The Re-norming of Airpower in Practice: An F-22-enabled Air Combat Force

11/19/2015

2015-11-12 By Robbin Laird and Ed Timperlake

In late October 2015, we had a chance to sit down and talk with key members of the Air Combat Command (ACC) staff about the evolution of the air combat force and the way ahead under the influence of new technologies coming into the force.

Participating in the ACC discussion were Lt. Col. Jay Flottmann, ACC Pilot Physciaian, Lt Col Scott Hamilton, ACC lead for the Multi-domain Adaptable Processing System, Major Glen Whelan, ACC F-15C Requirements Officer, Lt.Col. Scott Hoffman, Deputy Chief of the Operations Division at Air Combat Command (ACC/A3O, and Major Justin Anhalt, the Air Combat Command F-22 Program Element Monitor and requirements officer.

Their bios are found at the conclusion of the article.

The combination of talents of the group, in many ways reflects the evolution of the air force itself with an F-22 and F-15 C requirements officer, an A-10 pilot and the point man for the forthcoming allied exercise at Langley where the F-22, the Typhoon and the Rafale will fly together, an airborne networking requirements officer, and experts on air combat, more generally.

It is about the evolution of the air combat force – you fight with the force you have – and about how that force is changing under the template of fifth generation capabilities.

General Carlisle answering questions at the AFA breakfast presentation on June 1, 2105. Credit: SLD
General Carlisle answering questions at the AFA breakfast presentation on June 1, 2105. Credit: SLD

In an interview with the Commander of the ACC, General “Hawk” Carlisle, the point was made that the F-22 was a key enabler for the air combat force currently, and had led to a re-norming of airpower in practice.

Carlisle emphasized throughout our meeting the importance of the training transition throughout the fleet, not simply the operation of the F-22 and the coming of the F-35 as in and of themselves activities.

It is about force transformation, not simply the operation of the fifth generation aircraft themselves as cutting edge capabilities.

General Carlisle: “It is important to look at the impact of the F-22 operations on the total force. We do not wish, nor do the allies wish to send aircraft into a contested area, without the presence of the F-22.

It’s not just that the F-22s are so good, it’s that they make every other plane better. They change the dynamic with respect to what the other airplanes are able to do because of what they can do with regard to speed, range, and flexibility.

It’s their stealth quality. It’s their sensor fusion. It’s their deep penetration capability. It is the situational awareness they provide for the entire fleet which raises the level of the entire combat fleet to make everybody better.”

The shift is to a new way of operating.

What is crucial as well is training for the evolving fight, and not just remaining in the mindset or mental furniture of the past.

It is about what needs to be done NOW and training towards the evolving and future fight.

General Carlisle: “The F-22s are not silver bullets.

The F-22s make the Eagles better, and the A-10s better, and the F-16s better. They make the bombers better.

They provide information. They enable the entire fight.

And its information dominance, its sensor fusion capability, it’s a situational awareness that they can provide to the entire package which raises the level of our capabilities in the entire fight.

This is not about some distant future; it is about the current fight.”

The discussions with the ACC staff added not only granularity to Carlisle’s comments but broadened the discussion about re-norming and the way ahead as well.

The exercise coming up at Langley in December 2015 will feature the F-22 flying with the Typhoon (XI Squadron from the RAF) and the Rafales from the French Air Force. What these three aircraft have in come is that they all are about 10 years old in terms of combat experience and life.

This is a good reminder that it takes a decade for a new combat aircraft to get its “combat legs,” so to speak and to start to come into its own.

And in this case, these three different aircraft, which will fly for the next thirty years together in combat; and training and forging common tactics, is a core activity to shape overall capability for an air combat force.

The F-22 and its impact are good case studies in a key challenge facing the defense analytical community.

The aircraft is stealthy; its impact is anything but.

The F-22 is a breakthrough capability in terms of having redefined what a tactical fighter can do and what its impact can be.

As the A-10 pilot in the room underscored, fifth generation really is not about its tactical effect, it’s about the operational impact of fifth generation on the entire fleet.

“Prior to the F-22, the individual pilot could only have a tactical effect.

Now the pilot can have an operational effect. I can take a much smaller package to have a larger operational effect, which can have strategic impact.

Four F-15Cs or 4 A-10s showing up does not have a strategic effect; 4 F-22s can have such an effect.”

A key reason this is true is that the F-22 is the first of the fifth generation multi-tasking aircraft.

What this means that it can change its role during a mission appropriate to the combat task.

Or put another way, the F-22 was designed for air superiority but it has redefined the operational meaning of air superiority away from a classic air-to-air role and become an operational impact aircraft enabling the entire air combat force.

The F-22 pilot in the room discussed how the aircraft has been used in the Middle East, and highlighted its flexibility – shifting from dropping weapons, to providing force protection, including dealing with ground based threats to the air combat force, to becoming the ”quarterback” in contestable airspace.

Put in other terms, the F-22 is providing the mission assurance role for the air combat force.

This transformation has simply become part of operational practice; it is the quiet transformation infusing the USAF and the air combat force.

The F-22 pilot highlighted that although sensor fusion can be considered a key attribute of fifth generation, the ability to fly where you needed to go was a real discriminator.

“It is about stealth enabled sensor fusion; it is not just about generating information in the battlespace. There are places where legacy aircraft simply can not go and survive.”

The USAF started by shaping tactical integration of the F-22s with the F-15s.

That was a key effort of the first five years of the life of the F-22.

As one the ACC participants highlighted: “We started by flying F-22s with F-15s; the F-22s went out fired their weapons, had their impact and returned home.

The F-15s then fended for themselves with not always good results in our exercises.

It did not take us very long to grasp that integrated tactics were required where the F-22 enabled the F-15s and the F-15s supported the F-22s.”

The last five years have seen this type of tactical integration broaden out from the classic air superiority role to encompass the broader force to enable the operational effects, which the A-10 pilot spoke about.

There are three broad impacts of this shift to fifth generation enablement for the force.

The first impact is re-thinking the modernization strategy for 4th generation or legacy assets.

As the F-15 C requirements pilot highlighted: “When the USN gets a new carrier, the ships that can’t keep up get retired.

The USAF needs a similar approach with regard to the intersection of fifth generation with legacy.

But for those legacy assets to be modernized we need to modernize in terms of complementarity to fifth generation.”

The F-15C requirements officer noted that the modernization strategy was no longer stove-piped.

It was not about upgrading the F-15C for the air superiority mission; it was about upgrading for interoperability, with the goal of playing to strengths while minimizing weaknesses in both aircraft.

“How are we going to make it more in interoperable with fifth-gen fighters so it can keep up and it can complement that force and not operate alone doing its own thing, but rather as part of the total package.

F-15 and F-22 Joint Operations from SldInfo.com on Vimeo.

The second impact is re-working the interoperable air combat force.

The officer working air combat integration highlighted the intersection between fifth generation aircraft and the reworking of the connected air combat force.

To be clear, fifth generation aircraft are unique capabilities within an air combat force, not simply another data generator.

“Networking the force is a clear way ahead.

Whether it is interconnecting the fifth generation force or connecting the fifth with the fourth generation, and being able to share information in a multinational environment, the challenge is to enhance the operational connectivity of the air combat force.

The implicit assumption is that everybody has some piece of a puzzle.

Nobody has the entire picture, whether it’s piece of identification information or weapons quality track solution.

How do we network between and among the various participants in this joint multinational force to get the results we need to have?”

The third impact is continuously evolving the integrated tactics of the air combat force as the fifth generation element grows in significance and impact.

A key limit to the fifth generation cultural shift simply has been how few pilots exist for the F-22 and then the spin off effects from experienced F-22 pilots being available to shape the evolving combat culture.

In short, the F-22 enabled air combat force is here and operational. It provides a template for further innovation, as legacy fleets are co-modernized with the software upgradeable F-35 coming into global air combat forces.

ACC Participant Biographies:

Lt Col (Dr.) Jay T. Flottmann is the Air Combat Command MAJCOM Pilot-Physician.  Prior to this assignment, he was a graduate student at The Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy, National Defense University at Ft Leslie J. McNair, Washington D.C.  The National Defense University is an institution of higher education funded by the United States Department of Defense, intended to facilitate high-level training, education, and the development of national security strategy.  His previous assignments include the Chief of Flight Safety for the 325th Fighter Wing where he was the sole USAF Pilot-Physician in the F-22A, Raptor.

Lt Col Scott Hamilton is the ACC lead for the Multi-domain Adaptable Processing System (MAPS). He is assigned to the Combat Forces Division, Directorate of Planning, Programming and Requirements, Headquarters Air Combat Command, Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia. As the MAPS lead, Lt Col Hamilton develops requirements for the integration of an Infrared Search and Track system and multi-domain integration gateway into the F-15C.

During his time at ACC, he has led Research and Development (R&D) activities to identify potential solutions for addressing tactical data link requirements and managed AF programs for improving data link communications and interoperability among all AF platforms as part of the Joint Aerial Layer Network. Lt Col Hamilton

also leads the AF-Navy Joint Tactical Networking working group. Lt Col Hamilton’s operational experience includes tours as a Weapons Systems Officer (WSO) on the F-111 and F-15E.

Maj. Glen Whelan is the ACC F-15C Requirements Officer. His background on the F-15 includes the following: Jun 2002 – Jul 2003: UPT Student Jul 2003 – Nov 2003: IFF Student Nov 2003 – Jun 2004: F-15C B-course student Jun 2004 – Jun 2007: F-15C pilot,58 FS, Eglin AFB Florida Jun 2007 – Oct 2009: Air Liaison Officer, 4 ASOS, Mannheim Germany Oct 2009 – Jun 2013: F-15C pilot, 44 FS, Kadena AB Japan Jun 2013 – Jun 2014: ACSC Student Jun 2014.

Lieutenant Colonel Scott Hoffman is currently the Deputy Chief of the Operations Division at Air Combat Command (ACC/A3O) at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, VA.  In this capacity, he leads 48 members responsible for Commander Air Combat Command’s (COMACC) plans, readiness and readiness reporting, manpower, rated manpower, Command and Control (C2) systems, Continuity of Operations (COOP) program, and Counter-Drug detection and monitoring for Homeland Defense.  In addition, he provides oversight to the Unit Level/Unit C2 (UL/UC2) Program and functional management for Global Command & Control System (GCCS).

He also supervises the planning and execution of COMACC exercises and as well as provides support to 8 Combatant Commanders’ exercise programs which encompasses over 80 exercise events utilizing more than 1,400 aircraft and 21,000 ACC personnel on an annual basis.

Lt Col Hoffman has flown the B-1b, A-10A, and A-10C aircraft during his career.  A Command Pilot with more than 2900 flying hours, including over 2300 in the A-10, he has flown sorties in support of OPERATION SOUTHERN WATCH and OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM.

Major Justin “Stick” Anhalt is currently the Air Combat Command F-22 Program Element Monitor and requirements officer. In this position Major Anhalt defines modernization requirements that direct a $4.5B portfolio. Major Anhalt also serves as a 5th Generation advisor for numerous ACC core functions, advanced programs, F-35, and defense contractors. Major Anhalt earned his commission in 2002 through ROTC.

He has had numerous operational assignments in both the F-15C and the F-22.  During these assignments he twice deployed as part of F-22 Theater Security Packages in Asia. Major Anhalt holds numerous degrees andis a senior pilot with more than 1,400 flying hours in the F-22A, F-15C/D, T-38A/C, and T-37.

