French Aerospace Industrial Outlook for 2025

01/13/2025

By Pierre Tran

Paris – The French aerospace industry was entering 2025 with an “exceptional” geostrategic and political outlook, seeking to respond to strong demand for products and services, while bracing for a gathering storm of U.S. trade tariffs expected from an incoming administration, Guillaume Faury, chairman of Gifas, an aerospace trade association, said Jan. 9.

“There is an accumulation of instability, exceptional uncertainty, and a broad lack of visibility in government guidelines,” Faury told a news conference tied to the French tradition of presenting best wishes for the new year.

Faury is chairman of Groupement des Industries Françaises Aéronautiques et Spatiales (Gifas), and also chief executive of Airbus, the European aerospace company.

There was “geostrategic instability in Ukraine and the Middle East, commercial threat in the space sector from Elon Musk, and American protectionism in a form yet to be defined, but already announced by Donald Trump,” he said.

François Bayrou, a centrist politician recently appointed as prime minister by President Emmanuel Macron, was seeking to persuade a fractured parliament to approve the 2025 budget. The draft 2025 defense budget was due to rise to €50.5 billion from €47.2 billion in 2024, but the divided deputies had yet to approve the bill needed to release the funds.

Trump, the president-elect due to take office Jan. 20, has said the administration would impose a 10 percent tariff on all foreign imports and a 60 percent tariff on Chinese imports, in a bid to narrow the U.S. trade deficit.

French aerospace companies also had to face competition from emerging markets such as China, India, and other nations, which were “stronger and gaining in importance every day,” Faury said. The world was in deep transformation, and while there were strong, clear trends, there was also “a great deal of uncertainty.”

There was a great deal of uncertainty on the expected U.S. “tariff measures,” with lack of clarity on timetable, products, and conditions, he said, in answer to a question. Those expected measures will not lead to a change in the “competitiveness of our products,” he said, but they could lead to “change in the competitiveness of certain geographical zones.”

In terms of industrial investment by European companies, the U.S. had an attractiveness that was “extremely difficult to resist,” he said, citing the case of opening factories for new battery technology. Meanwhile, there was “non-attractiveness” of Europe due to a lack of certainty, he said.

This was not “delocalization,” or shutting down factories, he said, but “localization” of fresh investment, where there was the prospect of greater certainty and higher  return on capital.

The 27 European Union member states spent five times less than the U.S. on arms, he said, and Washington spent almost all its military budget on U.S. equipment, outside Europe, he said. The conditions for European economies of scale should be created, he added.

“We need a Europe which sparks confidence, which supports its actors, but also a Europe which supports exports, with national decisions and support from the (member) states,” he said, adding there was a contradiction to manage.

France Won €18 billion in Foreign Arms Orders

Meanwhile, the French armed forces minister, Sébastien Lecornu, said Jan. 7 that France had won in 2024 arms export orders worth “more than €18 billion,” which he said was the second-best year for the nation, with close to €10 billion stemming from foreign orders for the Rafale fighter jet, and attack submarines.

That compared to 2023 export orders of €8.2 billion and 2022 foreign orders of €26.97 billion

The minister was speaking at the formal event of presenting new year wishes to the services, in the main courtyard at Les Invalides.

The new year has started well, he said, with Iraq’s contract signed in September with Airbus Helicopters for 14 Caracal H225M military helicopters going into effect. Two of those helicopters were upgraded second-hand units. Those helicopters would replace the Russian-built Mi-17 helicopters.

The minister said he was looking for another record year in 2025, notably orders for the frigate for defense and intervention (FDI), as well as submarines, radar, artillery, helicopters, and the Rafale fighter.

There would also be particular focus on the SAMP/T new generation surface-to-air missile, he said, which would respond to “ballistic threats from Iran and Russia,” he said.

Dassault Shipped 21 Rafale

On the fighter front, Dassault Aviation reported 2024 delivery of 21 Rafale, up from 13 units shipped in the previous year. The company had previously forecast delivery of 20 of the fighters. Fourteen of the shipments went to France, with seven for export clients, the company said.

The company won 30 orders for the twin-engined jet, all of which were for foreign clients, down from the 60 orders in 2023, of which 42 were for France, and 18 for export.

The 2024 order book stood at 220 Rafale, comprising 164 for export and 56 for France. That compared to 211 units in the order book in the previous year.

The value of those 2024 orders and deliveries will be given March 5, when the 2024 financial results will be reported, the company said.

European Common Procurement

The European Commission approved €300 million ($309 million) of E.U. funding for five cross-border arms projects, seeking to boost coordination in weapons procurement, the Brussels-based executive said Nov. 14.

