The F-35 Helmet: A Significant Technological Advancement

11/21/2016

2016-11-21  In a recent story published on November 19. 2016 by Lt. J.G. Madeline Sanchez, with a dateline of San Diego, California, the F-35 helmet is highlighted a key part of the F-35 as a combat system.

When the DoD launched the acquisition process for the revolutionary multi-service, multi-role, single seat, single engine strike fighter aircraft known as the F-35 Lightning II, they envisioned a common platform across three variants that ultimately invigorated the defense industry world-wide, creating an influx of new technologies — notably the F-35 helmet.

A vital element of the F-35’s unprecedented warfighter capability, the helmet’s ground-breaking technology equips the pilot with mission-critical information on the helmet’s visor; resolves well-documented fit, comfort, and convenience problems associated with helmets worn by pilots of legacy aircraft; and fuses together the F-35’s cutting edge communications and sensor suite to form a clear picture of the operating environment — giving F-35 pilots unrivaled situational awareness and a decisive advantage over adversaries.

PACIFIC OCEAN (Nov. 7, 2016) — Royal Air Force Squadron Leader Andrew “Gary” Edgell, U.K. test pilot meticulously inspects his F-35B Lightning II aircraft during preflight. On the F-35B’s developmental test phase (DT-III) aboard the amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6), the aircraft is examined undergoing envelope expansion via a series of launches and recoveries in various operating conditions such as high sea states and high winds. (U.S. Navy Photo by Lt. j.g. Maideline Sanchez/Released)
PACIFIC OCEAN (Nov. 7, 2016) — Royal Air Force Squadron Leader Andrew “Gary” Edgell, U.K. test pilot meticulously inspects his F-35B Lightning II aircraft during preflight. On the F-35B’s developmental test phase (DT-III) aboard the amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6), the aircraft is examined undergoing envelope expansion via a series of launches and recoveries in various operating conditions such as high sea states and high winds.(U.S. Navy Photo by Lt. j.g. Maideline Sanchez/Released)

The latest iteration — known as the Generation III helmet — is also easily realigned and readjusted based on the individual pilot’s needs, whereas previous legacy F/A-18 helmets are rigid, cumbersome, and require manual upgrades.

While onboard the amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6) during the third and final shipboard phase of F-35B Lightning II developmental test (DT-III), Marine Corps Sgt. Nicholas Voegeli and Desirée Smith, F-35 Lightning II Pilot Systems Integration-Human Systems engineer, demonstrated the advancements featured in the F-35’s Gen III helmet.

Fabricated with its own Display Management Computer Hardware operating system the helmet enables pilots to toggle through different modes of data visualization. It also delivers a more efficient video feed than the F-35’s Gen II helmets — equipping pilots with symbology correlated inside the cockpit as well as outside the aircraft with the use of the Distributed Aperture System (DAS).

Using multiple DAS cameras installed peripherally around the aircraft, the pilot is able to display various modes of imagery such as thermal, night vision, and actual and achieve an unprecedented look-through-aircraft capability.

All modes are beneficial to pilots as they deliver a clear 360-degree picture during daylight and lowlight settings.

Thermal images portrayed through DAS enable pilots to view heat signatures emitted by various objects. For instance, a pilot can identify a ship running a hot engine against the vast darkness of the cold ocean. Night vision can also assist in magnifying low visibility objects against areas of very little to no light.

“The helmet mounted display (HMD) allows critical flight data to be viewable anywhere I look,” added Marine Corps Major John “IKE” Dirk, a test pilot and the F-35B DT-III Officer-In-Charge (OIC) from the Pax River Integrated Test Force (ITF) assigned to Air Test & Evaluation Squadron (VX) 23 based at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland.

“In addition to the aircraft’s flight symbology, I can display tactical data and even live night vision video.

The helmet helps me find friendly and enemy aircraft, locate targets on the ground, and can even point out the ship. It is fully integrated into the aircraft systems and enables a seamless transition between tactical display and the outside world,” he added.

Joint Helmet Mounted Cuing System (JHMCS) helmets worn by pilots of legacy jets such as F/A-18 Hornets, Super Hornets, and AV-8B Harriers, take a long time to install equipment enhancements while F-35 Gen III helmets are specially designed to facilitate the quick installation of equipment, thereby reducing the maintenance time required for each helmet.

Another problem with JHMCS legacy helmets is the graphics on the display visor, which block the pilot’s ability to see through an overly bright image. Engineers worked to refine this imagery on previous iterations of the Gen III helmet and now the latest helmet enables pilots to toggle through several gradients of opacity.

The pilot is also able to devote less time switching through different modes and doesn’t have to physically install Night Vision Goggles before starting a night mission because the Night Vision Device (NVD) is built-in.

“Legacy systems are often limited to a fixed heads-up display or separated into several systems — targeting helmet, night vision goggles, heads up display, etc.,” Dirk said. “The F-35 helmet integrates all of these capabilities and more into one balanced and comfortable helmet, complete with active noise reduction.”

