The Dreadnaught Class of Strategic Submarines

10/26/2016

2016-10-26 The UK government is committed to replacing the Trident submarines with a new class of strategic nuclear submarines.

According to a story published on the UK Ministry of Defence website on October 21, 2016, this new class will be known as the Dreadnaught Class, something which would make Sir Francis Drake happy!

Defence Secretary Michael Fallon has today announced that, to mark Trafalgar Day, Her Majesty the Queen has graciously approved that ‘Dreadnought’, one of the most famous names in the Royal Navy, will become the lead boat and class name for the Royal Navy’s new successor submarines.

Named fifty six years after the launch of Britain’s first nuclear-powered submarine of the same name, Dreadnought has extensive historical significance, borne by no fewer than nine Royal Navy ships.

A previous Dreadnought sailed with Sir Francis Drake to repel the Spanish Armada; another was present with Nelson at Trafalgar, where her gunnery was acknowledged to be the most devastating of any ship present. But the most famous of all was the ninth Dreadnought – a battleship so advanced that it rendered all others obsolete at a stroke. And it was 99 years ago this December, that the United States Navy sent four of its own dreadnoughts to join the Royal Navy’s Grand Fleet in Scapa Flow.

Such historical resonance will continue through the names of boats, 2, 3 and 4.

Today, the name remains synonymous with technical accomplishment and fighting power: not just in the United Kingdom, but around the world.

Defence Secretary Michael Fallon said:

Every day our ballistic missile submarines are used to deter the most extreme threats to Britain’s security.

Composite CGI (Computer Generated Image) image, showing what the Successor project submarine may look like once completed. Construction work will start on the UK’s new nuclear submarines, Defence Secretary Michael Fallon has announced, as he unveiled nearly £1.3 billion of new investment with BAE Systems. The Successor project will now move into the next stage, known as ‘Delivery Phase 1’, with manufacturing work beginning on structural steel work for the ‘auxiliary machine space’ of the first submarine: this contains switchboards and control panels for the reactor. The money will also be spent furthering the design of the submarine, purchasing materials and long lead items, and investing in facilities at the BAE Systems yard in Barrow-in-Furness where the submarines will be built. As part of our £178 billion equipment plan, the programme will be supported by a defence budget that will rise every year until the end of the decade, meeting the NATO commitment to spend two per cent of GDP on defence.
Composite CGI (Computer Generated Image) image, showing what the Successor project submarine may look like once completed. Credit: UK Ministry of Defense

We cannot know what dangers we might face in the 2030s, 2040s and 2050s, so we are building the new >Dreadnought class.Along with increasing the defence budget to buy new ships, more planes, and armoured vehicles, this commitment shows we will never gamble with our security.

Construction began last month on the successor programme, which will deliver the most advanced and quietest submarine ever conceived by the Royal Navy, and the first to be designed to accommodate both male and female submariners from the outset.

As part of our £178 billion equipment plan, the programme will be supported by a defence budget that will rise every year until the end of the decade, meeting the NATO commitment to spend two per cent of GDP on defence.

Several hundred suppliers will be involved in the programme at its peak, almost 85 per cent of those based across the UK – securing jobs from Scotland to the South of England.

And according to the Royal Navy website:

The Dreadnought class of ballistic submarines for the Royal Navy is now being built.

Successor was the name for the programme of delivering these submarines for the Royal Navy until the first boat was named in October 2016. 

This is the enduring commitment of the Navy’s dedication to continuous at sea deterrence (CASD) since April 1969.

The UK Defence Journal has provided a guide to the new class of submarines.

Government approved initial gate for the Dreadnought submarine programme to replace the the Vanguard class in May 2011.

While details remain sketchy at best regarding the Dreadnought class, one of the key features the new boats will have is a Common Missile Compartment (CMC). CMC aims to define the missile tubes and accompanying systems that would be used to launch new ballistic missiles, successors to the current Trident II/ D5 missile fleet used by the USA and Britain.

As key trends like cheaper sensors, increasing autonomy and artificial intelligence march onward, the next 40 years will see big changes in the underwater environment. SSBNs will need the flexibility to adapt to these changes if they intend to survive.

For the USA and Britain, the CMC needs to be part of that adaptation. Key options under consideration include a widened diameter for each tube from 2.21m – 3.04m, and the potential for flexibility beyond nuclear missiles, this would provide incredible future-proofing while delivery a (to some unwise), multirole capability.

The British government took the first steps in 2006 towards a joint US-UK missile compartment and the project was launched in 2008, initial gate approval for Britain’s ‘Successor’ project followed in 2011. Other contracts have followed, covering design and even the new kind of nuclear reactor the submarines are expected to use.

There is a precedent for this in the United States, the Virginia Class Block III fast attack submarine replaced their 12 vertical-launch cruise missile tubes with 2 Common Weapon Launcher (CWL). The size of those CWLs allows Virginia Class Block III submarines to launch cruise missiles, UAVs, UUVs, and more from their tubes.

British and American collaboration will also benefit and informs the Dreadnought class missile capability. The 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review stated the submarine will have eight operational missiles, carrying no more than 40 operational warheads between them. Furthermore, an important feature of the collaboration between the UK and the US has been collaboration between the UK and the US on the new and advanced PWR-3 pressurised water reactor nuclear.

PWR-3, representing the third generation of British pressurised water reactors, builds on cutting edge nuclear propulsion research undertaken by the MoD and Rolls-Royce in the last few decades and is rumoured to be at a very advanced stage of development.

The exact nature of the UK’s industrial access to US reactor technology remains largely unknown in the public domain, the Royal Institution of Naval Architects reported previously that it is likely that the UK has been given a good look at the S9G reactor design that equips the US Navy’s Virginia Class submarines.

Back to the missile compartments, there is no question that the future Common Missile Compartment will be built around the nuclear deterrence mission as its primary focus. That is unlikely to be its sole use, however, and it would not be surprising if some of those other potential uses ended up influencing the CMC’s design. As is the case with a force more focused on multi role capability, versatility is key. Industry is unsurprisingly quiet on the specifics of the engineering and technology but industry has given some intriguing glimpses at what we may see in the water, one day.

According to BAE, the lead partner for the Dreadnought programme, work on the concept design phase had been ongoing since 2007, but this has now completed, and an outline submarine design has been selected.

Following the Government’s approval of the Initial Gate Business Case in May, 2011, the programme moved into the Assessment Phase, which is the first major stage of the new submarine’s design and development. This is where the vessel concept and requirements are fleshed out and finalised into a detailed hull form and systems.

