Instant Eye

05/01/2020

U.S. Army paratroopers got the chance to learn and operate the 173rd Airborne Brigade’s newest acquisition, the Instant Eye in Pocek, Slovenia, March 04, 2020.

The Instant Eye is a quad-copter (drone) with multiple options for reconnaissance, quick employment and movement that makes this Small Unmanned Aerial System very versatile.

The controls and layout of the system were modeled off of video game controllers making it easier and more familiar for operators to use and master.

The 173rd Airborne Brigade is the U.S. Army’s Contingency Response Force in Europe, providing rapidly deployable forces to Europe, Africa and Central Commands areas of responsibilities.

SLOVENIA

03.04.2020

Video by Staff Sgt. Jacob Sawyer

173rd Airborne Brigade

Leadership Lessons Which Should be Learned from the Crozier Case

04/30/2020

Editor’s Note: We excerpted the eight lessons which should be learned from the complete article by Charlie Dunlap, J.D. on the Crozier case.

But Dunlap’s comprehensive article published in Lawfire should be read in its entirety and we are posting this excerpt to draw our reader’s attention and suggest they read the full article, which can be found here:

https://sites.duke.edu/lawfire/2020/04/27/eight-leadership-lessons-from-the-navy-carrier-captains-case/

Dunlap starts his article by putting the Crozier case in context:

Regrettably, the hagiographic narrative surrounding Captain Crozier is creating the very real risk that the wrong leadership lessons will be learned and propagated, irrespective of what does or does not happen to him personally.  If that occurs, the success of future military operations is imperiled, and troops could die.  Some things really can be that simple.

To be clear, everyone agrees military leaders have the responsibility for the health and safety of those entrusted to them.  Accordingly, Captain Crozier is to be rightly commended for being so concerned about the threat of COVID-19 to his crew.  That doesn’t mean, however, that he handled his responsibilities the right way.

Later in the article he highlighted lessons which he suggested should be learned from the case.

  • Senior military leaders should not assume a “peacetime” mindset in the midst of the risks intrinsic to 21st century “grey zone” conflicts.
  • Military leaders need to maintain situational awareness in a crisis.
  • In crises especially, military leaders need to be careful about the example they set in their civil-military relations
  • In crisis situations, leaders need to think inclusively in terms of the organization as whole and not about particular career fields.
  • In crisis situations, leaders need to put aside concerns about their own careers.
  • Senior leaders, especially in complex emergencies, need to communicate in an effective way, and understand their options if they believe their concerns are being wrongly ignored.
  • Commanders (as well as the media and the public) shouldn’t confuse popularity with good leadership.
  • Don’t trivialize potential civilian casualties as a mere “political” problem.

He concluded the article byframing a set of key questions:

“It would appear that Captain Crozier had zeal, but the question for General Milley and, ultimately, Secretary Esper, is whether the zeal was the right kind, and was it properly vectored?

“Or was Secretary Modly correct that Captain Crozier lacked sufficient appreciation for the “larger strategic context” and competing “national security imperatives”?

“Did emotion make him too impatient about the pace of the Navy’s action and the leadership of civilian superiors?

“Did he allow adversaries to seize the initiative in grey zone conflicts?  Did he overestimate the risk to his crew, and underestimate the risk to civilians?

“Overall, did Captain Crozier make the right decisions for the Navy and, more importantly, the nation?

“To be clear, Captain Crozier insisted that he was ready to take his ship into combat and fight adversaries if the nation was at “war”, but to what extent is he prepared to take risks to wage grey zone “war” when that’s the mission in our complicated world?

“The stakes are high as our adversaries are closely watching how the U.S. military deals with the pandemic.”

Editor’s Note: We thank Secretary Wynne for bringing this article to our attention.

Featured photo: Snow covers the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71). U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Apprentice Class Matthew Young/Released, January 29, 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Small Ship but a Significant Shift

By Robbin Laird

When I first came to Australia in 2014, I was asked to write a report for the Williams Foundation on their seminar on the evolution of airpower, which focused in a significant way on the coming of fifth generation aircraft and their impact on airpower modernization.

 From the F-35 to working on the new build OPV may seem a strange journey, but the connectors were set in place during the several years of Williams Seminars in which I participated and have written the reports.

Over the past several years, the focus of attention broadened from air power per se to the process of transformation of the Australian Defence Force, and the shaping of what has been referred to as the process of building a fifth generation ADF.