Editor’s Note: A key element of the ACC is constantly working on ways ahead in the competitive areas of high tempo combat and on ways to enhance the effectiveness of the air combat force.

Our visit to Nellis AFB highlighted those efforts, where Red Flag Exercises are a regular feature of combat learning with allied aircraft and training against both live and virtual adversarial systems.

https://sldinfo.com/red-flag-nellis-going-forward-training-the-force-of-the-expanded-battlespace/

In the video below is an example of ways to work the challenge.

The slideshow above highlights the F-22 and its interaction with the air combat force.

The slideshow shows various shots of the Raptor, the Eagle and of the F-22s training with F-35s and these aircraft area key elements of the renorming effort for the “fighter” force. Clearly, there are other participants as well but Raptor and Eagle integration tactics have led the way, and the coming of the F-35 will bring impetus to the next wave of renorming efforts, practices and concepts of operations.

The first photo shows an F-22 Raptor, from the 199th Fighter Squadron increasing in altitude shortly after taking off from Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, June 6, 2015. Pilots of the F-22 from the Hawaii Air National Guard’s 199th Fighter Squadron and the 19th Fighter Squadron teamed up with maintenance Airmen from the 154th Wing and 15th Maintenance Group to launch and recover 62 Raptors in a day. The previous record was 46 sorties in one day with 14 aircraft, this recorded was broken using only 12 of the 18 aircraft in the smallest F-22 squadron in the Air Force.

The second photo shows an AH-1W Super Cobra from Marine Light Attack Helicopter Squadron 773 Detachment A prepares to land as crew chiefs ready a Tyndall F-22 Raptor for take-off Oct. 27, 2015, during Exercise Southern Strike at Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Belle Chasse, La. Southern Strike allowed pilots to perform in a realistic environment and train with fourth and fifth generation fighters in high threat scenarios.

The third photo shows an F-22 Raptor from the 199th Fighter Wing as it soars over the island of Oahu as a part of Warrior Day exercises at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, Oct. 28, 2015.

The fourth photo shows an F-22 Raptor returning to Langley Air Force Base, Va., from a deployment to the Middle East, Oct. 9, 2015. Approximately 200 members of the 1st and 192nd Fighter Wings were assigned to the United States Central Command providing support and stability to the region.

The fifth and sixth photos show an F-22 Raptor landing at Langley Air Force Base, Va., April 17, 2014. The 94th Fighter Squadron F-22 returned from a nearly four-month deployment to Kadena Air Base, Japan.

The sixth and seventh photos show an F-15 Eagle aircraft from the 104th Fighter Wing, Massachusetts Air National Guard deploy for two weeks in support of the United States Air Force Weapons Instructor School (WIC) located at Nellis Air Force Base, Las Vegas on Friday, Oct. 30, 2015. WIC teaches graduate-level instructor courses to elite fighter pilots, and provides the world’s most advanced training in weapons and tactics employment to officers of the combat air forces.

The eighth, ninth and tenth photos show F-22 Raptors from the 94th Fighter Squadron, Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Va., and F-35A Lightning IIs from the 58th Fighter Squadron, Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., perform final preflight checks before taking off for an integration training mission on Eglin Training Range, Fla., Nov. 6, 2014. The F-35s and F-22s flew offensive counter air, defensive counter air and interdiction missions, maximizing effects by employing fifth-generation capabilities together.

The 11th photo shows a KC-135 Stratotanker with the 756th Air Refueling Squadron, Joint Base Andrews Naval Air Facility, Md., refuels a 1st Fighter Wing’s F-22 Raptor from Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Va. off the east coast, May 10, 2012.

The first Raptor assigned to the Wing arrived, Jan. 7, 2005. This aircraft was allocated as a trainer, and was docked in a hanger for maintenance personnel to familiarize themselves with its complex systems.

The second Raptor, designated for flying operations, arrived, Jan. 18, 2005.

On Dec. 15, 2005, Air Combat Command commander, along with the 1st FW commander, announced the 27th Fighter Squadron as fully operational capable to fly, fight and win with the F-22.

The 12th photo shows a U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor takes off from Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, to participate in a training sortie over Europe Sept. 3, 2015.

The U.S Air Force deployed four F-22 Raptors, one C-17 Globemaster III, approximately 60 Airmen and associated equipment to Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany.

The deployment occurred from August 28 to mid-September 2015.

The F-22s are deployed from the 95th Fighter Squadron at Tyndall AFB, Fla. While these aircraft and Airmen are in Europe, they conducted air training with other Europe-based aircraft.

The F-22s also forward deployed from Germany to maximize training opportunities.

The 13th photo shows a U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon from the 480th Fighter Squadron, Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany participate in a training sortie with F-22 Raptors Sept. 9, 2015, over the United Kingdom.

The 14th photo shows six F-22 Raptors from the 95th Fighter Squadron from Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla., fly over the Gulf of Mexico Nov. 5, 2015 during a local training mission.

The group of six F-22s were part of a large group formation of 15 Raptor

The final photo shows two F-15 Eagles fly in formation with an F-22 Raptor April 24, 2008 during a support mission near Nellis Air Force Base, Nev.

The F-15s act as “aggressors” to replicate potential adversary air force capabilities, tactics, training and equipment.

Credit Photos: US Air Force

The video at the beginning of the article shows the F-22 and F-15 taking off in Southwest Asia are shown from the 380th Air Expeditionary Wing flightline.

The F-22 is from the 525 fighter squadron based at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, and the F-15 is from the fourth fighter wing, based at Seymour Johnson AFB, North Carolina.

Credit: 380th Air Expeditionary Wing

4/3/14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Bering Strait: Choke Point of the Future?

2015-11-19 By Louis P. Bergeron

Strategic Insights

In the coming decades, the Bering Strait will emerge as a key global maritime choke point due to its strategic location.

The strait will link the dynamic Pacific Ocean economies with the economies in the North Atlantic Ocean using the increasingly ice-free Arctic Ocean as an economical transit medium, initially via the Northern Sea Route (NSR) over Russia.

The NSR passage saves commercial shippers thousands of miles of transit time and fuel on journeys between East Asia and Northern Europe.

While the savings in energy and time are impressive, the Bering Strait choke point is not without significant risks, both natural and man-made, that will challenge even the most daring businesses.

On the Margins

During the 20th century, most Western students grew up looking at maps centered on the Atlantic Ocean and Europe.

In order to display the world on a flat, two-dimensional surface, the Bering Strait provided cartographers with a logical dividing point to ‘split’ the world. However, this typically put the United States’ state of Alaska on the far left (west) and the Russian Chukchi Peninsula on the far right (east) of the map – seemingly worlds apart.

Yet, this belies the essential closeness of the Eurasian and American landmasses, separated by only the 51 nautical mile, north–south Bering Strait.

The strait’s depth of 30 to 50 meters connects the Arctic Ocean’s Chukchi Sea and the Pacific Ocean’s Bering Sea – representing the sole sea line of communication (SLOC) between these two oceans.

Screen Shot 2015-11-18 at 9.26.55 AM

The divide, while relatively short distance-wise, represents a large temporal divide with the International Date Line traversing the center of the strait: the Russian side is 21 hours ahead of the Alaskan side. In the depths of winter, ice flows occasionally clog the span of the strait from November to May, yet strong currents usually prevent a total freeze-over.

In the middle of the strait, the two Diomede Islands – Russia’s Big Diomede to the west and the United States’ Little Diomede, have stood witness to the thaws and freezes of the Bering Strait just like the relationship between the United States and Russia with only 2.4 miles separating the Cold War adversaries’ respective islands.

The Bering Strait has a long history of being a connector.

It connected Asia to the Americas via Beringia, also known as the Bering Land Bridge, during the Last Glacial Maximum.

Indeed, many credit Beringia for enabling the first major human migration from Asia into the Americas some 20,000-30,000 years ago. The connection, however, did not last, and as the glaciers receded, the land bridge re treated under the icy waters around 11,000 years ago as the Arctic Ocean and Pacific Ocean joined together at the Bering Strait.

The Bering Strait became known to Europeans in 1648 when Russian explorer Semyon Dezhnev reached the strait and discovered a native population living in the harsh conditions. In 1728, Virus Bering, a Danish navigator, took a Russian expedition to the strait. This expedition gave names to both the strait and the Diomede Islands – named in honor of the Russian Orthodox St. Diomede.

The entire area, claimed by Russia with competing claims by Britain and Spain, was largely neglected by the non-native population for another century. In 1867, in the midst of the post-US Civil War reconstruction era, US President Andrew Johnson’s Secretary of State, William Seward, negotiated a US$7.2 million (US$120 million in 2015 currency) payment to the Russian Empire for purchasing Alaska. Largely derided at the time by Johnson’s opponents as “Seward’s Folly” and “Seward’s Icebox,” perceptions of the purchase changed during the Nome Gold Rush in the late 1890s, which drew thousands of prospectors to the shores of the Bering Strait for the opportunity to strike it rich, including famed Wild West lawman Wyatt Earp who operated a saloon in Nome during the height of the rush.

During World War II, the Bering Strait became a crucial artery for the Lend-Lease Program goods travelling by sea and air over Alaska from the United States to the Soviet Union. The Bering Sea route was a much safer transport route when compared with the vulnerable convoys on the North Atlantic Ocean. Imperial Japan, in an= attempt to distract the Americans from actions in the South and Central Pacific, captured several of the United States’ Aleutian archipelago islands in the northern Pacific Bering Sea area.

Japan’s military actions spurred a massive US infrastructure investment in Alaska to back the Aleutian Islands. The World War II investment enabled significant development in Alaska in the post-war era.

For instance, US exploitation of the rich oil resources on the Alaskan Northern Slope in the 1970s owed much to World War II investments in Alaska. The Cold War presented the United States and then Soviet Union military with incentives to fortify their respective sides of the strait. The icy, four-decade standoff across the strait hid the sometimes very hot conflict happening under the seas of the Pacific and Arctic Oceans.

The Bering Strait served as a key transit corridor for conventional and nuclear-powered attack and ballistic missile submarines whose presence under the ice or in the frigid waters of the Arctic Ocean sometimes provided opportunities for intelligence collection and remains the quickest route for delivering a nuclear strike via submarine-launched or strategic bomber-launched weapons.

No longer on the margins New world maps showing up in classrooms and offices have started reflecting the changing global economic and power dynamics by placing the Pacific Ocean in the center of the map instead of the Atlantic.

This spatial reordering makes the Bering Strait a prominent feature at the top center of the map. With the strait no longer at the left and right edges of the map, one clearly sees the geostrategic importance of the Bering Strait as a connector and a divider.

Screen Shot 2015-11-18 at 9.01.18 AM

In the thaw from the Cold War, it seemed that the Bering Strait might symbolize a lessening of tensions between the United States and Russia; a Bering Strait tunnel was even discussed by ambitious developers to link together the two countries, reuniting Asia and the Americas after thousands of years of separation.

However, the geopolitics of the strait and the Arctic have turned frosty again since Russia’s involvement in Ukraine and now in Syria; the Bering Strait again has a front row seat to a declining Great Power relationship between the United States and Russia.

At a macro level, climate change is changing the dynamic in the Arctic Ocean, affecting the geostrategic importance. No place on earth has seen such rapid increases in temperature and alteration of climate as the Arctic. As the light-colored, reflective surface ice melts, the darker, now exposed seawater absorbs more solar radiation, making it warmer.

This warmer seawater then melts more of the surrounding ice in a vicious feedback loop contributing to the rapid decrease of Arctic sea ice.