First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope recently commented that

“The Royal Navy has been operating continuous at-sea deterrent patrols for more than 40 years, the Successor submarines will allow us to do so well into the future with cutting-edge equipment.”

The project will now move into the next stage, known as ‘Delivery Phase 1’, with manufacturing work beginning on structural steel work for the ‘auxiliary machine spaces’ of the first submarine: this contains switchboards and control panels for the reactor.

The money will also be spent furthering the design of the submarine, purchasing materials and long lead items, and investing in facilities at the BAE Systems yard in Barrow-in-Furness where the submarines will be built.

For the complete story go to the following:

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/guide-dreadnought-class-nuclear-submarine/

 

Euronaval 2016: An Overview on Australian, UK and US Naval Forces Modernization

10/25/2016

2016-10-14 Next week is the opening of Euronaval 2016.

Euronaval is a 5 day event being held from 17th October to the 21st October 2016 at the Paris Le Bourget in Paris, France.

Euronaval is jointly managed by the French Ministry of Defence and Secretariat of State for the Sea. It is one of the most important naval exhibitions in Europe and a very useful showcase for naval forces as well as industry.

Euronaval 2016.
Euronaval 2016.

Our partner, OPERATIONNELS SOUTIEN LOGISTIQUE DEENSE SECURITE, has produced a special issue of their magazine to be distributed at the Euronaval show.

http://www.sldmag.com

In that issue is a special section in English which highlights Australian, UK and US naval modernization.

That special section can be downloaded here for our readers:

https://sldinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Ops-Air-Sea-Dossier-Oct-2016.pdf

Mission Ready A-10s of the 104th Fighter Squadron Deploy to the Middle East

2016-10-17 By Todd Miller

The week of October 10, 2016 some 12 A-10s from the 104th Fighter Squadron (FS) with supporting personnel and equipment deployed.

The 104th Fighter Squadron (FS) is a Maryland Air National Guard (MDANG) squadron of the 175th Wing (WG) based at Warfield Air National Guard Base in Middle River, MD.

Second Line of Defense had the opportunity to visit the 175th WG and 104th FS just prior to deployment on Sept. 28, 2016.

Crew Chief SSgt. B. Sedlak provided insight into his role with the squadron:

“I consider A-10C #693 of the 104th FS “my own.”

“I am responsible to ensure it is in 100% flying condition, all systems checked and up, fully mission capable.

“When the pilot climbs aboard, he will have no question about safety, the aircraft or systems performance.

“He will drop in and be focused on piloting and the mission, knowing his aircraft is sound, safe and fully capable.”

Sedlak is focused, taking personal accountability for the aircraft to ensure it can complete an assigned mission.

His work is supported by a full complement of specialists; avionics, power plant, weapons, and more. Each specialist performs the required work that goes beyond Sedlak’s scope, however it is his job to review and ensure all technical orders have been followed, and the work executed correctly.

A-10 #693 first flew in 1978, and has experienced almost 40 years of punishing flight, low level, high G, all combined with the structure rattling GAU-8 Avenger 30mm cannon fire.

The “Hawg” and its cannon are infamous, and the mere sound of the aircrafts cannon fire “BRRTTTT” have created a rightful cult like following.

The A-10 is slated to be retired in coming years – but that date keeps slipping.

The aircraft was designed for a time in the cold war when the US and NATO needed an aircraft that could attack and shred columns of battle tanks and armor attacking Europe from the East. The awe-inspiring cannon has proven itself to be very effective in that role.

Given movement of adversaries to Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) systems comprised of sophisticated and integrated air defenses, close air support will rely on precision guided weapons launched from a distance.

Once retired, there will likely never be anything quite like the A-10 again.

However, right now in the insurgency-like environment of the Middle East, the A-10 remains extraordinarily potent and effective.

The unique howling of its engines is enough to send adversaries scrambling for cover.

Given its age, the aircraft takes careful assessment.

Sedlak has learned its quirks. Once each specialist has done their work and the weapons/sensors/jammers/fuel are loaded as required on the 11 hardpoints, he makes final checks; panels closed, weapons pins placed as required, no leaking fluid, no covers requiring removal, all control surfaces functioning as designed.

It is a moment of personal pride and satisfaction as the aircraft leaves the ramp, headed to the end of runway (EOR) for removal of weapons pins and final checks prior to take-off.

Sedlak is a full-time ANG service member.

He was motivated by his two brothers in the services (US Navy & USAF).

He wanted that same meaningful career and organizational pride he saw them experiencing. Sedlak notes that “the ANG is for those who want to serve, who want to make themselves better. For those that identify with the core values of the Air Force; Integrity First, Service before Self, Excellence in all we do.”

The ramp at Warfield ANG base was busy as personnel from all specialties were inspecting aircraft proactively prior to deployment.

The squadron planned to deploy 12 A-10s and with 3-4 spares available for any last moment aborts. Some deployments allow units to arrive on location with support equipment in place (following the departure of a previous unit).

The 104th would realize no such benefit in this deployment, they would be required to take all their support equipment. It was expected they would require multiple numbers of the largest transport in the Air Force inventory, the C-5 Galaxy to carry all the required support personnel and equipment overseas.

Sedlak does not find pre-deployment activity more intense than usual, simply focused.

However, the personal preparation for the six-month deployment was an additional exercise. Most members leave behind families and properties, and it is critical to have trusted people and systems in place to manage finances, and to be available for maintenance and any personal family crisis that may take place.

Not concerned with the potential danger of deploying to a volatile part of the world (in effect a war zone), Sedlak says everybody just keeps a steady calm and focuses on getting their jobs done.

Once there, he imagines that thoughts and emotions may change.

Even then – everyone will remain focused on the mission.

Mission comes first.

Besides, he notes that there is such a tight connection among personnel in the unit that it is like deploying with family. The teamwork and camaraderie is evident as a group offloads unexpended ammunition from the A-10s 30 mm cannon, and others move 4000 lbs of MK-84 (2 x 2000 lbs) practice bombs into storage.

Sedlak acknowledges that we live in a diverse society, and many may question why we are in the Middle East, or military engagements in general.

But he’s doing his job proudly knowing that it gives our society the freedom to express opinions – even dissenting ones.

There is one critically unique aspect of the National Guard not to be overlooked.

The “Guard” is made up primarily of civilians living within our own communities serving one weekend a month.

They may be lifted and placed into a war zone at a moment’s notice.

They may be deployed locally to help with natural disasters and crisis like the riots experienced in Baltimore last year.