The focus has expanded to a broader process of transformation, enabled by the coming of the F-35 and associated processes of change.

For the Royal Australian Navy, this process of change has been upon what the former Chief of Navy, Vice Admiral (Retired) Tim Barrett has referred as building not just an integrated navy but a navy able to contribute significantly to an integrated ADF.

During his presentation at the August 2016 Williams Foundation on air—sea integration, the Chief of Navy argued that

“We are not building an interoperable navy; we are building an integrated force for the Australian Defence Force.”

He drove home the point that ADF integration was crucial in order for the ADF to support government objectives in the region and beyond and to provide for a force capable of decisive lethality.

By so doing, Australia would have a force equally useful in coalition operations in which distributed lethality was the operational objective.

The Australian military is shaping a transformed military force, one built around new platforms but ones that operate in a joint manner in an extended battlespace.

They also recognize a key reality of 21st century military evolution in terms of shaping an integrated information-based operating force.

Interactive modernization of the force is built around decision-making superiority and that will come with an effective information dominant force.

To achieve the goals identified by Vice Admiral (Retired) Barrett, a new shipbuilding approach has been envisaged to shape the capabilities which an integratable force would need to have going forward.

Several new platforms emerged from the commitments of the Australian government in 2016, namely, a new Offshore Patrol vessel, a new ASW Frigate and a new build submarine.

Just listing these three patterns would in the normal course of affairs appear to be three platforms, which would be built sequentially but with separate tasks, missions and hull forms.

But the continuous shipbuilding approach articulated at the time of launching these projects has a more ambitious goal – linking these builds into a continuous modernization process in which integratability is a core capability of the evolving force.

The Arafura Class Offshore Patrol Vessel is the first of the new build platforms.

It provides the template with regard to the entire reset of how the Australians are seeking to build out their integrated distributed force.

The new build OPV is not just a new platform; it is the spearhead of a new approach.

This report draws on my recent visits to the Henderson shipyard, to Adelaide, to Sydney and to Canberra where I have discussed the new approach to shipbuilding, in general, and the new build OPV in particular.

And the importance of this effort is not just about the ADF and its way forward; this case study has significant relevance as the United States and other Australian allies work their own ways ahead with shaping an integrated distributed force.

For example, one Marine Corps aviator put it this way after reading the report:

“This is a a very interesting and informative report. I enjoyed reading it and took away a lot from their approach and emphasis on upgradeable mission systems and fusion of C2/ISR.”

You don’t just come to Darwin to kill snakes and crocks!

I did this report as a Research Fellow for The Williams Foundation.

And the report published on The Williams Foundation website is highlighted by VADM Tim Barrett AO, CSC, RAN (Retd.), Former Chief of navy and Williams Foundation Director as follows:

“The Williams Foundation research fellow, Dr Robbin Laird, has opened the aperture on the debate around an integrated 5th generation ADF with an insightful examination into the development of the Navy’s new Offshore Patrol Vessel.

“Conceived not simply as a replacement platform but as an adaptable and integrated capability within a joint force, Dr Laird presents the OPV program as a model for future capability development.

“This report compliments his previous work on 5th Generation air power Concepts within the ADF.”

http://www.williamsfoundation.org.au/News/8937002

The featured photo and the slide show below are the first shots of the first OPV being built in the Osborne shipyard at Adelaide, South Australia.

In a further milestone for the Offshore Patrol Vessel (OPV) program, the two halves of the first of class ship, Arafura, built by Luerssen Australia and its partner ASC have been brought together and welded to form a complete hull.

In what was the largest block move in the history of the Osborne Naval Shipyard and a considerable engineering feat, Australian Naval Infrastructure’s (ANI) operations team manoeuvred the two mega-blocks together, with only millimetres between them.

Rebooting the French Economy with the Help of the Defense Sector

04/29/2020

By Pierre Tran

Paris – The armed forces ministry has asked companies to submit ideas for speeding up orders for weapons, as part of a national recovery plan intended to soften the economic and social impact of the coronavirus crisis, industry leaders said.

Armed with information from industry, the ministry could claim a share of the national recovery plan. The government plans to inject more than €110 billion ($119 billion) into an economy hit by an extended lock down and high unemployment.

A recovery plan for the arms industry was highlighted by the chairmen of the three trade associations, GICAT for land weapons, GICAN for naval systems, and GIFAS for aerospace, when they appeared April 23 before the defense committee of the lower house National Assembly. That hearing was conducted over a video link.