The emerging consensus among climate scientists and climate models predicts that by the 2030s the Arctic will experience an ice-free summer, meaning there will be no significant ice packs left in the Arctic Ocean by late summer.

Some predictions even state that by later in the 21st century or early next century, given current trends, the possibility exists for a nearly year-round ice-free Arctic Ocean. Regardless of the exact dates, the fact remains that the indigenous human, animal, and marine ecosystems of the Arctic face radical, lasting changes in the coming decades.

With the reduced sea ice, the Arctic’s untapped resources and favorable geography becomes more attractive.

A Chinese map regarding the Arctic. Credit: SIPRI
A Chinese map regarding the Arctic. Credit: SIPRI

By some estimates, 10% of the world’s ‘discovered’ and 25% of the world’s ‘undiscovered’ conventional oil and gas lies underneath the Arctic Ocean for exploration and exploitation. Methane hydrates, frozen gas crystals found on the cold Arctic Ocean floor, might also entice energy companies and countries looking for cleaner-burning fuels in the future.

Additionally, fish stocks might become available to fishermen coming through the Bering Strait to capture fish that take advantage of the increasingly warmer waters of the Arctic Ocean. Tourism also stands to increase as the sea ice recedes.

Maritime traffic is poised to rise as well. The former Commandant of the US Coast Guard, Admiral Robert Papp, testified to the US Senate in March 2015 that: “The Arctic Ocean is becoming more navigable as evidenced by an increase in shipping through the Northern Sea Route over Russia.

Arctic Shipping

We have also seen an increase in shipping through the Bering Strait, a potential future choke point for trans-Arctic shipping traffic.” The US Coast Guard (USCG) reported a 118% growth in Bering Strait transit traffic from 2008 (220 transits) to 2012 (480). In 2009, two German merchant ships demonstrated the advantages of using the Bering Strait by sailing via the Russian Northern Sea Route from Vladivostok to Holland without the assistance of an icebreaker, shaving an impressive 4,000 nautical miles off of a regular 11,000 nautical mile transit.

Subsequent transits have captured the attention of shipping companies who grasp the significance of avoiding the pirate-prone, congested maritime choke points at the Straits of Malacca and Bab el Mandeb, as well as the restrictive transit through the Suez Canal.

The China Ocean Shipping Company, COSCO, remains publicly optimistic about the NSR. It recently sent a COSCO cargo vessel to Sweden from China via the Bering Strait and NSR in August 2015; the vessel will return to China through the NSR in October 2015 before the ice cap expands south in November restricting free, unescorted transits.

Management and Strategies

Generally, since the end of the Cold War, the Arctic has been a region of mutual interest and co-operation. The chief co-operation element for Arctic policy is the Arctic Council. Founded in 1989, Canada, Demark (Greenland), Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, and the United States constitute the council. The United States assumed two-year chairmanship of the rotating chair in April 2015.

Of the members, most are North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies with the exception of Russia, Sweden, and Finland. In addition, 12 observer countries to the council include China, Japan, South Korea, Germany, and the UK: countries without physical Arctic equities, but with interests in the environmental energy, and transit opportunities that the Arctic provides. The council has succeeded in securing agreements on protecting native peoples, the environment, and resolving maritime boundary disputes as they arise.

Additionally, the USCG announced on 30 October 2015 the Arctic Coast Guard Forum to address some of the issues described above through regional co-operation, with the forum including all of the Arctic Council members, even Russia.

To highlight the growing importance of the Arctic region, US President Barack Obama visited the Arctic Circle in August-September 2015, the first sitting American President to do so. His administration has attempted to demonstrate American commitment as an ‘Arctic Nation’. The Obama administration inked a US Arctic Strategy for public release in March 2013. This national strategy was quickly followed by a USCG Arctic Strategy (May 2013), a Department of Defense Arctic Strategy (November 2013), and an updated US Navy Arctic Roadmap (February2014).

All of these Executive Branch documents served to put forth a US narrative of the long-term prospects and challenges of a warming Arctic. Each document discussed securing the Arctic environment, native populations, and responsibly enabling exploration and possible extraction of natural resources.

Additionally, the US military and Coast Guard clearly want to ensure access to the Arctic Ocean as an area of military operations and for disaster response, search and rescue, and scientific expeditions, as well as using the Arctic as an arena of international co-operation with allies, partners, and competitors (e.g. China and Russia).

Understandably, the Russians have also included the Arctic and the Bering Strait as a key part of their national security and economic strategy. President Vladimir Putin’s narrative of a resurgent Russia includes a new, muscular naval doctrine unveiled in July 2015 that looks to the Arctic as an area of Russian military strength as the vital corridor to link the Russian Atlantic and Pacific Ocean fleets.

Plus, a review of NSR transits provided by the Northern Sea Route Information Office shows that 31 vessels made a complete NSR transit in 2014 from Cape Deshnev at the Bering Strait west to the Barents Sea, and from the Barents Sea east to Cape Deshnev and through the Bering Strait.

Most of the Russian-flagged vessels were general cargo and petrochemical carriers, and transits took place from late June to early November, ranging in length from 5 days to 43 days. Of those 31 vessels in 2014, however, only six were not Russian-flagged, showing use of the NSR is still overwhelmingly Russian de spite the successful cargo transits mentioned previously.

The Future Challenge

While signs point to the Bering Strait growing in importance for international commerce, energy, and environment, significant challenges remain.

For starters, the volume of traffic through the Bering Strait when compared to the world’s major maritime choke points shows a relative scale mismatch. The Strait of Malacca, for instance, has over 70,000 vessel transits annually, compared to the 480 through the Bering Strait in 2012.

It is simply easier under the current conditions to ship via the traditional maritime routes through the Indian Ocean.

The energy development long sought by global oil and gas companies has largely failed to materialize for several reasons.

One reason is the logistical challenge of operating above the Arctic Circle: ice or no ice, harsh weather prevails so resupply is difficult. Most oil companies had to use Seattle as their base of operations for their large exploration platforms before taking them through the Bering Strait.

Energy companies became nervous after the BP Deepwater Horizon oil platform tragedy in the Gulf of Mexico because of the herculean efforts required to cap the oil well, which would be impossible in the rough conditions of the Arctic so far from any significant maritime logistics resources.

In September 2015, Royal Dutch Shell, an international energy giant, announced that it had suspended oil and gas exploration efforts in the Chukchi Basin north of the Bering Strait “for the foreseeable future” after spending billions of dollars for the drilling block license and on the exploration operations.

The decline in global oil prices, as well as the potential for spills and negative media associated with the possible environmental sensitivities forced Shell’s hand after years of preparation. After Shell’s exit, the Obama administration’s Interior Department suspended the next round of oil and gas block lease sales in the Arctic for 2016 and 2017. Interior’s next lease period is expected for the 2017-2022 five-year leasing plan proposal, but leasing during that timeframe might also be cancelled.

Russia has 2/3 of populations which currently live in the Arctic. Credit: Russia's Artctic Strategies and the Future of the Far North,.
Russia has 2/3 of populations which currently live in the Arctic. Credit: Russia’s Arctic Strategies and the Future of the Far North,.

While these recent developments do not spell the end of Arctic oil and gas exploration and exploitation in the long term, in the near-term, market winds have stopped the Arctic hydrocarbon rush cold.

Before the Bering Strait can serve as a vital maritime choke point, the United States and Russia need to develop port facilities for refueling, repairs, and emergency response. Nome on the American side, home to 9,000 persons, is the largest populace in the strait. A March 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers “Alaska Deep-Draft Arctic Port System Study” found the navigation channel at Nome presently ranges from 3-6 meters in depth. The US harbor at Port Clarence has a natural depth of 10-12 meters, but with few people and even fewer services.

On the Russian side, Provideniya and Chukotsky have 4,500 and 5,200 inhabitants respectively. In order for the strait to attract more shipping commerce, a deep-draft Arctic port will need to exist.

Perhaps, in the future, Nome or Port Clarence might become the ‘Singapore’ of the Bering Strait – an area for interconnected transfer and receipt of cargo. That day, however, might be several decades away.

In the meantime, maritime safety remains the chief concern in the region – both environmental response and search-and-rescue (SAR) assets are few and very far in between. The USCG maintains the most robust capability in the region with their District 17 vessels, aircraft, and helicopters, yet the tyranny of distances and the generally poor operating conditions due to weather, affect their ability to respond to crises.

Maritime safety thus becomes a critical issue because of limited response capabilities; tracking vessels becomes more important in the area and this requires increased maritime domain awareness (MDA) in the region. Extensive use of Automated Identification System (AIS) is necessary for search-and-rescue missions, environmental concerns, tracking tourists, fishing fleets, and overall maritime traffic, especially in the tight confines of the Bering Strait.

In 2009, the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) approved revised “Guidelines for ships operating in polar waters”, which codified ship construction, environmental, and operating standards.

These standards, while welcome, also might serve to discourage commercial shipping companies from using the Bering Strait and NSR due to the costs associated with meeting the MSC guidelines with their current fleet of vessels.

Lack of icebreakers for the United States also hampers development. The United States has only two operational icebreakers, one medium icebreaker and one heavy, with one other heavy icebreaker undergoing serious repairs.

Meanwhile, Russia boasts over 40 icebreakers, including nuclear-powered icebreakers, to assist with keeping the Northern Sea Route open for most of the year, and to shepherd Russian naval vessels from east to west and west to east. In a July 2015 release, Russia’s new naval doctrine says that it will make investments in a new fleet of icebreakers to ensure Russian fleet use of the NSR year-round.

The new routes also present security and related challenges. Credit Image: Danish Arctic Strategy
The new routes also present security and related challenges. Credit Image: Danish Arctic Strategy

During President Obama’s Alaska visit in September, he called on Congress to fund a new icebreaker to start construction in 2020 instead of the current budget’s 2022 commencement.

From a military perspective, the Bering Strait and Bering Sea will likely be an area of contention. The strait remains a vulnerable choke point for the Russian Navy, especially if it is surging naval forces to the Pacific or from the Pacific to the Atlantic.

Additionally, other observer nations have expressed interest in operating in the region. When President Obama was in Alaska, China’s People’s Liberation Army-Navy (PLA-N) sailed several warships into the Bering Sea around the Aleutian Islands.

The US military runs into authorities issues in and around the Bering Strait as it serves as an overlapping area of interest for three geographic combatant commands: Pacific Command, Northern Command, and European Command, and a functional Combatant Command: Strategic Command, which monitors for ballistic missiles entering US airspace over the Arctic.

While armed conflict in the Bering Strait is a very remote possibility, as militaries start to operate there more frequently and development, commerce, and resources are unlocked, the risk of miscalculation grows.

Development and establishment of the Bering Strait as a critical maritime choke point and sea line of communication will take decades, and the extreme challenges of operating in that Arctic environment for energy exploration, tourism, fishing, and commercial shipping will persist.

Yet, the strait has a long history of being a connector, connecting Asia to the Americas and connecting the Arctic Ocean to the vastness of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. As the world looks to a Pacific Ocean-oriented 21st century, the

Bering Strait will no longer occupy the margins.

This article is republished with permission of our partner Risk Intelligence.

