Nigeria Builds Out Maritime Capacity in 2020

01/07/2020

By defemceWeb

The Nigerian Navy (NN) plans to take delivery of 41 new vessels in 2020, including patrol boats, interceptors and a hydrographic survey vessel.

In mid-December, the Nigerian Navy’s head of policy and plans Rear Admiral Beegroy Ibe-Enwo said it will receive new vessels from France, Malaysia, Vietnam and local manufacturers, adding to the 42 patrol boats and other vessels acquired in 2019.

Ibe-Enwo said the new acquisitions include a 60 metre OSV 160 hydrographic survey vessel from France’s Ocea, two 40 metre fast patrol boats from Damen Shipyard in Vietnam, four Manta class boats from Malaysia’s Suncraft, one helicopter from Italy (most likely an AW109) and 15 riverine patrol boats from Nigeria’s Epenal Group. The Nigerian Navy already has 20 18 metre Manta Mk III boats in service.

Ocea is also constructing two 35 metre FPB 110 fast patrol boats, a 24 metre FPB 72 fast patrol boat and four 17 metre C-Falcon interceptors for the Nigerian Navy, which has already received two FPB 110s, seven FPB 72s and a 35 metre FPB 98.

The Nigerian Navy is constructing its own vessels, and is busy with a third Seaward Defence Boat at the Naval Dockyard in Lagos State as well as two 500-ton self-propelled barges.

Earlier this month Vietnamese media reported that Hanoi-based James Boat Technology Company had delivered 50 composite patrol boats to Nigeria in mid-December 2019. They will be used for patrol, search and rescue and oil rig protection duties. Hong Ha Shipbuilding Company, meanwhile, received an order for ten 15 metre armoured patrol boats from Nigeria.

Naval acquisitions in 2019 included 20 riverine patrol boats, 20 rigid hull inflatable boats (RHIBs) and house boats. Earlier in December, the Nigerian Navy announced it had ordered an LST 100 landing ship from Damen, which is building the vessel at its facilities in the United Arab Emirates.

Maritime security continues to be a major issue in Nigeria, with numerous attacks against vessels in Nigerian waters. Rear Admiral Tariworio Dick, chief of training and operations, said 16 pirate attacks were reported from January to December 2019, with six successful and ten unsuccessful. “This is an improvement in comparison to the records for 2018 where a total of 34 pirate attacks were reported with nine successful and 25 unsuccessful.”

Dick said Nigeria’s oil and gas facilities and shipping is being threatened by piracy, sea robbery, crude oil theft, illegal oil bunkering, unregulated fishing, militancy and hostage taking, which is a major concern to the Navy. Several operations have been launched to combat these threats, with 378 illegal refineries destroyed in 2019, 62 speedboats impounded, 463 wooden boats destroyed and 275 suspects arrested.

This article was published by defenceWeb on January 6, 2020.

The featured photo show an Ocea FP 72 patrol boat.

 

Iranian Missiles in Iraq and the Killing of Soleimani

01/06/2020

By Debalina Ghoshal

A few weeks before the US killing of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) head, Maj Gen. Qassem Soleimani, there were reports that Iran was placing short range missiles in the chaotic Iraq to affirm its strategic position in the region.

Placing of short range missiles would have been a direct threat to US military presence in the Persian Gulf and Middle East in whole. Whether the killing of Soleimani would jeopardise US relations with Iraq and invite an attack by Iranian forces, is surely a matter to contemplate especially amid the Iranian missile presence in Iraq.

It is a known fact that Iran has been vying to gain regional supremacy in Iraq and many other parts of Middle East namely in Yemen. Iran’s major Middle East rival in Iraq had been Saudi Arabia while global rival has been the United States.

Approximately 5000 US troops were stationed in Iraq as of May 2019, and Iran backed militias have been trying their best to ensure that these troops leave the soil of Iraq sooner.

Placing of short range missiles became a tactical move to achieve a strategic aim- that is to make stationing of US troops in Iraq a costly affair for the United States.

President Trump a few months back assured that he did not want a war with Iran and that he was open for a dialogue.

