Visiting RAF Lossiemouth: “MacRobert’s Reply” and Tornado Thunder

05/01/2016

2016-05-01  The last of the Tornado squadrons is found at RAF Lossiemouth.

During a visit to Lossie in April 2016, the Squadron Commander of XV(R) Squadron as well as members of the squadron were interviewed about the transition role and the legacy of Tornado.

The operational experience of Tornado as well as the weapons which it pioneered – notably Brimstone and its variants as well as Storm Shadow – and the con-ops associated with those weapons can clearly be found in the next evolution of the RAF.

Namely, it is the blending of weapons with air crews and support crews in the Tornado legacy can be found in the new capabilities being shaped with Typhoon and the missiles pioneered by Tornado in operations and reflected in the new what MBDA calls “fifth generation” weapons.

Tornado “thunder” is being passed on to the Typhoon and to those who use the weapons which it pioneered in combat.

But there is another heritage which can be found when you enter the hanger and see the Squadron’s famous ‘MacRobert’s Reply’ aircraft.

The photo below was shot last year at the time of the 100th anniversary of the squadron.

F61CADC2_5056_A318_A8112BA38A0C6AE0

The Squadron had a Tornado GR4 especially painted for their centenary in the Squadron’s famous blue and red colors.

In a special training sortie, this unique jet flew alongside the Squadron’s famous ‘MacRobert’s Reply’ aircraft.

The MacRobert’s Reply story has its roots with the MacRobert family and World War II.

The three sons of Lady Rachel MacRobert and her husband Sir Alexander MacRobert were all killed within 3 years of each other in separate flying incidents; the eldest of the three was killed in action whilst on missions during World War II.

Lady MacRobert’s response to her sons’ deaths was to donate £25,000 to purchase a bomber for the RAF and asked that it be named “MacRobert’s Reply”.

This was the start of a tradition that the RAF has kept alive. A succession of RAF aircraft has since carried the name. The current “MacRobert’s Reply” is a Tornado GR4 from XV (Reserve) Squadron, still identified by the cherished tail letter ‘F’.

http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/xv-reserve-sqn-100th-anniversary-tail-takes-off-from-raf-lossiemouth-04032015

The story is especially interesting for Americans as well because Lady Rachel born in the United States in 1884.

A fuller explanation of her life and the gift to the RAF is provided by this source found on the Free Library.

If the MacRobert story wasn’t true, someone in Hollywood would have to invent it. 

The saga begins in 1854 when Alexander MacRobert was born in Aberdeen. 

Fascinated by education, he was determined to improve his intellect but, coming from a humble family, university was out of the question. Instead, when his family emigrated to Canada, Alexander chose to stay in Scotland and take night classes at Robert Gordon’s College and the Aberdeen Mechanics Institute while still working full-time at a paper mill. 

Incredibly, despite his job and his studies, he still had time to meet and fall in love with Georgina Porter, who worked in another office at the mill. 

When he was offered the job of managing a woollen mill, he jumped at the chance. All he had to do was tell Georgina that the mill was in … Cawnpore, India. 

Alexander and Georgina married on Hogmanay 1883 and moved to Cawnpore. By 1888, MacRobert was wealthy enough to buy a small estate at Burnside, now Douneside in Aberdeenshire and, before long, turned it into a splendid country house. 

But MacRobert’s visit to the house in 1905 was to be like no other. The heavy-hearted Scot had brought his wife home to die of cancer. 

MacRobert honoured her memory with a pounds 25,000 donation to Aberdeen University for cancer research to be named “The Georgina MacRobert Fellowship”. And after his lonely return to India, he established the “Georgina MacRobert Hospital” in Cawnpore. 

ladymacrobert1

It was in 1909, four years after Georgina’s death, that MacRobert met Rachel Workman while sailing home to Scotland. 

The fiesty young 25 year old was charming and intelligent – she had a BSc in Geology from London University – and her free thinking spurred her to join the suffragette movement. 

MacRobert was smitten by her and their courtship was, according one historian, “discreet and almost secretive”. 

Alexander eventually proposed, but agnostic Rachel refused to get married in a church, so they were wed in a Quaker Meeting House in York on July 7, 1911. 

At the stroke of a fountain pen, American heiress Rachel Workman became Lady MacRobert. 

During their courtship, the former paper mill manual worker had been knighted for his public services both at home and in India. 

Lady Rachel brought colour and energy into the marriage. But she also brought something Sir Alexander must have thought had passed him by – children. The couple doted on sons Alasdair, Roderic and Iain. And blessed with joy at home, Sir Alexander saw his businesses enjoy equal good fortune. 

A director of six companies, he merged them to form the British India Corporation, the highlight of his career in commerce. Back in Scotland, he bought the 9000-acre Cromar estate, which bordered on Douneside, from Lord Aberdeen. 

In 1922, when he was created a Baronet, he was proud to take the title of Sir Alexander MacRobert of Cawnpore and Cromar. 

Sadly, just when he was enjoying the fruits – and accolades – of years of hard work, Sir Alexander fell ill and died … fittingly, at Douneside. 

It says much about Lady MacRobert that she agreed he should be buried in Aberdeen beside Georgina, his first love and wife for more than two decades. 

Overnight, the Scottish estates, vast investments all over the world and not least, three sons aged 10, seven and five became Lady MacRobert’s responsibility. 

The boys were educated in English public schools and went on to study at Cambridge. 

In 1933, 500 guests arrived at Douneside for the coming of age of Alasdair – now Sir Alasdair as the eldest son. 

As if to give her growing sons “space” Rachel decided they could have the House of Cromar to entertain the friends they brought to Scotland. 

Aviation pioneers including Charles Lindbergh and Amy Johnson were the stars of the day and Sir Alasdair was greatly interested in their field. He had taken flying lessons in India and founded his own aviation business. 

Then tragedy struck. His promising young life was wiped out when an aircraft he was piloting crashed near Luton. 

Lady MacRobert mourned her husband’s heir but didn’t argue when Sir Roderic joined the RAF in 1938. 

On May 22, 1941, he led an attack on a petrol convoy in Iraq, but perished during the raid. He was buried in a Commonwealth grave in Mosul. 

The baronetcy fell to Sir Iain, just 24, who had joined the RAF straight from Cambridge as a pilot officer. 

A few weeks after taking leave to mourn his brother, Sir Iain returned to duty. His aircraft disappeared while searching for a bomber crew at sea. His body was never recovered. 

In 1953, his name appeared on the Runnymede War Memorial, unveiled by The Queen, in memory of the 20,000 airmen who have no known grave. 

lady-macrobert-3-kilted-sons-rev 2

The death of Iain was a final, devastating blow for Lady MacRobert who, as well as losing all three of her sons, would now see her husband’s title extinguished without an heir. 