That E.U. funding represented “a combined procurement value exceeding €11 billion,” the commission said, adding that was the first time the executive had given financial support for common arms procurement.

The funding came from the European defence industry reinforcement through common procurement instrument (EDIRPA), and allocated $60 million toward each of the five projects, bringing a total of €300 million E.U. funding, the commission said.

“EDIRPA’s €300 million investment has incentivized a commitment over 36 times larger, demonstrating the programme’s effectiveness in driving substantial defence investments across the E.U.,” the commission said.

“Bringing greater value for money through economies of scale, the common procurement will make critical defence capabilities more affordable for Member States’ armed forces. With products procured in common, Member States’ armed forces will have improved interoperability,” the commission said.

The procurement consisted of two joint air and missile defense systems comprising the Mistral and Iris-T missiles; a common armored system, namely a troop carrier; and two projects on 155 mm shells, namely common procurement of various types of the artillery ammunition, and high explosive 155 mm shells.

Airbus Shipped 766 Airliners

Airbus, the airliner builder based in Toulouse, southern France, reported in the early evening of Jan. 9 its delivery of 766 passenger aircraft in 2024, up from 735 in the previous year.

The European company, which also has a major plant in Hamburg, Germany, also reported net orders of 826 last year, down from a record 2,094 in 2023.

Airbus has two U.S. plants, with one in Mobile, Alabama for assembly of the A320 line, and a helicopter plant in Columbus, Mississippi, for the UH-72A Lakota light utility helicopter for the U.S. army.

Airbus also has a plant in Tianjin, China, with plans for opening a second assembly line in early 2026.

Airbus is winning in the airliner business, but it is ailing in the space sector, and is in talks with Thales and Leonardo for a cooperation deal. Airbus also needs to find orders for its A400M military airlifter to keep its Spanish assembly line open.

Boeing reported net orders after cancellation of 370 units at the end of November. The U.S. company is due to report 2024 fourth quarter financial results on Jan. 28.

Boeing has been struggling with production problems on its 737 Max airliner, a labor strike, and seeks a Texas court approval on a guilty plea deal on two 737 Max crashes. Families of the 346 victims of those crashes in 2018 and 2019 have filed objection to that plea deal, seeing it as too lenient in view of court sentencing guidelines.

Credit featured graphic: ID 351337003 | 2025 © Paradee Paradee | Dreamstime.com

F-35s arrive at MCAS Iwakuni

U.S. Marine Corps F-35B Lightning II aircraft with Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 225, 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), arrive at Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, Japan, Aug. 13, 2024.

Marines with VMFA-225 are temporarily operating from MCAS Iwakuni, Japan, in support of forward deployed elements of the 15th MEU, as well as other operations and training in the region while integrated with Marine Aircraft Group 12, 1st Marine Aircraft Wing.

MCAS IWAKUNI, YAMAGUCHI, JAPAN

08.07.2024

Video by Lance Cpl. Eliza Fremont 

AFN Iwakuni

Urgent Steps Needed to Strengthen U.S. Space Security

01/10/2025

By Richard Weitz

Maintaining access to space is critical for advancing U.S. sovereignty, prosperity, and security. Americans rely on space for navigation, reconnaissance, communications, weather forecasting, and other essential economic and security functions.

Space capabilities are inherently “dual use.” They can support military as well as civilian missions. Commercial space firms now possess capabilities previously available only to national governments. Year after year, they launch larger payloads at lower costs. Whereas a decade ago governments executed most space missions, now only effective public-private partnerships can preserve U.S. space security.

But the United States is facing a more threatening space environment. Russia and China continue to expand, modernize, diversify their space and counterspace capabilities. They possess advanced anti-satellite capabilities designed to disrupt, degrade, or destroy U.S. space networks. Their direct-ascent kill vehicles destroy targets through force of impact, while their “co-orbital” systems maneuver near objects to grab, hack, stalk, or smash them. Though both systems require rockets to propel them into space, Russia and China are developing directed energy, electronic warfare, and cyber weapons. These can attack targets above the atmosphere while still on Earth.

The Kremlin aspires to dominate the strategic high ground and exploit the U.S. military’s dependence on space. The Defense Department has confirmed that Russia is developing the capacity to deploy nuclear-armed space weapons. In exchange for abetting its aggression against Ukraine, Moscow has also advanced the military space programs of Iran and North Korea.

The Chinese Communist Party plans to make the PRC preeminent in space to achieve economic and military dominance on Earth. China now has more satellites in orbit than Russia, second only to the United States. Their number increases as the PRC develops larger carrier rockets to send heavier payloads deeper into space. Like Moscow, Beijing aims to build space-enabled kill chains to paralyze the United States in a conflict.