When they assist locally, they are not outsiders, they serve the very same communities where they live.

Seeing is believing: it is integrity, it is service, it is excellence.

The Aussie Tanker Achieves a New Milestone: An Update from the 86th Wing Commander

2016-10-25  Recently, the Australian KC-30A Multi-Role Tanker fleet has now been flown more than 20,000 flying hours.

The milestone was reached on a mission from Yokota Air Base in Japan to Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia on October 19, 2016.

According to the Australian Ministry of Defence:

Wing Commander Rob Williams, the Commanding Officer of No. 33 Squadron, said this was a memorable achievement for the Royal Australian Air Force.

“Each person involved with the KC-30A, from the transition into service to our achievement of 20,000 flying hours, should be proud of being a part of the KC-30A story,” Wing Commander Williams said.

“The milestone was reached on an international flight supporting two completely different missions, which further demonstrates the value of the aircraft.

“The KC-30A has transformed and enhanced the global reach of the ADF and will continue to mature in its role and application in the years to come.”

The press release from the Australian Ministry of Defence went on to provide an overview on the KC-30A within the Australian Defence Force.

The Air Force has five KC-30A aircraft in service operated by No. 33 Squadron from RAAF Amberley in South East Queensland. The aircraft was first flown by Air Force in September 2011.

KC-30A aircraft continue a high tempo of operations participating most recently in Exercise PITCH BLACK where it performed as a force multiplier conducting air-to-air refuelling for numerous fighter aircraft.

Throughout its 20,000 flying hours, the KC-30A fleet has achieved a number of firsts including a record for the number of passengers carried on an Air Force aircraft; 220 cadets from the Australian Defence Force Academy in March 2012.

The KC-30A’s most well known deployment is Operation OKRA in the Middle East Region.

The aircraft has provided over 36 million litres of fuel to Australian and coalition aircraft.

The KC-30A is fitted with two forms of air-to-air refuelling systems — an Advanced Refuelling Boom System mounted on the tail of the aircraft and a pair of refuelling pods underneath each wing. These systems are controlled by an Air Refuelling Operator in the cockpit, who can view refuelling on 2D and 3D screens.

KC-30A MRTT and E-7A Wedgetail conduct Air to Air refuelling testing in the airspace near RAAF Williamtown. *** Local Caption *** Air-to-air refuelling trials between KC-30A Multi-Role Tanker Transport and E-7A Wedgetail From 1-13 June 2015, air-to-air refuelling (AAR) trials were conducted between a RAAF KC-30A Multi-Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) and an E-7A Wedgetail Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW&C) aircraft for the first time. The KC-30A utilised its 17-metre-long Aerial Refuelling Boom System, which is capable of offloading fuel at up to 4500 litres per minute. During the trials, a total of seven sorties were flown by each aircraft, during which they conducted 118 'dry' contacts with the KC-30A's refuelling boom, and six 'wet' contacts, with a 20 tonnes of fuel being transferred. The trials were conducted under the direction of the Aircraft Research and Development Unit (ARDU), and will allow a significant increase in mission range and endurance for the Wedgetail.
KC-30A MRTT and E-7A Wedgetail conduct Air to Air refuelling testing in the airspace near RAAF Williamtown.  Credit: Australian Ministry of Defense

Having a fuel capacity of more than 100 tonnes, a KC-30A can remain fly 1800km from its home base with 50 tonnes of fuel available to offload. In its transport role, the KC-30A is capable of carrying as many as 270 passengers and comes with under-floor cargo compartments which can accommodate 34 tonnes of cargo.

Advanced mission systems are also fitted to the aircraft. They include the Link 16 real-time data-link, military communications and navigation suites, and an electronic warfare self-protection system for protection against surface-to-air missiles.

During our interview with Wing Commander Williams during a visit to Williamtown in August 2016, he underscored how the reach and range of the dyad of C-17 and KC-30A had transformed the ADF.

“The idea a decade ago that we could effectively lodge a force anywhere in Europe and operate at short notice was unimaginable.

“For example, in our response to the downing of Malaysian airlines Flight 17, the KC-30 and C-17 force, in terms of seat miles and ton miles, did more lifting in 15 days than Australia did in the Berlin Airlift and we were in the Berlin Airlift for a significant period of time.”

https://sldinfo.com/visiting-amberley-airbase-australia-an-update-from-the-86th-wing-commander/

And in an interview with No. 33 Squadron at Amberly Airbase in August, the leadership of the squadron highlighted the significant progress, which the tanker has made in enabling the ADF.

Question: How has the plane and crews performed to date in operations in the Middle East?

Answer: “In the Middle East, we’re seeing reliability, or mission dispatch rates, up near 96%.

“Some months it’s 100%. From a maintenance perspective, we’re probably looking at a serviceability rate of about 97%-98% for our MER ops.”

Question: In your view, why has the plane performed as well as it has?

Answer: “I haven’t really considered that before but it is an aircraft built on a proven and mature platform, an A330-200.

“It’s been around for many years. It retains much of its green aircraft architecture.

“That’s why we see those dispatch rates.

“It largely provides almost airline-like dispatch rates.”

https://sldinfo.com/re-visiting-33rd-squadron-an-update-on-the-kc-30a/

The first slideshow highlights the KC-30A in the recent Pitch Black 2016 exercise and is credited to the Australian Ministry of Defence.

The second slideshow shows the KC-30A visiting Europe in July 2016 first in the UK, then in France and then in Italy.

The Future of the Eurofighter Typhoon: Shaping a 21st Century Air Combat Capability

10/24/2016

2016-10-12 By Robbin Laird

During my last visit to Australia, I met with the 86th Wing Commander, who is in charged of the Royal Australian Air Force’s C-17 and KC-30A fleet.

We discussed the evolution of the dyad in support of the operations of the Australian Defence Force, and the evolution of the two aircraft working together in supporting the joint force.

He made a key point about what force integration meant with regard to the acquisition and modernization of core platforms: “No one wants to buy a platform; they want to shape and deploy a capability.”

Put in other terms, when looking at air systems, the ability to evolve the platform within the overall context of the evolution of an integrated force is a key measure of the value of a combat platform.

A case in point is the evolution of the Eurofighter Typhoon.

The aircraft’s origin was in the Cold War and the defense requirements within a Europe shaped by a NATO-WARSAW Pact confrontation.

Its role was largely defined by its air defense capabilities confronting Warsaw Pact aircraft with the need for weapons mass to strike multiple aircraft.