However, with Iran placing its short range missiles in Iraq, there was surely pressure on Trump to deliver and also ensure that the US is able to place its cards well should there be any room for a dialogue.

The killing of Soleimani opens that door for the United States.

The United States was trying its best to make Iraq a “sovereign, independent” Iraq that is free of influence from its neighbours like Iran.

However, by placing missiles in Iraq, Iran was only solidifying its position in the country- a move completely unacceptable by the United States and also a move that the US knows is impossible without the support of IRGC.

By attacking IRGC, which is the main caretaker of Iranian missile forces, the United States is making it clear that it would not allow any military build-up by Iran backed forces in Iraq.

Though the missiles and their specifications were not mentioned, reports suggest that the missiles do have a range of approximately 1000kms that could easily reach US forward forces in the Middle East.

With this, Iran has strongly positioned itself to exploit the anti-government protests in Iraq- a move again that would have not been acceptable to the United States.

In addition, Iran backs the Hezbollah that also runs operations in Iraq. Iran has proliferated missiles to Hezbollah in Iraq operating collectively with factions of Popular Mobilization Forces that are Iran backed.

Should missiles fall into the hands of these factions loyal to Iran, they would ensure that US diplomatic and business missions in Iraq failed completely.

This is a threat the US cannot afford to avoid to deal with.

In fact, this is the reason why not just Soleimani but US killed top Iranian backed militia, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis- the pro-Iranian Shi’ite Kataib Hezbollah militia.

Kataib Hezbollah is backed by IRGC al-Quds Force whose commander was Soleimani.

The Kataib Hezbollah militia group had gained a lot of prominence and if they possessed missiles they would have surely performed deadlier attacks on US military bases in Iraq.

The US was already conducting “precision defensive strikes” that would degrade the ability of the militias to strike at Iraqi bases that were hosting forces of the Operation Inherent Resolve. With long range systems, the militia in future could target US forces in the Persian Gulf.

However, with the command of two crucial forces now gone, it could be difficult for the forces to regain the supremacy and tactical benefits they sought by going after US troops.

Both the leaders had their own charisma and ability to take robust decisions that will be difficult at the moment for any new commander to fulfil.

Does that mean that the US has paved its way to gaining regional supremacy in Iraq?

That question is too early to be answered at the moment.

One has to watch how Iran would respond to this move of the US, or if at all they would respond or just appoint another able commander to suit their needs.

Debalina Ghoshal is a Non Resident Fellow, Council on International Policy, Canada and an Asia Pacific Fellow, EastWest Institute

The featured  photo released on August 25, 2010, by the Iranian Defense Ministry, claims to show the launch of the Fateh-110 short-range surface-to-surface missile by Iranian armed forces, at an undisclosed location. (AP Photo/Iranian Defense Ministry,Vahid Reza Alaei, HO)

Also, see the following:

Lt. General (Retired) Deptula on the Soleimani Affair

And the following as well:

https://www.csis.org/analysis/iranian-missiles-iraq

iran-missiles-iraq.html

Deterring War With Iran

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davedeptula/2020/01/06/how-to-deter-war-with-iran-meeting-the-challenge/#66ce4c5b66dd

 

Disaster Resilience: Meeting the Challenge

By John Blackburn

As we deal with the ongoing bushfire disaster in Australia it is worth reflecting on the report the Department of Home Affairs National Resilience Taskforce did in 2018 on Australia’s disaster risk and vulnerabilities.

The aim of the report was to help understand where to prioritize collective efforts to reduce loss and harm across society.

It provides a frame to equip leaders at all levels to have a different conversation about disaster risk, so that together the actions and decisions we make can uphold public trust and confidence, reduce suffering and sustain a safe and prosperous nation.

Some of the vulnerabilities listed in the report are:

  • High levels of dependency and growing system interconnectedness;
  • Just-in-time supply, low levels of storage, hub and spoke distributions;
  • Single sources or lines of supply and few alternative sources;
  • Dependence on imports to meet demand (e.g. food, fuel);
  • High expectations of continuous ongoing supply;
  • Low tolerance for loss and disruption.