But instead of crumbling under the strain of the tragedy, she decided it only fitting that someone else should fight on in her sons’ names in an aircraft donated by her. 

In one of the most powerful and poignant letters ever penned by a grieving mother, Lady MacRobert wrote to Secretary of State for Air, Sir Archibald Sinclair: “It is my wish to make a mother’s immediate reply in a way that I know would also be my boys’ reply – attacking, striking sharply, straight to the mark. 

“The gift of pounds 25,000, to buy a bomber to carry on their work, expresses my reaction on receiving the news about my sons. They would be glad that their mother replied for them and helped to strike a blow at the enemy. 

“So I feel that a suitable name for the bomber would be “MACROBERT’S REPLY”. Might it carry the MacRobert Crest, or simply our badge – a frond of bracken and an Indian Rose crossed? 

“I have no more sons to wear the badge, or carry it into the fight. If I had 10 sons, I know they would all have followed that line of duty.” 

The chosen bomber was a Stirling of XV Squadron and in command was Flying Officer Peter Boggis who flew it bravely through many missions, including an attack on the German Navy at Brest for which he received the Distinguished Flying Cross. 

And when it crashed in 1942 at Peterhead, its replacement also bore the “MacRobert’s Reply” name. And so, a great tradition was born. 

Fifteen Squadron may have changed, but its “Foxtrot” aircraft has always been a “MacRobert’s Reply” – a Lincoln in 1947, a Washington in 1949, a Canberra in 1953, a Victor in 1958, a Buccanneer in 1970, and a Tornado from 1983 onwards. 

In 1993, when XV(R) Squadron moved to Lossiemouth, “MacRobert’s Reply” was back home in Scotland. 

But Lady MacRobert wasn’t finished after one bomber. She donated four Hurricane fighters, three named after her sons and one called “MacRobert’s Salute to Russia – The Lady”. Lady MacRobert also established the MacRobert Foundation and several trusts. And the House at Cromar, where her sons entertained their friends, became a leave centre for airmen. 

In 1954, Lady MacRobert passed away of heart failure, at Douneside, aged 70. 

The photos of the MacRoberts are credited to the MacRobert Trust.

http://www.themacroberttrust.org.uk/about-the-trust/gallery/

And the photos in the slideshow of Tornados at Lossie were provided by RAF Lossiemouth and are credited to them.

According to the RAF website, XV(R) Squadron is described as follows:

XV Squadron has over 280 permanent personnel, and up to 40 aircrew students at any one time, making it the largest and busiest fast jet squadron in the Royal Air Force. As the Tornado GR4 Operational Conversion Unit its main commitment is to the training of Pilots and Weapon Systems Operators before sending them onto front-line squadrons.

The Tornado GR4 is a multi role ground attack and reconnaissance platform. It is capable of performing a variety of day and night, all-weather operations. These include: Airborne Interdiction using precision ground attack munitions; Suppression and Destruction of Enemy Air Defences; Close Air Support for coalition troops; Air-to-Air refuelling and Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance. The Tornado GR4 is currently deployed on operations over Iraq in support of Operation TELIC and it is due to replace the Harrier GR9 in Afghanistan on Operation HERRICK in the summer of 2009.

XV Squadron teaches ab-initio aircrew straight from their advanced flying training at RAF Valley and RAF Leeming, as well as conducting Refresher Courses for experienced operators returning back to the Tornado GR4 following other tours of duty; additionally, XV Squadron undertakes Fast Jet Cross Over training for pilots and weapons systems operators converting across to the Tornado GR4 from other fast jet aircraft and the Squadron also trains aircrew officers from other nations Air Forces who are posted to the UK on an overseas 2-3 year ‘exchange tour’ flying the Tornado GR4 with the Royal Air Force.

XV Squadron also conducts post-graduate courses. The Squadron is the home to the Qualified Weapons Instructor Course, the Electronic Warfare Instructor Course and the Instrument Rating Examiner Course; each of these courses provides advanced qualifications to front line aircrew. Additionally, XV Squadron provides both aircrew and ground crew support to RAF operations around the globe when required.

 

 

 

 

The Army Operates at RAF Lossiemouth as Part of Joint Warrior 2016

04/30/2016

2016-04-30 Army units operate periodically at RAF Lossiemouth to provide for their specialized capabilities to the joint force.

In the slideshow below, the first few photos show an Army assault unit taking an airfield as part of the Joint Warrior 2016 exercise.

The British Army’s rapid reaction force has demonstrated the unique reach and agility that its specialist air manoeuvre capabilities provide to the military.

An aviation assault to capture the airfield at Kinloss Barracks today (Mon 7 Apr) marked 16 Air Assault Brigade’s arrival on Exercise Joint Warrior, the biggest annual military exercise in Europe.

Troops from the 3 PARA Battlegroup landed at Kinloss in Chinook, Merlin and Puma 2 support helicopters, protected by Apache attack helicopters, to assault the airfield.

Once secured, more troops and heavier equipment were delivered across the day by C-130 Hercules transport aircraft.

Airfield capture is a key skill required for the brigade’s role as the Air Assault Task Force, which is ready to deploy anywhere in the world at short notice to conduct the full range of military operations from non-combatant evacuation operations to warfighting.</p>

The operation was planned and launched from West Freugh, some 250 miles away near Stranraer.

The troops deployed from their base in Colchester last week, passing through the Joint Air Mounting Centre (JAMC) in South Cerney, Gloucestershire, for vehicle and personnel checks.

On Saturday (5 Apr) they took over West Freugh from 3 Commando Brigade Royal Marines and carried out battle preparations, including a parachute jump. Kinloss will now be established as a base for further missions, which could include helicopter-borne infantry strikes and stabilisation operations.

The next few photos show Army presence in the Joint Warrior 2016 exercise, which along with Cold Response earlier this year in Norway show NATO training its forces of the defense of the North Atlantic and Northern European areas.

The next few photos in the first slideshow highlight an earlier Army training event at Lossie.

Apaches came to Lossie from 2 to 11 September 2013 for Exercise PANTHERS PEAK.

The squadron will conduct mountain flying training in the Scottish Highlands so newly qualified instructors can be taught how to train students in challenging conditions.

Apache pilots learn to fly in mountainous areas as part of their pre deployment training before deploying to Afghanistan.

673 Squadron, 7 (Training) Regiment Army Air Corps, is an apache training squadron based at the Army Aviation centre, Middle Wallop in Hampshire.

The role of the squadron is to: train new pilots,pilots returning to the aircraft after a period of non flying related tours and newly qualified instructors.