But with the collapse of the Warsaw Pact, the plane entered a kind of political limbo in which the demand side for fighters was in doubt, and the reset of its role put in motion.

It first entered operational service in 2003, in a period where the evolution of combat aircraft was in play.

Put in other terms, an aircraft initially designed to defend European airspace against the Warsaw Pact was being launched in a time when there was political ambiguity about the role of fighters in the defense of Europe.

According to Eurofighter, the history of the development and then operation of the aircraft is as follows:

Eurofighter Typhoon is Europe’s largest military programme, with the four founding nations – Germany, Spain, United Kingdom and Italy – all using the aircraft in their own air forces. Upgradeability and flexibility was at the core of the specification to ensure that the platform could be used highly effectively by all air forces providing unrivalled global partnership.

The construction of the first Eurofighter Typhoon prototypes began in 1989 and it was agreed that each of the four parent nations would host the production line and final assembly for the components of the aircraft it was responsible for: Warton for BAE Systems, Manching for EADS Germany, Turin for Leonardo – Aircraft Division and Getafe for EADS CASA.

In 1994, the Chiefs of Air Staff of Germany, Spain, UK and Italy all agreed on their advanced aircraft requirements, with DA1 and DA2 Eurofighter Typhoons making their first test flights that same year.

By 1996, the nations had agreed on the workshare production, and a year later the 500th test flight took place in Manching, Germany.

Over the late 1990s and early 2000s the aircraft undertook extensive environmental, weapon firing, in-flight fueling and supersonic speed tests.

Between 2003 and 2005 the Eurofighter Typhoon was introduced into service across the 4 core nation’s Air Forces. During this period aircraft received the defensive aids sub system (DASS), the multinfunctional information and distribution system (MIDS), initial direct voice input (DVI) and sensor fusion systems.

In 2005, the UK signed an understanding with Saudi Arabia that Eurofighter Typhoon would replace the Saudi Tornados. In 2006 the aircraft was operational and patrolling the skies of Italy during the Winter Olympics. The Austrian Air Force (Luftstreitkräfte) received its first Eurofighter Typhoon in 2007, with Saudi Arabia receiving its first aircraft in 2008.

A year later, the 4 core nations of the founding consortium received the second tranche of aircraft, which undertook a unique advanced medium range Air-to-Air missile (AMRAAM) firing trial.

The objective was to fire a missile while the radar was in passive mode, demonstrating a key stealth capability.

Also in that year, it was established that the aircraft would receive upgrades every two years and major hardware upgrades every four years. By 2010, the aircraft featured an advanced helmet-mounted symbology system (HMSS).

The Eurofighter Typhoon began combat missions in Libya on 21 March 2011 as part of the United Nations’ Odyssey Dawn operation. On deployment RAF Typhoons carried Enhanced Paveway II bombs and totalled 3,000 flying hours and over 600 sorties during a six month period on Operation Ellamy.

Put in other terms, the airplane was birthed in the 1990s a period in which the function and requirements for fighter aircraft was in play.

A difficult time to launch a new fighter program, but as the strategic environment changed and operational demands changed, the program adjusted the focus on what the aircraft would provide in terms of combat capabilities.

But to do so meant changes in software, hardware, cockpit redesign, and enhancing the role of the pilot to handle information in the battlespace.

It also required marrying those changes with different weapons load outs, or put in other terms, the aircraft and its redesign was symmetrical with the redesign of weapons which would be carried by the aircraft.

No less than a evolution for a classic air superiority fighter to a multi-role fighter was undertaken and with it a significant shift in the weapons to be carried by the fighter.

In other words, new capabilities were being shaped for the aircraft-weapons combat system, which Typhoon is and is evolving to.

From discussions with Typhoon pilots, what has been emphasized is that the evolution of the technology in the cockpit, including the C2 and radar systems has led to a significant enhanced capability to deliver support to the combat force throughout the battlespace.

According to one Typhoon pilot

“When we flew the Typhoon in Libya, we did our first real ground attack role, but we added the Paveway in a very austere fashion.

It performed pretty well in 2011; but it was challenging to operate.”

When Tranche 2 entered the force, there is a solid foundation laid for shaping the way ahead for the evolution to the ground attack capabilities of the aircraft.

“The real upgrade to Tranche 2 was the Phase 1 enhancement.

It integrated Paveway IV into the aircraft; the integration provided a focused capability for the ground strike role.

The software completely changed with an enhanced capability to perform the ground attack role.

We now could direct the weapon to a variety of targets with the onboard control systems and software.

In the early Tranche 2 experience, the weapon was not really integrated with the aircraft; with the evolution of Tranche 2,

Paveway IV is completely integrated into the aircraft’s combat system.”

He described Tranche I as a difficult platform to target a ground attack weapon for the targeting pod could find a target, but the pilot would have to handle the weapons use manually.

The pilot was the sensor.

Now with Tranche 2, the pilot could type in the targeting information and the plane will then provide the data to execute the strike mission.

“This capability has been demonstrated in Operation Shader.

And the targeting capability was so effective that JTACS actually were calling for the Typhoon/Paveway IV capability on a regular basis.

We had combat mass and significant strike capability which could be delivered rapidly and coalition partners quickly began to pick up on this capability.”

As he described the change in performance and its impact: “We could operate a four ship formation and strike 16 targets in one pass.

We never could do that with Tranche 1.

And we provided close air support to our ground forces, and provide information to the ground forces to support their operations, with targeting information provided from the ground maneuver forces, or from our onboard sensors.”

The way ahead in his view is the integration of new weapons, such as the evolving Brimstone series, to expand the capabilities, which the Typhoon can deliver in the battlespace.

He argued that if the weapons envelope was expanded then the speed of the Typhoon could be leveraged to expand the attack profile of the aircraft.

For this Typhoon pilot, the recent Operation Shader experience highlights the new capabilities of Typhoon, and shapes in his mind a key way ahead.

Rather than being limited to a classically defined air superiority fighter, the Typhoon is evolving into a multi-mission aircraft.

The Tranche 3 package will deliver the next phase of combat capability with regard to the air system, and includes a integrated mix of systems which will deliver enhanced combat capability.

Editor’s Note: The four slideshows highlight Typhoons.

The first shows RAF Typhoons conducting an air intercept of Russian aircraft and ensuring that they do not enter British or NATO airspace.

The second shows Spanish Typhoons involved in intercepting Russian aircraft during their time conducting the NATO Baltic Air Patrol in 2015.

Four Eurofighter Typhoons and 114 personnel from the Ejército del Aire (Spanish Air Force)supported the NATO Baltic Air Policing (BAP) mission during the first six months of 2015.

