2nd Brigade Combat Team Air Drop

09/16/2019

Paratroopers assigned to 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division conducted an airborne operation on Sicily Drop Zone at Fort Bragg, N.C., Aug. 7, 2019.

The 82nd Airborne Division is America’s Global Response Force and is capable of deploying forces within 18 hours of notification to conduct the full range of military operations anywhere in the world.

2BCT, 82nd Abn. Div. White Falcons Conduct Airborne Operation

NC, UNITED STATES

08.07.2019

Video by Staff Sgt. anthony johnson

2nd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division Public Affairs

Brazilian Foreign Minister in Washington DC, September 2019

09/14/2019

The Brazilian foreign minister recently was in Washington DC and was very visible in providing an update on what the new Brazil was seeking in its relationships with the United States, notably with the Trump impact on U.S. policies.

As Lauren Meir of The Washington Times wrote in an article published on September 11, 2019:

President Trump and Brazil’s conservative populist President Jair Bolsonaro have an opportunity to forge a new “universal insurgency,” an anti-globalist movement that stands up for those whose voices and views are not respected by traditional political forces, Brazilian Foreign Minister Ernesto Araujo said Wednesday on a visit to Washington.

Like Mr. Trump, Mr. Bolsonaro — dubbed the “Trump of the Tropics” — is given to politically incorrect statements and maximalist demands that infuriate his liberal opponents but energize his socially conservative, political base.

“Trump and Bolsonaro are a part of the same insurgency, what I would call universal insurgency against [BS],” Mr. Araujo said in an address to the Heritage Foundation.

In a speech dubbed “Brazil is Back,” the foreign minister applauded Brazilians and Americans who are “no longer buying the traditional lies of the system.” He said Brazilian voters and Mr. Trump’s “MAGA voters” have created a “revolt against ideology,” and touted Mr. Bolsonaro for being “the only political leader capable to bring the people to power.”

And in a joint press conference at the U.S. State Department, the Minister highlighted the coming of the new Brazil.

The Minister expanded on his remarks at a presentation at the Heritage Foundation during his visit as well.

The Brazilian Foreign Minister Visits Washington

For articles by Dr. Kenneth Maxwell, on the new Brazil, see the following:

Professor Kenneth Maxwell: Perspectives on Brazil and the World

Challenges for the Australian Submarine Enterprise

09/13/2019

By Marcus Hellyer

The word on the street is that the government intends to make a decision by Christmas on whether to relocate full-cycle dockings of the Collins-class submarines from Osborne in South Australia to Henderson in Western Australia.

Full-cycle dockings are the two-year-long deep overhauls that ASC conducts to prepare the boats for their next 10 years of service. They will also be the foundation of the life-of-type extension that’s intended to keep the Collins a relevant capability until its eventual retirement sometime in the 2040s.

Some in South Australia speculate that this is the result of the West Australian government working with the federal ministers for defence and defence industry—both West Australians—to ‘pinch’ work from Adelaide.

But consideration of a move predates the recent changes on the coalition government’s front bench. In March 2018, the minister for defence industry—the very South Australian Christopher Pyne—acknowledged that Defence was ‘contingency planning’ to move full-cycle dockings. And ASC’s CEO Stuart Whiley informed Senate estimates that Defence had asked ASC in December 2017 to study a potential move to Henderson. A redacted draft of the study was released under freedom of information disclosure in August last year.

The South Australian response has been fairly restrained. Like the dog that caught the car it chased, South Australia is probably wondering how it’s going to digest all of the shipbuilding work it has landed; full-cycle dockings may not be worth fighting for, particularly if moving them frees up workers in Adelaide for the building of the Attack-class submarines and the Hunter-class frigates.

Western Australia appears to have learned that bids for defence work should be couched in terms of the national interest, arguing that moving full-cycle dockings west would lead to better capability outcomes. It didn’t help its case by simultaneously releasing a reporttrumpeting the economic benefits to the state of a move. Overall, however, there’s a level of maturity across the board that accepts the decision must be based on capability.

So would moving full-cycle dockings deliver better submarine capability? There are good cases to be made both for and against moving, which I outlined last year in an ASPI special report. Overall, the core arguments come down to which location allows for best mitigation of the workforce risks associated with sustaining and upgrading the Collins at the same time as three major shipbuilding programs are ramping up (the submarines and frigates, plus the offshore patrol vessels).