Risk Intelligence

The latest issue of Strategic Insights (No. 60, November 2015) focuses on key strategic choke points globally and is a must read for addressing this critical geopolitical dynamic.

http://www.riskintelligence.eu/maritime/strategic_insights/

For some earlier pieces on the Arctic published on Second Line of Defense see the following:

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/denmark-holds-arctic-emergency-exercise/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/coast-guard-cutter-healy-arctic-cruise-2015/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/is-the-us-ready-for-sustained-arctic-operations/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/arctic-challenge-exercise-2015-ends/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/the-russians-the-arctic-and-the-baltics-activism-in-support-of-strategic-re-positioning/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/arctic-challenge-exercise-2015-norway-as-the-lead-nation/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/special-report-june-2014-european-defense-the-arctic-and-the-future/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/admiral-wang-on-baltic-and-arctic-defense-a-danish-perspective/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/shaping-arctic-defense-leveraging-the-grid/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/the-arctic-challenge-from-a-danish-perspective-a-discussion-with-read-admiral-retired-henrik-kudsk/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/the-arctic-opening-co-opetition-in-the-high-north/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/sarex-13-and-the-arctic-challenge/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/the-nordics-and-baltic-and-arctic-defense-a-discussion-with-the-head-of-risk-intelligence/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/the-nordics-the-russians-and-defense-the-baltic-and-arctic-security-convergence/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/russian-resurgence-and-the-arctic/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/greenland-and-the-arctic-the-emergence-of-a-new-sovereign-state/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/preparing-for-an-arctic-future-general-jacoby-looks-at-the-challenges/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/how-ready-is-the-us-navy-for-arctic-operations-not-very/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/alaska-the-arctic-and-crafting-strategic-depth/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/china-and-the-arctic-an-element-of-an-evolving-global-strategy/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/the-why-for-the-norwegian-f-35-decision-the-arctic-dimension/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/a-danish-perspective-on-the-challenge-of-arctic-security/

http://sldinfo.wpstage.net/ending-reluctance/

The slideshow above highlights the USCG Cutter Healy’s Arctic Cruise 2015.

  • In the second photo, a conductivity temperature depth monitor is lowered into the Arctic Ocean from the Coast Guard Cutter Healy July 10, 2015. The CTD monitor will test the water for oxygen levels and salinity.
  • In the third photo, a small-boat crew from the Coast Guard Cutter Healy works with scientists to place a device called a wave rider into Arctic waters for testing, July 11, 2015. The Healy is conducting operations in the Arctic with the Coast Guard Research and Development Center and scientists from various other agencies.
  • In the fourth photo, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration scientist Kevin Vollbrecht launches a Puma unmanned aerial vehicle from the bow of the Coast Guard Cutter Healy July 11, 2015. The Puma is being tested for flight and search and rescue capabilities.
  • In the final photo, Coast Guard Cutter Healy crewmembers move a 1,000 pound buoy into place for deployment in the Arctic, July 10, 2015. The buoy also has a clump anchor, which will keep it in place until it is recovered.

 

Credit:U.S. Coast Guard District 17 PADET Anchorage:7/10/15

Defeating the “Islamic State” (“IS”): One Tribe at a Time

2015-11-19 By  Amatzia Baram

“IS” cannot be defeated as long as it controls territory that can produce large revenue and serve as base for operations.

“IS” has the Iraqi-Syrian desert that is providing them with some $1.5m per day worth of oil, in addition to ransom, an endless supply of archeological items and a few million Islamic tax (zakat, kharaj, ‘ushr) payers.

They are probably the richest Islamic terrorist organization in history, richer even than the dreaded Assassins of Alamut Mountain, who terrorized the Islamic world and the Crusaders between the 11th and 13th centuries.

What does the French president’s announcement that “France is at war” mean?

It seems that only an enhanced air campaign, but without ground troops it will take 2-3 years to destroy “IS”. In the meantime they can saw havoc in the West. The Western countries’ reluctance to send ground forces to eradicate “IS” is understandable.

Military victory can be achieved quickly, but controlling this vast area is another thing altogether.

Rather than liberation, most Sunni Muslims will see the invasion as a pro-Iranian foreign occupation.

A Sunni insurgency is therefore to be expected, and for an extended period of time.

Kurdish forces aided by thousands of lightly armed Yazidi fighters captured a strategic highway in northern Iraq in the early stages of an offensive to reclaim the town of Sinjar from the Islamic State, which seized it last year. Credit: Bryan Denton for The New York Times
Kurdish forces aided by thousands of lightly armed Yazidi fighters captured a strategic highway in northern Iraq in the early stages of an offensive to reclaim the town of Sinjar from the Islamic State, which seized it last year. Credit: Bryan Denton for The New York Times

Furthermore: can the local population under foreign occupation rise out of the ashes and build a stable and peaceful political system in a brand-new “Syriraq”, devastated and cut-off from the high seas?

It may still be necessary to put Western boots on the ground, but first a less drastic and more promising way needs to be tried.

A sample of the solution is already enfolding in front of our eyes.

With Allied air support, the Kurds of Iraq and Syria have already pushed IS out of large swaths of land.

In early November the Iraqi Kurds launched a renewed offensive to drive “IS” out of Sinjar, in Iraq’s north-west. They must be helped much more, but the Kurds do not have the numbers to liberate either of the two countries.

Most of the Sunni-Arab tribes of Iraq and Syria living in “IS”-occupied areas are sitting on the fence, waiting.

They are hostile to “IS” due to its super-extreme interpretation of the Islamic law, very alien to local traditions, but they are also hostile to the Alawite regime in Damascus, to the Shi’i government in Baghdad, and to the Shi’i-Persian overlords in Tehran.

If their expectations are met by the international Coalition they will fight “IS” and win. A few Iraqi Sunni tribes like albu-Nimr, albu-Risha and parts of the Jubbur have already joined the war against “IS.”

A few others joined “IS.”

However, the majority, including the two largest tribal federations of Dulaym and Shammar Jarba and many others are still waiting.

The Sunni Arab tribes of Iraq will need light and medium weapons, but no less importantly: a commitment that the West will guard their rights once “IS” is out of the way.

Among their rights they consider the right to establish autonomy similar to the Kurdish one in Iraq that will have its own national guard and will receive an equitable share in the Iraqi oil revenues.

Also, most Sunni Arabs of Iraq are demanding to end the 2003 de-Ba`thification laws that de-facto have been used as an anti-Sunni tool.

Due to an Iranian dictate and pressures from some Shi`i-Iraqi militias, Shi’i-hegemonic Baghdad is so far unwilling or unable to accept these demands, and the Iraqi tribes remain on the sidelines.

In Syria the position of the tribes and clans is more opaque but Syria, too, will most likely become a loose federation if it survives at all. Like the Kurds, the Sunni-Arab tribes in eastern Syria need to be assured that those areas that they liberate from “IS” will receive an autonomous status as part of the new Syria.

Tribal support for putting down an insurgency worked well in Iraq.

Since early 2007, under General David Petraeus, the US decided to approach the Sunni tribes for cooperation against al-Qa`ida in a systematic way.

By early 2009, with the Sunni tribal Awakening (al-sahwah) militia under Shaykh Abd al-Sattar Abu Risha as part of the Surge, the insurgency was defeated.

By 2010 however, the tribes and the Sunni community as a whole were left to the mercy of a paranoid, vindictive and bigot PM Nuri al-Maliki in Baghdad.

The result was the resurrection of al-Qa`ida, later “IS.”

Today the tribes are reluctant to stick their necks without Western military support and a clear political commitment for the post-“IS” era.

Even if Baghdad and Tehran object, and so far they do, weapons must be provided and such a commitment must be given.

Sunni Arabs, rather than unruly Shi’i militias or Western troops must liberate the Sunni-Arab areas, and now is the time.

Dr. Amatzia Baram is a professor of Middle East History and Director of the Center for Iraq Studies at the University of Haifa. On October 29, 2003 Dr. Baram publishes an OpEd in the NYT: “ Victory in Iraq: One Tribe at a Time”.

 

 

 

 

The Truman Strike Group Leaves Norfolk for the Middle East: Bringing Lethal Agility to the Fight

11/17/2015

2015-11-16 By Ed Timperlake

In a fight against ISIS, a non-state force with the resources of a state, air strikes and insertion of forces can not only lead to the destruction of forces in being but infrastructure supporting those forces.

What you do not want to have are forces which can be captured by the radical Islamists and used as pawns in a deadly game.

The sea services provide a unique set of assets as flexible expeditionary strike groups made up of amphibious ships or a carrier strike group and can bring a diversity of assets to bear on fixed or fleeting targets.

As a retired Marine commented on the recent ISIS attack on Paris:

“ISIS is so drunk on their own venom, that they have seriously underestimated the resolve of the French.”

And, as well, the solidarity of those forces unwilling to see civilized society decimated by the barbarism of Islamic militants.

When a strike force like the Truman goes to sea, it is a commitment of the military and their families to defeating the kind of evil represented by ISIS,

Yesterday, the USS Truman, with surface combatants set out into Harm’s Way with families, loved ones and supporters of the United States Navy waving good-by as the Strike Group left Norfolk Naval Base, through Hampton Roads and then cleared Willoughby Spit and was visible from Little Creek Amphibious Base and many historic Civil War fortifications.

Much like the fanatical Nazis celebrated their sense of ethnic purity against the “weaker” Anglo-Saxon races, ISIS believes its ideological purity will prevail over the “weakness” of the West.

The fleet represents what America has become — a powerful multi-ethnic society, that in spite of its differences, finds ways to work together, notably against those who seem dedicated to the extermination of civilized society.

Those who are honored or events remembered by having ships named after them represent the best of America and its armed forces.

The Truman is of course named for President Truman, a man who demonstrated courage in combat and in leadership of the United States.

The USS Anzio, a Ticonderoga Class Guided Missile Cruiser, is named for the battle of Anzio, where American and allied forces fought off of the beaches and finally broke out to pursue the Nazis in northern Italy.

The Burke Class Destroyer USS Bulkily is named for Vice Admiral John Bulkeley, MOH, known as “The Sea Wolf.”

The citation listed in Arlington Cemetery for Vice Admiral Bulkeley highlights his accomplishments.

For extraordinary heroism, distinguished service, and conspicuous gallantry above and beyond the call of duty as commander of Motor Torpedo Boat Squadron 3, in Philippine waters during the period 7 December 1941 to 10 April 1942.

The remarkable achievement of Lt. Comdr. Bulkeley’s command in damaging or destroying a notable number of Japanese enemy planes, surface combatant and merchant ships, and in dispersing landing parties and land-based enemy forces during the 4 months and 8 days of operation without benefit of repairs, overhaul, or maintenance facilities for his squadron, is believed to be without precedent in this type of warfare.

His dynamic forcefulness and daring in offensive action, his brilliantly planned and skillfully executed attacks, supplemented by a unique resourcefulness and ingenuity, characterize him as an outstanding leader of men and a gallant and intrepid seaman.

These qualities coupled with a complete disregard for his own personal safety reflect great credit upon him and the Naval Service.

The USS Gravely Burke Class destroyer is named for Vice Admiral Gravely.

Samuel Lee Gravely Jr. was a highly decorated Navy Officer who pioneered the way with a multitude of firsts for African Americans in the military.

Some of his most notable achievements included, being the first African American Navy Vice Admiral, the first African American to command a Navy warship, the first African American to command a warship during combat, the first African American to command a Navy Fleet, and the first African American to obtain Flag Rank in the military.

His decorations include the Bronze Star, Legion of Merit, Navy Commendation Medal, and Meritorious Service Medal.

The USS Gonzalez Burke Class destroyer is named for Sgt Alfraedo Gonzalez MOH,

Alfredo Gonzalez, who was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for heroism in Vietnam in February 1968, was born 23 May 1946, in Edinburg, Texas. He graduated from Lamar Grammar School in 1955, and from Edinburg High School in 1965. 

