Task Force Bataan

07/09/2025

Task Force Warhawg, 1st Battalion, 360th Infantry Regiment, 5th Armored Brigade, incorporated counter-unmanned aerial systems training into Task Force Bataan, 1st Battalion, 200th Infantry Regiment’s culminating training exercise in preparation for their assumption of the Horn of Africa mission overseas.

C-UAS training progressed deliberately from classroom to application during the urban area platoon assault day and night live-fire exercise at Dona Ana Range 50, New Mexico June 2-12.

DONA ANA RANGE, NEW MEXICO

06.13.2025

Video by Staff Sgt. Raquel Birk 

5th Armored Brigade

Helicopter Support Training and the Super Stallion: March 2025

07/08/2025

U.S. Marines with Logistics Operations School conduct helicopter support team training utilizing a CH-53K King Stallion assigned to Marine Heavy Helicopter Squadron (HMH) 461 at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, March 18, 2025.

The HST training is designed to prepare Marines to manage activities at landing zones and to facilitate the pickup, movement, and landing of helicopter-borne troops, equipment, and supplies.

CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA,

03.18.2025

Photo by Cpl. Zachariah Ferraro 

Marine Corps Combat Service Support Schools

 

AUKUS at a Strategic Crossroads: Redefining the Path Forward

By Robbin Laird

The AUKUS partnership stands at a critical juncture. Born from the vision of three leaders who have since left the political stage, this ambitious trilateral alliance centers on one of the most complex defense undertakings in modern history: enabling Australia, a non-nuclear nation, to operate nuclear-powered attack submarines.

While the submarine program captures headlines, AUKUS represents something far more significant than a single procurement initiative. The partnership has evolved into a comprehensive framework for unprecedented technology sharing and joint manufacturing between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. This expansion reflects a strategic necessity born from the realities of our changing world order.

Beijing’s approach to global competition demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of asymmetric warfare. As Henry Kissinger observed about guerrilla conflict, “The conventional army loses if it does not win. The guerrilla wins if he does not lose.” China embodies this principle through strategic patience, resource conservation, and tactical flexibility.

This patient strategy manifests across multiple domains. Economically, China has avoided the Soviet Union’s fatal mistake of concentrating solely on heavy industry. Instead, Beijing pursues comprehensive manufacturing capabilities, insulating the Chinese economy against trade restrictions and technological limitations. Geopolitically, China promotes “multi-alignment,” encouraging nations to engage with multiple powers rather than committing to singular partnerships.

China appears positioned to exploit Australia’s apparent hesitation to engage constructively with the Trump administration. While this reluctance may be understandable given political dynamics, it risks undermining Australia’s strategic interests. Advancing Australian security and influence requires pragmatic engagement with AUKUS and charting a realistic path forward with American leadership.

The current AUKUS submarine program faces a fundamental challenge: it cannot be sustained within existing budget constraints while maintaining the Australian Defence Force’s broader modernization needs. Defense analyst Peter Jennings has articulated this starkly: Australia can have either the new submarines or a properly equipped ADF, but not both under current funding levels.

The path forward requires decisive action on two fronts. First, Australia must significantly increase defense spending to enable simultaneous ADF modernization and submarine program development. This includes funding for the fourth F-35 squadron and the nuclear submarine enterprise and both investments demand substantially more resources than current government allocations provide.

Second, the Trump administration must position AUKUS as the cornerstone of American Indo-Pacific strategy, championing democratic interests in the region. Any Pentagon skepticism or diplomatic pique regarding Australian leadership undermines broader strategic objectives. The same President Trump who articulated a compelling strategic vision in Saudi Arabia and demonstrated decisive action regarding Iran possesses the capability to reset AUKUS on a realistic trajectory toward success.

The consequences of failure extend far beyond the three AUKUS nations. In a multipolar world increasingly dominated by authoritarian powers, the inability of democratic allies to execute ambitious collaborative programs sends a dangerous signal. Only China benefits from any breakdown in Australian-American cooperation or the failure to adequately fund and realistically structure the AUKUS partnership.