“We are proposing a recovery plan to support the defense industrial and technology base similar to the one adopted after the 2008 crisis which was much less severe,” said Stéphane Mayer, chairman of CIDEF, the trade body which represents the three associations. Mayer is also head of GICAT.

France adopted a supplementary budget of €2.4 billion after the 2008 financial crisis, funding a speeded up order of the third helicopter carrier, the Dixmude, and other arms programs.

Defense executives are concerned their claims for support will be lose out to civil sectors, with unemployment rising sharply in the first quarter, particularly in March, when the lock down started.

Confirming Options

Among the ideas for a recovery plan were confirming options for the Griffon multirole troop carrier, Jaguar combat and reconnaissance vehicle, Serval light multirole troop carrier, Caesar artillery, helicopters, and drones, Mayer said. Industry was in talks with the ministry and Direction Générale de l’Armement procurement office.

There are effectively two recovery plans. The economy ministry is drawing up a macro-economic recovery plan based on deferred payment of tax, loans, and social security, while offering state guarantees for bank loans.

There is also a recovery plan for economic sectors.

“The economics ministry is asking sector by sector to make proposals for the key elements needed to relaunch the economy,” said Hervé Guillou, chairman of the GICAN naval trade association and former executive chairman of Naval Group. Guillou was speaking after the committee hearing closed.

The armed force ministry has asked industry leaders and trade associations to make proposals to relaunch the defense industry and technology base.

Companies are submitting their ideas, which are effectively requests for early orders for equipment, he said. The overall proposition was expected to be ready by May 15.

Political Lobbying

This is essentially a political project, as French firms are keen to promote the defense industrial and technology base “as a strategic concern,” in light of the current crisis, an industry source said.

There is a multi-year military budget law, which is not legally binding, and every year there is risk the funding will be diverted, the source said.

“There is arbitrage every year,” the source said.

Among the ideas the defense firms could submit were medical service, and research and development in digital technology, which offer dual civilian and military use.

Defense was unlikely to be seen as high priority in the national recovery plan, an analyst said.

If funding indicated in the military budget law were observed in full that would be “superb,” said François Lureau of EuroFLconsult, a consultancy. “Do not expect more.”

Virus May Hit Exports

France risked losing its share in the world arms market, as German companies had continued working during lock down, Chinese factories were restarting, and US industry was receiving government aid while maintaining large industrial capacity, Guillou told the parliamentary committee.

Maintaining a strong French supply chain was a positive signal to potential export clients, said Eric Trappier, head of GIFAS and executive chairman of Dassault Aviation. The timetable has been shaken in a Swiss competition for a fighter jet.

Airbus, Boeing, Dassault and Lockheed Martin are competing in the Swiss tender.

Finland was holding a fighter competition, for which Lockheed had retained a former head of the Finnish defense forces, Trappier said.

In Finland, Airbus and Boeing had retained as lobbyists respectively a former commander of the defense forces and former defense minister, Helsinki Times reported April 18. Airbus, Boeing, Dassault, Lockheed Martin and Saab are competing in Finland.

A budgetary burden stemming from Covid 19 will move foreign arms deals down the priority list, analysts said.

“An export arms order is a political, economic and diplomatic card to play, and that is not a priority at the present time,” said Loic Tribot La Spiere, director of think tank CEPS. For now, it was not a priority for Switzerland to order a new fighter jet.

For the French economy, there are concerns in sectors such as tourism, education and health service, he said. Defense has slipped down in the priorities list, and internal security was more of an issue.

Arms exports could be hurt by the need for clearance by customs officers, who have been on furlough, said Jean-Pierre Maulny, deputy director of think tank IRIS. A delay in customs clearance held up delivery, which would slow down client payment.

Airbus has cut production of airliners in response to a big drop in air travel, a move which hurts the supply chain, which builds equipment for dual civil and military use. That sparks cashflow problems.

Europe seen as Key Focus

“Europe is the real subject,” said Lureau, in view of the need for funding.

There is debate on whether the European Union 2021-27 budget will finance the European Defense Fund, which had been proposed to stimulate cross-border spending on research and technology, and research and development.

The European Commission initially proposed €13 billion for the fund, with Finland proposing €6 billion, leading European Council president Charles Michel to pitch €7 billion, Maulny said. Now, with the ballooning budgets to counter the spread of the virus, there are concerns the fund might be cancelled.