These technological advancements of the F-35 Gen III helmet will save military expenditures due to several new factors.

The use of laser scanning technology creates an exact replica of a pilot’s skull, thereby fabricating a portable styrofoam helmet liner that is a break-through above and beyond the traditional custom-designed helmet for each pilot.

This styrofoam cap fits into any size helmet, enabling a pilot to take the helmet liner from squadron to squadron for use throughout his or her career, optimizing the flexibility of the pilot flight equipment inventory, eliminating risk of damage to helmets during squadron transitions, and reducing investments in large inventories of helmets.

As the pilot dons the cap and helmet, two ocular cameras situated above the helmet’s display visor are manually aligned to his or her interpupillary distance (IPD) settings for each eye to ensure the acuity of each pilot’s vision and establish the proper fit of each helmet.

“The helmet is definitely well worth it considering what it brings to the fleet, the capability it brings to the warfighter who keeps us safe, and how it equips all of the pilots,” said Smith, referring to the clear 360-degree picture of the battlespace that the helmet delivers.

This unrivaled situational awareness equips the pilot with an unparalleled ability to dominate the tactical environment.

Likewise, commanders at sea, in the air or on the ground immediately receive information collected by the F-35’s sensors via data link — empowering them with an instantaneous, high-fidelity view of ongoing operations, making the F-35 a formidable force multiplier while enhancing coalition operations.

Additionally, legacy aircraft only displayed targets on screens installed inside the actual cockpit, creating a disadvantage because pilots would have to turn their heads away from their surroundings.

Now, F-35 pilots can focus on their targets via the Gen III helmet display visor.

This empowers them to keep track of adversaries farther than they could ever turn their heads.

“You can’t put a price on the blanket of freedom that this aircraft will deliver,” Voegeli added.

“The threat of any adversary who wishes to bring us harm is ultimately the reason to test this next generation fighter jet. The moment this aircraft is put in the fight all questions will come to an end.”

The quantity of specifications in this piece of revolutionary equipment showcases the DoD’s integration of pilot equipment with its next generation strike fighter, its focus on warfighter performance and pilot safety, and its ability to inspire technological advancements that ensure U.S. air combat superiority for generations to come.

Editor’s Note: You can read Ed Timperlake’s report on the role of the squadron pilots in combat innovation below in flip book form.

Norwegian Joint Strike Missile Tests at Edwards AFB

11/05/2016

2016-11-05 According to an article published on November 4, 2016 by Kenji Thulowei, Public Affairs Office with the 412th Test Wing at Edwards AFB, the wing is in the process of conducting tests on the Norwegian Joint Strike missile which will eventually operate from the F-35.

One advantage of the F-35, is that a nation’s missiles integrated onto “their” F-35 is integratabtle onto every one else’s similar variant of the F-35.

The Australians and the Japanese have expressed interest in the missile as well as Raytheon planning to manufacture the missile in the United States as well.

EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. -- A U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon piloted by Maj. Jameel J. Janjua of the Royal Canadian Air Force carries a developmental test version of the Joint Strike Missile (JSM) to its release point above the Utah Test and Training Range west of Salk Lake City. When development is complete, the Joint Strike Missile is intended for use aboard the F-35 Lighting II Joint Strike Fighter. Janjua is assigned to the 416th Flight Test Squadron based at Edwards Air Force Base as part of an officer exchange program. (U.S. Air Force photo by Christopher Okula/Released)
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. — A U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon piloted by Maj. Jameel J. Janjua of the Royal Canadian Air Force carries a developmental test version of the Joint Strike Missile (JSM) to its release point above the Utah Test and Training Range west of Salk Lake City. When development is complete, the Joint Strike Missile is intended for use aboard the F-35 Lighting II Joint Strike Fighter. Janjua is assigned to the 416th Flight Test Squadron based at Edwards Air Force Base as part of an officer exchange program. (U.S. Air Force photo by Christopher Okula/Released)

From Norway to Australia, members from a number of allied and partner nations have come to Edwards Air Force Base to team with base units to test systems, enhance international cooperation and advance their own air force’s capabilities.

At the 416th Flight Test Squadron, a team of U.S. Air Force engineers and pilots are working with Norwegian government and industry personnel in testing the Joint Strike Missile. The JSM is designed to be carried in the F-35A’s internal weapons bay and is the only powered, anti-surface warfare missile to do so according to Norwegian officials, said James Cook, the 416th FLTS JSM program manager.

The JSM is an advanced missile made of composite materials and uses stealth technology. It has air intakes, fold-out wings and tail fins. The navigation system supports terrain-following flight and can be used against sea- and land-based targets.

Before it can be integrated with the F-35A, it is being tested on F-16 Fighting Falcons from the 416th FLTS. The F-16 provides an excellent platform to initially test the missile before it’s transferred to the fifth-generation fighter, test managers said.