But are we missing the forest for the trees? There are two bigger issues here than full-cycle dockings per se. The first is, what does Australia’s submarine enterprise look like in an era of two submarine classes? The second is, what is ASC’s role in that enterprise?

The key to the success of the get-well program for Collins sustainment that followed the Coles review was the establishment of a single Collins enterprise. All participants signed up to the required targets, and all participants’ accountabilities were clear. After a lot of hard work, the result has been that Collins availability now meets or exceeds world benchmarks.

With the establishment of the future submarine program and the selection of Naval Group as the Commonwealth’s design and build partner, the single enterprise has been blown apart. It’s not clear if there are now two separate enterprises delivering two parallel submarine capabilities, or one with multiple bedfellows thrust uncomfortably together. Either way, it’s not seamless. If anything, suggestions that the Collins’ full-cycle dockings should be moved west are a tacit admission that one part of the submarine enterprise, ASC, needs physical quarantining for its own protection.

But moving full-cycle dockings west won’t help the long-term viability of the Collins if ASC doesn’t have a clear role in the long-term submarine enterprise. For a successful capability transition, the Collins has to operate for another 25 years (table 2, page 18), and for the next 20 the navy will likely have more Collins than Attack-class boats.

But if the best ASC’s workforce can hope for is to manage the Collins’ graceful degradation as it sails slowly into the sunset, they will walk well before then. If you were a young engineer, what would you do? Join ASC to manage an ageing submarine into oblivion? Or join Naval Group to design, build and potentially sustain the navy’s future capability? Our submarine capability could evaporate through loss of Collins engineering expertise well before any meaningful quantity of Attack submarines are delivered.

Rather than the current laissez-faire approach, the government could decide that the long-term sustainment, including full-cycle dockings and upgrades, of all of Australia’s submarines will be conducted by ASC, an Australian-government-owned entity that has shown itself capable of world’s best practice in submarine sustainment. That would necessarily include the Attack class.

The decision would give ASC’s workforce (both existing and yet to be recruited) certainty about their future and allow the enterprise to manage a planned workforce transition.

For ASC to sustain the Attack class successfully, it would need to understand its design philosophy. That means ASC would need to be meaningfully incorporated into Naval Group’s design and build processes. But ASC would give at least as much as it gets.

It’s often stated that a key lesson from the Collins program is that submarines need to be designed for sovereign sustainment. Injecting ASC’s hard-won knowledge in sustaining Australian submarines in Australian operating conditions into the design of the Attack class seems essential. Yet three and a half years after the selection of Naval Group, the one entity that understands the sustainment of Australian submarines still has no formal role in the design and build of the Attack class.

The government has repeatedly emphasised its requirement for a sovereign submarine capability. ASC now sources around 90% of Collins components locally. That approach should be incorporated into the Attack-class program, to maximise both sovereign capability and Australian industry capability.

Planning for the Collins life-of-type extension, or LOTE, has started. Incorporating Attack-class components such as diesel engines or photonic periscopes into the Collins as part of the LOTE offers the potential to de-risk the build of the future submarine, enhance Collins’ capability, and provide commonality of systems across the enterprise to ease the transition. It’s hard to see how this can work effectively without a formal partnership of some kind between ASC and Naval Group.

Going purely by the Collins schedule (table 2, page 18), one could argue that if full-cycle dockings are going to move west, a decision is needed now—the first Collins full-cycle docking incorporating a LOTE is due to start in 2026. Ideally, you wouldn’t want the first full-cycle docking in the west to be something that complex, so the last ‘regular’ full-cycle docking, starting in 2024, would be the one to aim for. Four years isn’t that much time in light of the need to build a new workforce if the work does move west.

But a decision purely on full-cycle dockings without addressing the broader issue of the future of ASC potentially creates more risk than it retires. Australian workers generally don’t move. So ASC’s existing workforce is unlikely to move to Western Australia. While the blue-collar workforce could potentially be rebuilt in the west on the foundation of the team already performing mid-cycle dockings there, ASC’s engineering workforce couldn’t be rebuilt there from scratch. Faced with the prospect of somehow working on the Collins submarine more than 2,000 kilometres away and an uncertain long-term future, ASC’s experienced engineers may simply elect to walk across to the other side of Osborne shipyard to work on the Attack class. That would put the viability of a further 25 years of Collins service in a dire position.