The third shows Typhoons at RAF Lossiemouth.

The fourth shows RAF Typhoons at the Trilateral Exercise held at Langley AFB, December 205.

The photos are credited to the RAF and to the Spanish Air Force.

And the video below shows the Eurofighter from inside the cockpit during flight.

 

According to BAE Systems: This year, “a UK Eurofighter Typhoon, featuring the latest weapons fit, performed a spectacular display for crowds at the Royal International Air Tattoo (RIAT) and Farnborough International Air Show, with BAE Systems’ Typhoon Test Pilot Nat Makepeace at the controls.

The display demonstrated the Eurofighter Typhoon carrying four Meteor Beyond Visual Range Air to Air missiles, two ASRAAM infra-red missiles, six Brimstone 2 low collateral, precision strike missiles, and two Paveway IV GPS/laser guided bombs.

And this video, shot from a camera mounted in the cockpit as Nat performed his display at Farnborough, provides a unique perspective on a stunning performance.”

And the following graphic produced by BAE Systems provides an overview on the evolution of Typhoon capabilities:

img_0194-2

The Weapons Revolution Continues: MBDA Shapes a Way Ahead for Strike Platforms in the Kill Web

10/17/2016

2016-10-08 By Robbin Laird

The US Navy has clearly articulated a way ahead for US and allied forces, namely to shape integrated capabilities for the distribute force able to deliver effects throughout a kill web.

The CNO has shaped a concept of the kill webs to describe the approach towards shaping a distributed joint and coalition force, which can deliver effects throughout the extended battlespace.

One of the key aspects of changes involves weapons in the kill web.

Target identification and weapons delivery will not be necessarily located on the same platform; indeed, the ability to deliver lethal effect in the electro-magnetic battlespace will be distributed throughout the kill web.

Weapons are distributed throughout the kill web and can be fired by platforms also operating throughout the kill web capable of firing weapons not carried by that platform.

The Extended Battlespace

Distributed strike will become increasingly significant as well as weapons modernization accelerates and the problem of providing new capabilities to the force, a force that is distributed in operations.

What might be called fifth generation weapons can be identified as their ability to be networked and provide selectable, proportionate effects ideally at extended ranges.

On the networking aspect, it is their capability to interact with the launch platform or with the controller in the battlespace, which can be another platform in the battlespace.

It is interactivity with the strike command elements deployed in the battlespace and an ability to operate with strike agility, which characterizes the fifth generation platform.

The challenge is integrate weapons within the kill web, to ensure that weapons are not simply fired from a close proximity source but can be used by the decision authority most capable of identifying and killing a threat.

As Rear Admiral Manazir has put it:

“C2 is ubiquitous across the kill web. Where is information being processed?

Where is knowledge being gained?

Where is the human in the loop?

Where can core C2 decisions best be made and what will they look like in the fluid battlespace?

The key task is to create decision superiority.

But what is the best way to achieve that in the fluid battlespace we will continue to operate in? What equipment and what systems allow me to ensure decision superiority?”

With regard to weapons, this means ensuring that the weapons capability is in keeping with the evolution of the sensors and command elements in the kill web.

MBDA is currently making significant progress with two such weapons, the Meteor air-to-air weapon and the SPEAR 3 air-to-ground weapon. Both of these weapons have interactive data links and the capability to shift from a particular weapons platform, which launched it to another platform able to direct the target path.

Another core characteristic of what can be considered fifth generation weapons is that they are software upgradeable weapons, which are redesigned as both technology and combat performance evolve.

SPEAR 3 and Meteor are software driven, each can be enhanced further as lessons are learned or the threat evolves alongside their host platforms

These weapons can be carried by fifth generation aircraft which solves a problem identified by former Chief Air Force Scientist Mark Lewis: “Why are we putting 3rd and 4th generation weapons on 5th generation aircraft?”

Indeed, at the recent AFA annual conference, the ACC Commander, Hawk Carlisle, was asked that question and underscored that indeed this was a significant problem and one on which the USAF is working on.

MBDA’s approach has been to build its latest weapons to be useable by a variety of air platforms, including fifth generation ones, so that the flexibility of the kill web being shaped can be enhanced.

With regard to SPEAR this means that it can be carried by an F-35 which allows it to engage significantly more targets than if it used a legacy glide weapon or that Typhoon which will also most likely carry SPEAR 3 can contribute significant load out capability of this weapon for the platforms operating in the extended battlespace.

It is about what the weapon can do as an interactive data linked strike asset ON a platform; and yet be able to operate by OTHER platforms identified by the C2 authority to take over those strike assets and direct them to their final product.

This is about interactive capabilities; and a new approach to weaponization, which will transform how US or allied forces operate in the extended battlespace.

Spear 3 is a key example of how the UK is focusing upon the enhanced capabilities of the F-35 and Typhoon as strike platforms, but also shaping a way ahead for the kill web approach to weaponization.

Shaping a new weapons revolution where weapons are enabled throughout the attack and defense enterprise and not simply resident for organic platform operations is a key element of the way ahead. For example, the new software enabled Meteor missile can be fired by one aircraft and delivered to target by that aircraft or the inflight data link can be used via another asset – air or ground based – to guide it to target. METEOR firing from Gripen. Credit: SAAB
Shaping a new weapons revolution where weapons are enabled throughout the attack and defense enterprise and not simply resident for organic platform operations is a key element of the way ahead. For example, the new software enabled Meteor missile can be fired by one aircraft and delivered to target by that aircraft or the inflight data link can be used via another asset – air or ground based – to guide it to target. METEOR firing from Gripen. Credit: SAAB

And the Meteor air superiority missile operating off of the Typhoon, or Rafale l or Gripen can contribute not only to its own defense but through the kill web enabled strike complex contribute to the coalition force as well in terms of providing support functions. It is about re-framing what being a wing man is really all about in a fifth generation context

As then ACC Commander General Mike Hostage put the approach: “The 5th Generation aircraft will enable the air combat cloud and allow me to use my legacy assets differently. Many of my 4th Gen fighters can be used to extend the network of linked systems providing reinforcing fires, and I can focus on the 5th Gen assets as the core nodes shaping distributed joint capabilities.”

At the heart of interactive change as well is the evolution of the platforms carrying the new weapons as the new weapons themselves become integrated into the platform.

For example, the Swedish Air Force’s Gripen has integrated the Meteor onboard the aircraft which the Swedish Air Force believes substantially increases the lethality and survivability of the Gripen. According to a press release from SAAB dated July 11, 2016, this synergy was highlighted between weapon and platform.

