, did not help.

But above all she missed the growing consternation and alienation of the majority of citizens.

This included many disenfranchised white former unionized working class men, displaced by the loss of formerly well paying manufacturing jobs throughout the upper mid-western states, who have seen, over the past two decades, their factories closed, and their jobs lost to Mexico and China.

And this sullen anger was powerfully reflected by Trump’s anti-free-trade rhetoric, and his constant attack on NAFTA, which had been one of president Bill Clinton’s principal, and much touted trade deals, and which many who live in the so-called “rust-belt” communities, blame for the demise of their livelihoods.

In the distant past in Europe what happens this week in the United States would have been called a “peasants revolt”.

Today it is a revolt at the ballot box.  

But no-one should underestimate what has just happened.

Both in the UK over Brexit, and now in the USA, President-elect Donald Trump has, in his own inducible and often tough style, taken advantage of a wave of neo-populist revulsion with the political and economic establishment, especially that located in cosmopolitan New York City and Washington DC.

This allowed him to gain an overwhelming electoral victory, which will without question, not only transform American politics for decades to come, but which will also potentially bring about profound changes in US relations with the rest of the world.

Trump’s victory also saw the Republican Party retain control of the US House of Representatives and the US senate. And they did so very much as a result of Trump’s electoral coattails.

This will mean what speaker Paul Ryan calls a “republican” government, where the two houses of congress and the presidency are all held by the same political party.

This will have enormously important implications for future legislation, and above all for the future composition of the Supreme Court, where the appointment of a new justice is pending to fill the vacancy left by the death of justice Antonin Scalia, and where more vacancies are likely to be occur over the next few years.

So that the other major branch of the US government structure, the Supreme Court, is also impacted by Trump’s victory.

What else will Trump do?

On the domestic front, Trump has promised to do away with “Obamacare” which was President Obama’s singular legislative achievement, but which is deeply unpopular among voters, and which faces major rises in the cost of premiums next year.

He has said he will reverse all of Obama’s executive orders which is within his presidential power to do.

On the foreign policy front, he will, he said during the presidential campaign, undo the nuclear deal with Iran. He will deport, he says, all undocumented aliens held in US jails on criminal charges. He will build a frontier wall to keep out Mexicans or as he put it recently: “We send our troops to defend other’s borders, why can’t we defend our own.”

He will impose limitations on the access of Muslims to the US. Not surprisingly the Mexico peso, which has yo-yoed up and down as Trump’s fortunes waxed and waned in the opinion polls, has suffered its greatest collapse in its value against the US dollar since Trump’s electoral victory.

Trump he has said will repudiate and renegotiate trade deals in the interests of protecting American jobs and national interests.

It is a potentially revolutionary agenda.

Not surprisingly Trump’s electoral victory has been greeted with dismay in many international capitals from Berlin to Brussels to Mexico City.

But in Brexit obsessed London, prime minister Theresa May, who is one of the few British politicians who has not publicly criticized Trump, see opportunities for a better trade deal than she could have hoped for under President Obama, who said that Britain outside the EU would be “last in the line” (he actually said last in the “queue” using the British and not the American word.)

In Moscow, meanwhile, the reaction to Trump’s unexpected victory was all delight. Trump is seen by Vladimir Putin (unlike Hillary Clinton) as being a much more workmanlike partner in improving US-Russian relations.

But the test may come much sooner than Trump wants.

The Russian battle fleet is already assembled on the Syrian coast. Putin with his ally President Assad will undoubtedly strike the rebel areas of Aleppo before President Trump assumes office in January.

Putin is famously skillful at creating “facts on the ground.” He has done so in the past and there is no reason to believe he will not do so again while the U.S. is preoccupied with a totally unexpected and unprecedented presidential succession.

So there is much to worry about.

An untested American president is arriving in a very dangerous world. The domestic agenda will upend much of the consensus of recent decades.