At the core of the government’s defence industry policy is the concept of industry as a fundamental input into capability. This is a powerful tool that allows, and indeed requires, Defence to shape the industrial landscape to ensure Australia has the industrial capability the defence force needs. The alternative is to simply hope that when the time comes, industry will somehow deliver. But hope is not a strategy.

Marcus Hellyer is ASPI’s senior analyst for defence economics and capability.

This was published by ASPI on September 5, 2019.

The featured photo shows the Royal Australian Navy Collins Class Submarine HMAS Sheean at sunset during a routine transit and training exercise off Christmas Island.

VMM-163 in the Gulf

U.S. Marines with  Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 163 (Reinforced), 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), conduct aircraft maintenance aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Boxer (LHD 4). The Boxer Amphibious Ready Group and the 11th MEU are deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations in support of naval operations to ensure maritime stability and security in the Central Region, connecting the Mediterranean and the Pacific through the western Indian Ocean and three strategic choke points.

ARABIAN SEA

11.06.2018

Video by Lance Cpl. Dalton Swanbeck

11th Marine Expeditionary Unit

USS New York

09/11/2019

USS New York (LPD-21) is a San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock and the fifth ship of the United States Navy to be named after the state of New York.

When onboard, the memories of September 11, 2001 are evident throughout the ship.

07.07.2019

Video by Petty Officer 2nd Class James Veal

And in in an article we published on 09/10/2011 we highlighted the building of the USS New York:

In this video, workers are seen turning steel from the September 11th destruction of the World Trade Center into a ship that will operate for decades in taking the fight back out into the global arena.

Remembering September 11th the USN-USMC Way from SldInfo.com on Vimeo.

The ship was built in New Orleans.

Twenty-four tons of steel from the World Trade Center were recycled for the project.  About seven tons were melted down and poured into a cast to make the bow section of the ship’s hull.  The steel has been treated with reverence by the ship builders and several workers have postponed retirements for the honor of working on the USS New York.

The USN explains the character of the new USS New York:

From flight deck to crew quarters, the LPD of the 21st century is state-of-the-art in design and technology, superseding four older classes of amphibious landing craft.

In fact, the vessel you see in New York harbor today is the latest in a long line of warships named for the state and city of New York

She is one of three new amphibious assault ships named after places in three states where more than 3,000 people were murdered in the infamous terrorist attack of September 11, 2001.

Still in construction are the other two: the soon-to-be USS ARLINGTON (LPD-24) named for the Virginia county in which the Pentagon is located, and the USS SOMERSET (LPD-25) named for the Pennsylvania county where American Airlines Flight 93 crashed into a field.

All three ships will go to sea with steel in their bows that was salvaged and re-formed from all three terrorist attack sites: LPD-24’s from the Pentagon building’s structural girders, LPD-25’s from the meltdown of a crane used to excavate the airliner wreckage.

The lead ship in the LPD series, USS SAN ANTONIO (LPD-17), was followed into the Navy fleet by USS NEW ORLEANS (LPD-18), USS MESA VERDE (LPD-19), USS GREEN BAY (LPD-20) and USS SAN DIEGO (LPD-22).

Compared to previous USS NEW YORKs, each of these modern-day ships is a swift and agile giant. LPD-21, for example, cruises significantly faster and her waterline is 111 feet longer than the long-ago decommissioned battleship USS NEW YORK (BB-34).

As force-projection platforms, USS NEW YORK and her sister LPDs are designed and equipped to operate with maximum stealth and tactical flexibility. Her components include…

The V-22 tilt-rotor Osprey aircraft

Three types of helicopters

14 expeditionary fighting vehicles (EFVs) and/or several air-cushioned landing craft (LCACs) for across-the-beach deployments of U.S. Marine Corps and Special Forces personnel.

Assembled in various combinations, this “mobility triad” is uniquely adaptable to a variety of modern-day combat situations, making USS NEW YORK and her sister LPDs unrivaled in their responsiveness and defensive capabilities.

http://www.ussny.org/ship.php

And the SLD team was there with the launching of the USS Arlington.

https://www.sldinfo.com/at-the-christening-of-the-uss-arlington/

https://www.sldinfo.com/a-missed-opportunity/

Australian E-7A Wedgetail Red Flag 19-3

09/10/2019

The Wedgetail or the E-7 has proven itself in Middle Eastern operations and the Australian program has a new partner, namely, the RAF as well.