“What we’re doing is conducting risk-mitigation testing with the F-16 before the JSM is integrated on the F-35,” Cook said.

All tests are conducted over the Utah Test and Training Range.

“I think it’s awesome to be a part of the next generational fighter while being in a legacy fighter combined test force. I’m excited to see the final outcome, which will be the culmination of all we’ve done here. To see it hit the target and explode the way it was planned to do,” Cook said.

Along with Cook, the JSM team consists of test pilots Maj. John Trombetta and Maj. Jameel Janjua (Royal Canadian Air Force), flight test engineers Eric Biesen and Tom Smeeks and Collin Drake, project engineer.

The JSM program at the 416th is one project that falls under the squadron’s European Participating Air Force Program, which Cook manages. The squadron conducts tests for European customers when requested.

According to Raytheon:

The Joint Strike Missile – or JSM – is a long-distance anti-ship missile designed to take on high value, heavily defended targets.

The long standoff range (distance from the aircraft to the target) ensures that the aircraft and pilots remain out of harm’s way.

JSM has sophisticated target acquisition capability that uses Autonomous Target Recognition, made possible by an imaging infrared seeker.

It is the only fifth-generation cruise missile that will be integrated on the F-35 and also available for integration on other aircraft intended for offensive anti-surface warfare (OASuW) applications.

Joint Strike Missile

FEATURES

  • Advanced engagement planning system that exploits the geography in the area 
  • Accurate navigation system for flight close to terrain 
  • High maneuverability to allow flight planning in close vicinity to land masses
  • Discriminating seeker with imaging infrared technology
  • Two-way networking datalink (compliant with standard military equipment) offering target-update, retargeting and mission-abort capabilities

The Joint Strike Missile is a partnership between Raytheon Company and Norwegian defense company Kongsberg Gruppen.

An Overview on the F-35 as a Flying Combat System

10/12/2016

2016-10-12 In this video produced by Lockheed Martin, a video overview on the F-35 as a game changer is discussed.

It is the synergy of the F-35 with evolving combat approaches which is shaping and will shape  transformational capabilities.

As Rear Admiral Manazir, N-9 for the US Navy has put it:

“For instance, when we talk about the F-35 we are focused not simply on the platform but how that F-35 empowers and fits into the distributed networks or kill webs.

“It is the outcome and effect we are focused on.

“If we’re going to fight next to each other, the force (as an evolving distributed capability) has to understand how to employ their weapons systems, including how to best leverage the F-35, rather than just relying on the pilot that is flying the F-35 understanding what it can do.”

Or as Group Captain Ian Townsend from the Royal Air Force has put it with regard to the synergy between the new British carrier and the F-35:

“As an airman, I like anything that enhances my ability to deliver air power, and the ship certainly does that.

“The ship has been tailor-made from first principles to deliver F-35 operational output.

“The ship is part of the F35 air system.

I think this is the key change to where we were in Joint Force Harrier where the ship was really just a delivery vehicle.

“The ship was just a runway.

“The Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers are much more than that.

“They are right at the heart of the air system’s capability fundamentally enabling and supporting what the air vehicle is doing three, or four, or five hundred miles away from the ship. 

“And that wasn’t quite the same in Joint Force Harrier with the Invincible Class CVS carriers.

“So it’s very different for us.

“Everyone involved in embarked F-35 operations needs to understand what the air vehicle is going off to do because everybody on the ship is much closer to that end delivery of effect.

“This is a very different concept of operations from 15 years ago.

“When I launched from the CVS in 2005 to fly an operational misison in Afghanistan, once I left the deck, I was gone.

“The next contact I would have with the ship was when I called for recovery, several hours later.

“Whilst I was airborne the ship and I became very separate operational platforms.

“When a UK Lightning launches from the QUEEN ELIZABETH, the information link between the air vehicle and the ship now means that they remain connected during the operation greatly enhancing operational capability.

“In terms of being an information node or a C2 node, we’re in a much different place now.

“And I think that’s really quite interesting for us as air commanders in terms of our ability to control what is going on forward with the airplanes.

“I also think from a pilot’s perspective, being on the deck in my F-35, being able to see in my cockpit what is going on in the battle space, because my brothers in their F-35s already in the operational battlespace have sent information back to me, I think that’s really exciting as well.

“We are no longer launching into the unknown.

“We can see what’s happening.

“We understand what we’re going off to go and do, but we can see the real-time situation in the battle space before we launch off the deck. 

“This is a significant operational benefit.”

Or as Air Commodore Kitcher, Director General of Capability Planning in the RAAF has put it:

“The F35 introduction’s is catalyst for significant change.

“Although the jets don’t arrive in Australia until the end of 2018, and IOC is not until the end of 2020, believe me, we are right in the middle of introducing the F-35A into service.