The Australian-American relationship transcends any single program, but AUKUS has become a test case for democratic nations’ ability to adapt and cooperate in the face of authoritarian challenges. Success requires political will, adequate funding, and strategic clarity from all partners. The alternative or the failure to deliver on these ambitious commitments serves only to advance Beijing’s patient strategy for global influence.

The moment demands leadership equal to the challenge. The future of Indo-Pacific security may well depend on whether democratic allies can transform AUKUS from an ambitious concept into operational reality.

Also, see the following:

AUKUS in the Crosshairs?

Facing China, Dealing with Trump, and Shaping Effective Australian Defence: Ross Babbage Goes to the Heart of the Matter

The Australian Defence Force: Meeting the Modernization Challenges

 

The Defense Department Should Restore Cornell University’s Research Funding

07/07/2025

By Ed Timperlake

Cornell University President Michael I. Kotikoff recently expressed serious concerns about the sudden freeze of federal research grants, particularly those from the Department of Defense. His statement reveals the troubling scope of this funding suspension and its potential impact on critical national security research.

President Kotikoff’s initial statement outlined the gravity of the situation:

“Cornell is aware of media reports suggesting that more than $1 billion in federal grants have been frozen. While we have not received information that would confirm this figure, earlier today Cornell received more than 75 stop work orders from the Department of Defense related to research that is profoundly significant to American national defense, cybersecurity, and health.

“The affected grants include research into new materials for jet engines, propulsion systems, large-scale information networks, robotics, superconductors, and space and satellite communications, as well as cancer research – work of significance for our national defense, the competitiveness of our economy, and the health of our citizens.”

The situation has since worsened. According to June 12 correspondence from Cornell Media Relations, the university has now received more than 140 stop-work orders and terminations from various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense, resulting in a cumulative impact of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Beyond the financial implications, this freeze has left world-class professors and brilliant doctoral students in limbo. These dedicated researchers, working on projects vital to American national security, now face uncertainty about their work’s continuation and future funding. The lack of communication from federal agencies about the basis for these decisions compounds the problem.

As a Naval Academy graduate, Vietnam Marine veteran, and Cornell MBA alumnus, I believe I can offer insight into why Cornell deserves immediate restoration of its research funding. The university’s commitment to supporting veterans provides a compelling argument for the Defense Department’s continued partnership.

Cornell University stands as a beacon of support for America’s veterans. According to U.S. News and World Report’s “Best Colleges for Veterans,” Cornell University and the University of Chicago are tied for the number one ranking in the United States. These institutions represent the top-ranked schools in the 2025 Best Colleges rankings that participate in federal initiatives helping veterans and active-duty service members pay for their degrees.

Today’s veterans represent a unique generation forged in what many call “the sandbox wars.” These volunteers come from across America. They come from large cities and small towns, from farms, factories, office buildings, and service industries. While they span the political spectrum as Republicans, Democrats, and Independents, they share a common foundation of service.

Their military experience instilled a fundamental truth captured in the combat saying: when bullets are flying and people are dying, it comes down to the fact that no one was in it for the money. This generation of veterans possesses the moral clarity to drive positive change in America.

At their finest moments, these men and women demonstrated they were not driven by greed, posturing, or excuses. They didn’t complain or make excuses; they simply put one foot in front of the other and soldiered on to accomplish the mission and build better lives for themselves and their families.

Veterans possess a well-developed instinct for integrity and truth, making them resistant to manipulation by those who would exploit their energy for personal gain. This character trait becomes particularly valuable in academic and research environments, where intellectual honesty and rigorous inquiry are paramount.

Many of these veterans are currently students at Cornell University, bringing their commitment to service and integrity to their academic pursuits. Their presence enhances the university’s research environment and reinforces its commitment to supporting national defense objectives.

The Department of Defense should immediately restore Cornell University’s research funding. The university’s track record of supporting veterans, combined with the critical nature of its research projects, makes it an ideal partner for defense-related research initiatives.

Cornell University, as a land-grant institution serving New York state and the nation, has worked diligently to create an environment where all individuals and viewpoints are protected and respected. The university has demonstrated its commitment to working with federal partners to continue the valuable contributions made by its scientists and scholars.