If the fund were dropped, there could be other ways to support the arms industry.

Patrick Bellouard, chairman of EuroDefense-France, a think tank, sent March 29 a letter to Thierry Breton, European commissioner for internal market, calling for support of the technology and industrial base in the light of the Covid 19 crisis.

The think tank called for a European recovery plan in two steps, with an initial rescue of companies, to maintain their factories and most critical capabilities, followed by orders for equipment to relaunch industry after the crisis.

A study of the various means of financial support and financial instruments was needed, with these to be applied to the rescue and recovery plans, the letter said. This would help investment in the European Union.

Studies conducted by the Commission for a “financial toolbox” to be used on production and delivery could be activated with urgency, the letter said.

Funding Could be Matter of Timing

Generally, if a project is in the early stages when a financial crisis hits, it will likely be left on the shelf, said a European official. If there is program in progress, it could be slowed down, with funding returned in the medium term.

“It is a maturity issue,” the official said.

This article was published by Opérationnels on April 27, 2020.

Photo ©  Thomson Reuters 2012, as published in 2013 in >>> www.latribune.fr

 

 

 

 

 

Europe, the COVID-19 Crisis and Libya

The migration crisis of the past few years preceded the COVID-19 crisis, but the concern about how the two might cross one another is a major one within Europe.

One approach being taken by the European Union is to try to bolster the Libyan Coast Guard to hold back illegal migration by sea from Africa to Europe.

In an April 24, 2020 article by Nikolaj Nielsen published by the EUObserver, the effort by the European Union to shore up the Libyan Coast Guard with a signifiant financial effort to support training.

The money is being taken from the European Neighbourhood Instrument, the EU’s financial arm when it comes to countries like Libya. It will also come from the North of Africa section of the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa.

The Visegrád Group, composed of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, are also pitching in from their own €35m pot.

It comes on top of the some €90m already doled out to the Libyan coast guard by the European Union. 

At the same time, the warring factions in Libya are being supported by countries like Egypt, Russia, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates.

The Libyan National Army (LNA) led by Khalifa Haftar is supported by Cairo and Abu Dhabi while Ankara backs the internationally-recognised Government of National Accord led by Fayez al-Sarraj.

Turkey’s military support, including scores of Syrian mercenaries, has momentarily tipped the balance of power in Sarraj’s favour. 

But the LNA has since managed to secure air defence systems, possibly from the United Arab Emirates via Russia or other eastern European countries.

Eljarh says Russia is now angling its way into supporting Haftar as a more capable partner than Cairo and Abu Dhabi.

“The Russians are increasing their engagement – political engagement, let’s say. They understand that things have starting to get difficult for Khalifa Haftar,” he said.

The European Union has had a difficult time mustering any ceasefire in a country ravaged by competing interests, migration paranoia, and outside influence and actors.

Danish Support to French-led Operation Barkhane

By defenceWeb

Denmark’s two EH-101 Merlin helicopters have transported 1 800 personnel and 45 tonnes of cargo during their first three months in Mali as part of the French-led Operation Barkhane counter-terrorism operations in the region.

The French defence ministry earlier this month said the two Merlin helicopters and more than 70 soldiers have been deployed to the French base in Gao, Mali, since the end of 2019. Since reaching full operational capability on 24 December, the unit logged 250 flight hours by the end of March.

During those three months, the Danish detachment completed 120 missions over 250 flight hours. During these operations, the two Merlin helicopters transported nearly 1 800 people and 45 tonnes of cargo, enabling Force Barkhane to significantly increase its operational and logistical capabilities, the French defence ministry said.

This article was published by defenceWeb on April 14, 2020.

 

 

 

B-52 Maintainers at Red Flag 20-2

Airmen from the 96th Aircraft Maintenance Unit work on a B-52 Stratofortress at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, during Red Flag 20-2, March 16, 2020.

In addition to giving aircrew an opportunity to experience advanced and realistic combat situations in a controlled environment, this exercise also gives maintenance units a chance to simulate the pace of real-world operations.

NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, NV,

03.16.2020

Video by Staff Sgt. Philip Bryant

2nd Bomb Wing Public Affairs

Japanese and French Defense Ministers Confer

04/28/2020

According to the Japanese Ministry of Defence, on April 17, 2020, the Japanese Defence Minister and his French counterpart conferred on joint issues.