The Royal Australian Air Force participated in Red Flag 19-3. Number 2 Squadron brought an E-7A Wedgetail to train alongside the U.S. in one of most realistic air-to-air exercises the U.S. Air Force provides.

Nellis AFB Public Affairs

Aug. 13, 2019

See also the following:

An Update on the Australian Wedgetail and Its Evolution: A Discussion with Group Captain Stuart Bellingham

 

 

USMC Maintainers in the Gulf

09/09/2019

U.S. Marines with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 163 (Reinforced), 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), conduct aircraft maintenance aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Boxer (LHD 4).

The Boxer Amphibious Ready Group and the 11th MEU are deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations in support of naval operations to ensure maritime stability and security in the Central Region, connecting the Mediterranean and the Pacific through the western Indian Ocean and three strategic choke points.

ARABIAN SEA

08.08.2019

Video by Lance Cpl. Dalton Swanbeck

11th Marine Expeditionary Unit

VMFA-122 Works the F-35B at Red Flag 19-3

09/08/2019

Marines assigned to VMFA-122 stationed at Marine Corps Air Station Yuma brought their F-35B Lightning II fighter jets to Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., to participate in Red Flag 19-3.

Nellis AFB Public Affairs

July 17, 2019

The F-35 as a multi-domain rather than simply a multi-mission combat asset is a core player in the evolution of Red Flag.

As one Air Force Officer has noted about the evolution of Red Flag:

“Red Flag began as an air-to-air fight, but it’s evolved into a multi-domain conflict to make sure America’s warfighters from across the Services are ready for tomorrow’s fight.,” said Col. Michael Mathes, 414th Combat Training Squadron commander. “Air, Space, Cyber and Command and Control forces come together in our training environment here at Nellis to ensure that when our nation calls, we can meet and beat our adversaries.”

A notable element of this Red Flag was that this was the first time that the Marines were the lead in the Air Operations Center.

As Lance Corporal Levi Guerra argued in an article published by the 3rd MAW on August 9, 2019:

NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. — 

The hallway is narrow, dimly lit and – for the most part – silent. It is the calm before the storm that awaits. One right and left turn later, as the hallway opens up into a high ceiling area known as the combat operations division or “The Floor,” bustling with the unusual uniformity of multiple military branches working side by side in a joint coalition training event. Screens flash with information and military members communicate information back and forth. The occasional call of “ATTENTION ON THE FLOOR“ can be heard loud and clear over the voices below, and, for the first time in recent history, at the helm of it all stands a United States Marine.

This is Red Flag 19-3 and it is not your typical Red Flag experience.

“This is the first time where we’ve had Marines as the lead Air Operations Center,” said Air Force Lt. Col. Julie ‘Spaz’ Sposito-Salceies, the commanding officer of the 505th Test Squadron. “We’ve had Marine participation before, but not in such a leadership role where they were the ones that integrated Air Force, Navy, Army, Marines, Coalition, in a large-scale exercise. That is so much more difficult than people understand and the Marines knocked it out of the park.”

For Red Flag 19-3, Marines from Marine Tactical Air Command Squadron (MTACS) 38, Marine Air Control Group (MACG) 38, 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing (MAW), comprised the core group of Marines leading the Combined Air Operations Center Nellis (CAOC-N) on Nellis Air Force Base, July 7 to August 3, 2019. The group was augmented by other units across both 2nd and 3rd MAW.

Red Flag began in 1975 to provide pilots ten simulated combat flights before performing combat missions during the Vietnam era. Red Flag has since evolved into two parts centered around one theme; preparing Airmen, Sailors, Soldiers, Marines and Coalition forces for tomorrow’s fight. The tactical portion, in which pilots perform the simulated combat flights, and the operational side, where military members in the CAOC-N train to control agencies that fight the war.

The CAOC is made up of military members across the Department of Defense, to include coalition members, who work side by side to coordinate and ensure execution of air combat operations in an integrated manner. Trainers, known as “white team”, act as the enemy and put CAOC-N members through both real and simulated complex scenarios guided by subject matter experts, to sharpen their decision making skills.

“War is dynamic and we make a plan for everything, but nothing ever goes as planned,” explained U.S. Air Force Master Sgt. Peyton Tomblin Jr., the squadron superintendent of the 505th Test Squadron. “At Red Flag, you’re just going through the motions as planned, like the CAOC receiving a command from the Coalition Forces Air Component Commander (CFACC) for a rescue mission. And then the white team, which builds up the simulations and acts as the enemy in this exercise, throws things in there that are not planned. So it’s practice, practice makes perfect, and at Red Flag we practice flexibility, because flexibility is the key to air superiority.”