Enlisting in the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve at San Antonio, Texas, 3 June 1965, he was discharged to enlist in the regular Marine Corps, 6 July 1965.

He completed recruit training with the 3d Recruit Training Battalion, Marine Corps Recruit Depot, San Diego, California, the following September, and individual combat training with the 2d Battalion, 2d Infantry Training Regiment, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California, that October.

After completing individual combat training, he became a rifleman with Headquarters and Service Company, 1st Reconnaissance Battalion, 1st Marine Division, and served in that capacity until January 1966. He next saw a one year tour of duty as a rifleman and squadron leader with Company L, 3d Battalion, 4th Marines, 3d Marine Division. He was promoted to private first class on 1 January 1966; to lance corporal on 1 October 1966; and to corporal on 1 December 1966.

Upon his return to the United States in February 1967, he saw duty as a rifleman with the 2d Battalion, 6th Marines, 2d Marine Division, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.

Ordered to the West Coast in May 1967, he joined the 3d Replacement Company, Staging Battalion, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California, for transfer to the Far East.

On 1 July 1967, he was promoted to sergeant, and later that month, arrived in the Republic of Vietnam. He served as a squad leader and platoon sergeant with the 3d Platoon, Company A, 1st Battalion, 1st Marines, 1st Marine Division.

While participating in the initial phase of Operation Hue City in the vicinity of Thua Thien, Vietnam, on 4 February 1968, Sergeant Gonzalez was mortally wounded from hostile rocket fire.

A complete list of his medals and decorations includes: the Medal of Honor, the Purple Heart, the Presidential Unit Citation, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze stars, the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry with star, the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry with Palm, the Military Merit Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal

It is a fleet which honors great Americans, and make no mistake, great Americans serve today in the fleet.

One hopes that the opening lines of Gladiator are what awaits the Isis: “Unleash Hell!”

Editor’s Note: A good overview of the departure of the Truman strike group was provided by Ali Rockett of the Daily Press and published on November 16, 2015:

The aircraft carrier Harry S. Truman and its strike group left Naval Station Norfolk Monday for a deployment set to start in the Middle East as U.S. and coalition forces increase strikes on Islamic State militants, who have claimed credit for last week’s attacks in Paris.

The Truman is expected to reach the Persian Gulf before the year’s end. The U.S. has been launching air strikes into Iraq and Syria from aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf — at least until last month, when the USS Theodore Roosevelt left the area after an extended deployment.

The two-month gap is the first in nearly a decade that the U.S. has had no carrier in the region.

While the Truman’s departure date was set more than a year ago, it came about six months earlier than first planned. In October 2014, it was announced that the ship would switch deployment cycles with the Norfolk-based USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, which required an additional 10 months in the shipyard. 

This means the 3,000 sailors aboard the Truman readied the ship for deployment in about half the normal time.

Another 2,000 sailors are attached to the carrier’s flotilla, which includes guided-missile cruiser USS Anzio, and guided-missile destroyers USS Bulkeley, USS Gravely and USS Gonzalez, the Navy said. Carrier Air Wing 7, with nine squadrons, is also assigned to the group.

The seven-month deployment will also include operations in the waters around Europe and Africa.

The guided-missile destroyer USS Ramage also departed Norfolk Monday for an eight-month deployment in the Middle East. It will be independent of the carrier strike group and will provide ballistic missile defense, according to the Navy.

The photos in the slideshow highlight the various ships in the Truman strike group.

The first photo shows an F/A-18F Super Hornet, assigned to the “Swordsmen” of Strike Fighter Squadron 32, launches from the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75).

Harry S. Truman, flagship for the Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group, is seen deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility conducting maritime security operations, supporting theater cooperation efforts and supporting Operation Enduring Freedom (1/9/14).

The second photo shows Guided-missile cruiser USS Anzio (CG 68) steams through the Gulf of Aden. Anzio is assigned to Combined Task Force 151, a multi-national, mission-based task force established by the Combined Maritime Forces in January 2009 to conduct counter-piracy operations in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Somali Basin and Arabian Sea (7/15/11).

The third photo shows the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) conducts high-speed turns during a rudder check. Harry S. Truman is conducting carrier qualifications in the Atlantic Ocean (3/14/09).

The fourth photo shows the guided-missile destroyer USS Bulkeley (DDG 84) transits the Gulf of Oman. Bulkeley, part of the Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group, is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility conducting maritime security operations, supporting theater security cooperation efforts and supporting Operation Enduring Freedom (11/26/13).

The fifth photo shows the guided-missile destroyer USS Gravely (DDG 107) returning to Naval Station Norfolk after a scheduled deployment. Gravely deployed to the U.S. 6th Fleet area of responsibility in support of maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the eastern Mediterranean Sea and conducted missions in support of Operations Sharp Sentry, Atlantic Sentry, and Active Endeavor (11/18/13).

The final photo shows the Truman preparing to depart from Norfolk Naval station and is credited to Barbette Timperlake.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

France Responds: “We Are At War”

2015-11-17  President Hollande has responded decisively against ISIS.

“France is at war.”

“The acts committed Friday night in Paris at the Stade de France are acts of war.

“We must respond with cold determination to the attack that our country was a target of.”

VERSAILLES, FRANCE - NOVEMBER 16: French President Francois Hollande delivers a speech during an exceptional joint gathering of both of the French houses of parliament on November 16, 2015 in Versailles, France. During his speech, the French President expressed his commitment to "destroying" Islamic State (IS), following Friday's terrorist attacks which left at least 129 people dead and hundreds more injured. (Photo by Thierry Chesnot/Getty Images)
VERSAILLES, FRANCE – NOVEMBER 16: French President Francois Hollande delivers a speech during an exceptional joint gathering of both of the French houses of parliament on November 16, 2015 in Versailles, France. During his speech, the French President expressed his commitment to “destroying” Islamic State (IS), following Friday’s terrorist attacks which left at least 129 people dead and hundreds more injured. (Photo by Thierry Chesnot/Getty Images)

He underscored that the Islamic State terrorists likely targeted France because it’s a country defined by liberty and democracy.

“Our democracy stands more true than these assassins.”

“We are not engaged in a war of civilization, because the terrorists do not belong to any civilization.”

He repeated France’s call to arms and applauded the resilience of the French people.

“I’m calling again on our compatriots to take this opportunity to show our country’s honor, lucidity, and dignity.

“[They] are ardent, courageous people who stand up every time.”

Policemen have gone “beyond themselves” to protect the people, Hollande added.

“Our enemy in Syria is Daesh, so it’s not about containing but about destroying this organization to save the populations of Syria and Iraq, but also Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and neighboring countries.

It’s also to protect us, to prevent this from happening on our soil.”

He said it’s a fight against terror on a global scale, and a war that will need “patience” as “[t]errorists are threatening the entire world, not just France.”

“Our enemy disposes of the most vile tactics to kill, but the enemy is not out of reach,” Hollande said.

“Their crime reinforces our determination to destroy them.”

France started by air strikes against known strongholds of ISIS in Syria.

And France has committed financial resources to stepping up the war as well.

According to an article in the Daily Telegraph by :

France has invoked emergency powers to sweep aside EU deficit rules and retake control over its economy after the terrorist atrocities in Paris, pledging a massive in increase and security and defence spending whatever the cost. 

President Francois Hollande said vital interests of the French nation are at stake and there can be no further justification for narrowly-legalistic deficit rules imposed by Brussels. “The security pact takes precedence over the stability pact. France is at war,” he told the French parliament. 

Defence cuts have been cancelled as far out as 2019 as the country prepares to step up its campaign to “eradicate” ISIS, from the Sahel in West Africa, across the Maghreb, to Syria and Iraq. 

At least 17,000 people will be recruited to beef up the security apparatus and the interior ministry, fast becoming the nerve centre of the country’s all-encompassing war against the ISIS network. 

The new forces include 5,000 new police and gendarmes, 1,000 customs officials, and 2,500 prison guards. “I assume it will lead to an increase in expenses,” he said. 

The combined effect amounts to a fiscal stimulus and may ultimately cushion the economic damage of terrorist attacks for the tourist industry, but the “rearmament” drive spells the end of any attempt to meet deficit limit of 3pc of GDP enshrined in the Stability and Growth Pact. With France in open defiance, the reconstituted pact is now effectively dead. 

The European Commission expects the French deficit to be 3.4pc of GDP next year and 3.3pc in 2017, but the real figure is likely to be much higher and will last through to the end of the decade. The concern is that this could push the country’s debt yet higher from 96.5pc of GDP to nearer 100pc, made worse by the effects of deflation on debt dynamics. 

Mr Hollande said France will invoke article 42.7 of the Lisbon Treaty, the solidarity clause obliging other member states to come to his country’s help by “all means in their power”. It would be beyond parody for Brussels to continue insisting on budget rules in such a political context. 

Hollande is shaping a new approach in the Middle East to support the war against Isis.

He has recognized that working with Assad is better than failure to focus on ISIS.

And working with the Russians is clearly part of the strategy as they are players in Syria, in the Middle East and are working new relationships with Israel and Jordan as well.

The French Parliament, November 17, 2015. Credit" Murielle Delaporte
The French Parliament, November 17, 2015. Credit” Murielle Delaporte

According to an article by Eric Maurice in the EuObserver:

“The enemy is Daesh,” he said, using the Arabic name for the Islamic State group.

“We shall not just contain it, but destroy it,” he said, adding that France will “intensify its operations” in Syria following Monday’s raids.

Hollande also wants to build “a large and unique coalition” against the terrorist group.

He announced that France has asked for a meeting and a resolution from the UN Security Council.

He also said that he will soon meet US and Russian presidents, Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin, “to join our forces and reach a conclusion that has been too long overdue.”

“We are not in a war of civilisations, because they [the terrorists] don’t have any,” Hollande said.

France was attacked, he said, because “it is the land of freedom and of human rights.”

“Terrorists believe that people will allow themselves to be impressed by horror,” he said. “That is not the case,” he assured the parliamentarians. “They are the ones who will go down in history as the losers.”

“We shall continue to work, go out, live and influence the world,” he said, adding that the UN climate conference will still take place in Paris in December.

“French killed French,” he told parliamentarians.

“The France that assassins wanted to kill is youth in all its diversity,” he said. “The only crime of these young people [who were killed] was to live.”

Much like Bush lead in dealing with 9/11 and expected others to support his efforts, President Hollande is taking the same tack.

And he is looking for internal security reforms, European wide changes and coalition shifting in the Middle East to get serious about destroying the infrastructure of ISIS.

 

Shaping a Way Ahead for the 21st Century Air Combat Enterprise: An Australian Perspective on the Italian First Flight

11/16/2015

2015-11-13 By Robbin Laird

The first flight of Italian F-35 pilots occurred on November 5, 2015.

The two pilots flew a USAF and a RAAF jet. The flight aboard the Australian jet highlighted the role of the partners in the F-35 program, and a harbinger of things to come.

As the Italian pilots highlighted in an interview after the flights:

Question: You flew an Australian jet yesterday.  

You do not normally work with Australian pilots, but you will get to know them from the ground up as well as you train at Luke and fly each other’s jets.  

What is your sense of this dynamic? 

Answer: The young guys will grow up in a very advanced warfighting and multi-national environment because of this program. 