“In addition to personnel we have embedded in the overall F-35 program in the US, we have two RAAF aircraft and four instructors at Luke AFB. Our first cadre of dedicated F-35 maintainers and engineers departs for the US in Jan 17, and will be gaining the necessary experience so we can operate the F-35 in Australia from the end of 2018.

“Operating the F-35 will be one thing, but we also need to be able to sustain it, and the methods of sustaining the F-35 are also different to older platforms. 

“We have been planning for a while now, and these plans will continue to evolve, but I’m not sure our system fully understands that this significant transition is well and truly underway.

“You can keep flying legacy aircraft forever if you want to spend enough money on them, but they all reach a point where they will become capability irrelevant. 

“Our Classsic Hornets are doing a great job in the Middle East right now, and due to the raft of Hornet upgrades we have completed, remain amongst the most capable Classic  Hornets anywhere.

“However, they will reach a point in the near future, especially in the higher end fight, where their utility  will be significantly diminished.

“The F-35 brings 5th generation qualities which will allow for a significant expansion across a raft of ADF capabilities. Air Maritime, Land and most importantly joint.

In short, the F-35 is being introduced as the US and key allies are renorming air power.

As the then head of the Air Combat Command, General Hostage put it in an interview with us:

“You mean the Re-norming air operations if I were to steal a term?

“Well, I was fortunate to fly the airplane, I learned what I didn’t know.

“I was writing war plans in my previous job as a three star using the F-22s in a manner that was not going to get the most out of them that I could’ve because I didn’t truly understand the radical difference that the fifth gen could bring.

“People focus on stealth as the determining factor or delineator of the fifth generation, it isn’t, it’s fusion.  Fusion is what makes that platform so fundamentally different than anything else. And that’s why if anybody tries to tell you hey, I got a 4.5 airplane, a 4.8 airplane, don’t believe them.  All that they’re talking about is RCS (Radar Cross Section).

Fusion is the fundamental delineator.  

“And you’re not going to put fusion into a fourth gen airplane because their avionic suites are not set up to be a fused platform.  And fusion changes how you use the platform.

“What I figured out is I would tell my Raptors, I don’t want a single airplane firing a single piece of ordinance until every other fourth gen airplane is Winchester.  Because the SA right now that the fifth gen has is such a leveraging capability that I want my tactics set up to where my fourth gen expend their ordinance using the SA that the fifth gen provides, the fifth gen could then mop up, and then protect everybody coming in the next wave.

“It’s radically changing how we fight on the battlefield.

“We are fundamentally changing the tactical battlefield.  How a tactical platform operates with the fusion of fifth gen.

“What the aviators do is fundamentally different in a fifth gen platform versus fourth gen in the tactical fight.

“From an operational standpoint, there are some changes because there are now some things that we can do with fifth gen that I might not have been able to do before.

“But the fundamental mechanism of producing air superiority, to enable ground operations, to enable deep strike, to enable all these other things; those fundamental things, those tasks are the same.

“I have got the command embarked on a full-court press to get a fourth to fifth, fifth to fourth capability that will need a combat cloud to be fully empowered, but it will then allow us to fundamentally change how the fourth generation platforms fight in addition to the fifth gen.

“Without that back and forth communication, machine-to-machine, the fourth gen’s going to have to do what they already do, they’ll just leverage some of the capability that fifth gen — the SA the fifth gen can provide.

“If I can get that machine-to-machine, now the fourth gen platform will begin to realize some of the benefits inherently at the tactical level that the fusion engines of the fifth generation aircraft provide.”

Recently, The Cyber Brief interviewed the Marines leading expert on fifth generation aircraft, who is an F-22 and F-35 pilot among many other things.

Lt. Col. “Chip” Berke had these choice words for the F-35 critics:

The question of “Is it worth it?” has to be put into context. You can only determine the worth of this airplane if the capability is understood. If you want to define the capability along 4th generation standards and say it’s not worth the price of the program, that’s a pretty flawed argument to me.

For someone who is pretty familiar with the role and the impact of tactical aviation in a joint warfight – and I’ve been in combat in the F-18 numerous times – I’m very comfortable saying that the F-35 is a much more capable aircraft in terms of missions. It gives us a qualitative advantage, but more importantly, it has, inherent in its existence, an ability to adapt to missions we’re not even familiar with right now. It’s going to create an ecosystem, and it’s going to facilitate a whole host of other contributors to a network of warfighting information without which we would be at a huge disadvantage.

A lot of people either underestimate or misunderstand the actual capabilities of the F-35. It’s almost impossible to overstate how significant the emergence of this airplane is for the Marine Corps and the joint war force in general. Then you start to incorporate concepts like the F-35B and how expeditionary it is, and where it can operate. It can contribute to joint force missions and provide combatant commanders with a specialized aircraft that offers a persistent capability that may not represent 100 percent of what they need, but it’s available to them all the time.