The inevitable Royal Commissions and Inquiries could do well to start with this report and reflect on their recommendations rather than reinventing the wheel.

national-resilience-taskforce-profiling-australias-vulnerability

The featured photo shows a firefighting helicopter tackles a bushfire near Bairnsdale in Victoria’s East Gippsland region, Australia. STATE GOVERNMENT OF VICTORIA

Editor’s Note: What can be learned as well is the challenge of dealing with crisis management in the broader sense as well.

The Challenges of Crisis Management: The ‘Phony War” as a Case Study

Bomber Task Force Europe 20-1

This video serves as a Bomber Task Force Europe wrap-up video production, which captures the efforts and successes of the deployed Airmen from Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, to RAF Fairford, England, in 2019.

BTF Europe brought four B-52H Stratofortress bombers, 2nd Bomb Wing Airmen and necessary support equipment to the European theater to test their ability to integrate and operate from a forward location.

During BTF Europe 20-1, aircrew flew with the French Air Force, Royal Norwegian Air Force, Saudi partners, Czech Air Force, and Polish Air Force.

RAF FAIRFORD, UNITED KINGDOM

11.21.2019

Video by Staff Sgt. Philip Bryant

2nd Bomb Wing Public Affairs

The Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force-Crisis Response-Central Command and Crisis Intervention: Insertion Into the Baghdad Embassy Crisis

01/03/2020

The United States along now with the Japanese are the only tiltrotor enabled combat forces in the world.

This unique capability has been the backbone of innovations in distributed operations for the USMC for more than a decade of combat experience.

And the upgrading of the Osprey underway for the USMC and the inclusion of the Osprey now in the carrier aviation force will carry forward further innovations for the tiltrotor enabled combat force.

During a visit to Pax River last Fall, the path to further innovations was highlighted by Colonel “Squirt” Kelly.

Coming from the F-35 program provides Kelly with a leg up in terms of understanding what that aircraft can contribute to the Osprey and how, in turn, the V-22 aircraft needs to be modified to a more useful member of the integrated distributed force.

“With the Marine in the back of the Osprey working with his MAG-Tab (tablet), he or she is able to gain access to information flowing in from other platforms in the battlespace.

“And that is one key aspect of what we are focused on as we rework the program.

“Indeed, we have already done exercises at MAWTS-1 and VMX-1 where the Marine in the back of a V-22 can be looking on his MAG-TAB at a video generated from an H-1 or an F-35 operating in the same battlespace.”

And the V-22 working with the F-35 is a key element of being able for the Marine Corps/Navy team to work a Lightening carrier approach whereby an LHD like the USS America can operate a significant number of F-35s with accompanying Ospreys.

And this approach clearly is about changing dramatically the nature of what a Marine Corps assault force looks like as well as the combat effect it can achieve.

This next round of innovation is building on a significant period of innovation driven by the incorporation of the Osprey into the USMC approach to distributed operations.

A key example of which recently landed in the US embassy in Baghdad during the recent embassy crisis.

One can remember 1979 and the inability of the US to get inside the US embassy in Tehran to regain control of its embassy. This time it was different. Not just because it was in Baghdad, but the Osprey enabled CR-Special Purpose MAGTF has been created and operated for a number of years.

U.S. Marines assigned to Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force-Crisis Response-Central Command (SPMAFTF-CR-CC) 19.2, prepare to deploy from Kuwait in support of a crisis response mission, Dec. 31, 2019. Marine Corps photo

We have followed the Osprey from its initial deployments to the Middle East until the most recent innovations.

A clear milestone of change was the creation of an integrated distributed force, the Special Purpose MAGTF Crisis Response.

This force of C-130Js and Ospreys is designed to go rapidly to a crisis point and intervene in time to make a difference.

And it is capable of being integrated into a larger USMC or joint force as the tip of the spear.

It was designed in part to deal with embassy under siege crises but has expanded its envelope of operations.

But the events in Baghdad highlighted a core competence of the force.

Ben Werner highlighted the role of the force in the Baghdad events as follows:

The Pentagon is sending more forces, including roughly 100 Marines, to provide additional security to the U.S. embassy in Baghdad after a mob stormed the compound’s main entrance on December 31. 2019.

Marines assigned to Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force-Crisis Response-Central Command deployed to Baghdad from Kuwait, according to the Pentagon.