They will be used to not just working together from time to time in an exercise, but will build in common tactics from the ground up and help each other innovate as well. 

https://sldinfo.com/italy-and-two-historic-first-flights-in-2015-shaping-the-f-35-global-enterprise/

The partners, the USMC, the USN and the USAF is learning to fly their most advanced jet AT PRECISELY THE SAME TIME as key allies.

Put bluntly, rather than learning to fly WITH the U.S. services on different jets, the Italians and other F-35 nations are shaping common training, tactics and procedures for a global fleet FROM THE GROUND UP.

To get a sense from the Australian point of view of the event and it’s meaning, I had a chance to discuss the Australian experience with Group Captain Glen Beck, Director of the Air Combat Transition Office in the Royal Australian Air Force.

He is responsible for how the RAAF transitions its air combat elements, and is primarily focused on the introduction of the F-35 as well as the Growlers into the force. He is the senior F-35 pilot in the transition, which means that the pilots at Luke AFB involved in F-35 training report to him.

An A21 F/A-18 Hornet (front), piloted by Wing Commander Glen Beck from No77 Squadron, and an A44 F/A-18F Super Hornet 'Rhino', piloted by Flight Lieutenant Andrew Habersberger from No1 Squadron fly over Melbourne, Victoria during the Australian International Airshow 2011. The 2011 Australian International Airshow and Aerospace & Defence Exposition, held at Avalon in Victoria from 1-6 March, coincides with the Royal Australian Air Force’s 90th birthday. Air Force’s Airshow activities celebrate this milestone by remembering our past and looking to our future with the theme tradition, innovation, evolution.
An A21 F/A-18 Hornet (front), piloted by Wing Commander Glen Beck from No77 Squadron, and an A44 F/A-18F Super Hornet ‘Rhino’, piloted by Flight Lieutenant Andrew Habersberger from No1 Squadron fly over Melbourne, Victoria during the Australian International Airshow 2011.

A bio of Group Captain Beck can be found at the end of the interview.

“The way we think about it is that we are not focused simply on the platforms but upon the evolution of air combat capabilities as we introduce the new platforms. It is about balancing the strengths over time of the various platforms and looking at balance and complementary capabilities among the air platforms, such as Super Hornet, F-35, Growler and Wedgetail.”

Question: How important is it to get in on the ground floor with the F-35 and working together with the partners?

Group Captain Beck: The model being shaped at Luke is standing up critical mass with integrated USAF and partner efforts. It is a much better model than several small groups nationally trying to work it out for themselves.

It also means that the users can speak with one voice about the development of the program, and what is working and what is not working.

This allows us to address ways to improve things like the working of ALIS, how the maintainers work together, how to maintain and sustain, how the spare parts pool can work more efficiently, how to improve IT support, etc.

The critical mass can work towards a common set of solutions, rather than everyone coming at it from very different angles.

This makes approaches to change more coherent.

It allows us to prioritize tasks to be dealt with at the project level as well in moving ahead with training.

Question: The Italian pilots highlighted the importance of sharing common TTPs. 

How important is this from your point of view?

Group Captain Beck: It is important to have shared understanding.

It is about the end state you are driving towards.

It is about interoperability for the warfighter.

If you can shape that understanding as you are learning the system then you are setting yourself up for better combat success in the future.

The 17th Luke Air Force Base F-35A Lightning II jet arrived at Luke Air Force Base Dec. 18, 2014. The jet accompanied the first Royal Australian Air Force F-35A Lightning II to arrive here. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Staci Miller)
The 17th Luke Air Force Base F-35A Lightning II jet arrived at Luke Air Force Base Dec. 18, 2014. The jet accompanied the first Royal Australian Air Force F-35A Lightning II to arrive here. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Staci Miller)

Question: How is the Luke AFB process helping shape this common approach?

Group Captain Beck: We are in the 61st Fighter Squadron with the USAF.

The guys there are finding it relatively seamless working with the USAF in the squadron. We have many commonalities in how we train, think and operate.

As far as the Italians and the Norwegians at with the 62nd Fighter Squadron working with the USAF.

We will have less day-to-day interactions with the Italians and Norwegians, but the way the program is set up you could have Australian instructors and students working with the 62nd Fighter Squadron as well as the reverse.

http://flightlines.airforcetimes.com/2015/06/22/luke-stands-up-new-f-35-squadron/

We are working with the same curriculum and syllabus within the program.

Question: You are working critical mass not just from a pilot perspective but from the air systems perspective. 

Is that how to look at it?

Group Captain Beck: It is. Not everyone has enough jets at the beginning but by being part of a coalition critical mass they have access to more than simply their own national jets.

By putting the various national participants in a common pool you can accelerate learning and shape more effective solutions from the beginning.

And we are seeing a clear acceleration of this process, something not easily recognized by those not participating in the program.

And with the growing numbers of F-35 pilots and maintainers, you will bring fifth generation into the main stream. Rather than simply being a niche capability, it will become the mainstay for change for the air combat force.

It is going to become more of a day-to-day experience; it is going to become less “special” and more normal.

Exercise directors from participating countries for Exercise Cope North, including Group Captain Glen Beck (5th from left) from the RAAF listen to the opening briefs at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam. *** Local Caption *** Exercise Cope North Guam 2014 (CNG14), conducted from 14 - 28 February 2014, is a Commander Pacific Air Forces sponsored, multilateral field training exercise with the United States Air Force (USAF), Japan Air Self-Defence Force (JASDF), and the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF). Conducted from Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, CNG14 involves a large force employment Air Combat Exercise with Dissimilar Air Combat Training and a Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HA/DR) exercise which runs concurrently but with separate exercise scenarios.CNG14 involves over 1000 personnel and 80 aircraft and is designed to increase the combat readiness and interoperability of the USAF, JASDF and RAAF. The HA/DR exercise focuses training on coordination of disaster relief efforts, in particular medical support and aero-medical evacuations.
Exercise directors from participating countries for Exercise Cope North, including Group Captain Glen Beck (5th from left) from the RAAF listen to the opening briefs at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam. Credit: Australian Ministry of Defence, 2/14

A lot of people don’t realize how much momentum we have in the program and we are rapidly achieving critical mass in the program.

This will be the premier fighter in the 21st century; several nations will be using it; and sharing their combat experiences, and building an evolving capability over time. In my opinion, a lot of people are yet to think through what the impact of this will mean.

Question: And the capability of partners and allies to work through their own ways ahead will be enhanced as well.

How do you view the regional opportunities inherent in the program?

Group Captain Beck: There is a clear capability to work to build greater regional collaboration as well. Instead of a FMS approach to buying a US system, the F-35 is more of a global network of depots, suppliers and there are opportunities to collaborate as well regionally from an ownership of capability perspective.

Bio – Group Captain Glen Beck

Current Responsibilities 

The position of Director Air Combat Transition Office (DACTO) retains overall responsibility for coordination of the RAAF’s air combat transition composing F18F, F18G and JSF. DACTO is specifically responsible for introduction to service of the F-35A as a representative of the Capability Manager in the Australian JSF Division Integrated Project Team.

Previous Service

Group Captain Glen Beck was born in Melbourne in 1969. Upon completing high school he attended the University of Melbourne for one year before joining the RAAF in 1989. Group Captain Beck continued his studies at the Australian Defence Force Academy and graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in 1990.

After completing No. 158 Pilot’s course, Group Captain Beck progressed to 3 SQN to fly the F/A-18. At the completion of his first flying tour he became a Qualified Flying Instructor and instructed at 2FTS in Pearce, followed by teaching F/A-18 conversion course at 2OCU.

In 2003 Group Captain Beck saw combat action over Iraq with 75 SQN, and shortly after returning became the Executive Officer (XO) at 3 SQN. In 2006 Group Captain Beck attended Staff College in Toronto, Canada, where he earned a Master of Defence Studies Degree. Upon returning to Australia he was promoted to Wing Commander and spent 2 years in Capability Development Group, doing fast jet project work in Canberra.

Group Captain Beck was appointed Commanding Officer of No. 77 Squadron from 30 June 2009 until 14 January 2013, for which he was awarded the Conspicuous Service Cross. He was promoted to Group Captain and appointed Chief of Staff for Air Combat Group for two years until his present DACTO role commenced in January 2015.

Group Captain Beck has approximately 4500 flying hours including more than 3000 on the F/A-18.

Editor’s Note: Group Captain Beck was involved in last year’s Cape North exercise which is discussed in this USAF piece published on 2/16/14.

By Tech. Sgt. Zachary Wilson
Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs2/16/2014 – ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam  — More than 1,800 service members and approximately 50 aircraft from the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, Japan Air Self-Defense Force, Royal Australian Air Force and Republic of Korea Air Forces came together to kick off the 85th iteration of Pacific Air Forces’ Cope North exercise Feb. 14 on Andersen Air Force Base, Guam.The trilateral field training exercise features a full spectrum of fighters, bombers, transport, re-fueling and command and control aircraft from the U.S., JASDF, and RAAF designed to improve combat readiness, develop a synergistic disaster response, and increase interoperability between partner nations.Also as part of Cope North 14, Republic of Korea Air Force will join with the other nations to conduct humanitarian assistance and disaster relief training.”Cope North is a tremendous opportunity for nations in our region to train together at Andersen building a common set of tactics, techniques and procedures” said Brig. Gen. Steven Garland, 36th Wing Commander.

“We live in a very dynamic region of the world and the Airmen participating this year in our largest Cope North to date, all recognize the value provided to the region from great team work.”

The flexibility and rapid response exhibited during the recent Philippine typhoon relief effort of Operation Damayan underscores the value of training opportunities during times of relative calm so nations are prepared to respond in times of crisis to support their nation,” said Garland.

Exercise directors representing each nation’s component all remarked on the uniqueness and quality of Andersen’s infrastructure, facilities and the Central Marianas airspace the units will use during the two-week exercise.

“We have great facilities, great airspace here and this exercise is all about getting better, learning from each other and doing it safely,” said Col. John Parker, U.S. Cope North exercise director and 35th Operations Group commander at Misawa Air Base, Japan.

The three participating countries each feature an exercise director, leadership teams, planning sections, aviators, maintenance and other support members, said Maj. Micah Bell, an exercise planner from 5th Air Force at Misawa. Through interoperability, the three teams each assume the lead on various operations throughout the exercise and work closely with their counter-parts.

Aircraft from the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, Japan Air Self-Defense Force, and Royal Australian Air Force fly in formation over the Pacific Ocean in support of exercise Cope North 2013, Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, Feb. 5, 2013. During this event, the aviators trained on war-fighting integration tactics. Cope North is a multilateral aerial and humanitarian assistance and disaster relief exercise, held annually, designed to increase the combat readiness and interoperability of the U.S. military, JASDF, and RAAF. (Courtesy photo/Jim Haseltine/Released)
Aircraft from the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, Japan Air Self-Defense Force, and Royal Australian Air Force fly in formation over the Pacific Ocean in support of exercise Cope North 2013, Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, Feb. 5, 2013. During this event, the aviators trained on war-fighting integration tactics. Cope North is a multilateral aerial and humanitarian assistance and disaster relief exercise, held annually, designed to increase the combat readiness and interoperability of the U.S. military, JASDF, and RAAF. (Courtesy photo/Jim Haseltine/Released)

“Interoperability is a word that gets used often during this exercise,” he said. “We take that very literally; we want to not only get safe, effective training, but also want to learn from our partners and share lessons learned.”

The exercise is unique in that it combines air-to-air and air-to-ground combat training with allied partners and additionally incorporates a humanitarian aid and disaster response portion concurrently.