Speaking today at a the Farnborough International Airshow, at a ceremony to mark the Meteor’s entry into service, Major General mats Helgesson, Chief-of-Staff of the Swedish Air Force said, “After extensive testing by FMV and the Gripen Operational Test and Evaluation unit, all of the new MS20 functions including the Meteor missile are now fully integrated with Gripen.

The Swedish Air Force is now in its Initial Operational Capability phase with the Meteor.

The Meteor missile is currently the most lethal radar-guided missile in operational service, and the Swedish Air Force is the only operational user so far. I am very proud and satisfied to have the Meteor in the inventory of my air force.”

The complete MS20 upgrade is now flying with Swedish Air Force Gripens and MS20 enhancements will soon be implemented in the Gripens of the Czech Air Force. The upgrade delivers a host of new capability options for air-to-air, air-to-surface and ISTAR missions plus many improved mission systems and other changes. As ever with Gripen, operators are free to choose how, when and to what extent they implement the new capabilities that the upgrade enables.

A key element of Gripen’s MS20 capability expansion is full integration of the MBDA Meteor BVRAAM (Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Missile). Swedish Air Force Gripens are thus the world’s first and only fighters to be operational with this revolutionary European weapon system.

The ramjet-powered Meteor, developed by MBDA with Saab as a key partner, is an advanced, long-range and agile air-to-air weapon that is uniquely designed to counter the most sophisticated airborne threats of the 21st century.

Meteor is a tactical missile with strategic effect. Its extremely long range (beyond 100 km) and unrivalled no escape zone (three times greater than any current BVR missile) will dominate the future air-to-air battlespace, giving a decisive capability to Gripen and its pilots.

http://saabgroup.com/media/news-press/news/2016-07/gripen-leads-the-world-with-new-operational-capabilities/

The Swedish Air Force Chief, Maj. Gen Mats Helgesson underscored that “From our perspective, (the Meteor) is a game changer. This is something we have invested lots of money in and makes the C/D a really potent air defender again….We are not completely ready with all the tactics, but it is fielded.”

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/meteor-introduction-transforms-swedish-air-defence-425537/

The Typhoon is a more complex case as the multi-nation aircraft is being comprehensively transformed through changes in the cockpit, radar, helmet and targeting systems to handle a complex weapons load out.

The Typhoon will provide significant weapons mass for the new weapons being built by MBDA as well as some core legacy ones as well.

The Typhoon carrying a SPEAR 3 Missile. CreditL RAF
The Typhoon carrying a SPEAR 3 Missile. CreditL Eurofighter

And this year, Typhoon has been progressing with its transition to a core air-to-ground role and as it does so integrating the key weapons which perform the strike element within that mission, Brimstone, Storm Shadow and the new SPEAR 3 missile.

For example, Eurofighter in a news story published on July 12, 2016, announced that the Typhoon successful fired a SPEAR weapon for the first time.

The SPEAR missile is being developed to meet the UK’s Selective Precision Effects At

Range Capability 3 (SPEAR Cap 3) requirement for the UK’s F-35 Lightning II aircraft, with the potential to equip Typhoon. SPEAR will precisely engage long range, mobile, fleeting and re-locatable targets in all weathers, day or night, in the presence of countermeasures, obscurants and camouflage, whilst ensuring a safe stand-off range between the aircrew and threat air defences.

https://www.eurofighter.com/news-and-events/2016/07/spear-missile-fired-from-eurofighter-typhoon-as-future-capability-development-continues

But it is the interactive modernization of the Typhoon with innovations in the weapons enterprise, which shape a new capability, one which is integratable into a kill web.

The interactive innovations in Typhoon were highlighted at a UK Eurofighter Typhoon display at the Royal International Air Tattoo earlier this summer.

According to a press release from Eurofighter dated August 10, 2016:

“A UK Eurofighter Typhoon, featuring the latest weapons fit, performed a spectacular display for crowds at the Royal International Air Tattoo (RIAT) and Farnborough

International Air Show, with BAE Systems’ Typhoon Test Pilot Nat Makepeace at the controls.

The display demonstrated the Eurofighter Typhoon carrying four Meteor Beyond

Visual Range Air to Air missiles, two ASRAAM infra-red missiles, six Brimstone 2 low collateral, precision strike missiles, and two Paveway IV GPS/laser guided bombs.”

https://www.eurofighter.com/news-and-events/2016/08/inside-the-cockpit-of-award-winning-eurofighter-typhoon-display

The point here is the significant load out on the jet which can be used by itself, by its traditional wingman or to operate as a wingman in a kill web, which means by assets not operating within the fighter formation itself.

The UK MoD has focused as well on ensuring that its own fifth generation aircraft has advanced air-to-air missiles for its own defense,.

The aircraft are different and will operate differently as well in terms of effect, but by having a missile that can operate cross platform in 21st century combat environments, weapons innovation is not narrowly scoped to a platform or single platform dependent.

This is why the MoD signed a major contract this Summer with MBDA for its advanced air-to-air missile, ASRAAM. In discussions with Australian pilots who fly aircraft with ASRAAMs on board they particularly like the capability to fire the weapon and have it destroy targets behind it, which is clearly anticipating the data link enabled weapons world.

Artist Rendition of F-35 Firing Spear 3 Missile. CreditL MBDA
Artist Rendition of F-35 Firing Spear 3 Missile. CreditL MBDA

According to an article published on the UK MoD website on August 16, 2016:

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) has awarded a contract worth around £184 million to ensure the UK’s new supersonic stealth combat aircraft will continue to be equipped with the latest air-to-air missile. Designed and manufactured in the UK,

ASRAAM is an advanced heatseeking weapon which will give Royal Air Force (RAF) and Royal Navy F- 35B Lightning II pilots, operating from land and the UK’s two new aircraft carriers, the ability to defeat current and future air adversaries….. ASRAAM, which uses a sophisticated infra-red seeker, is designed to enable UK pilots to engage and defend themselves against other aircraft.

It is capable of engaging hostile air targets ranging in size from large multi-engined aircraft to small drones…..

ASRAAM is currently in service with RAF Typhoon and Tornado aircraft and is being carried daily on missions over Iraq and Syria as part of the coalition fight against Daesh.

The updated missile variant being secured under this new contract is expected to enter service on RAF Typhoon aircraft from 2018 and on RAF and Royal Navy F-35 aircraft from 2022, when the current variant will be taken out of service.

http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/411-million-investment-in-new-missile-for-uks-new-jets-sustains-700-uk-jobs-19052016

The entire kill web approach affects the modernization and acquisition of platforms and weapons as well as the high-end training necessary to shape an integrated force.