It’s really difficult for me to say how good the airplane is because it’s so much better than anything we even thought of building, let alone have actually built. And part of the reason why it’s delayed is because the technology is so complex and what we’re asking it to do is so significant that it’s going to take some time and a little bit of patience, but ultimately, it’s in the hands of the war fighter now.

And that’s the best place for it to be because people that are using this to support Marines and to support the joint forces are going to figure out what they need out of it and what it can do.

And that’s part of the reason why the program is doing so well lately and why the news is getting better –  we’ve got it in the hands of the people that are going to use it.

I’ve always said this: the greatest advocates of the F-35 are the people closest to the program. The biggest skeptics and critics are the people farthest away from the program. The less you know about it, the less you understand it, and the more critical you are of it. If you ever hear someone pining away for the F-16 of 1979 or the F-18 of 1983 or the F-15 of the mid 70’s, you’re talking to a someone who’s so far behind the technology and what the airplane can do that to me, his criticisms are just totally unwarranted.

The people that know the most about the jet are the people who are the biggest advocates for it. And keep in mind these are people with experience in other airplanes and other warfighting assets. I didn’t grow up on the F-35.  I had three previous operational experiences with amazing airplanes prior to the Joint Strike Fighter. 

My opinion of the F-35 is vastly higher than that of anything else, and that’s just because I understand it.

For the full interview, see the following:

https://www.thecipherbrief.com/article/qualitative-advantage-1091

 

Rollout of the First Japanese F-35

09/24/2016

2016-09-24  Senior Japanese and U.S. government officials joined Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) to celebrate the roll out of the first Japan Air Self Defense Force (JASDF) F-35A Lightning II, marking a major milestone in Japan’s enhanced national defense and strengthening the future of the U.S-Japan security alliance.

The ceremony was attended by more than 400 guests from both governments, militaries and defense industries.

Kenji Wakamiya, Japan’s State Minister of Defense spoke at the event, saying, “With its low observability and network capability, the F-35 is the most advanced air system with cutting-edge capability as a multi-role fighter. As the security environment surrounding Japan has become increasingly severe, because of its excellence, it is very significant for the defense of Japan to commit to acquiring the F-35 year by year.

The Rollout of the First Japanese F-35 from SldInfo.com on Vimeo.

The F-35A is expected to fulfill an important central role in Japan’s air defense system. Given that the United States Government has designated Japan as a regional depot in the Asia-Pacific area, introduction of F-35A to Japan is a perfect example, enhancing the Japan-US alliance.”

Gen. Yoshiyuki Sugiyama,JASDF Chief of Air Staff, said, “The F-35A has remarkably advanced system. This highly sophisticated 5th generation fighter will bring a great development to air operations as a game changer. In integration with current JASDF assets, it surely promises to enormously contribute to not only the benefit of our national defense and but also regional stability.”

Other distinguished guests attending included: Dr. Hideaki Watanabe, commissioner of Japan’s Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Agency, Frank Kendall, undersecretary of defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, Gen. Terrence O’Shaughnessy, commander of U.S. Pacific Air Forces, and Marillyn Hewson, Lockheed Martin chairman, president and CEO.

“The men and women of Lockheed Martin are honored to bring the exceptional capability of the F-35A to our partners and friends in Japan,” said Hewson. “The security alliance between Japan and the United States has been a cornerstone of peace and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region for generations, and we are proud to continue that legacy of cooperation with the rollout of the first F-35A to the Japan Ministry of Defense and the Japan Air Self Defense Force today.”

Japan’s F-35 program includes 42 F-35A Conventional Take Off and Landing aircraft, acquired through the U.S. government’s Foreign Military Sales program. The first four aircraft are built in Fort Worth and the remaining 38 aircraft will be built at the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Final Assembly & Check-Out facility in Nagoya, Japan, where aircraft assembly is underway. Maintenance training for the first JASDF F-35A technicians is underway at Eglin AFB, Florida, and the first JASDF F-35A pilots are scheduled to begin training at Luke AFB, Arizona, in November.

 https://www.f35.com/news/detail/lockheed-martin-and-japan-celebrate-roll-out-of-japan-air-self-defense-forc

FORT WORTH, TX, UNITED STATES

09.23.2016

Courtesy Video

Defense Media Activity

As the article above mentions, the bulk of the Japanese F-35s will be built at the Nagoya facility. The Nagoya FACO will be the second international F-35 production facility. The other is located at Italy’s Cameri air base. Nagoya has always been the focal point of Japan’s aviation industry. The aircraft being built at the plant will be the fifth one delivered to the Japanese forces.

Additionally, the US Department of Defense selected the Nagoya FACO in 2014 for the North Asia-Pacific regional heavy airframe Maintenance Repair Overhaul & and Upgrade (MROU) facility.

A Norwegian F-35 Pilot Provides an Update: Shaping New Combat Capabilities in the Northern Edge of NATO

09/22/2016

2016-09-22  Kampflybloggen (The Combat Aircraft Blog) is the official blog of the Norwegian F-35 Program Office within the Norwegian Ministry of Defence.