The detachment of Apaches shows the versatility of the Station and their ability to cater for a variety of aircraft. RAF Lossiemouth will see an increase in such exercises over the next few years to train alongside the TyphoonForce and utilise the airspace, as the area means the aircraft can be used to their full operational capability.

The final three shots in the slideshow are there because they are just cool.

According to the UK MoD website published April 11, 2016 prior to the exercise, Joint Warrior 2016 was described as follows:

RAF Lossiemouth is set to host a small contingent of international Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA) and F-16 fast jets for Exercise Joint Warrior 16-1 which will take place from the 11th to the 22nd of April.

Exercise Joint Warrior is a tri-service and multinational exercise conducted in the UK during the spring and the autumn of each year. The exercise will involve more than 31 warships and submarines, 60 aircraft, and a total of around 6,500 personnel from the 14 participating nations.

This year RAF Lossiemouth will be hosting MPA aircraft such as the P3 Orion, Atlantique and the new P-8 Poseidon which is planned to be based in Moray. RAF Lossiemouth’s Typhoons will also take part in the Exercise alongside a detachment of Turkish F-16s.

Flight Lieutenant Guy Radcliffe, the Exercise Operations Officer at RAF Lossiemouth, said:

“The hosting of these Exercise participants will involve every section at RAF Lossiemouth. In order to facilitate each visiting units’ individual requirements for the Exercise, planning has been ongoing since last year to ensure that we are ready.

“It will be an extremely busy fortnight for the Station and the airfield itself. Particular challenges will involve working with different coalition countries, operating large aircraft from an airfield which is set up for much smaller, fast jets and fitting it all around RAF Lossiemouth’s own ongoing high operational tempo, essential training and QRA.”

The aircraft from the Canada, Germany, France, Norway, Turkey and the US will begin arriving at RAF Lossiemouth in the weeks leading up to the Exercise….. 

Normally RAF Lossiemouth operates its flying programme from 0800 to 2300, however during this Exercise some night flying may take place out with this period. 

The slideshow below shows some of the aircraft involved in the exercise and have been provided by RAF Lossiemouth during my visit and are credited to them.

And at the conclusion of the exercise, a local reporter provided a wrap up.

Ben Hendry in story published in The Press and Journal on April 23, 2016 noted the following:

A major military training exercise hosted by RAF Lossiemouth has drawn to a close, with fleets of international aircraft jetting off from the base throughout yesterday.

Operation Joint Warrior brought some of the world’s most advanced fighter jets into the skies above Moray, where they staged a series of spectacular aerial training sessions.

More than 3,400 Nato troops took part in the land, sea and air war games event – including 22 ships, four submarines and more than 40 aircraft from a dozen Nato nations and three partner countries.

For the past two weeks the region has been buzzing with excitement about the event, with enthusiasts flocking from far and wide to glimpse the awe-inspiring machines in person.

But by yesterday afternoon, a hush had descended on the base as normality began to reassert itself.

One onlooker, who made several trips to the viewing area at the northern edge of the RAF Lossiemouth runway, hailed the success of the event.

The former RAF serviceman said that a fleet of Turkish F-16 jets had been the main attraction for a lot of the aviation enthusiasts who visited the area for the event.

He added: “The Turkish jets flew on missions twice almost every day, and were involved with some important training sessions.”

A German crew which had been participating in the war games exercise was unexpectedly called away shortly after it begun, and many experts believe they were summoned to assist with international operations.

A fleet of Poseidon aircraft attached to Patrol Squadron 10 at the “Red Lancers” Naval Air Station in Jacksonville, Florida, proved of special interest to observers and Lossiemouth personnel – as the airfield will secure its own brand new deployment of the craft in the coming years.

The hulking spy planes were stationed at the northern end of the runway throughout the exercise, and it is understood that RAF chiefs plan to keep the station’s new fleet in that area.

RAF experts who have maintained their surveillance skills since the UK’s fleet of maritime patrol aircraft was decommissioned in 2010 spent time conferring with the American pilots and learning more about the machines.

It is believed that they will train the crews who will work with the machines when they take up a permanent residence at RAF Lossiemouth.

https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/897689/joint-warrior-concludes/

And for those keen on seeing the movement of aircraft, some footage from Joint Warrior exercise during April 2016 from RAF Lossiemouth, North Scotland can be seen in the video below.

Tornados and Typhoons based at the camp along with visiting aircraft, such as the P-8 and the Turkish F-16s can be seen.

All the photos were provided by RAF Lossiemouth and are credited to them with thanks.

A400M and Voyager at RAF Lossiemouth

04/29/2016

2016-04-29 Lossie is a key operating base for Typhoon and Tornado, and as such is supported by aircraft from other bases, notably from Brize-Norton where the lift and tanker fleet is based.

For example, the rapid deployment of the Typhoon from Lossie to the Middle East after the Parliament vote authorizing the RAF participation in the most recent round of conflict in the Middle East, the Typhoons rapidly deployed to Cyprus facilitated by the support fleet, with the A400M taking the required support materiel along with the Typhoons for the forward engagement.

In the slideshow below, A400Ms of the French Air Force are seen at Lossie.

In addition, the RAF version of the Airbus 330MRTT is seen at Lossie in support of the fast jet fleet.

The first photos show the RAF’s Voyager is seen at RAF Lossiemouth, Moray, Elgin.

The Voyager flew into Lossiemouth to take 51 Squadron RAF Regiment down to RAF Brize Norton prior to their deployment to Afghanistan.

The final photo shows the Voyager after it flew into Lossiemouth to take 51 Squadron RAF Regiment down to RAF Brize prior to their deployment to Afghanistan.

 

According to the RAF:

There are two types of Voyager aircraft: The K Mk2 is a two-point tanker, equipped with 1 FRL Mk32B 900E pod under each wing and the K Mk3, a three-point tanker with an additional centre line hose for larger ‘receiver’ aircraft.

Very few internal changes were required to modify the A330-200 for the Air-to-Air Refuelling role. In particular, no additional fuel tanks are required and, as Voyager shares the same wing as the four-engine A340, there is a pre-strengthened location available for mounting the wing Mk32B pods.

The fuel, necessary for refuelling operations, as well as that required for the aircraft’s mission, is carried within the existing wing and fuselage tanks. This arrangement leaves the cabin free for the transport of up to 291 personnel, and the cargo hold remains available for freight on either military or civil pallets.

On a typical deployment across the Atlantic, a single aircraft would be able to refuel four Tornados and still carry 11,000lb (5000kg) of freight/passengers. Voyager also has a flexible Aeromedical configuration, which includes the ability to carry up to forty stretchers and three critical care patients.