The research being conducted at Cornell—covering new materials for jet engines, propulsion systems, large-scale information networks, robotics, superconductors, space and satellite communications, and cancer research—directly serves our national defense, economic competitiveness, and public health.

Given Cornell’s exceptional support for veterans and its critical research contributions to national security, the Defense Department should expeditiously review and restore the university’s research funding. The combination of world-class academic excellence and a veteran-friendly environment makes Cornell an invaluable partner in advancing America’s defense capabilities.

The freeze on research funding not only harms individual researchers and students but also undermines America’s long-term security and competitiveness. It’s time to unfreeze the money and restore this vital partnership.

Ed Timperlake, Cornell MBA, served as the first Assistant Secretary of Congressional and Public Affairs and later Public and Intergovernmental Affairs as the VA achieved Cabinet rank.

 

Touch-and-go Flight Operation Drills

U.S. Marine Corps F-35B Lightning II aircraft assigned to Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 242, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, conduct touch-and-go flight operation drills aboard the amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6), in the Solomon Sea, June 9, 2025.

Marine F-35Bs bring a 5th generation multi-discipline strike capability to support combined-joint all domain operations in key maritime terrain.

The 31st MEU is operating aboard ships of the USS America Amphibious Ready Group in the 7th Fleet area of operations, is the U.S. Navy’s largest forward-deployed numbered fleet.

SOLOMON SEA

06.08.2025

Video by Sgt. Peter Rawlins

31st Marine Expeditionary Unit

Chinese Bravado and Australian Sovereignty: A New Era of Strategic Competition

07/06/2025

By Robbin Laird

I have been coming to Australia since 2014 and writing the seminar reports for the Sir Richard Williams Foundation bi-annual seminar reports.

I have done so because of my deep commitment to the U.S.-Australian relationship but more generally because of my concern with the rise of multi-polar authoritarianism and its threat to our democratic way of life.

I spent much of my life dealing with the Soviet threat to Europe and the West and have spent much of my life in Europe dealing with this challenge.

I have been part of or dealt with many U.S. administrations over the years and am used to the ebbs and flows of policies and always amazed at how dominant the last hour’s judgement passes for strategic historical narrative.

But what is not to be missed is the shift from the bipolar world of the Soviet Union and the United States to the globalization marble cake of democracies, authoritarian powers, and the growth of a new Europe heavily influenced by migration from the Middle East.

What has been fascinating is the rise of China and the narrative spun from President Xi and his mates.

My interlocutor with regard to this dynamic was my friend Harald Malmgren who unfortunately died earlier this year. He chronicled the dynamic changes in the past twenty years in China, its economic reforms, and the transmutation of the economic results of these reforms into the new variant of the Chinese imperial reach in the form of Xi ism.

Probably no greater anomaly is the Chinese passing themselves off as a poor country of the global south and a leader of the BRICS.

And what I found fascinating this year has been the absolute bravado of the Chinese government with regard to Australia.

No longer remotely covering its game, the Chinese ambassador to Australia has warned Australia that they should not increase their defense capabilities because China was only building “normal” military power.

You will be glad to know that Australia should not follow the dangerous NATO path of increasing defense spending.

The Ambassador assures us:: “China unwaveringly adheres to a defensive national defence policy, with military spending accounting for just 1.5 per cent of its GDP. It is far below the global average and paling in comparison to certain hegemons or their allies and partners. On peace and security, China has the best track record among major countries. In recent years, having observed the profound shifts unseen in a century, President Xi Jinping proposed the Global Development Initiative, Global Security Initiative and Global Civilisation Initiative, advocating for shared global development, collective security and dialogue among civilisations. China has once again contributed its wisdom, solutions and strength to world peace and development.”

And he reminds Australia of how important China is to Australia’s prosperity and should go on playing their role as a raw materials provider the Chinese non-hegomon.

“China and Australia are important economic and trade partners, with highly complementary economic structures. Australia’s abundant energy and mineral resources, along with its distinctive agricultural products, have found a vast market of 1.4 billion consumers in China.”

Another manifestation of Chinese bravado with regard to Australia designed to remind Aussies to stay in their place was manifested earlier this year in a dramatic moment when the Chinese Navy circumnavigated Australia playing target practice.