The author of this post, Major Morten “Dolby” Hanche, has more than 2200 hours behind him in the F-16, he is a U.S. Navy Test Pilot School graduate, and on 10 November 2015 he became the first Norwegian to fly the F-35.

He now serves as an instructor pilot with the 62nd Fighter Squadron at Luke Air Force Base in Arizona.

This post is an updated version of an article first published in Norwegian.

http://nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2016/09/16/lack-of-perfection-does-not-mean-disaster-how-i-read-test-reports-as-a-pilot/

I finished up writing this article before getting ready to fly another sortie in the F-35.

Based on my own experiences flying the F-35A, I feel that the media´s interpretation of the previous DOT&E report is influenced heavily by unrealistic expectations – something which seems to be a trend. 

Major Morten Hanche i cockpit før en flytur med F-35 jagerfly på Luke AFB i USA / Major Morten Hanche in cockpit before a flight with a F-35 fighter plane out of Luke AFB in USA
Major Morten Hanche in cockpit before a flight with a F-35 fighter plane out of Luke AFB. Credit: Norwegian Ministry of Defence

I don´t see the point in countering every claim that´s being brought up. 

First off, it´d make for a very long article. 

Secondly, I would not be dealing with the bigger problem, which in my mind is a lack of understanding.

I fully expect the F-35´s most hardened critics to discount this article, regardless of what I write.

However, some may choose to believe my story, based on the fact that I know the airplane and its capabilities as a pilot.  I don´t make my claims based on bits and pieces of information, derived from potentially unreliable sources.  

They are based on experience actually flying and training with the jet for nearly a year

My goal is to shed some light on airplane development and testing; why we test, what we discover in testing and what a test report may result in.

I write this based on my own experience, both through education at the US Naval Test Pilot School, but more importantly through working with the F-16 and the F-35, both operationally and in test settings….

I´ll start with smartphones, as another example of technology development. Admittedly, phones are somewhat different from a fighter airplane, but there are similarities. 

A smartphone is a complex system of systems – just like a fighter jet.  The phones keep evolving with both new hard- and software.  It is not unheard of therefore that the manufacturers issue updates. 

Updates which provide new capabilities, but which also aim to correct previous errors.

According to Wikipedia, Apple released its iOS 9.0 operating system to their iPhones and iPads on 16 September 2015.

The 9.0.1 update was issued already on 23 September, followed closely by the 9.0.2 update on 30 September.  Then 9.1 on 21 October and 9.2 on 8 December 2015.

Such a frequent update rate might indicate that not everything worked perfectly from the start.

Still, wouldn´t it be a bit harsh to claim that the phones didn´t work with the first four software versions?

Major Hanche concluded with this key point:

To me, a compelling argument for how well the F-35 works is evident by what we´re able to do in training. 

Three weeks back I was part of a four-ship of F-35s. 

Our mission was to overcome an advanced airborne threat, while locating and destroying an equally advanced surface based air defense system. 

After neutralizing these threats, we were able to destroy four additional targets. 

All this prior to receiving the Block 3F capabilities. 

Suffice to say that this mission would have been close to suicide with a four-ship of F-16s alone!

For a look at the arrival of software upgradeable combat aircraft, see the following:

The Software-Upgradeable Combat Aircraft: The Case of the P-8

And for the broader context within which Norway has acquired the F-35, see the article by Carl A. Posey in the September 2016 Air and Space Magazine:

http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/norways-air-force-180960362/?no-ist

The Guard at NATO’s Northern Gate

With a new force of F-35 Joint Strike Fighters, Norway readies for Europe’s next threat.

Though the conversation around the restaurant is mostly in Norwegian, you also hear diners chatting in English, a good deal of it concerning aviation. The room is stocked with tech reps tending the flock of F-16s stationed here, and preparing for the Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning IIs that will soon begin their migration to Norway. The prospect of their arrival has already begun to transform not only this nation’s air force, but every branch of its military…..

“I have been flying the F-35 for quite some years now,” he puts “flying” in air quotes—“in a simulator environment. The F-35 isn’t built for a dogfight. It is very popular to talk about this one-on-one. But [such talk] should die, really. The fight can happen in a decidedly different way than it would in the F-16. One-on-one with guns only doesn’t really matter. You did something dramatically wrong if you ended up in a dogfight” in the F-35.

RNoAF 2nd Lt. Elsie Johnsen watches her radar screen as a pair of Norwegian F-16s extend greetings to two Russian Tu-95 Bears. Credit Photo: Norwegian Armed Forces
RNoAF 2nd Lt. Elsie Johnsen watches her radar screen as a pair of Norwegian F-16s extend greetings to two Russian Tu-95 Bears. Credit Photo: Norwegian Armed Forces

The Joint Air Power Competence Centre experts maintain that the F-35, like the F-22, has been designed “to engage without being engaged in turn,” and at visual range, that engagement isn’t always a furball. They point out that the F-35 can engage a target that’s behind it, something more traditional fighters can’t do.