Following an open competition, AirTanker, the civilian contractor, was selected by the MOD to provide the replacement Air-to-Air Refuelling and Air Transport capability through the Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft (FSTA) programme. This is a Private Finance Initiative (PFI) solution, in which the private sector provides not only replacement aircraft, but also a complete and secure long-term service.

While the RAF will continue to retain responsibility for all military tasks involving Voyager, AirTanker will own, manage and maintain the fleet and provide infrastructure, support, training facilities and some personnel. This comprehensive service will ensure that the RAF has full operational availability of the fleet over a 27 year period.

One novel aspect of the AirTanker contract is the facility to lease the aircraft for civil operations. The considerable commercial demand for the aircraft makes it attractive to third-parties who would operate those aircraft from the fleet that are not immediately required for RAF use.

This would deliver a major cost saving to the MOD and taxpayer, and ensures that the considerable capability advantages of Voyager are affordable.

The RAF website also provides details on its evolving A400M fleet as well.

The Royal Air Forcetook delivery of the first Airbus A400M Atlas aircraft during an official ceremony, held at RAF Brize Norton, on 17 November 2014. The arrival of ZM400 heralds the staged delivery of a further 21 aircraft, in a schedule expected to be complete by 2019.

Although the RAF will employ the A400M’s strategic reach and impressive payload capacity by initially operating it in the strategic air transport role, Atlas is primarily a tactical airlifter. Its tactical capabilities will be developed over the next 8 years as it assumes the roles performed by the Lockheed Martin C-130J Hercules prior to the C-130’s planned retirement from RAF service in 2022.

Number LXX Squadron is the first operational Airbus A400M Atlas Squadron. The Squadron stood-up in an administrative and engineering support capacity on 1 October 2014. In September 2015 the Squadron began air transport tasking with its small, but growing cadre of trained aircrew.

Number XXIV Squadron, the Fixed Wing AirMobility Operational Conversion Unit, is responsible for conductingtraining for Atlas aircrew and engineering personnel. AdditionallyNo. 206(R) Squadron conduct test andevaluation as part of the aircraft’s capability development process…..

The aircraft is capable of carrying a load of 25 tonnes over a range of 2000nmls at speeds comparable with pure-jet military transports.

It is capable of operating either at low-level (down to 150ft agl) or at high-level altitudes to 40,000ft, and it is able to deploy troops and/or equipment between and within theatres of operation either by parachute (up to 108 paratroopers), or by landing on short, unprepared or semi-prepared strips. It also offers significant improvements in reliability, maintenance and operating costs over the C-130J Hercules fleet.

The two-pilot flight deck crew will have the benefit of an integrated, digital avionics system in the cockpit and a fly-by-wire control system.

Additional systems will provide a night-vision-compatible glass cockpit complete with two head-up displays supported by at least five multi-function displays that will allow state-of-the-art avionics developments to be incorporated to the flight-deck design, so greatly reducing crew workload.

The aircraft is driven by four Europrop International (EPI) turboprop engines, which will be the most powerful turboprops developed to date in the western world, they will be lighter, easy to maintain and will consume 20% less fuel per mission relative to a similar turbofan engine.

A modern Defensive Aids Suite is fitted, incorporating radio and infra-red frequency detectors, electronic-countermeasure equipment and chaff/flare dispensers.

The cargo bay of the Atlas is controlled by one Air Loadmaster, and can be configured for a number of roles: pure troop carrying, or a mixture of troops and support equipment; palletised cargo or military wheeled and tracked vehicles; two attack helicopters such as the Apache or Puma; or a mixture of light and heavy engineering equipment.

Off-loading equipment or stores after landing can be achieved using conventional ground equipment, the aircraft’s internal load-roller system, by airborne parachute or by gravity extraction from the aircraft’s rear ramp.

The Voyager supported the deployment to a Red Flag exercise, where in the photos below, the Typhoon is seen both on the way (over the Grand Canyon) and operating with the F-22 and other USAF and coalition assets in a high-end air combat training exercise.

The credit for the photos in the three slideshows goes to RAF Lossiemouth and was provided by them.

 

 

 

 

Visiting RAF Lossiemouth: Building Out a 21st Air Combat Base

04/28/2016

2016-04-28 By Robbin Laird

It seemed a bit odd to be looking at the North Sea on April 24th, after looking at the Pacific over my right while driving up from Sydney to Williamtown Air Base on March 23rd.

It was also considerably colder, and reminded one of why the Scots make scotch in the first place. They have great water, barley and a weather that requires drinking scotch.

In between, we had a chance to talk with the Northcom/NORAD Commander who lives roughly half way between these two airbases.

This is a notional rendering of the 10 and 2 O'Clock challenge. It is credited to Second Line of Defense and not in any way an official rendering by any agency of the US government. It is meant for illustration purposes only.
This is a notional rendering of the 10 and 2 O’Clock challenge. It is credited to Second Line of Defense and not in any way an official rendering by any agency of the US government. It is meant for illustration purposes only.

What Admiral Gortney highlighted when we visited him in Colorado Springs was the threat to North America from the 10 and 2 O’Clock positions.

When you are at Lossie you are clearly in the center of the 2 O’ Clock threat envelope, which for the Brits is clearly about the defense of their homeland.

RAF Lossiemouth currently is a Typhoon and Tornado base, but with the Tornados to be phased out within the next few years, the Typhoons will be joined by the P-8, which will probably operate as well from Lossie.

This provides the opportunity to integrate the Typhoons with P-8s with the F-35s, which will operate off shore from the new carriers or, in other words, shaping a kill web to protect the homeland and to anchor the defense of the Northern NATO countries.

In effect, Lossie will train to support the formation and evolution of a 21st century combat force in which a multi-mission combat fleet of Typhoons will work with the maritime-focused but land-based capable maritime combat system which is the P-8 (which will operate in the area, regardless of the final decision concerning where to base the fleet), and which, in turn, will work with the multi-tasking flying combat system which is the F-35.

In forthcoming interviews, we will discuss the roll out of a 21st century base approach, the key role of Typhoon for the RAF and both the challenges and opportunities inherent in its modernization,and the impact of the Tornado and its legacy upon the evolution of the 21st century combat fleet.

Recently, Lossie hosted aircraft and personnel participating in Joint Warrior 2016.

According to an April 8, 2016 story published by the BBC:

Exercise Joint Warrior is held twice a year – in April and October – for thousands of army, navy and air force personnel.

The training will see increased military activity at Faslane on the Clyde, RAF Lossiemouth in Moray and ranges at Cape Wrath in Sutherland.

The exercise runs until 23 April and will involve submarines, surface ships and aircraft including RAF Typhoons.

Warships and aircraft have already started arriving in Scotland ahead of the start of the training.

This year’s second staging of Joint Warrior, which will also take place in Scotland, will include what the Royal Navy has described as its first “robot wars”.