“We live in a region with lots of natural disasters,” said Group Capt. Glen Beck, RAAF exercise director. “The (Australian Air Force) isn’t very large so we are always grateful for training opportunities; this is the largest international exercise we do and it’s definitely the largest footprint.”

Col. Hiroshi Kurata, serving as exercise director for JASDF, noted the significance of both training for disaster and building professional relationships.

“It’s been three years since the earthquake hit eastern Japan and I appreciate all the support and cooperation we received during Operation Tomodachi,” he said. “Additionally, I ask three things from all in attendance here: Do your best, enjoy your job and make as many friends as possible.”

http://www.andersen.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123400490

Norwegians at Luke AFB: First Norwegian F-35s Arrive

2015-11-14 The first two Norwegian F-35 aircraft are seen arriving at Luke AFB, AZ and the first Royal Norwegian Air Force F-35 student pilot’s initial flight as well in the video below.

Norway is one of the F-35 partner nations currently training pilots at Luke AFB.

The two Norwegian F-35 jets arrived from the Lockheed Martin plant at Ft. Worth, TX and will join the 62nd Fighter Squadron which is training both Norwegian and Italian pilots in addition to US pilots.

Maj. Morten Hanche of the Royal Norwegian Air Force also did his initial F-35 flight and is the first Norwegian student to complete F-35 training at Luke AFB.

Both events took place on Nov. 10th, which is the birthday of the Royal Norwegian Air Force.

Norwegians at Luke AFB: First Norwegian F-35s Arrive from SldInfo.com on Vimeo.

Credit: 56th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

11/10/15

According to a piece by Senior Airman Grace Lee of the 56th Fighter Wing Public Affairs published on 11/10/15:

The first two Norwegian F-35s arrived today at Luke Air Force Base, Ariz. Shortly after, a Norwegian pilot flew the F-35 Lightning II for the first time today, in conjunction with the Royal Norwegian air force’s birthday.

The F-35 program took its first step forward integrating partner nations with the arrival of the first Australian F-35 Dec. 18, 2014, at Luke. Almost a year later the next big international step for the program came when two Italian pilots completed their first flight in an F-35 Nov. 5 here.

This marks the second international partner to have F-35s arrive for training at Luke.

“Today is a great day for the 62nd Fighter Squadron, the 56th Fighter Wing, and the U.S. and Norwegian air forces,” said Lt. Col. Gregory Frana, 62nd FS commander. “Since the 62nd FS stood up as an F-35 squadron back in June of 2015, we have been focused on training the world’s best F-35 pilots. Today, as we accept our first partner aircraft into the squadron, we are one step closer to fulfilling our mission of training the best F-35 pilots from around the world.”

The day was a result of the combined efforts of the U.S. and its Norwegian partners.

“Over the past few months we have been working closely with our Norwegian partners to ensure that we are ready to receive and fly the most technologically advanced aircraft the world has ever seen,” Frana said. “Today is the result of a monumental team effort, but the effort will not stop here. The effort will continue as the U.S. and our partners bring the F-35 to initial operational capability and utilize this amazing machine to strengthen alliances and defend our national interests.”

Similar to the partnership Norway had with the U.S. and other partner nations with the F-16, the F-35 partnership will make for an unstoppable force.

“When it comes to the partnership, we see a very good transfer from our experience with the F-16 to the F-35,” said Royal Norwegian air force Maj. Morten Hanche, 62nd FS training pilot. “Working with the same and some new partners, will allow us the same benefits. Also, it will allow us to easily integrate and operate together as one force. This is because we train together, we know each other and we keep it very similar.”

Eight other nations will be training alongside the U.S. on the new airframe. Other partner nations that will be joining the U.S., Norway and Australia in the F-35 training program here will be Turkey, Italy, and the Netherlands, in addition to Foreign Military Sales countries Japan, Korea and Israel.

“When the F-35 deploys in the future, it will be alongside our Norwegian partners,” said Brig. Gen. Scott Pleus, 56th FW commander. “The relationships built here in the West Valley will be critical to both our nations as we move forward. Building partnership activities is priceless as the Air Force reinforces long-established bonds and cultivates new friendships through training opportunities, exercises and military-to-military events.”

Luke currently has 32 F-35s and by 2024, Luke is scheduled to have six fighter squadrons and 144 F-35s. Norway will have seven F-35s stationed at Luke.

Recently, two Italian pilots flew a USAF and a RAAF F-35 as part of their training at Luke AFB.

The USAF is learning to fly its most advanced jet AT PRECISELY THE SAME TIME as key allies. Rather than simply learning to fly WITH the USAF on different jets, the Italians and other F-35 nations are shaping common training, tactics and procedures for a global fleet FROM THE GROUND UP.

As one of the Italian pilots put it:

Question: You flew an Australian jet yesterday.  

You do not normally work with Australian pilots, but you will get to know them from the ground up as well as you train at Luke and fly each other’s jets.  

What is your sense of this dynamic? 

Answer: The young guys will grow up in a very advanced warfighting and multi-national environment because of this program. 

They will be used to not just working together from time to time in an exercise, but will build in common tactics from the ground up and help each other innovate as well.

The impact of the joint training from the ground up was highlighted by Group Captain Glen Beck, Director of the Air Combat Transition Office in the Royal Australian Air Force.

Question: You are working critical mass not just from a pilot perspective but from the air systems perspective.  

Is that how to look at it? 

Group Captain Beck: It is. Not everyone has enough jets at the beginning but by being part of a coalition critical mass they have access to more than simply their own national jets. 

By putting the various national participants in a common pool you can accelerate learning and shape more effective solutions from the beginning. 

And we are seeing a clear acceleration of this process, something not easily recognized by those not participating in the program. 

And with the growing numbers of F-35 pilots and maintainers, you will bring fifth generation into the main stream. Rather than simply being a niche capability, it will become the mainstay for change for the air combat force. 

It is going to become more of a day-to-day experience; it is going to become less “special” and more normal. 

A lot of people don’t realize how much momentum we have in the program and we are rapidly achieving critical mass in the program. 

This will be the premier fighter in the 21st century; several nations will be using it; and sharing their combat experiences, and building an evolving capability over time. In my opinion, a lot of people are yet to think through what the impact of this will mean. 

What follows is the Norwegian judgment about receiving their first F-35 in late September 2015.

On Tuesday 22 September, the first Norwegian F-35 was officially presented in Texas. This marks the beginning of a new era for the Norwegian Armed Forces.

The aircraft was rolled out in front of some 300 prominent guests in Lockheed Martin’s aircraft final finishes hall in Fort Worth, Texas. Among the guests were Norwegian Minister of Defence, Ine Eriksen Søreide, and Chief of Defence, Admiral Haakon Bruun-Hanssen.

 “This is a joyful day for us all. This shows that we are modernising our defence, and that is an important part of our activity,” said the Admiral.

 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY

Norway has decided to buy up to 52 new F-35A multirole fighters within 2025. The jets will replace today’s F-16 fighters gradually from 2019. The F-35s, however, are more than just a replacement for today’s Norwegian fighters. 

“This jet’s combat capability is significantly better than the F-16’s. The advanced stealth technology increases its survivability and makes it easier to get close to an opponent without being detected. Also, the weapon systems have a significantly longer range than we have on the F-16s,” Bruun-Hanssen said.

NORWEGIAN MISSILE

 In her speech, Norwegian Minister of Defence Ine Eriksen Søreide, pointed out the long-lasting and close relationship between Norway and the USA. 

Several Norwegian companies have also contributed to the development and construction of the F-35s. Among them is Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace, which has developed the Joint Strike Missile in cooperation with the Norwegian Armed Forces. The missile will be integrated in the Norwegian F-35s.

 STAYS IN THE USA

 During the ceremony, the internationally renowned Norwegian trumpeter Ole Edvard Antonsen played his song “Vidda” (the mountain plateau in English). Antonsen wrote the song after being a passenger on board an F-16. 

The building of Norway’s first F-35 started in September 2013. After some final testing it will fly to Luke Air Force Base in Arizona in November. Norway’s second F-35 is soon to be completed, and in 2016, Norway’s next two jets will be completed. The first four Norwegian jets will all be based at Luke, where the training and education of Norwegian F-35 pilots will be carried out.

 A VITAL CAPACITY

The first Norwegian F-35 is scheduled to land in Norway in 2017, a milestone that the Chief of Defence is looking very much forward to:

 “Absolutely. The F-35 is one of the most important platforms in tomorrow’s Norwegian defence.

We build most of our defence around the F-35s, and all the capacities in this jet,” said the Admiral.

The photos in the slideshow highlight the arrival of the Norwegian F-35 jets at Luke AFB.

The first photo shows the second Norwegian F-35 Lightning II touches down at Luke Air Force Base, Ariz., Nov. 10, 2015. The jet marks the scheduled arrival of the first of two F-35s for the Royal Norwegian Air Force, making Norway the newest partner in the international F-35 joint-partnership program at Luke.

The second photo shows Maj. Gen. Morten Klever, the program director of the Norwegian F-35 program, accepts the first two Norwegian F-35 Lightning IIs after they arrived at Luke Air Force Base, Ariz., Nov. 10, 2015. Shortly after, a Norwegian pilot flew the F-35 for the first time, in conjunction with the Royal Norwegian Air Force’s birthday.

The third photo shows Norway’s first F-35 Lightning II taxis to the parking ramp Nov. 11, 2015, at Luke Air Force Base, Ariz.

The final photos shows Royal Norwegian Air Force Maj. Morten Hanche, a 62nd Fighter Squadron training pilot, prepares for his first F-35 Lightning ll flight Nov. 10, 2015, at Luke Air Force Base.

Credit Photos: USAF

 

 

C2 for Hybrid War: The Marines Preparing for Combat

2015-11-11 By Robbin Laird and Ed Timperlake

Counter-insurgency warfare has been the dominant template dominating U.S military engagements for more than a decade.

Joint warfare has been largely defined in terms of the air and naval services supporting the ground forces doing COIN.

COIN has become so dominate, that the key elements of a fighting force have been crafted in its image, with slow motion warfare, hierarchical C2, the growth of the OOLDA (Observe, Orient, Legally Review, Decide, and Act) loop replacing a decisive, quick action OODA or Observe, Orient, Decide and Act loop, K-Mart type of logistics support capabilities, significant numbers of Forward Operating Bases or FOBs in the battlespace, and uncontested and uncontestable air space.

In a recent article by Francis Tusa, the age of COIN has been decisively replaced by the demands of what he refers to as hybrid warfare, or his version of what the Marines used to call the Three Block War. 

How much more hybrid can you get than the current situation over Syria?

The “traditional” view of hybrid warfare is an enemy who exhibits elements of different parts of the conflict spectrum – some cyber, some conventional, some guerrilla, perhaps. 

But look at what US/French (and soon British …?) forces face over Syria today: a low level insurgent threat, which can exhibit some higher level capabilities, and then a very high intensity threat from Russian SAMs and combat aircraft. 

Not a hybrid threat from one foe, but one made up of different enemies. That really is hybrid! 

Under Marine Corps Commandant Amos, the need to shift from the COIN template as the dominant definer of military engagement was clearly recognized and the shift was started. The first clear statement of this shift was the “return to the sea,” or ramping up combat Marines experience operating from the ampbhious fleet.

As noted in a 2012 article about the shift:

“The Marine Corps is not designed to be a second land army,” he testified, despite its participation in land campaigns from World War I to Iraq and Afghanistan. Instead, he said, the Corps “is designed to project power ashore from the sea.”