Additionally, an infantry battalion from the Immediate Response Force (IRF) of the 82nd Airborne Division are headed to U.S. Central Command, the Pentagon announced following an earlier version of this post.

“Approximately 750 soldiers will deploy to the region immediately, and additional forces from the IRF are prepared to deploy over the next several days,” the Pentagon said in a statement.

“This deployment is an appropriate and precautionary action taken in response to increased threat levels against U.S. personnel and facilities, such as we witnessed in Baghdad today.”

The protesters included members of the Shia group Kataib Hezbollah militia, according to an NPR report. Group members were protesting recent U.S. military airstrikes on five Hezbollah sites in Iraq and Syria.

A Look Back to the Juba Operation

The standup of the capability has provided a significant innovation for the USMC and for crisis response.

Murielle Delaporte visited the SP-MAGTF based in Spain in 2013, and her discussion with the USMC personnel provides a good sense of the approach to innovation represented by standing up the SP-MAGTF, as well as how tiltrotor capability provided the foundation for the innovation in concepts of operations.

In a 2014 article published in Leatherneck, Murielle Delaporte provided an overview of the Crisis Response unit with a focus on the effort in South Sudan.  Interviews conducted in December 2013 at the Morón de la Frontera Air Force Base in Spain, where the SPMAGTF–CR temporarily has been deployed since April 2013.

In the following excerpt taken from the article, the author discusses the Juba Operation.

According to the Commanding Officer of the SP-MAGTF-CR in December 2013, Col. Scott Benedict:

“This force provides new capabilities where there has been a gap,” said Col Benedict.

Historically, we would provide this kind of capability of a Marine expeditionary unit [MEU], i.e., the Marine forces that are on ships. 

Where there have been some gaps in the coverage of these ships, the Marine Corps created this force and intends to create others like it in order to fill those gaps.

So in that sense, it is a new capability, but the skills that we bring as a SPMAGTF are the same types of skills that Marines have always brought to the fight. In terms of comparing what we are doing now with what we have been doing in the past, my experience over the years has been that this is more the type of missions that Marines have done historically…..

However, what we have historically done is operate small units like this and provide very flexible and agile capabilities to respond to crisis. We have done it for years off amphibious shipping, and now we do it with the extended range capability of the V-22 which allows us to provide some very similar capabilities over the vast areas that we are responsible for.

The ACE commander, LtCol Freeland, who has been trained as both a CH-46 and a MV-22 pilot, said there is a paradigm shift due to the juxtaposition of the expeditionary vertical-landing capability of the V-22—especially useful if a runway or an airfield is not available or if it is necessary to land near the target—and the long legs brought by the KC-130J is able to generate on the theater.

“Both the MV-22 and KC-130J have worked together before in the past, but the way we are teaming them here is a little different: I think one of the best analogies is the tank-infantry team concept,” said Freeland.

We now share the whole mission together: It is shared mission management, shared functional responsibilities within the same flight. 

Such a change is not overly difficult, but it is different, and we are expanding tactics, techniques and procedures to leverage the unique capabilities of each airframe.

You have, on the one hand, one V-22 aircraft going a distance, a good one but nothing incredible—let’s say 350 miles—and land vertically anywhere, and you have, on the other hand, one KC-130J which can fly thousands of miles, but [has] to land on a runway. 

Now you put the two of them together, and you can take this team thousands of miles away and land anywhere. 

This is a very significant paradigm change. 

We bring agility and task organize the Ground Combat Element to go anywhere we need to quickly.

“The work we have been doing traditionally in Africa has been done off amphibious shipping,” Col Benedict added.

We would send a ship up and down the coast, and we would operate. 

So, this is the same idea that we would not have a permanent presence, but different aircraft. 

The capability that we have now is unique, as this pairing of the MV-22 and the KC-130J gives us the type of ranges that is necessary to be able to operate in Southern Europe, while still being able to reach all the operational areas that are necessary in Africa. 

That is what I meant by bringing together the old and the new, because when the Marine Corps was envisioning bringing the V-22 forward as a capability, we envisioned this kind of distance to employ the force.