And a formidable potential challenge to international business, financial and policy elites, which have in Trump’ s worldview, have stacked the cards against the average American worker.

The world will not be the same under president Trump.

That much is sure.

Editor’s Note: We have consistently taken Donald Trump and his candidacy seriously. 

That puts is in a distinct minority. 

Now the press which could not do anything but support the political mobilization of his critics and opponents and the Inside the Beltway strategists are now going to get it right about Trump and his Administration’s path to the future?

In our next SLD Forum to be launched shortly, we are going to address the challenges and the way ahead for Trump and his Administration in defense and foreign policy.

He comes to power when first order principles worldwide are in turmoil; he is prepared to look at first principles and to shape new paths and approaches.

We have been the first to the Whiteboard in taking Trump seriously PRIOR to him becoming the President-elect.

We will continue to do so and to be more than willing to criticize those in the “policy elite” who believe their outmoded views simply prevail over the new President, his Administration and the American people.

If you wish to comment on this article, you can do so on the Second Line of Defense Forum:

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/11/president-elect-trump-revolution-no-less/

Also see Dr. Maxwell’s earlier piece:

For some of our earlier pieces PRIOR to the election, see the following:

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/11/new-administration-new-day/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/11/trump-defense-approach-secretary-wynne-talks-impact-gulf-coast/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/11/secretary-wynne-trump-defense-modernization/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/10/why-an-ostrich-policy-wont-work-it-is-more-than-just-trump/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/09/second-nuclear-age-american-security-trump-channels-inner-de-gaulle/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/09/can-trump-rebuild-american-infrastructure-repatriated-profits-feasible-pathway/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/09/the-what-if-of-a-trump-presidency-in-defense/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/09/understanding-trumps-approach-to-governing/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/09/offshore-balancing-emerging-as-donald-j-trumps-strategy-for-global-defense/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/09/president-trumps-defense-agenda-and-canada/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/09/the-high-priests-strike-again-trump-is-not-learning-from-us/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/09/how-would-president-trump-deal-with-north-korea-and-china/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/09/a-turbulent-world-trump-and-strategic-re-direction/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/09/objections-tpp-t-tipp-trump-clinton-real/

http://www.sldforum.com/2016/03/the-post-trumped-the-high-priests-of-washington-vet-a-candidate/

http://www.sldforum.com/2015/11/a-president-trump-would-play-hardball-with-china/

Typhoon Ground Support System: A Perspective from RAF Lossiemouth

11/14/2016

2016-11-14 By Robbin Laird

During a June 2016 visit to RAF Lossiemouth, I had a chance to discuss the GSS or Ground Support System approach for the Typhoon with an RAF officer involved with GSS.

This digital system is a key part of both maintaining the Typhoon and enhancing its performance going forward.

According to a publication by Eurofighter Typhoon, the system is described as follows:

“The implementation into the aircraft of advanced Built-In Test and diagnostic features has substantially reduced the number of Ground Support Equipment (GSE) compared to previous aircraft.

The remaining suite of state-of-the-art GSE was developed according to the same stringent standards as the aircraft, thus ensuring performance and reliability…..

The Ground Support System (GSS) gives all operators a leading edge mission and engineering data management.

This provides rapid seamless bi-directional data flow from the operational and maintenance centres to the aircraft and back. The GSS is linked to the National Support Centre and Industry, thus facilitating continuous on-line data and intelligence transfer.”

The RAF added this insight with regard to GSS:

“Information Communication Technology (ICT) Technicians play a pivotal role supporting, operating, and maintaining vital ICT subsystems essential to the support of Typhoon.

This is achieved by empowering Mechanical, Avionic and Weapons trades with the ICT capability to diagnose the critical engineering data produced by the aircrafts advanced computer systems.

Additional ICT expertise is also utilised by supporting aircrew and operations staff through the management of Mission Support Systems that are vital to the operational functionality of the aircraft.

In summary, we deploy and provide 24/7 support to all the stations day to day operations worldwide.”