Unmanned Warrior 2016 will involve drones, including unmanned aerial vehicles and machines that can operate underwater.

And according to the UK MoD website published April 11, 2016 prior to the exercise:

RAF Lossiemouth is set to host a small contingent of international Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA) and F-16 fast jets for Exercise Joint Warrior 16-1 which will take place from the 11th to the 22nd of April.

Exercise Joint Warrior is a tri-service and multinational exercise conducted in the UK during the spring and the autumn of each year. The exercise will involve more than 31 warships and submarines, 60 aircraft, and a total of around 6,500 personnel from the 14 participating nations.

This year RAF Lossiemouth will be hosting MPA aircraft such as the P3 Orion, Atlantique and the new P-8 Poseidon which is planned to be based in Moray. RAF Lossiemouth’s Typhoons will also take part in the Exercise alongside a detachment of Turkish F-16s.

Flight Lieutenant Guy Radcliffe, the Exercise Operations Officer at RAF Lossiemouth, said:

“The hosting of these Exercise participants will involve every section at RAF Lossiemouth. In order to facilitate each visiting units’ individual requirements for the Exercise, planning has been ongoing since last year to ensure that we are ready.

“It will be an extremely busy fortnight for the Station and the airfield itself. Particular challenges will involve working with different coalition countries, operating large aircraft from an airfield which is set up for much smaller, fast jets and fitting it all around RAF Lossiemouth’s own ongoing high operational tempo, essential training and QRA.”

The aircraft from the Canada, Germany, France, Norway, Turkey and the US will begin arriving at RAF Lossiemouth in the weeks leading up to the Exercise…..

Normally RAF Lossiemouth operates its flying programme from 0800 to 2300, however during this Exercise some night flying may take place out with this period.

The slideshow below shows some of the aircraft involved in the exercise and have been provided by RAF Lossiemouth during my visit and are credited to them.

RAF Lossiemouth has entered another significant period of its history.

The Station remains an important fast jet main operating base within the Royal Air Force, with both Tornado and Typhoon squadrons based here.

RAF Lossiemouth remains the home to the Tornado GR4 Operational Conversion Unit, XV (Reserve) Squadron, who train all Pilots and Weapons Systems Operators to operate the Tornado GR4.

During the summer of 2014 two Typhoon squadrons, 6 Squadron and 1 (Fighter) Squadron, relocated to RAF Lossiemouth. The Station’s third Typhoon squadron, II(Army Co-operation) Squadron relocated from RAF Marham in early 2015.

As part of the changes, the Station assumed Quick Reaction Alert (Interceptor) North (QRA(I)N) duties from September 2014. RAF Lossiemouth is now primarily responsible for maintaining QRA(I)N – providing crews and aircraft at high states of readiness 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to police UK airspace and to intercept unidentified aircraft.

Additional units at RAF Lossiemouth include No 5 Force Protection Wing of the RAF Regiment. 5 Force Protection Wing includes a regular field squadron, 51 Squadron RAF Regiment, and a reserve squadron, 2622 Squadron of the Royal Auxiliary Air Force Regiment

RAF Lossie

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obama, Boris and “Brexit” (Updated)

04/24/2016

2016-04-24 By Kenneth Maxwell

President Barack Obama was in London this week on his way back from a visit to Saudi Arabia.

The visit to Britain was a valedictory visit of sorts.

It will probably his last visit to the United Kingdom as the President of the United States.

On Friday he took his presidential helicopter to Windsor Castle, together with his wife, Michelle, to see Queen Elizabeth II and her husband, the Duke of Edinburgh.

The 95 year-old Prince Phillip drove his wife and the Obamas back to the castle in his range-rover.

It was the day after Queen Elizabeth’s 90th birthday.

President Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron at a college basketball game in Ohio in March 2012. Credit: Carolyn Kaster / Associated Press
President Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron at a college basketball game in Ohio in March 2012. Credit: Carolyn Kaster / Associated Press

The Obamas then retuned to London for a private dinner with Prince William and Kate Middleton, otherwise known as the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, at Kensington Palace.

They also met the young prince George.

The next day, Saturday, Obama went to the Globe Theatre in London, where he saw a brief performance of Hamlet on the 400th anniversary of Shakespeare’s death in 1616.

And he then participated in very well successful meeting and discussion with hundreds of London school children.

But Obama’s main contribution was his declaration about “Brexit” at Downing Street on Friday afternoon, during a news conference with David Cameron, the British Prime Minister.

On June 23, 2016, Britain will vote in a referendum on whether Britain should leave or remain in the European Union. Barack Obama could not have been clearer.

He said that Britain would be weaker and less influential outside the European Community.

And he added that in terms of free trade deal with the US, something those campaigning for Britain to leave the EU are claiming would be an alternative for a post-EU Britain, he could not have been clearer.

He said that in terms of free trade deals wit the United States, Britain would be at “the back of the queue” using British, not American terminology, for Britain having to wait at the back of the line.

Since the ability of the UK to make trade deals outside the European Community has been one of the “Brexiters” main contentions, he undermined one of their principal arguments for a British exit.

The “Brexiters” were predictably furious.

The more so because they are mostly instinctively pro-American “Atlanticists.”

Obama’s point of view was, the “Brexiters” quickly claimed, the posturing of a “lame-duck” president.

Alexander Boris de Pfellel Johnson, better know as Boris Johnson, the outgoing conservative Mayor of London, who is also a highly paid journalist, had already struck a pre-emptive blow against Obama who he called “perverse” and a “hypocrite” in his expected opinion about Britain remaining in the EU.

He had accused Obama of being hostile to Britain because of his “part-Kenyan ancestry” which meant he claimed that Obama had an “ancestral dislike of the British Empire.”

Moreover, Obama had, Boris, claimed “removed the bust of Churchill” from the White House.

But the White House has already said that the story of the removal of Churchill’s bust was “100% untrue.” Churchill’s bust is still in the White House in the residence outside the Treaty Room.

One British reaction to the intervention of the President in UK electoral politics.
One British reaction to the intervention of the President in UK electoral politics.

Obama said that he had placed Martin Luther King’s bust in his office. Obama said that in any case, regarding Winston Churchill, that he “loved the guy.” Churchill’s grandson, the conservative member of parliament, Sir Nicolas Soames, who is in favour of Britain remaining within the EU, said that Boris Johnson’s comments were “deplorable” and were “completely idiotic.”

Ironically, Boris Johnson, was born on the East Side of Manhattan, and has US and well as British citizenship. He was recently involved in a tax dispute with the IRS. But has apparently now paid up.

He has said that he intends to renounce his American citizenship in order to prove his “commitment to Britain.”