According to Rear Admiral Manazir: “The key is continually evolving combinations of capabilities that enhance the defensive and offensive power of the platforms that you put into the kill web.

We are very focused on the evolving man-machine relationship, and the ability of manned and unmanned systems, as well as kinetic and non-kinetic systems, to deliver a broader spectrum of capability to the force.

We are aiming to use the machine for the OO (Observe-Orient) part of the OODA (Observe-Orient-Decide-Act) Loop and optimize our human capabilities to do the DA (decide-act).

Fighter pilots have always been “thinking aviators” but we are adjusting what we expect from them as they become key nodes and crucial enablers in the kill web. Becoming a Top Gun pilot in this world will be quite different than in the legacy one.”

It is clear that MBDA is building weapons for this new age Top Gun pilot.

Canada Rebuilds Its Surface Fleet: Off the Shelf or Contributing to Deterrence?

2016-10-17 By Danny Lam

North Korea’s latest nuclear test (Sept. 9, 2016) and their growing thermonuclear and ICBM capable of reaching North America as early as 2020 materially altered many assumptions behind Canadian defense policy.

Emerging threats like ICBMs and strategic cruise missiles tipped with credible thermonuclear warheads will become major threats to Canada by the time Canadian Surface Combatants (CSCs) enter service.    Canada will need ballistic and cruise missile defenses to deter states like North Korea.   Shore based ABM systems will not be sufficient if the threat will evolve into submarine launched missiles.

Likewise, at the low end, anti-access and area denial threats that are cheap and proliferating raise questions as to the cost to defeat them.   Low end threats require renewed attention to low cost, deep magazine counters like lasers that are presently being tested and will probably be required for the CSC fleet as it evolves with new technologies onboard the ships.

The government announced in June, 2016 that their current approach is to buy an “off-the-shelf” design for the Canadian Surface Combatant Program and modify it to save time and money.

Will the existing designs under consideration be capable and upgradeable to deal with threats and mission profiles expected in their lifetime both at the high and low end?

Will these ships be built in such a way that they can accommodate new, lower cost operational concepts which will evolve over the lifetime of the surface combatants?

Critical to an anti-ballistic missile role by 2025 will be tight integration with NORAD systems and sensors applying a combat cloud concept.   This enables many platforms to cue missiles on the CSC with Cooperative Engagement Capability.

On board the CSC, having the space and capability to fit radars optimized for air and missile defense like AN/SPY-6 tightly integrated with Aegis BMD Systems will be necessary.   Similarly, adequate future electrical supply and storage for direct energy weapons and electronic or tron warfare will be a consideration.

Rogue states like North Korea will foreseeably develop the capability simultaneously to fire volleys of missiles, some with dummy warheads and penetration aids to increase the likelihood of their warheads reaching target.   This places a premium on vessels with large Vertical Launch magazines that are compatible with expected upgrades in missiles.

Inventories of missiles are expensive to maintain in peacetime, and subject to wear and aging at sea leading to many vessels sailing with partially filled magazines.   Moreover, inventories of missiles obsolete rapidly and require frequent updates as the threats are better understood.   Hardware updates are difficult to do with deployed missiles.

A critical issue for the CSC candidates will be whether the platform ties Canada to a particular VLS missile supplier and the versatility of the VLS launchers.   The capability of the supplier to supply missiles from inventory as needed, continuously update and upgrade them to deal with the latest threats are a concern. VLS missiles are typically too heavy to be air freighted and need to be transported by sea.   This is a major consideration for wartime resupply.

Replenishment of stores and fuel at sea is a well-practiced routine in NATO navies.   Replenishment or resupply of VLS underway replenishment, on the other hand, is not well developed.   Reloading VLS cells presently require heavy equipment, specialized crews and munition facilities at industrially robust ports.

With a new set of threats facing Canada, solutions to defense loom large. And any investments need to build toward enhanced capabilities; not just check a platform box for the defence force..Credit Image: Bigstock
With a new set of threats facing Canada, solutions to defense loom large. And any investments need to build toward enhanced capabilities; not just check a platform box for the defence force. Credit Image: Bigstock

Underway replenishment of VLS cells is probably not doable in the foreseeable future, but forward VLS reloading with a specialized vessel is practical with existing technologies.   Teamed with the capability for at-sea hardware upgrades of missiles, it is a force multiplier for the CSC fleet.

Will at-sea VLS re-arming figure prominently in the requirements?

Given Canada’s vast territory with few major ports, and extremes of climate, this can potentially become a capability where Canada can excel in.     Canada does not have a program for a specialized vessel with this capability.   Such a vessel, if developed, will likely find a ready market abroad providing that the CSC VLS system is not a niche product.

Finally, there is the question of how Canada would field an anti-ballistic missile deterrent by 2020 and the time when the CSCs are scheduled to come into service.  An interim capability may be required that cannot be met via upgrading the existing Canadian fleet.

Acquiring an interim capability that plug the gap and give more time for technologies to mature and craft a clean-sheet design based on 2018 requirements may be a lower lifecycle cost alternative to the modified “off-the-shelf” option.

Canadians are complacent about threats to the homeland because we have been safely sheltered under the US nuclear umbrella for a half century.

That is no longer the case in the second nuclear age with many new and emerging nuclear weapons powers like North Korea, Iran, Pakistan, etc. that challenge the status quo.

Canadians have to do their part in anti-ballistic missile defense and deterrence and buying the right kind of surface ship can provide a foundation to do so.

That may not be possible in the penny-pinching style dating from the end of the cold war.

It is not about buying an “off-the shelf” ship; it is building a surface combatant that is upgradeable through out its life to contribute to deterrence and defense of Canada.

Danny Lam is an independent analyst based in Calgary.

The Maryland Air National Guard Deploys Cyber Team in the Digital Battlespace

2016-10-13 By Todd Miller

The Department of Defense (DoD) is ambitiously building a Cyber Security force to fulfill its Cyber Strategy. It is a high priority given the network dependence of our defense and national infrastructure and the growth and severity of cyber attacks.

“Hunter,” an intelligence analyst with the Maryland Air National Guard (ANG) 275th Cyber Operations Squadron describes the challenge:

“The domains of Air, Sea & Land are finite, generally fully mapped and known. In the cyberspace domain, the internet is the terrain and it is arguably infinite, growing and morphing every day.”