We just have not been [until now] in a position to take advantage or to have to use that capability.

In this particular mission and with this particular force in the area we are responsible for, we are employing the V-22, the KC-130J and a task-organized ground force at the distances we envisioned when this aircraft was designed. 

That is revolutionary.

The Marines also are going back to some geographic roots as well, since they have had a long history in West Africa during the Cold War and in the ’90s and early 2000s.

Benedict added,

Well before the current ‘post 9/11,’ it has been episodic because we do exercises and theater security cooperation where we partner with nations, so we learn from them and they learn from us, keeping in mind that we might work together in the future for a common goal. 

However, we have not based there. 

We have been doing these operations for years, and it has paid dividends when we had to do ‘provide support’ for different countries on the continent.

Another MAGTF, called SPMAGTF Africa, is, in fact, more dedicated to training and partnering with African forces and has been building those relationships for several years on the continent.

This long-lasting effort has proven an essential part in the success of the recent evacuation of U.S. and non-U.S. citizens from South Sudan, with the ability to rely on neighboring partners such as Uganda, which at the time of the crisis actually was involved in a pre-planned small logistics exercise with SPMAGTF Africa, while USAFRICOM also was overseeing an aircraft mission flying 850 Burundians as peacekeepers in Central Africa.

Juba, South Sudan, also has been a case in point demonstrating the revolutionary capability of the pairing between the MV-22B and the KC-130J with the longest-range insert ever accomplished by the SPMAGTF–CR.

As the domestic situation worsened in South Sudan on Dec. 15, 2013, a decision was made to evacuate part of the personnel from the U.S. Embassy in Juba. The mission was given to USAFRICOM, which assigned its execution to the Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa based in Djibouti. It was under the authority of the CJTF-HOA commander, Brigadier General Terry Ferrel, USA, that on Dec. 22, 2013, SPMAGTF–CR repositioned about a third of its force—160 Marines and sailors—from Morón de la Frontera to Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti.

Approximately 12 hours later, a platoon-size element (about a third of that very force) was flown by a KC-130J to Entebbe, Uganda, in order to be better postured to support operations at the U.S. Embassy in Juba.

“Within 60 hours of receiving the execution order, SPMAGTF–CR inserted forces more than 4,000 nautical miles from Spain to Djibouti, Uganda and South Sudan,” said Capt Sharon Hyland, SPMAGTF–CR public affairs officer.

“The distance from Spain to Djibouti is equivalent to a flight from Anchorage, Alaska, to Miami, Florida. This was the longest-range insert to date for this force and was a testament to the organic aviation assets and our task organized force which enables us to accomplish our mission.”

On Jan. 3, 2014, a squad-size element of Marines from SPMAGTF–CR successfully evacuated more than 20 personnel from the U.S. Embassy in Juba, via a KC-130J in coordination with the East African Reaction Force (EARF).

Special Purpose MAGTF-CR: The Juba Operation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The United Arab Emirates and Missle Defense

By Debalina Ghoshal

It is a known fact that Middle East is not only gearing up its offensive capabilities but also its defensive capabilities as a deterrence against enemy missile threats. The Gulf Cooperating Countries (GCC) have always been crucial allies of the United States and one of the aims of the United States is to integrate the missile defence system architecture of each of the GCC member into a regional umbrella that would help the United States to form a strong defensive deterrent against the Iranian missile threat.

One of the GCC members, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the only Middle East country that possesses the Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) system that it received from the United States. UAE in the recent past has been subjected to missile threats from Yemen and the missile defence systems have helped UAE to counter these threats.

The Need for UAE Missile Defense Capabilities

That UAE feels threatened by Iranian missile program and the possibility of Iran to develop nuclear weapons.

However, UAE is not only facing threats from Iranian missile systems, but they are also facing threats from Yemeni Houthis who constantly fire ballistic missiles at UAE and Saudi Arabia. These missiles though are being claimed to be provided by Iran to back the Shia Houthis, an accusation denied by Iran though, UAE irrespective of who provides the missile system to Houthis faces imminent threat.

UAE not just faces threats from ballistic missiles but is also facing threats from cruise missiles.

In fact, in December 2017, reports confirm that Houthis have fired cruise missiles at UAE’s Barakh nuclear power plant.