He has made no secret of the fact that he is ambitious to succeed David Cameron as prime minister. His supporters think he is entertaining and humorous.

The President visits the Queen but without the right to swoop down in his full helicopter force. Credit: Express
The President visits the Queen but without the right to swoop down in his full helicopter force. Credit: Express

But his detractors think he is lazy, dishonest, and prone to use homophobic and racist language.

The British public can expect much more of this as the June referendum over Britain “in” or “out” of the EU approaches.

President Obama, who is very popular in Britain, has now made it very clear where the US stands on “Brexit.”  He was in fact absolutely right to say what he said. All foreign leaders have said the same thing.

But Boris Johnson and his pals have also made it clear where they stand.

And the tone of Boris’s response to President Obama’s intervention means that the debate has only one path ahead now. And that is down hill very fast.

Editor’s Note: The cartoon is from the following:

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/04/22/europe/obama-british-reaction/

Editor’s Note: Three additional points can be added to the original article by Kenneth Maxwell.

The first is that the President learned that it is not a good idea to tick off a 90 old woman, particularly when she is the Queen of England.

Having long memories of what the President’s security air flotilla did to her lawn, she made it clear to the President that he was allowed only three helicopters on his return visit and would comply with her security requirements when eating at his and not imposing his own.

According to the Express:

Her majesty called the US president’s bevy of choppers “over the top”, meaning the Secret Service had to rethink their plans to land about six aircraft in the 300-year-old gardens of her main residence during his tour of the UK this week.

The Queen put her foot down and said there was no chance his extensive security backup would be accompanying him to Windsor Castle.

She said only three helicopters, including the president’s personal aircraft Marine One, could land on the lawn when Mr Obama, 54, and his wife, Michelle, 52, came for dinner with the Queen and Prince Philip to celebrate her 90th birthday.

Her insistence came after the president’s helicopters damaged the grass when half a dozen of them landed during his last visit in 2011.

The engines’ heat scorched the grounds and the wheels left divots in one of the UK’s oldest lawns, planted during the reign of Queen Anne in the early 1700s.

One royal source told the Daily Star Sunday: “It was a write-off and the Queen was not amused.”

An insider said US aides refused to change their plans on security grounds but came around to the Queen’s wishes eventually

How nice of the “US aides” to remember to recognize that they were not visiting an off-site American facility!

“She rarely imposes her will but when she does people listen – it just took the US Secret Service agents a little time to realise that.”

 http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/663896/Queen-banned-Obama-helicopters-Windsor-Castle

Obviously, these people have never had grandmothers!

But then it got even more amusing, when the 94 year old Prince Philip insisted on picking up the President and driving in his own Land Rover.

And behind was the President Limo anxiously following the 90 plus Prince consort! 

Prince Phillip playing host.
Prince Philip playing host.

 

The second is that always be wary of the political analogy which can be bounced off of your words.

Did some of the key Brexit supporters really put in front of the British public that the glorious opportunity to pursue and Albanian model could be theirs?

According to Maxwell, Michael Gove, the Justice Secretary in Cameron’s government, and another leading “Brexiteer”, said earlier in the week in a major speech that outside the EU Britain “would thrive.” He said that The “UK would join Bosnia, Serbia, Albania and the Ukraine” in a European free trade zone.

His critics were quick to point out the “Albanian model” for a post-EU Britain.

It is surprising that he (or Boris Johnson) did not also revive the memory of Ahmet Huhtar Zogolli, King Zog, the self proclaimed King of Albania from 1928-1939, who settled into the “Ritz Hotel” in London during the Second World War before leaving for exile in Egypt (at the time of King Farouk) and died in France in 1961.

The third is that when is a referendum not really the final word? When it is a British referendum.

The British constitution has a very long history and it is about the role of Parliament in making laws, not about direct election of the Prime Minister or of laws which will govern the realm.

This means that even if the British public or more accurately some percentage of the British voting republic does vote for the Bretex option, that is merely the beginning of sorting out what really will happen. Although David Cameron would be gone, and most likely elections held, the next Parliament and government would sort out the way ahead with the recommendation from the referendum as a key data point.

Does this mean Britain leaves the Commission and stays in the Council of Ministers? Does it mean both? IF Britain remains as part of the Council of Ministers it could be in Europe but out of the Commission, which might be more than enough to satisfy the way ahead and perhaps act as a jolt to the rest of the Commission member countries.

After all, what is really at stake is how well the Commission have served the citizens of the European nations and whether the Commission has outlived its usefulness in its current form in any case.

 

 

 

Boeing, Denmark and Reaching Out to Danish Voters: An Unprecedented Ad Campaign

04/23/2016

2016-04-23 Unless you read and speak Danish or have friends in Denmark, you might have missed this one.

Boeing is reinventing itself in Denmark using its American approach in Nordic country.

Instead of the Vikings invading Anglo-Saxon territory, we are seeing something in reverse.

When companies compete to sell their products, systems or services in the defense sector, they do many things in terms of public relations.

But Boeing is doing something quite unusual in Denmark – they are using their time-tested approach used in the United States now in Denmark.

But Denmark is not the United States.

When Boeing lost the tanker competition to Airbus, they pushed hard on the “American tanker” line and appealed directly to American voters and Congressman that the “right tanker” for America was the “tanker built in America.”

One could point out that the USAF is still waiting for their new tanker several years later, while the world’s air forces, including Arab ones, are flying the new Airbus tanker.

What works in America, why not try abroad?

We now learn from Boeing’s ads in Denmark that the Danish taxpayer will save a lot of money if the Danish Air Force buys F-18s and that money can then be used for schools and hospitals.

One can be sure the Danish government loves having Boeing appeal over the heads of the government to the Danish voters!

As Hans Tino Hansen of Risk Intelligence has put it with regard to the Boeing approach:

“What Boeing does not understand is that the Danish public expects the politicians to take this kind of decision. It is not about winning an ad campaign.

With these advertisements, it is turning the Danish public off rather than animating them.

It is actually detrimental to their own interests.

Danish citizens do not want foreign companies telling how to spend Danish taxpayer money.

They do not want a defense product pushed down their throats.”

Even Sputnik News has picked up on this.

Today, pictures of Boeing fighter jets adorn the front pages of a number of national newspapers in Denmark. With the country’s stock of ageing F-16 slowly approaching the end of their lifetime, Denmark’s armed forces are looking forward to a more state-of-the-art replacement.

The choice lies between three warplanes, namely the Joint Strike Fighter (produced by US Lockheed Martin), the Eurofighter Typhoon (produced by Airbus in partnership with a pan-European consortium) and the F/A-18 Super Hornet (produced by Boeing), with the F-35A Lightning II (Joint Strike Fighter) generally regarded as the front-runner.