Hunter describes the internet as the “Wild West” – an image of a time and place where anything goes, violence a way of life, “law and order” fleeting, commercial opportunities (mines, railroads) non-existent one day booming the next, the saloon the Facebook of the day, and change fast and furious.

We have become too familiar with the hazards of the internet, leaked emails, busted corporations, compromised databases, stolen identities – and so many more examples of the vulnerabilities of this new indispensable terrain.

While these risks are troubling for corporations and individuals, they are potentially devastating for our military forces.

Emerging warfare doctrine has been described by Richard S. Deakin in his book “Battlespace Technologies” (Artech House Publishers, 2010) as “Network-Enabled Information Dominance.” The warfighter and weapons platforms utilized today (F-22, F-35, AEGIS Cruisers, P-8, E-3G, Wedgetail, Triton/Global Hawk and more) generate an unprecedented amount of information are very effective in a network enabled environment.

The enabled platforms share information via the network and create a unified battlespace picture, where each individual platform has access to the others targeting data.

The result is what the Navy calls the “tactical cloud” or as others reference, the “Kill web.”

The information and network enabled systems provide the warfighter with unprecedented situational awareness and give strategic and tactical command a tremendous advantage in any conflict.

Caption for Slide Gallery: The 275th Cyber Operations Squadrons Cyber Protection Team at work in the “Hunters Den.”  A squadron of the 175th Wing Maryland Air National Guard. 

And yet, given they rely on the internet these networks have the potential of being hacked, compromised, or degraded. There can be no higher imperative than to protect the networks that carry the information as well as the associated platforms.

Any compromise will have a serious impact on warfighting capability.

In the last few years the Government and DOD have mobilized to take this threat seriously with the launch of the United States Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM), a sub-unified command of the United States Strategic Command.

Within the Air Force, Cyber is led by the 24th Air Force, a chain of command that includes the 175th Wing of the Maryland ANG and its 175th Cyberspace Operations Group.

The recently activated 175th COG is unique: it is the first Air National Guard (ANG) Wing to have a group structure containing multiple cyber squadrons (3 Operational Squadrons, 1 Operational Support Squadron).

Second Line of Defense visited the 275th Cyber Operations Squadron on September 28, 2016 at the beginning of their first deployment.

Cyber Operations Squadrons (COS) utilize Cyber Protection Teams (CPT) as an operational team to fulfill objectives. While the structure is based on an Air Force model, it is still such a new endeavor that aspects are still evolving.

Many of the personnel involved today have retrained from other disciplines – everything from C-130 pilot to Tactical Aircraft Maintenance.

They now have the privilege of being on “the cutting edge,” performing ground breaking work, refining structures, and cyber tactics.

The ANG model brings additional value by the inclusion of the best cyber personnel available in the private industry. As Hunter explains, the synergy of sitting within a team of the smartest available private industry cyber specialists, while performing cutting edge service is extraordinarily satisfying. The 175th is uniquely situated in Maryland close to Fort Meade, an area with scores of exceptionally qualified cyber specialists.

While the typical ANG personnel serve “one weekend a month” deployment involves putting civilian life on hold and reporting full time. During deployment the squadron may continue to work out of their home base, or given their mobility may relocate equipment and personnel to support a designated network in another location.

While cyber groups within different services have defined roles, CPTs are aligned with; a National CPT against a known threat (Nation State); the Combatant Commander (COCOM) in a specific theater of operations such as Europe (USEUCOM), South Pacific (USPACOM) etc.); the Department of Defense (DOD) Networks; or Service aligned (Air Force, Army, Navy, Marines). The 275th is service aligned with the USAF (24th Air Force) to perform missions on Air Force spheres of influence.

Director of Operations Major C. Ferguson used the physical security apparatus of the base to describe the role of the CPT; the base has a gate, the network has entry points; base security examines credentials and vehicles upon base entry, the CPT views packets, digital signatures and credentials; the base has a fence; the network has a firewall; the base has scores of buildings with different levels of access, the network has areas of similar nature.

The CPT’s job is to survey the network for vulnerabilities, ensure it is secure, and actively protect it.

Hunter notes that the Internet is dramatically different than the domains of Air, Water, Land and Space in that one can be attacked, and not even know it. While probing in the physical domain may include activity close to an adversary’s borders – within the internet the “war” is constant, attacks are real and consequential.

The CPT efforts look for fingerprints that may indicate a previous infiltration or attempt. Like cyber detectives they will follow “the bread crumbs” – always mindful of the legal obligations and process to be maintained.

For example, a cyber analyst might pick a “box,” go look at it, analyze captured network traffic, look for statistical anomalies and subsequently be involved in active adversarial pursuit. Once a network is surveyed and secured the CPT trains the local cyber operator (LCO) to perform the ongoing protection.

In the squadrons ops room (the Hunters Den) the teams structure reveals an openness that supports collaboration.

CPT Mission Commander, Major D. Carpenter indicates that only about 15% of personnel’s time is actually spent on the computer. Most of the time is spent in communication, analysis and consulting with other team members (including intelligence specialists). While not specifically designated for offensive activity the team is “weaponized,” as Carpenter notes, “their weapons system oddly looks like a laptop.”

Potential impacts of cyber warfare bridge both the non-kinetic and kinetic realms. While non-kinetic effects such as data exploitation, data theft, and activity such as monitoring data feeds from a remotely piloted vehicle (RPV) could be considered a typical threat, the dangerous and very real field of Kinetic Cyber has emerged.

Examples of kinetic cyber include the release of the stuxnet virus and its crippling effects on Iran’s nuclear program, or the alteration of the speed of pumps on a pipeline that led to a catastrophic explosion.

Other kinetic cyber impacts could involve taking control of a specific platform, or be as simple as infiltrating a secure facility and turning off the air conditioning to the server room resulting in a shutdown of computer servers to a critical network.

One can appreciate the tremendous importance to secure military networks.

An effective cyber-attack would most certainly reduce warfighting capability and jeopardize the ability of the military to prevail in a conflict with minimal losses.

The threat is sobering, and it is encouraging to see the tremendous effort being expended by the Government and DoD to rapidly develop an effective Cyber Command structure and scores of CPT’s. Units like the 175th COG, and 275th COS demonstrate a new but critical capability for the “network enabled” battlespace.

Second Line of Defense expresses gratitude to Col. C. Kohler and SrA E. Saunders of the Maryland National Guard Public Affairs Office as well as Maj. D. Carpenter CPT Mission Commander, 275th Cyber Operations Squadro