No one in Norway seems troubled by the offensive mission the F-35 is designed to fly, or the claim that it will be able to penetrate and survive high-threat environments. “The F-16 has a pretty good offensive capability,” says Aamodt…..

“We control all the radars there are in Norway,” he explains, referring to a string of installations monitoring the country’s airspace and borders. But those radars are quickly becoming obsolete. “We have radars that were developed and delivered in the 1970s. Also some less than 10 years old.” Like so much else in the Norwegian military, replacing them over the next decade is linked to the arrival of the F-35…..

Over the next several years, the much-anticipated covey of F-35As will arrive, bringing new capabilities that will dominate Norwegian military strategy for decades to come. The F-35 will become Norway’s main line of defense, and if called out, demonstrate its strike capability.

Ed Timperlake added this comment about the “right stuff” Norwegian style:

I was a Fighter Pilot with VMFA-451 (F-4Js) and we scrambled to Andoya from MCAS Beaufort in 1972 to deter Russia (then Soviets).

The Norwegian Military across the board that we worked with are world class warriors.

Shaping a Way Forward for the Canadian Air Force: Putting the Fighter Decision in Context

09/21/2016

2016-09-21 By Danny Lam

The Canadian Air Force along with the entire Canadian Defence Force faces a tough transition.

The challenges to Canada associated with developments in both Europe and Asia or what the recent NORTHCOM/NORAD Commander referred, as threats from the 10 and 2 O’clock are going up, not down.

Yet the position of the government seems fixated on not addressing the way ahead, but ways to implement their campaign pledge to not buy the F-35.

It is time for the government to reconsider this position, given that all of the key allies for Canada in the 10 and 2 O’clock are F-35 partners, but also that the alternative is not really cost effective in any case.

It would make sense to have a competition but one in which the choice of new combat aircraft be put within a broader context, namely, how to shape an overall airpower transition in which manned, and unmanned systems will evolve in the decades ahead, and the integration of air with ground and maritime will grow as Canada’s partners work to shape integrated force structures.

The Canadian choice must consider the broader context, and not the narrow question of a fighter replacement.

Recently, the Standing Committee on National Defence release a report which was entitled “Canada and the Defence of North America: NORAD and Aerial Readiness.”

http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=e&Mode=1&Parl=42&Ses=1&DocId=8406082

“Today, NORAD is once again faced with new military technologies and threats,

forcing it to review its capabilities and processes in order to ensure that it remains relevant and ready to efficiently respond to an increasingly complex and ambiguous international security environment.”

The question on the table is how might Canada best support its own interests through the modernization of NORAD and enhancing its maritime, air and ground-based defense capabilities?

“The RCAF, however, needs new aircraft and infrastructure to replace some of its aging assets and to ensure its capabilities remain relevant. A few procurement and infrastructure renewal projects are currently underway, but many more are expected to be launched in years to come.

It is clear that billions of dollars will need to be invested in the RCAF in the near future, not only to maintain its level of readiness and to ensure that its contributions to NORAD as well as search and rescue operations, in particular, remain as efficient and successful as can be, but also to enhance its capabilities to respond to any new challenge or threat the international security environment may throw its way.

The security of Canada and Canadians depends on it.”

Testimony to the Committee highlighted in many cases the need for any fighter selection to be part of wider multi-domain modernization effort.

In other words, it was not just about selecting a fighter aircraft, it was choosing one which could lead, support or was symmetrical with a broader transformation approach.

It would be wise for the government to have a competition for the fighter replacement, but one, which put that selection into the broader dynamic of defense modernization. Which choice would lean forward to the future of defense transformation, rather than simply deliver a replacement fighter aircraft?

The turn of the 20th and 21st Century will see acceleration in the pace of technical change equal to or greater than the Industrial revolution.

Widespread deployment of microelectronics, computing, and communication, advanced manufacturing and other technologies that are fast moving and evolving in civilian applications have found their way as well into military systems and as the military transforms among Canada’s allies there is a bounce back effect as well as forces are modernized and transformed.

Operational requirements like replacements for Canadian Fighters that took years to draft, decades to implement, procure and deploy, are becoming challenged by faster moving peer competitors who can often outspend NATO allies.

Consequently, Canadian Forces are stuck with antiquated gear — rather than constantly refreshing their stock as new innovations and opportunities occur.

A two-seater CF-18 flies over the Parc des Laurentides en route to Valcartier firing range. © 2012 DND-MDN Canada
A two-seater CF-18 flies over the Parc des Laurentides en route to Valcartier firing range.
© 2012 DND-MDN Canada

That may have been fine in the 1970s, but in an era of rapid technological change, it is fatal.

Technological revolutions are changing threats to encountered by Canadian Forces faster than the procurement and supply system can supply appropriate equipment like MRAP vehicles in Afghanistan.   Wartime pressures further accelerate evolution.