Besides, Denmark has been a partner nation in the F-35 program since 1997, contributing an estimated 291 million dollars to the development project….

Although the decision is solely up to the politicians in Copenhagen, Boeing is leaving no stone unturned in its massive campaign, which is addressed to the entire Danish population.

According to Tom Bell, Head of Boeing’ global sales and marketing department, the decision is so important that all of the Danish population ought to be involved.

It is our impression that an expense of such proportions concerns both the politicians and the population, and we hope the campaign will lead to an open and honest debate about the huge cost to the Danish taxpayers,” he said, explaining that Boeing has never launched campaigns of such a scale before.

The Mi17 chosen as the best helicopter for the Afghan forces.
The Mi17 chosen as the best helicopter for the Afghan forces.

Boeing believes that its radio and media outreach to the “average Danish citizen” is an appropriate step to take in playing its role as the custodian for Danish defense and budget.

Actually, Boeing has missed the core point: they have no role as custodian of the Danish budget!

To put this in perspective: the Russians provided combat helicopters for the Afghans paid for by DoD funds.

Many US manufacturers did not like this and worked the normal way to try to change DoD policy.

http://www.dodbuzz.com/2014/11/03/russia-delivers-last-of-u-s-bought-helicopters-to-afghan-military/

So to continue with this analogy, the Russian firm to make its case takes out ads in many American newspapers and on radio, to argue that buying Russian helicopters versus those produced in America will save millions on hospitals and other civilian projects.

I am sure there would have been no reaction in the United States to such tactics.

Editor’s Note: The Williams Foundation of Canberra, Australia and the Centre for Military Reform, Copenhagen, Denmark, held a seminar on the future of airpower last year which addressed the challenges facing allies and how the evolution of airpower could aid in dealing with those challenges.

At the symposium, Ed Timperlake provided an overview of the kinds of challenges facing 21st century airpower, and it is against the evolving threat environment where a defense capability needs to be measured in terms of its adequacy or not.

It is not a voting contest.

For a copy of this report, please go here:

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/integrating-innovative-airpower-a-report-from-the-copenhagen-airpower-symposium/

Shakespeare at 400

04/21/2016

2016-04-21 By Kenneth Maxwell

April 23, 2016, will mark the four hundred years since the death of William Shakespeare in Stratford-upon-Avon. There will be many celebrations.

Not only was Shakespeare the greatest writer in the English language.

Shakespeare-poster-web

He has also been gloriously translated into many foreign languages, including most notably into Portuguese by the great Brazilian poet, Manuel Bandeira. But the commemorations bring back memories of my school days.

I went to a private boarding school in the southwest of England. I was there mainly because I failed my “11- plus examination” with meant I would not be admitted to the local “Grammar School.” The examination was intended to separate the “brighter” students from “the rest,” who would be streamed into a “secondary modern” schools, which they would leave at 15 year of age and destined for more “mundane” jobs.

The system was abolished in the 1980s in an effort to “democratize” secondary education.

The overall effect was, however, to greatly stimulate private education at the secondary level, and diminish the quality of education which had long been the hallmark of a public “Grammar School” education, something which William Shakespeare had enjoyed in the late sixteenth century in Stratford-upon-Avon.

In fact I may inadvertently have had a role in the ending of the “11- plus” examination. A family friend of my room mate at Cambridge University, George Thomas, was a labour member of parliament and was later the Speaker of the House of Commons.  He introduced broadcasting into the proceedings of parliament.

George Thomas had been a poor scholarship boy from a broken family in industrial South Wales. He was shocked when I told him of my failure of the “11-plus” examination, and he was very impressed that despite this early setback I was now a student at Cambridge University.

I was very lucky that my parents could afford (with difficulty at times) to sent me to a private school. But one of the great and permanent advantages of this was that I was able between the ages of 12 and 18 to play various roles in the school’s annual Shakespeare play.

I began as “Miranda” in “The Tempest” (it was an all boys school at the time). And I ended my school career playing Henry V, which was notable because we had the first girls from the local private girls school playing the female roles.

Kate, the daughter of the King of France, who after Henry’s victory at the battle of Agincourt was to marry Henry, was played by Diana Hoddinott, who later became famous as a professional actress.

She played Annie Hacker, the wife of  the government mister, and later prime minster, in the wildly successful and hilarious BBC TV sitcom  “Yes Minister” and “Yes Prime Minister” in the 1980s.

Paul Eddington played Jim Hacker, her husband, and Nigel Hawthorn played Sir Humphrey Appleby, his permanent civil service secretary. Jim Hacker “thought” as a minister, as later as the prime minister, that he ran the country.

Sir Humphrey “knew” that it was the civil service that in fact did so.

I had been invited to join the National Youth Theatre while at school.

But since I had already been offered a place at St Johns College, Cambridge University, I turned down the opportunity. I had intended to continue with acting after I went up to Cambridge. And I had gone for an audition.

But I was entirely put off by the arrogance of the then chairman of the Cambridge Dramatic Society, Corin Redgrave, one of the decidedly lesser talents of that very talented theatrical dynasty. He sat in majesty, on a very large throne, in the middle of a very small stage, from which he was reviewing the performances of the applicants.

I left before it was my turn. I did not act again thereafter.

But I never forgot Shakespeare’s plays or the parts I played in them at school.

It was the very best part of my education. And a truly magnificent introduction to the English language. Miranda in “The Tempest” was very first role in my very first play. I was thirteen at the time .

“The Tempest” was Shakespeare’s last play written in 1610-11. It was based in part on the ship-wreak of the “Sea Venture” on the island of Bermuda in 1609, during a ferocious Atlantic hurricane, while en route for the new settlement of Jamestown, Virginia.

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 1.21.45 PM

My sister, who is the family historian, recently discovered that among those marooned on Bermuda was Henry Bagwell, the grandson of Thomas Chappell, the mayor of Exeter, one of our ancestors. He was among those who constructed the pinnace “The Deliverance,” from out of the salvaged wood from the wreak of the “Sea Venture” and from Bermuda cedar.

When “The Deliverance” eventually reached Jamestown, Virginia, in 1610, those from the Bermuda ship-wreak found that only 50 of the 500 early English settlers at Jamestown had survived the winter.

Henry Bagwell was later to become the first clerk of the county court of Accawmack, Virginia.

But I well remember the words of Caliban from Shakespeare’s “The Tempest” from all those years ago:

“The clouds methought would open and show riches

Ready to drop upon me; that when I wak’d,

I cried to dream again.”