The onboard computers on the Typhoon provide a steady stream of data into the brick carried within the aircraft.

That brick is removed after flight and the data downloaded to the ground IT system for diagnosis.

Typhoon Support; Credit: BAE Systems
Typhoon Support; Credit: BAE Systems

The data becomes part of the operational data base for the aircraft, and provides regular inputs to the ongoing assessment of the parts and components onboard the aircraft.

The data is used to provide the information necessary for servicing the aircraft and readying it for the next flight.

The data is also part of the lessons learned mission debrief performed by returning pilots from a mission.

It is a deployable system and part of the capability of Typhoon to deploy to areas of interest like the Baltics or the Middle East.

The GSS is a fundamental element in making the Typhoon an expeditionary aircraft.

The GSS officer highlighted that improvements were under way in ways to manage the data and display the results.

“We are getting better displays to show the findings which will, in turn, enhance our ability to service the aircraft.”

And serviceability is crucial to generate increases in the sortie generation of the aircraft as well.

The officer highlighted that the Typhoon experience is a key input to the RAF learning how manage data-generated by aircraft to be able to make steps forward into the age of ‘big data’ management.

These challenges will only increase as the P-8 and the F-35 come to the RAF, but the Typhoon experience is an important part of the RAF learning curve.

 

An Update on the A400M: Refueling of One A400M by Another

2016-11-14 According to a press release published on November 14, 2016, Airbus Defence and Space highlighted an important step forward for the program.

The Airbus A400M new generation airlifter has further expanded its capabilities as a tanker by successfully demonstrating air-to-air refueling contacts with another A400M. In two flights conducted from Seville, Spain the development aircraft performed more than 50 contacts in level flight and turns using the centreline hose and drum unit (HDU).

A400M air refueling contacts with second A400M. Credit: Airbus Defence and Space
A400M air refueling contacts with second A400M. Credit: Airbus Defence and Space

The A400M is the only tactical tanker on the market with this third refuelling point, in addition to its underwing pods, enabling refueling of large receivers such as another A400M or C-130.

It has a basic fuel capacity of 63,500 liters, which can be increased with two extra cargo hold tanks carrying 7,200 liters each, and can refuel from the HDU at a rate of 2,000 liters (600 US gallons) per minute.

The technique would allow the A400M to carry a 20 tonne payload more than 6,000nm / 11,000km non-stop from Paris, France to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

The standard A400M aircraft has full provisions for air-to-air refueling (AAR) operations already installed and only requires the rapid installation of the optional air-to-air refueling kit to become a tanker.

After a recent trip to Albacete air base in Spain, Second Line of Defense visited Madrid and will soon publish interviews providing an update on the A330 MRTT and on the A400M and the role of software in the modernization of the aircraft.

We will publish the interview from the Albacete air base as well with the Eurofighter team that most recently went to the Baltics to conduct the NATO Air Patrol in the region.

A400M Refueling Second A400M from SldInfo.com on Vimeo.

Visiting Quick Reaction Alert North

11/13/2016

2016-11-13 By Robbin Laird

When I was a kid, I remember the images of deterrence which were provided by strip alert bombers against the Soviet threat.

Now we have images in the press of the strip alert Typhoons dealing with the air defence of the United Kingdom against a wider variety of threats than simply that of the Soviet Union, but which clearly includes the successor state, that of Russia.

When I visited RAF Coningsby, I learned that the base housed QRA South or Quick Reaction Alert South.

Question: The RAF has had to focus more on British airspace protection with both the terrorist threat and the upsurge in Russian airspace activity impacting on the UK.

What role has the Quick Reaction Alert force played in this process?

Answer: At RAF Coningsby, we are more focused on the terrorist threat whereas at RAF Lossiemouth we focus more on the Russian activities.

But the demand on resources is significant. Everything at each base, from equipment, to logistics to training is focused on maintaining the alert posture and ensuring we are ready 24/7.