However, UAE is believed to be possessing one of the most advanced missile defence capabilities in Middle East and defends itself with the Patriot systems (nine batteries) for medium to high altitude threats while the THAAD ( two batteries) for targeting exa-atmospheric targets such as the long range intercontinental missile systems developed by Lockheed Martin.

Along with this, UAE also possesses the AN/TPY-2 Surveillance Transportable Radar.

This radar will further increase the capability of the missile defence system for better interception.

Though the radar system is primary radar system for the THAAD, the same would also operate with the PAC-3 systems.

The radar has been developed by Raytheon and according to the then vice president of Global Integrated Sensors at Raytheon Integrated Defence Systems in 2011: “the radar will provide UAE with unprecedented surveillance and defensive capabilities.”

Among the Patriot variants, UAE possesses the Patriot Gem-3 and the PAC-3 missiles that ensure terminal point defence. The country also possesses capabilities to defend air borne threats like the MIM 23-HAWKS providing UAE the capability to defend low and medium altitude airborne threats.

In addition, the UAE in December 2017 has also been in talks with South Korea to bolster military cooperation and have had discussions to carry out tests in UAE of South Korean anti-missile system that is being developed as a component of the Korean Air and Missile Defence (KAMD) program.

A Regional Framework

In 2015, the then assistant secretary at the US Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance, noted: “it is increasingly important to think strategically about the deployment of…missile defence assets in a regional context.”

A regional GCC missile defence architecture is crucial from both technological point of view as well as strategic point of view.

Regional GCC missile defence architecture is believed by the United States to strengthen the capabilities of the United States to better defend the region, its allies and forward deployed forces by encouraging cooperation by allowing effective burden sharing.

But how far will this regional framework become a success story is only to be seen.

The GCC comprises UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Oman.

Saudi Arabia and UAE are facing similar missile threats from the same sources- Iran and Yemen. The cooperation would include “information sharing” and “early warning and tracking data.”

The Trump administration has also emphasized on the need to integrate the GCC missile defence architecture as the countries are using US missile defence systems and related assets.

Therefore, it only makes sense to integrate them for better defensive capabilities.

However, while UAE and Saudi Arabia share cordial relations, they have severed ties with Qatar in the recent past.

At the same time, UAE’s belief of a unified GCC is also to include Iraq into the architecture, a plan which the United States is not appreciative of, owing to the security conditions in Iraq at the moment.

There remains a rift on the difference of opinion on Iraq and its inclusion in GCC defense considerations. It would be obvious that if all the GCC members would have to be integrated into a regional missile defence architecture with Iraq too as a member of GCC, it would also mean that Iraq would need to be integrated as well into the missile defense architecture.

This would mean that the United States would need to provide missile defence and related asset systems to Iraq.

Such an option may not be acceptable to the United States.

Moreover, Qatar is moving towards buying the Russian S-400 anti-missile system- a move that may hinder the progress of the regional architecture as the United States would be apprehensive of Russia befriending Qatar to gain access to US missile defence technologies and developing counter-measures for the same.

In addition, Qatar has also sought for Chinese missile systems and the same concern leaves the United States worried.

In addition, the UAE has also started to enhance their ties with Russia.

It is a known fact that several Middle East countries have showed interest in the S-400 anti-missile system as well, although with the actions by Turkey’s Erdogan, this dynamic may be in even greater flux than before.

In addition, though UAE and Saudi Arabia are cooperating on Yemen and in Syria, it must be noted Saudi Arabia being the bigger power in GCC is often viewed with suspicion by other GCC members to the fear of Saudi dominance in the region.

Conclusions

The UAE is clearly enhancing its missile defence capability.

UAE is significantly investing in acquiring sophisticated missile defense systems as part of its overall defense modernization approach.

Debalina Ghoshal is a Non Resident Fellow, Council on International Policy, Canada and an Asia Pacific Fellow, EastWest Institute

The featured photo shows Satellite imagery from 16OCT16 confirming the deployment of the AN/TPY-2 Radar (Imagery: DigitalGlobe)A

UAE THAAD Site Reaches Milestone

Also, see the following:

Baghdad SPMAGTF Deployment

U.S. Marine Corps MV-22 Ospreys drop off Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force-Crisis Response-Central Command (SPMAGTF-CR-CC) 19.2 Marines at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Iraq, Dec. 31, 2019.