In a telephone conversation with Minister Parly of France:

The two ministers exchanged views on issues such as the roles to be played by the defense authorities given the global spread of COVID-19. Minister Kono explained about the infection-preventative measures Japan Self-Defense Forces have taken in their operation on the cruise ship Diamond Princess and analysis by the SDF Central Hospital using a presentation document (see attached). Minister Parly also explained about the situations and measures taken in France.

Further, two ministers exchanged views on defense cooperation between Japan and France.

Minister Kono, taking into consideration the implications of COVID-19, expressed the importance of both countries’ maintaining watertight defense system and of continued and strengthened bilateral defense cooperation based on the vision of Free and Open Indo Pacific.

The two ministers agreed on the following three points bearing in mind the circumstances arisen by the spread of COVID-19;

(1) sharing information, knowledge and lessons learnt about the measures taken by defense authorities towards overcoming COVID-19 at the earliest stage;

(2) necessity of sharing threat recognition based on current circumstances and potential effects of the spread of the virus that each country may undergo in terms of defense policy from the perspectives of roles to be played by defense authorities; and

(3) promoting vigorously defense cooperation and exchanges, including the 2+2 meeting at the earliest possible timing, based on the vision of Free and Open Indo Pacific while maintaining communication between the defense authorities.

This was a follow up from the fifth annual Japanese-French Foreign and Defence Ministers meetings which were held last year, on January 11, 2019.

At that meeting: The four Ministers shared the view that Japan and France, as “Exceptional Partners” sharing fundamental values and strategic interests, and the Chair of G20 and G7 respectively this year, would cooperate closely towards the peace and stability of the international community.

 The four Ministers shared the view that the two countries, which are both maritime and Pacific nations, would advance concrete cooperation in order to maintain and strengthen free and open Indo-Pacific. In particular, in order to materialize the cooperation in the maritime area, the four Ministers decided to establish the Japan-France Comprehensive Maritime Dialogue.

The four Ministers welcomed France’s announcement of the Strategic Review and Military Planning Law 2019–2025, and Japan’s announcement of the National Defense Program Guidelines and Med-Term Defense Force Buildup Program.

Japan-France security and defense cooperation

(1) The four Ministers welcomed that a joint exercise had been held when the French naval frigate Vendemiaire had made a port call in Japan in February last year, and shared the view that Japan and France would hold joint exercise this year, taking the opportunity of France’s deployment of an aircraft carrier group led by the French aircraft carrier Charles-de-Gaulle to the Indian Ocean. In addition, the four Ministers shared the view that Japan and France would hold joint exercises and trainings in all military services in the Indo-Pacific region in a regular and practical manner.

(2) The four Ministers shared the view that they would further cooperate in the areas of maritime security including Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA), and capacity-building assistance in Southeast Asian and Pacific Island countries, while ensuring synergy among the two countries’ efforts in the Indo-Pacific region.

(3) With regard to defense equipment and technology cooperation, the four Ministers welcomed the commencement of a joint research on next-generation mine-countermeasure technology, which would be the first cooperation project between the two countries in this area.

(4) In order to create and develop a free, fair, and safe cyberspace, the four Ministers shared the view that they would work closely together through various fora including the Japan- France Bilateral Consultations on Cybersecurity. In addition, the four Ministers welcomed the deepening of cooperation on space, and confirmed that they would further strengthen their cooperation in both the security and civilian sectors through the next Japan-France Comprehensive Dialogue on Space and other opportunities.

Regional affairs

(1) The four Ministers reaffirmed the necessity to achieve the complete, verifiable and irreversible dismantlement (CVID) of all weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles of all ranges by North Korea and for fully implementing the relevant United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions. Minister Kono and Minister Iwaya highly appreciated France’s decision to dispatch vessel and aircraft in the first half of this year to monitor illegal activities at sea, including “ship-to-ship” transfers. The four Ministers confirmed that they would continue to work closely for the full implementation of the UNSC resolutions.

(2) The four Ministers also exchanged views on the situation in Iran, including the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), and confirmed that Japan and France would continue to work closely on this issue.

(3) The four Ministers reaffirmed the importance of a free and open maritime order based on the rule of law, and expressed their strong opposition to unilateral actions increasing tensions.

(4) In addition, the four Ministers exchanged views on disarmament and non-proliferation, and regional situations including on Syria and Russia.

The featured photo is from the meeting last year between the two governments held at Brest, France.