Traditional NORAD missions protecting against bombers and cruise missiles transiting the high Arctic to attack urban centers in North America is insufficient.   Year round shipping, exploitation of Arctic resources and non-traditional security threats at sea or on land make for a much more complex security challenge by the mid-21st Century.

The Trudeau Government elected in October 2015 opted to re-visit the decision to acquire the Joint Strike Fighter after indecision under the previous government.

Between September 2015, the Liberals vacillated from an initial pre-election proposal to “save money” by not buying the F-35 in favor of “many [unspecified], [allegedly] lower-priced options”, to an “interim” buy of 20 F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, to most recently, to request information from many vendors including Lockheed-Martin’s JSF which “does not work and is far from working” that reached IOC on August 2, 2016 (F-35A) and July 31, 2015(F-35B).

The F-35 as a software upgradeable aircraft, along with others such as the Australian Wedgetail and the P-8/Triton combination being flown by the US Navy, Australia and in the P-8 case soon by the UK, provide upgradeable options which are symmetrical with dynamic change.

This is a notional rendering of the 10 and 2 O'Clock challenge. It is credited to Second Line of Defense and not in any way an official rendering by any agency of the US government. It is meant for illustration purposes only.
This is a notional rendering of the 10 and 2 O’Clock challenge. It is credited to Second Line of Defense and not in any way an official rendering by any agency of the US government. It is meant for illustration purposes only.

An initial buy of three squadrons of F-35s could be seen as a way to accelerate change across the force, and Canada can decide where to evolve its airforce in the future as new unmanned and other manned systems enter the forces of the US and our closest allies.

Together with a modest life extension program for CF-18s and certain interoperability upgrades, the F-35’s superior sensor and other capabilities can enhance the capabilities Canada’s fighter fleet.

Armed with data on the true costs of each platform, including the total cost of support assets: tankers, command and control & electronic warfare craft, Canadian Forces can make better choices for the next buy

Preserving options to the early 2020s allow for more visibility on issues like the vulnerability of bases and command and control nodes. Implicit in the Canadian statement of operational requirements is attacks on rear-echelon infrastructure within North America defended by NORAD assets are unlikely to succeed.   This is a very dubious assumption given what is known of Russian and Chinese rearmament trajectories.

The proliferation of UAVs, stealthy supersonic cruise / hypersonic missiles and fractional orbital bombardment systems in the next decade will blur the distinction between tactical and strategic weapons defined by the INF Treaty — which may be abrogated like the ABM treaty. These systems, used with state-of-the-art EW systems, offer an opponent the opportunity to launch a conventional first strike against infrastructure that effectively disables fighters dependent on them.

Existing NORAD bases, few and target rich, risk obsolescence.   While bases can be defended, hardened, staffed and equipped with rapid runway / infrastructure repair capabilities as they are in Western Europe, it is a costly option.   Dispersal of bases, or should Canada field an Ice Breaker Landing Helicopter Dock (LHD) that can serve a range of sovereignty missions in the Arctic, would favor STOVL capable craft like F-35Bs and a key advantage of the F-35 program is the ability to shift among the types of F-35s within the program.

Alternatively, the US Navy’s CBARS or similar craft can improve the range and endurance of any fighter and dependence on a few bases or vulnerable aerial refueling and command and control assets.

Given the vast expanse that Canada must patrol and defend, it is questionable whether any manned fighter will operate by itself in the defense of Canadian maritime and airspace or in Gortney’s terms, the 10 and 2’ Oclock.

This is why the former head of NORAD spoke of the need to shape a kill chain, which the current US Navy leadership is now reworking to become a kill web with distributed strike, ISR and C2 and a concept very relevant to Canadian defense interests.

For the US Navy, the F-35 is seen as a key enabler of the kill web, but is not and of itself capability.

Admiral Gortney is quoted in the Defence Committee report and in an interview conducted towards the end of his tenure, that it was important to combine a fighter buy with new maritime and other air-sea capabilities. Again, the fighter decision needs to be put into this broader context.

It is a reasonable bet that during the transition, we will be operating with a mixed fleet of manned, unmanned autonomous and semi-autonomous platforms as issues ranging from force structure & organization, doctrine, political, economic and legal issues are worked through.

During times of rapid change, the premium is on keeping options open while committing enough resources to meet current and near term challenges and surviving a conflict long enough for reinforcements to arrive should deterrence fail.

Danny Lam is an independent analyst based in Canada.

For the Admiral Gortney interview, see the following:

http://defence.frontline.online/article/2016/3/4712-NORAD/NORTHCOM-

https://www.sldinfo.com/north-american-defense-and-the-evolving-strategic-environment-admiral-gortney-focuses-on-the-need-to-defend-north-america-at-the-ten-and-two-oclock-positions/

http://breakingdefense.com/2016/04/northcom-defending-north-america-at-ten-and-two-oclock/