BAGHDAD, IRAQ

12.31.2019

Video by Sgt. Maj. Joey Thompson

According to a story by Ben Werner of USNI News published on December 31, 2019:

The Pentagon is sending more forces, including roughly 100 Marines, to provide additional security to the U.S. embassy in Baghdad after a mob stormed the compound’s main entrance on Tuesday.

Marines assigned to Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force-Crisis Response-Central Command deployed to Baghdad Tuesday from Kuwait, according to the Pentagon.

Addtitionally, an infantry battalion from the Immediate Response Force (IRF) of the 82nd Airborne Division are headed to U.S. Central Command, the Pentagon announced following an earlier version of this post.

“Approximately 750 soldiers will deploy to the region immediately, and additional forces from the IRF are prepared to deploy over the next several days,” the Pentagon said in a statement.
“This deployment is an appropriate and precautionary action taken in response to increased threat levels against U.S. personnel and facilities, such as we witnessed in Baghdad today.”

The protesters included members of the Shia group Kataib Hezbollah militia, according to an NPR report. Group members were protesting recent U.S. military airstrikes on five Hezbollah sites in Iraq and Syria.

The U.S. airstrikes were in response to Kataib Hezbollah militia attacks on Iraqi bases hosting Operation Inherent Resolve coalition forces including U.S. military personnel, according to a statement released Sunday by chief Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman.

“Recent KH strikes included a 30-plus rocket attack on an Iraqi base near Kirkuk that resulted in the death of a U.S. citizen and injured four U.S. service members and two members of the Iraqi Security Forces (ISF),” Hoffman’s statement said….

The Marine Corps’ Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response trains to respond to emergency operations throughout U.S. Central Command.

The Marine Corps revamped its U.S. embassy crisis response program after the murder of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three Americans in his security detail during an attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012.

And in a follow-up story published on January 2, 2019, Werner added the following:

The Marines now in Baghdad are assigned to the Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF)-Crisis Response-Central Command. Among their skill sets is to provide additional security to U.S. embassies in the CENTCOM region quickly.

The Marine Corps revamped its U.S. embassy crisis response program after the murder of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three Americans in his security detail during an attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012.

However, with the MAGTF now in Baghdad, Esper and Milley said they needed to send additional forces to act as a regional reserve force. They want CENTCOM Commander Marine Corps Gen. Kenneth McKenzie to have sufficient forces to respond quickly to any emergency in the region, which is why about 750 members of the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division left for Kuwait on New Year’s Day.

“A special purpose MAGTF can only go so far, so the 82nd brings in, again, additional soldiers to augment that as needed,” Esper said. “And why them? That’s because they bring an 18-hour readiness status. It’s unique in our military.

Esper would not provide a timeframe for how long the Marines will remain in Baghdad or how long the 82nd Airborne Division will remain in Kuwait….

The Pentagon has to be much more flexible and willing to send its ready forces, Esper said.

“This is an example of dynamic force employment where we’re able to quickly deploy forces and use them as we need to and then redeploy them,” Esper said. “We have to get much more nimble operationally, so this is a good opportunity for us to do that as well.”

Meanwhile, Esper and Milley have other options near the region if more forces are necessary. The Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group with Carrier Air Wing 1 is operating in the North Arabian Sea.

The Bataan Amphibious Ready Group with the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit embarked is operating in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of responsibility. The Bataan ARG and 26th MEU are scheduled to start the African Sea Lion naval exercise soon with forces from Morocco, a Navy spokesperson told USNI News.

 

5th Special Forces Group (Airborne) Conducting Airborne Operations

Soldiers with 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne) conducting airborne operations that was used to create a video in support of the Special Operations Recruiting Battalion Campaign at Fort Campbell, KY, on April, 12 2019.

FORT CAMPBELL, KY, UNITED STATES

04.12.2019

Video by Staff Sgt. Iman Broady-Chin

5th Special Forces Public Affairs Office