Although Russian and Chinese counterspace capabilities present independent challenges to the United States, the threat increases as they combine their resources, experience, and technologies. Russia and China have purchased important space technologies from each other, linked their space navigation systems to better compete with the U.S. GPS network, and coordinated planetary exploration missions. Further Sino-Russian collaboration could potentially leverage Russia’s extended experience in space with China’s enormous resources to forge a formidable anti-Western partnership.

In the face of these threats, the United States needs enhanced space awareness to avert operational surprise, build more rapid launch capacity to restore critical missions even when attacked, and develop better tools to degrade adversaries’ counterspace capabilities.

Further efforts are needed to achieve tactically responsive space capabilities to execute urgent requirements. The Ukraine war offers insights for improving resilience of satellite constellations and their ground networks. Satellites have been critical for surveillance and dynamic targeting but have proven vulnerable to cyber and electronic assault.

Combining the Pentagon’s capabilities with commercial and allied systems yields superior results. Through frequent exercises, the Defense Department can bolster readiness and interoperability. Conversely, the United States should press allies to eschew projects with Russia and China that could have military space applications.

One essential advantage the United States enjoys over Russia and China is its robust space private sector. U.S. commercial companies have proven particularly useful for enhancing domain awareness, achieving technological breakthroughs, and responding to novel conditions.

However, the United States needs to diversify space suppliers. Presently, one contractor, SpaceX, conducts approximately four out of five U.S. space launches. Whatever its technical achievements, the company has experienced frequent setbacks. Its management is under investigation for alleged labor and regulatory violationsloose security procedures, and unreported contacts with foreign governments.

The United States needs assurance that its commercial partners are ready and willy to render support in conflicts and other crises. Following the example of U.S. Civil Reserve Air Fleet and the Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement in the air and sea domains, respectively, the planned Commercial Augmented Space Reserve could empower the military to quickly access private sector satellites in an emergency.

Prudence warrants that the Defense Department prevent its major contractors from maintaining links with potential U.S. adversaries and expand its portfolio of national security launchers. Though overclassification remains a problem, the government must insist that allpartners adhere to security best practices. The Pentagon must also scrutinize space supply chains to ensure that its contractors do not rely on the same vendors for critical components.

Featured image: ID 136686433 © Siarhei Yurchanka | Dreamstime.com

Heavy Lift at WTI 1-25

U.S. Marines assigned to Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One, conduct heavy lift exercises as part of Weapons and Tactics Instructor course 1-25 at Auxiliary Airfield 2 near Yuma, Arizona, Oct. 4, 2024. WTI course is a seven-week training event hosted by MAWTS-1 which emphasizes operational integration of the six functions of Marine aviation in support of the Marine Air Ground Task Force, Joint and Coalition Forces.

10.04.2024

Video by Cpl. Nicholas Johnson 

Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron-1

Transporting Patriot Missiles aboard MV-22B Osprey

01/09/2025

U.S. Army Soldiers with 1st Battalion, 1st Air Defense Artillery Regiment and U.S. Marines with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 265, Marine Aircraft Group 36, 1st Marine Aircraft Wing transport Patriot missiles on an MV-22B Osprey from Kadena Air Base to Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, Okinawa, Japan, Nov. 5, 2024.

The prototype loading system was designed to offer a more efficient method of transporting Patriot missiles.

OKINAWA, JAPAN

11.05.2024

Video by Lance Cpl. Thalia Rivera 

1st Marine Aircraft Wing

Logistical Support to Amphibious Operations: How Maritime Autonomous Systems Fill the Gap

01/08/2025

By George Galdorisi

One of the most frequently-read recent articles on this site is Mike Daum’s excellent piece: Infantry Wins Battles, Logistics Wins Wars: The Role of the Army’s ‘Little Navy’ in the Pacific​. As the title implies, this piece is focused on the U.S. Army; however, two key statements universalize Daum’s argument. He argues that “getting American troops into the fight is relatively easy—the hard part is keeping them there” and that “one suggestion is to integrate uncrewed surface vessels (USVs) into the logistics chain”—both of these points extend beyond the Army’s needs.

The challenge of providing logistics sustainment to forces in the field is not a new phenomenon. Over 2,500 years ago, Sun Tzu noted, “The line between disorder and order lies in logistics.” One need not be a historian to understand the importance of logistics to warfare over many millennia. From Alexander the Great (who noted: “My logisticians are a humorless lot…they know if my campaign fails, they are the first ones I will slay”) to Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan (“Logistics are as vital to military success as daily food is to daily work”) to General Robert Barrow, then-Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps, who coined a phrase that is still a staple of U.S. War College curricula: “Amateurs talk about tactics, but professionals study logistics.”