“Amphibious capabilities provide the means to conduct littoral maneuver – the ability to maneuver combat-ready forces from the sea to the shore and inland in order to achieve a positional advantage over the enemy.” The Navy-Marine Corps team “provides the essential elements of access and forcible entry capabilities that are necessary components of a joint campaign,” Amos said. 

Fortunately for the Marines, Amos’ passion to restore the naval services’ amphibious capabilities is shared by Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert.

The launch of the Bold Alligator series of exercises in 2011 has highlighted the return to the sea, and focusing on enhanced capabilities to operate from the sea base.

The maturing of the Osprey and the F-35B arriving on the sea base are powerful enablers for the Navy-Marine Corps team to shape an expeditionary force able to insert force, achieve objectives and withdraw.

Indeed, the Marines are working hard on shape modern and 21st century insertion forces, which can operate across the range of military operations or ROMO.

A key part of insuring mission success is appropriate C2 to lead a flexible insertion force into an operation and out of that operation.

In an interview earlier this year, the Commander of the 2nd Marine Expeditionary Brigade highlighted how important C2 transformation was to the evolving Marine Corps mission set.

In that interview, Major General Simcock highlighted that 2d MEB is shaping – namely a scalable, modular, and CJTF/JTF-capable Command Element, which can provide the leadership and direction for military insertion into fluid and dynamic crisis or contingency situations.

Recently, the Second Marine Air Wing (2nd MAW) held Wing Exercise 15 at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, to train for the kind of C2 flexibility which could support an insertion force in a situation where a near peer competitor was projected to be involved, just the sort of situation which Tusa envisaged.

A key part of that exercise was working flexible C2 of the kind necessary for expeditionary forces as opposed the decade behind of relatively static COIN C2.

We had a chance to discuss the exercise with Col. Kenneth Woodard, the exercise director and 2nd MAW operations officer.

The exercise drew upon earlier work, as well as scenarios developed in other exercises, notably at 29 Palms, to provide the projected operational context to the exercise.

Continuity with regard to scenarios and linkage back to earlier exercises and preparing the ground for the next ones allows for the kind of dynamic learning process, which is crucial to shaping effective 21st century combat forces.

“What we’re trying to do here at the wing is to ensure that we’re able to provide the MAGTF with support tomorrow, today, as well as we did in the past operations, and build on lessons learned. And continue to focus and train our battle staff to be able to set forth ways to use evolving capabilities as well.”

Col. ,Woodard emphasized that having an exercise Wing Exercise 15 was very time consuming and challenging so they would do only a couple of such exercises in a year.

“It’s hard at wing level to train ourselves. It’s very difficult because we don’t have higher headquarters right here that could play that role. To do that we have to simulate the different players in the command process to ensure that Wing level C2 is able to meet the evolving challenges in a fluid battlespace.”

What was simulated in the Wing Exercise was the ability to operate in a land environment when a near peer competitor was part of the combat situation.

This meant that they had to exercise defensive and offensive actions to support the force, and to ensure operational success.

“We had a near peer competitor, and we had a robust aviation elements and, and surface-to-air defenses to counter their offensive capabilities and in our scenario, we were reacting to some of their attacks.”

Expeditionary logistics are crucial to a dynamic operation which can not rely on pre-existing K-Marts to provide supplies for the operation.

According to Col. Woodard, during the exercise they established a FOB to provide support for the advancing forces.

But the question then is how to empower the FOB as part of the dynamic force?

“How do you supply it? Can you do it via truck? Do you get up there via a KC-130? Where’s gas can be stored once you get up there? How are the aircraft are going to get in and out of the FOB?

How do you establish communications at the FOB with our NIPRNet or our SIPRNet?

There are a lot of variables to deal with and to consider.

Our logisticians and our aviation ground support division, were key players in coming up with a plan during the exercise to answer those sorts of questions.”

And the fog of war such as pilots getting sick on mess food and other such intrusions were included in the exercise as well.

Sailors were involved as part of the medical team simulating how best to deal with casualties during the simulated combat as it is crucial to leave no man behind particularly in today’s combat world where hostages can become key political pawns. The role of the team aboard the USS Kearsarge, which conducted the TRAP mission to recover a downed USAF pilot, certainly demonstrated that in real world combat.

As part of the learning process, the Wing Exercise is a prelude to an exercise with 2nd Marine Expeditionary Force in May and then there is Bold Alligator in the Fall.

Lessons learned in the exercises and real world combat are folded into dynamic learning process so that the Marines can prepare for Hybrid War of the type which Francis Tusa envisages.

And the shock of moving from COIN to hybrid war for some in the military and in the defense analytical community is a profound one.

As a senior retired and well respected Marine Corps general put it with regard to the need to shift from the COIN template:

Those who yearn to re-fight the large scale “boots on the ground” nation-building battles we conducted in Iraq and Afghanistan are not going to get their way.

Land-centric warriors loved the primacy of their position in those wars, but our political leaders learned that the world’s representative democracies do not have the stamina (or stomach) required to win those wars over the course of the many years that are required. 

In my view, we are unlikely to see thousands of US troops on the ground doing nation building again any time soon. 

However, there is a core group of “revered thinkers” who built there résumés on “drinking tea” and “eating soup” in foreign lands. 

It’s no surprise that people who base their entire credibility on nation building would oppose the F-35 and other legitimate technological advances in modern warfare. 

And the crucial need to reform C2 approaches from the overlay bureaucratic and centralized C2 structures which have grown during the COIN years was highlighted as well by a recently retired, and widely respected chief of Air Force.

The CAOC (Combined Air Operations Center) worked well in the first Gulf War because it held true to the concept of decentralized execution. 

It has morphed into centralized micromanager of air ops and post office box for the Joint force. 

It didn’t function all that well in 2003 and Afghanistan has just made it worse. 

We are wasting our Air Power assets (without significant C2 reform).

The slideshow of photos provided by 2nd Marine Air Wing show various aspects of the exercise in process.

In the first photo, 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing Marines initiate and assist with flight requests during Wing Exercise 15 at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, Oct.13, 2015. Performing defensive and offensive measures to counter both traditional and irregular threats based on today’s real world adversaries, the Marines and Sailors learned to work together to accomplish various missions by conducting Tactical Air Command Center operations during Wing Exercise 15, at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, Oct. 13-16.

In the second picture, Lt. Col. Bradley Philips updates Col. Mark Palmer, the 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing chief of staff, on the status of current operations for the aviation combat element during Wing Exercise 15, at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, Oct. 13, 2015. During the exercise, the Marines participated in various scenarios that tested their ability to use defensive and offensive strategies in order to maximize readiness and efficiency of 2nd MAW. Phillips served as the senior watch officer during the exercise.

In the third picture, 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing Marines assess scenarios with fixed-wing assets during Wing Exercise 15, at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, Oct. 13, 2015. Performing defensive and offensive measures to counter both traditional and irregular threats based on today’s real world adversaries, the Marines and Sailors learned to work together to accomplish various missions by conducting Tactical Air Command Center operations during Wing Exercise 15, at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, Oct. 13-16.

In the fourth picture, Lt. Cmdr. Laura Anderson coordinates medical support for the aviation combat element during Wing Exercise 15, at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, Oct. 13, 2015. Marines assigned to battle staff positions participated in operational planning teams requiring staff input across the entirety of 2nd MAW. Medical planners were a vital link in the exercise as they coordinated a multitude of casualty evacuations and general health and welfare for U.S. Marines and Sailors within the ACE.

In the fifth picture, planners within the 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing assess available wing assets in order to support a request made by ground forces during Wing Exercise 15, at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, Oct. 13, 2015. 2nd MAW aviation assets and its highly trained personnel provide the ground combat element and Marine Air-Ground Task Force commander with unprecedented reach and tactical flexibility. Performing defensive and offensive measures to counter both traditional and irregular threats based on today’s real world adversaries, the Marines and Sailors learned to work together to accomplish various missions by conducting Tactical Air Command Center operations during Wing Exercise 15, at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, Oct. 13-16

In the final picture, Lance Cpl. Michael Lobiondo, left, and Lance Cpl. Matthew Cancino patrol a compound during Wing Exercise 15, at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, Oct. 14, 2015. During the exercise, the security detail patrolled the area to maintain security. While they’re maintaining security, Marines with 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing provide defensive and offensive countermeasures in order to increase the overall readiness of the aviation combat element and supporting units.

2nd MAW Prepares for Future Engagements

By Cpl. U. Roberts | 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing | October 16, 2015

The U.S. Marine Corps is the nation’s crisis response force, forward deployed and poised to rapidly respond to crises within the arc of instability and within regions of anticipated future conflicts.

The ability to provide support from the air is predicated on the ability to bring airpower as close as possible to the fight. There isn’t a force more capable of responding quickly in any environment around the world than the Marine Air-Ground Task Force. It is the adaptable, rapidly deployable nature of Marine Aviation that makes this possible.

Marines with 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing began refocusing training requirements on near-peer adversaries by conducting Tactical Air Command Center operations during Wing Exercise 16, at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, Oct. 13-16.

“The idea behind the exercise was to train the battle staff,” explained Col. Kenneth Woodard, exercise director and 2nd MAW operations officer. “The MAW must be ready to deploy and employ as a wing-level headquarters in a major theater war … WINGEX provided us an opportunity to test the battle staff and prepare it for this requirement.”

The battle staff is composed of primary and special staff sections across the 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing. It supports the aviation combat element’s capability to operate, plan and execute all functions of Marine aviation across the range of military operations.

While it is not possible to plan and be prepared for every future engagement, 2nd MAW plans to optimize its readiness and continuously enforce and maintain standards in an effort to increase the capability of defending the homeland and supporting the ground combat element.

Although the exercise lasted four days, the planning phase and coordination required spanned 10 months. Marines assigned to battle staff positions participated in operational planning teams requiring staff input across the entirety of 2nd MAW.  

In effort to make the constructive simulated exercise realistic, planners from the II Marine Expeditionary Force Battle Simulation Center integrated the ground combat element, logistics combat element as well as higher commands such as II MEF and host nation militaries, forcing the ACE Marines to coordinate not only among themselves, but also across the entire MAGTF.

Performing defensive and offensive measures to counter both traditional and irregular threats based on today’s real-world adversaries, the Marines and Sailors learned to work together to accomplish various missions.

“Working with the different agencies across the wing and outside entities was a major takeaway from this exercise,” explained Capt. Kevin Tingley, the future operations rotary wing planner.  “It allowed many of us who haven’t actually deployed in this capacity to truly see the inner workings of what makes the MAGTF work.”

While the purpose of the exercise is to strengthen war-fighting capabilities, the exercise will help key personnel identify training achievements and deficiencies to prepare for future combat operations.

“After several years of sustained combat operations, we need to continue training and executing our mission requirements so that we can ensure we are equally as responsive tomorrow, as we were in past operations,” said Maj. Gen. Gary Thomas, 2nd MAW commanding general. “Outstanding support to the MAGTF is a mindset.

There is a global demand for forces to remain ready, and if we are going to do something, we are going to do it well. This exercise speaks to the quality of the battle staff’s preparation and execution to make it happen.”

Although WINGEX has come to an end, the continuous training and betterment of 2nd MAW Marines and Sailors will continue to evolve when 2nd MAW participates in the II MEF-wide exercise, next year. Nonetheless, if the nation calls for the rapid insertion of ground units or the need for close air support — the 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing will be there to answer the call.