As Justin Bassi, the Director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute put it:

“Australia must stop being surprised by every new Chinese military or hybrid warfare development. Beijing’s confidence is growing in all domains, including cyberspace. With intrusions known as Volt Typhoon, China’s intelligence agencies were outed in 2023 as having pre-positioned malware for disrupting and destroying our critical infrastructure. This should also be seen as a rehearsal for later cyber moves.

“And now, for the first time in the modern era, we have seen a potential adversary rehearse its wartime kinetic strategy against Australia. Yes, the Japanese did surveillance and intelligence gathering before World War II, but this circumnavigation with live-fire exercises takes us well beyond intelligence collection. Beijing has been undertaking “intelligence preparation of the battlespace” for some time with ships it frequently sends to Australian waters to observe our exercises or to conduct oceanographic studies (which improve submarine operations).”

The Chinese “Great White Fleet” came and went but the demonstrated effect was clearly evident.

For much of the past two decades, China’s economic reforms created opportunities for mutually beneficial relationships with democratic nations. Australia, in particular, benefited enormously from China’s insatiable appetite for raw materials, with the resources boom fundamentally reshaping Australia’s economic landscape.

However, what many observers failed to anticipate was how Beijing would leverage its economic success to fuel broader imperial ambitions.

The transformation from Deng Xiaoping’s pragmatic economic reforms to Xi Jinping’s assertive nationalism represents more than a change in leadership.

It signals a fundamental shift in China’s relationship with the world.

Under Xi’s leadership, China has moved from “hiding its light under a bushel” to actively projecting power and influence across the globe.

This new confidence manifests in various ways, from the Belt and Road Initiative to increasingly aggressive territorial claims in the South China Sea.

One of the most striking aspects of China’s current global posture is the paradox between its actions and its rhetoric.

Despite being the world’s second-largest economy with a military budget that rivals major powers, China continues to position itself as a developing nation and champion of the Global South.

This narrative allows Beijing to claim moral authority while simultaneously pursuing policies that many would associate with the rise of a major power seeking to remake the world in its image.

The BRICS grouping exemplifies this contradiction.

While China presents itself as a leader of developing nations seeking to challenge Western dominance, its own behavior increasingly resembles that of a traditional imperial power.

This disconnect between rhetoric and reality has become a defining feature of contemporary Chinese diplomacy.

Australia’s experience with Chinese assertiveness provides a case study in how Beijing approaches relationships with middle powers that it perceives as strategic competitors.

The transformation has been dramatic and swift.

Where once Chinese officials spoke in diplomatic euphemisms and maintained the pretense of mutual respect, recent years have witnessed unprecedented directness in Chinese messaging to Australia.

The Chinese ambassador’s recent warning to Australia about increasing its defense capabilities represents a remarkable departure from traditional diplomatic norms.

For a foreign ambassador to essentially dictate to a sovereign nation what military capabilities it should or should not develop crosses lines that have been respected for centuries in international relations.

The audacity of such statements reflects a level of confidence – or perhaps overconfidence – that would have been unthinkable even a decade ago.

The most dramatic manifestation of this new assertiveness came with what can only be described as a modern version of the Great White Fleet – China’s naval circumnavigation of Australia. This was not merely a routine naval exercise but a deliberate demonstration of power projection capabilities. The fact that Chinese naval vessels conducted what appeared to be target practice during this voyage sends an unmistakable message about Beijing’s military reach and intentions.

This naval demonstration serves multiple purposes for China. Domestically, it projects strength and reinforces the narrative of China as a rising power capable of challenging Western dominance. Internationally, it serves as both a warning to Australia and a signal to other regional powers about China’s growing capabilities and willingness to use them.

The Chinese approach to Australia reflects broader patterns in Beijing’s international behavior. From the economic coercion of South Korea over the THAAD missile defense system to the military confrontations in the South China Sea, China increasingly employs a combination of economic pressure and military intimidation to achieve its objectives.

This represents a fundamental challenge to the liberal international order that has underpinned global stability since World War II. The rules-based system that Australia and its allies have championed assumes that nations will resolve disputes through dialogue and international law, not through displays of military force or economic coercion.