The aircraft and pilots on QRA are only the tip of the pyramid of activity to ensure success in such an important mission.

https://sldinfo.com/royal-air-force-operations-and-evolving-concepts-of-operations-shaping-a-triple-transition/

When I visited RAF Lossiemouth in June 2016, I had a chance to visit the QRA based at Lossiemouth which is in addition to the one at RAF Coningsby

According to an RAF article published on September 19, 2014:

Royal Air Force aircraft at RAF Lossiemouth have launched the Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) for the first time since the Moray base took on the role of defending the UK’s Northern airspace. Typhoon jets were scrambled to identify aircraft in international airspace. The aircraft identified as Russian military ‘Bears’, did not enter UK airspace.

RAF Lossiemouth’s Station Commander, Group Captain Mark Chappell, said:

“This first successful launch for QRA North has been what all of the hard work by RAF Leuchars and RAF Lossiemouth personnel over recent months has been for.

“The relocation of two Typhoon squadrons was a significant challenge, one that was met by our whole team. The many months of preparation and infrastructure improvements have made us absolutely ready for this launch, and shows we are in the best position to provide the service to the United Kingdom that the Royal Air Force was primarily created for – that is, the protection of our airspace.”

Royal Air Force Lossiemouth began a new era in its history on the 1st of September when it assumed the provision of what the RAF calls the ‘Quick Reaction Alert (Interceptor) North’ task for the United Kingdom.

The role is carried out by crews from 6 Squadron. The pilot of the first launch said:

“It was an honour to be part of what is a milestone in the history of RAF Lossiemouth. With the move of Quick Reaction Alert from Leuchars to Lossiemouth, it has been a huge ask of many personnel. The fact that we had a flawless scramble and intercept of two Russian Bears was a testament to the hard work and commitment of all personnel involved.

“A very proud moment, not just for the pilots who did the intercept but the engineering crews who did a fantastic job, as well as many other station personnel involved in this constant commitment.”

http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/first-qra-for-raf-lossiemouth-19092014

During my visit, I was able to address the question of the nature of the pyramid necessary to launch QRA ready aircraft.

Visiting the QRA area demonstrated the 24/7 quality of the operation.

There was the red button to generate the movement of pilots and personnel to launch the aircraft very rapidly.

Map published by the Daily Mail on 2/19/15 showing Typhoon intercepts of Russian aircraft in 2014 and 2015 up to that point.
Map published by the Daily Mail on 2/19/15 showing Typhoon intercepts of Russian aircraft in 2014 and 2015 up to that point.

There are ops areas and offices, crew rooms, a dining area and kitchen to serve the staff, bedrooms for the rotational crew and a gym to remain ready.

But the question of what the pyramid looks like beyond this is simply having two pilots ready 24/7 with 2 support staff and eight engineers for each week in support as well.

1(F) Squadron, II (AC) Sqn. and 6 Sqn. provide the aircraft, pilots and engineers for the 24/7 operation. The Air Traffic Control Center is manned 24/7 to enable aircraft to launch at any time. The Ground Support System or GSS provides support to the Typhoons with mission data and computer systems used by the aircraft.

And chefs and catering staff are on station to cook and serve meals for duty personnel, three meals a day, 365 days a year.

To put it bluntly: to be 24/7 ready is a significant demand signal for the Typhoon fleet, and one which can be overlooked in terms of the number of aircraft which are required to remain ready for operational launch, 24/7 and 365 days a year.

According to the QRA North team, the Typhoon has performed its role well, but it requires maintainers, pilots and operations personnel to pay close attention to the rotation of aircraft into the demand side of QRA.

And when the RAF deploys to the Baltics, in effect, the UK is supporting three QRA efforts.

The pyramid is demanding; the photos of the planes on strip alert simply masks the significant level of effort to ensure that they are on strip alert.

This demand side is one which can be easily overlooked by everyone, except those providing the capability and the intruders into UK airspace.