Credit for second graphic:

http://graphicshakespeare.tumblr.com

 

 

The Way Ahead for the Joint Land Combat Force: The Perspective of the Australian Army Chief, Lt. General Angus Campbell

04/20/2016

2016-04-20 By Robbin Laird

The well-regarded chief of the Australian Army, Lt. General Angus Campbell, weighed in on the future of the Australian Army in the joint environment in two presentations recently in Canberra.

The first was during the RAAF’s 2016 Air Power Conference and the second was during the Williams Foundation seminar on new approaches to air-ground integration.

For the Chief of Staff of the Army, it about having the “right effect, at the right place and the right time” for the joint ground force, whereby he clearly meant the joint maneuver force.

He underscored that the core challenge was the co-evolution of the ground, air and naval forces to deliver a timely capability against the tasks or missions in the area of interest.

Chief of Army, Lieutenant General Angus Campbell, DSC, AM, at the range during Exercise Jericho Dawn at Puckapunyal, Victoria, on 18 March 2016. *** Local Caption *** The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) and the Australian Army, with support from Northrop Grumman, have successfully conducted a firepower demonstration and a combat team quick attack demonstration at Puckapunyal Military Area in Victoria as part of Exercise Jericho Dawn to display the powerful effects of integrated air and land operations. The live fire exercise allowed RAAF and Army operators, together with Defence and Industry representatives, to observe the combined air and land capabilities in two scenarios. The operators demonstrated the current capabilities, before trialling new ways to improve air-land integration, including the way that aircraft and vehicles connect and translate information through different communication networks.
Chief of Army, Lieutenant General Angus Campbell, DSC, AM, at the range during Exercise Jericho Dawn at Puckapunyal, Victoria, on 18 March 2016.  The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) and the Australian Army, with support from Northrop Grumman, have successfully conducted a firepower demonstration and a combat team quick attack demonstration at Puckapunyal Military Area in Victoria as part of Exercise Jericho Dawn to display the powerful effects of integrated air and land operations. Credit: Australian Ministry of Defence

He argued that the technology was outpacing our concepts of operations and argued that if Wellington came back to see operations in World War II, he would see a decisive difference in how the ground forces operated in the combined arms context.

But that if one would look from World II to now, although the technology had changed dramatically, the differences in concepts of operations are not as significant as the changes in technology would allow.

He argued that we needed to become significantly more innovative in our conceptual thinking to find ways to better leverage technology and to prepare to better use advancing technologies and capabilities.

Here he saw two great opportunities.

The first is to break the hold of incrementalism and imagine significant disruption driven by dynamics of change being introduced in the man-machine relationship. He argued, in effect, that we need to think from the future back into our current thinking to shape a better way ahead in the joint arena.

The second is to move from the very divergent data, communications and related systems to shape more convergent efforts, in effect, to shape more effective co-evolution of the key elements of combat power.

And to shape a more effective joint land force it is crucial to determine where the key capabilities might most effectively be placed, throughout the multi-dimensional combat force.

Lt General Angus Campbell, Chief of the Army, addresses the question of innovation and modernization for the ADF,
Lt General Angus Campbell, Chief of the Army, addresses the question of innovation and modernization for the ADF,

“In some cases, we are looking for the touch points where best to evolve a capability,” by which he meant that rather than looking for organic upgrades to each platform, the challenge was to look at the joint force and determine which elements of the evolving capability can perform optimal tasks within the overall force capability.

He argued for the increasingly important role of the small, mobile unit within the ground forces, which can leverage the joint assets and, in turn, can contribute to the other joint forces in shaping more effective fire or situational awareness solutions.

He argued that the evolution of software was a key element in the joint space, and that ways needed to be found to more rapidly evolve software in the joint space to provide for the joint effect.

And the “T” or transformation factor was crucial. Rapidity of operations was a key element of the way ahead, and it was important for the joint land force to be able to function more rapidly, with greater effect and in a variety of situations in which connectivity would be degraded.

“The small group needs to train to operate in degraded situations and to operate with as great a capability to not be detected as possible.”

The integration of air, naval and ground power was crucial to the way ahead, and the Australian Army’s battle management lab had RAAF officers involved on the ground floor shaping the way ahead.

Clearly, for the Australian Army chief, the Army is an embedded joint force, and with the new RAAF and Royal Australian Navy capabilities coming on line, would become more so.

Meanwhile back Inside the Beltway a discussion on Breaking Defense seemed in one instance to reflect the thinking Down Under.

According to Lt. General Deptula and Doug Birkey’s characterization:

“Army Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster issued a warning April 5 to the Senate Armed Services Airland subcommittee saying that the service will be  “…outranged and outgunned by many potential adversaries in the future….”

This statement garnered much attention in the media, but it artificially assesses Army capabilities in a stovepipe and fails to account for the realities of joint power projection.

Bottom line: the individual services don’t fight wars, the Combatant Commanders do by assembling an optimized mix of forces from each of the services to execute a given strategy to attain a desired set of conditions against a specific threat.”

The authors went to argue that “To put it simply, a soldier on the ground working in coordination with a B-1, B-52, the assets of a carrier air wing, or standoff munitions from a ship is afforded immense range and overwhelming firepower.

Those capabilities assembled as a joint task force create a synergy greater than any single service component alone.  In short, the combatant commands will never allow the US Army to be “outranged and outgunned.”

In Australia, the argument by Deptula and Birkey is simply ground truth from which the Australian Army is building its future.

And the Williams Foundation seminar on new approaches to air-ground integration simply builds from this point:

Air forces need to be capable of delivering air and space power effects to support conventional and special operations in the land domain. Air-Land integration is one of the most important capabilities for successful joint operations.

The last decade has seen a significant shift in how airpower has supported ground operations.

With the introduction of systems like Rover, the ability of airpower to provide precision strike in conjunction with ground forces saw a significant change in dramatic effects possible from a wide variety of air platforms.

Precision air dropping in support of outposts or moving forces introduced new capabilities of support.

This template of air ground integration is really focused on air operating in conjunction with ground whereas with the shift in the global situation, a much wider set of situations are emerging whereby the air-ground integration approach will become much wider in character, and the ability to insert force rapidly, as a precision strike capability, and to be withdrawn will be a key tool in the toolbox for decision makers.

Fifth generation enabled operations will see a shift to a distributed C2 approach which will clearly change the nature of the ground-to air command system, and with the ability of fifth generation systems to generate horizontal communications among air assets outside the boundaries of a classic AWACs directed system, the change in C2 will be very wide ranging.”

In other words, the co-evolution of the services was crucial in shaping a more effective force, and one capable of operating more effectively in a more timely manner.

Note: For the presentation of the Chief of Staff of the Australian Army’s presentation to the RAAF Airpower Conference 2016, you can listen here:

https://app.box.com/s/auj2inov49kzoxgb4mw2dm8k6jd3y8fz