The Marines leading the CAOC at Red Flag had experience running a Marine Tactical Air Command Center (TACC), a smaller, similar version of the CAOC. They had led exercises such as Steel Knight 19, Pacific Blitz 19, Weapons and Tactics Instructor (WTI) Courses, and Integrated Training Exercises (ITX). What made the opportunity to lead the CAOC so valuable was the higher level of operational assets, dynamic pieces and joint-coalition based training that Red Flag drives.

“To get us here in the first place it started with a question,” explained Marine Corps Maj. Nicole F. Nicholson, an air command and control officer with Marine Air Control Group (MACG) 38 and the first Marine Chief of Combat Operations for CAOC-N, the lead officer on the exercise. “I knew Marines had supported Red Flag in other capacities before as one of the tactical units and we knew the CAOC existed so we asked the question, ‘Aren’t there spots in the CAOC?”

They started by sending a few Marines to Red Flag 19-1, explained Nicholson. They arrived and participated in the training, where it proved to be a fantastic learning opportunity. After the positive feedback from both the Marines and their Air Force hosts, planning and preparation commenced for the challenge of leading the CAOC during Red Flag 19-3.

 The 37 Marines who arrived at the CAOC-N had never before worked in an Air Operations Center (AOC), putting them at a disadvantage compared to their counterparts. While some would be intimidated by the challenge, the Marines were motivated by it. As Royal Australian Air Force Flight Lt. Steven L. Booth, an assistant operations officer for MTACS-38 explained, the Marines brought an aggressive tenacity that led them to success.

“The Marines bring an incredible level of enthusiasm and passion,” said Booth. “Many of the Marines sitting on the Combat Ops floor have been thrown into billets and scenarios that are far from their standard problem set, and through lateral problem solving and brute force have they been able to overcome challenges.”

One of the initial training challenges that every branch encounters when running the CAOC-N is the diversity among the service branches and coalition partners. Red Flag gives individuals the unique opportunity to train alongside their brothers and sisters from around the world to strengthen their interoperability. The Marine Corps is America’s 911 rapid-response force. While 3rd MAW can and will continue to deploy in support of combat operations as part of I Marine Expeditionary Force, it is critical that the Marines of MACG-38 develop relationships with their teammates in other branches.

“The cross pollination between forces from different nations is incredibly valuable at all levels,” Booth explained. “At the tactical level, I can share my knowledge and experience and at the same time fully understand and integrate with a multi-functioning service that does procedures in a different way. Both parties learn a lot from each other and revise their own tactics, techniques and procedures to effectively create a more absolute and resolute way of solving problems.”

During the final awards ceremony, where subject matter experts broke down how the Marines performed, one theme became apparently clear: The Marines had far exceeded expectations for Red Flag 19-3.

“The Marines are very outspoken, direct in a very positive light and they are truth tellers,” said Sposito-Salceies. “They don’t tell me what they think I want to hear and I really appreciate the candidness and the ability to have a good and productive dialogue with them. They brought new ideas into the CAOC, such as the execution checklist that we will be implementing for future iterations.”

The training conducted in the CAOC-N for Red Flag 19-3 was an invaluable experience for the Marines and other branches involved. Conducting realistic training and participating in exercises enables 3rd MAW to remain ready to respond to emergency crisis’s around the globe.

“The Marine TACC is scalable and flexible enough to assume the responsibilities of a CAOC and enable a Joint Force Air Component Commander,” said U.S. Marine Corps Lt. Col. Grant Clester, the commanding officer of MTACS-38. “Red Flag gives us the edge to conduct large scale air operations with joint and coalition forces in any clime and place.”

MTACS-38’s opportunity to lead the exercise resulted in incredible training for the Marines participating and an experience they will never forget. Through strength of will and training the Marines have proven they have what it takes to not only perform in these types of advanced aerial operations but the skill and knowledge to perform above and beyond expectations.

“I had a lot of confidence coming here that we could do it, but that was just confidence,” said Nicholson. “And you can only hope that you have prepared the Marines enough to be able to perform at this level. So, to see them blossoming in this environment and doing better in a lot of regards or on par with other CAOC’s in the past is outstanding. For some of them, this is their first time setting foot in this type of environment and I’m proud of their work.”