Navy-Marine Corps amphibious operations represent perhaps the one area where logistics cannot fail. Once Marines are on the beach, they have few options to continue the fight if their logistics train breaks down—and might even have to withdraw. The prospect of assaulting a hostile shore today is more daunting than ever. The capacity of Marines to seize the beach and push inland depends on the security of their logistical support.

The Navy-Marine Corps team has pushed the envelope by leveraging new technologies to make the nation’s expeditionary assault force more distributed, lethal, survivable, and sustainable. Given the importance of logistics to the success of any amphibious assault, the sustainability function is one that is ripe for new technology insertion.

Enhancing Expeditionary Logistics with Emerging Technology 

For the Navy-Marine Corps team, the importance of logistics figures most prominently during an amphibious assault. The INDOPACOM Joint Exercise Valiant Shield, overseen by Commander Marine Forces Pacific (MARFORPAC) experimented with using emerging technology to provide sustainment to Marines on the beachhead during this critical juncture.

Marines in the fight use enormous quantities of fuel, food, ammunition, and other material as they attempt to move off the beachhead. While many functions are important in an amphibious operation, once the assault is underway and Marines are on the beach, sustainment is crucial in ensuring their success. The mission will ultimately fail if the Marines are not able to have reliable and continuous sustainment.

Using manned naval craft for this sustainment mission puts operators at unnecessary risk of enemy fire. Using scarce manned craft to perform this mission also takes them away from more necessary roles such as moving men and material between ships of the expeditionary strike group. That is why this major Navy-Marine Corps amphibious exercise evaluated the ability of unmanned surface vessels (USVs) to conduct this sustainment mission.

MARFORPAC used USVs during Valiant Shield 2018 to resupply the landing force. The exercise coordinator used a catamaran hull 12-foot MANTAS USV to provide rapid ship-to-shore logistics sustainment.  While this small, autonomously-operated USV carried only 120 pounds of cargo, the proof-of-concept worked and demonstrated that unmanned surface vessels could effectively resupply troops ashore.

Using unmanned vehicles for the sustainment mission can be a game-changer for expeditionary assault forces.  Beyond removing human operators from harm’s way, using USVs in this role frees manned craft for other missions. Additionally, having a continuous, preprogrammed, logistics resupply process to perform one of the dull, dirty and dangerous functions important in an amphibious assault means that there is one less thing for the commander to have to manage during these operations.

This proof-of-concept with a 12-foot MANTAS USV achieved positive results. That said, resupply in 120-pound increments is far less than is required to provide what is needed by the Marines on the beach. The Valiant Shield exercise provided the impetus and inspiration to continue to explore the use of USVs for amphibious force sustainment. Now, the Navy and Marine Corps are looking to “scale-up” small USVs and continue to experiment with using larger USVs to provide greater sustainment quantities.

“Scaling-Up” to Deliver Expeditionary Logistics

To undertake this scaling-up effort, the Navy and Marine Corps asked the maker of the MANTAS family of USVs (Maritime Tactical Systems, Inc.) to develop a larger proof-of-concept unmanned surface vehicle for this logistics sustainment mission using the same catamaran hull design as the smaller vessel used in Valiant Shield.

38-foot “Devil Ray” unmanned surface vehicle is now operable and has participated in numerous Navy and Marine Corps exercises and has demonstrated the ability to provide logistics support at scale. While this may not be the ultimate size or type of USV the expeditionary assault force needs as a long-term solution, it will go a long way to advancing the state-of-the-art in unmanned semi-autonomous or autonomous logistics support.

While there are a range of larger USVs that can be evaluated by the Navy and Marine Corps, the basic specifications of the 38-foot Devil Ray (T38) provide an indication of the ability of USVs to provide a steady, continuous stream of logistics support to Marines on the beach. The T38 can carry a payload up to 4,500 pounds. The vessel travels at a cruise speed of 25 knots and draws just 18 inches of draft. The speed and carrying capacity of the T38-sized USV allows it to fulfill this and many other important logistics functions.

Delivering Logistics Sustainment to Troops Ashore

An amphibious formation typically stands no more than 15-25 nautical miles off the beach being assaulted. Using a notional stand-off distance of 20 nautical miles, an amphibious formation equipped with four T38s traveling at their cruise speed of 25 knots could deliver 18,000 pounds of material from the amphibious ships to the beach per hour, allowing the short time needed for loading and unloading the craft. Multiply that by twenty-four hours and you get a buildup of well-over 400,000 pounds of vital material per day, enough to support a substantial force of troops ashore.