Australia’s response to Chinese assertiveness has been multifaceted, involving both domestic capability building and strengthening of international partnerships. The AUKUS agreement with the United States and United Kingdom represents the most significant manifestation of this approach, providing Australia with access to advanced military technologies while deepening defense cooperation with key allies.

However, the challenge extends beyond military capabilities. China’s approach combines economic, diplomatic, and military tools in ways that require equally comprehensive responses. This includes everything from supply chain diversification to information warfare defense to diplomatic coalition building.

The current tensions between China and Australia reflect broader questions about the future of international relations in an era of renewed major power competition. The bipolar clarity of the Cold War has given way to a more complex and potentially more dangerous multipolar world where the rules of engagement are still being written.

For Australia, managing this relationship requires careful balance between deterrence and diplomacy, between alliance solidarity and economic pragmatism. The stakes could not be higher – they involve nothing less than the preservation of Australian sovereignty and the maintenance of the regional stability that has enabled decades of prosperity.

The transformation of China from economic partner to strategic competitor represents one of the defining challenges of our time. The bravado displayed by Chinese officials toward Australia signals a new phase in this relationship, one where diplomatic niceties have been replaced by frank displays of power and intention.

Understanding this shift requires moving beyond the last hour’s headlines to grasp the deeper strategic currents reshaping the Indo-Pacific. The challenge for Australia and its allies is to respond to this new reality while preserving the values and institutions that have served them well for decades. The choices made in the coming years will determine whether the region continues on a path toward greater cooperation or slides toward confrontation and conflict.

The Chinese circumnavigation of Australia was more than a naval exercise – it was a statement of intent.

How Australia and its allies respond to that statement will shape the evolving strategic landscape in the near to mid term.

Also, see the following:

China’s navy sends a steady drumbeat of ships around Australia

The Emergence of the Multi-Polar Authoritarian World: Looking Back from 2024

Assessing Global Change: Strategic Perspectives of Dr. Harald Malmgren

 

A B-17 Crashes at Noirmoutier Island, France, July 4, 1943: The B-17, Its Impact and Continuing Signifcance

07/04/2025

On this July 4th 2025, it is important to remember the Flying Fortress: When Heroes Fell from the Sky

When that B-17 went down over France on 4 July 1943, it became part of a larger story.

Seventy years after a B-17 Flying Fortress crashed into Nazi-occupied territory, French villagers gathered in 2013 to honor the American airmen who never made it home.

This is more than a story about an airplane. It’s about courage measured in aluminum and blood, about young Americans who climbed into flying fortresses knowing the odds, and about French civilians who risked everything to help fallen airmen under the Nazi boot.

One of resistance, sacrifice, and an unbreakable bond between nations.

The crew’s training, their desperate final mission, and the French response to their plight illuminate both the human cost of war and the enduring power of remembrance.

But this book published today reaches beyond the past.

Drawing lessons from the B-17 era, it reveals timeless truths about airpower, military procurement, and the challenges of maintaining readiness in an uncertain world.

The same questions that haunted Pentagon planners in 1943.

How do you build the right aircraft?

How do you train crews fast enough?

How do you balance cost with capability?—echo in today’s defense debates.

What makes this story endure?

  • The strategic genius and devastating cost of daylight bombing campaigns.
  • Personal accounts of airmen who flew into hell and the French who sheltered them.
  • How a 1943 crash created bonds that lasted seven decades.
  • Lessons for modern military leaders struggling with technology and readiness.
  • The Franco-American relationship forged in crisis and sustained through remembrance.

From training fields in America to flak-filled skies over Europe to a solemn ceremony on a French island, this is the story of how war creates both tragedy and brotherhood—and why some debts of honor can never be fully repaid.

A tribute to the Flying Fortress, the men who flew her, and the allies who never forgot their sacrifice.

For a podcast discussing the B-17 in World War 2, in general, and with regard to this particular B-17 and its continuing significance today, see the folllowing:

Remembering the B-17 and Its Role in World War II

Remembering the B-17 and its Role in World War II: Noirmoutier Island, France, 2013