The Navy and Marine Corps are planning an ambitious array of exercises in the years ahead. Based on the promising performance of small, unmanned surface vessels in support of expeditionary assault forces, the Navy and Marine Corps would be well-served to experiment further with larger USVs to perform this vital logistics sustainment mission.

Those nations and navies with significant amphibious assault forces would be well served to leverage what the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps have already demonstrated in exercises such as Valiant Shield and explore the advantages of using unmanned surface vehicles to rapidly, reliably and continuously resupply troops ashore.

George Galdorisi is a career naval aviator and national security professional. His 30-year career as a naval aviator culminated in fourteen years of consecutive service as executive officer, commanding officer, commodore, and chief of staff. Additionally, he led the U.S. delegation for military-to-military talks with the Chinese Navy. He is the author of 18 books, including four New York Times bestsellers. His most recent book, “Algorithms and Armageddon: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Future Wars, was published by the U.S. Naval Institute Press in 2024.

This article was first published on 2 January 2025 on the Center for Maritime Strategy.

Featured photo: MARTAC USVS are not built as single platforms but to operate as a mesh fleet carrying diverse payloads. Here two of the MARTAC platforms are seen with the smaller MANTAS operating with a DEVIL RAY. Credit Photo: MARTAC

Also, see the following:

 

 

 

 

Casualty Evacuation Via Osprey

U.S. Marines and Sailors assigned to Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One conduct simulated casualty evacuation as part of Weapons and Tactics Instructor course 1-25 near Yuma, Arizona, Oct. 3, 2024. WTI is a seven-week training event hosted by MAWTS-1 which emphasizes operational integration of the six functions of Marine aviation in support of the Marine Air Ground Task Force, Joint and Coalition Forces.

10.04.2024

Video by Cpl. Maurion Moore 

Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron-1

Our First Book for 2025: The Australian Defence Force: Meeting the Modernization Challenges

01/07/2025

The Australian Defence Force: Meeting the Modernization Challenges examines the Australian Defence Force’s (ADF) modernization efforts in light of evolving geopolitical realities, particularly concerning China. The book analyzes the challenges of balancing immediate readiness with long-term force planning.

The author incorporates interviews and presentations from the 2024 Sir Richard Williams Foundation seminar, highlighting perspectives from various ADF branches and allied nations (U.S., U.K.).

Key themes include the impact of political cycles on defense spending, the need for a national security strategy, and the crucial role of industry collaboration in achieving modernization goals.

The book also explores the complexities of building combat mass through a networked, “kill web” approach, focusing on adaptability and rapid technological upgrades.

In the forward to the book John Blaxland comments: “In The Australian Defence Force: Meeting the Modernization Challenges, Robbin Laird updates us on the work covered in his previous book, Australia and Indo-Pacific Defence: Anchoring a Way Ahead (2023). That work provided much more than just an overview of material covered at the previous Williams Foundation seminar. His lucid distillation of the key issues and challenges related to Australia and Indo-Pacific defence, spanning air, land, sea and beyond, warrant re-reading. It also sets up the reader for the contrast which follows in this volume.

“Laird’s new work focuses on the rub points arising from trying to implement long term strategic choices for acquiring next generation military capabilities, while being required to manage ongoing day-to-day operational requirements for the Australian Defence Force – a force which finds itself increasingly challenged.  Laird explains this as ‘a case study in the clash between force design for an envisaged force and the need to enhance the force in being to deal with the world as it is.’

“This book highlights the enduring challenge faced by a democracy in getting the politics right while facing short political cycles and competing national priorities which inhibit government willingness to spend on defence. This reflects the age old ‘guns’ versus ‘butter’ dilemma faced by governments elected not on what might happen on the international stage, but on what they have done so far on the domestic front.

“Laird captures the essence of the challenge for defence readiness whereby exquisite platforms are no longer the sole focus, and in planning for continent-spanning defence capabilities, how to build combat mass effectively. The challenge is a significant one in light of the scale of the emergent security issues in the Indo-Pacific to which Australia may be required to respond and the reluctance of governments to spend to match their rhetoric with reality.”

Featured photo: A heritage formation, led by a CAC CA-18 Mustang flanked by two F-35 Lightning II aircraft from No. 77 Squadron, during the Warbirds Over Scone 2024 airshow. Credit: Australian Department of Defence

For a podcast discussing the book, follow the link.