Challenges of Aerospace Innovation: The Case of the A400M

05/24/2015

by Robbin Laird

© 2015 FrontLine Defence (Vol 12, No 3)

The tragic May 9th crash of an A400M (MSN 23), near the Airbus final assembly plant near Seville, Spain, reminds us of how risky the introduction of new systems can be.

Due to be delivered to the Turkish Air Force in June, the plane crashed during a test flight, killing four flight test crew members.

When I grew up in the 1950s, ongoing design and evolution of new aircraft unfortunately saw many injuries and fatalities during the development and test processes that remain an integral part of any aerospace innovation effort.

Injuries and fatalities have rocked many unique aviation technologies over the years. Fortunately, new techniques and technologies have dramatically reduced the numbers of accidents and casualties in the test process – but have not completely eliminated the risk inherent to introducing new systems.

Innovation in the aviation sector sometimes comes with deadly cost.

Can we suppress mankind’s primal drive to invent and improve?

No, but we can investigate, make changes, and ultimately move forward, always with safety as a priority.

We crave the new capabilities that innovation delivers, and always have.

In the case of the A400M, the innovation it is delivering is clearly significant to the Air Forces that are already operating the plane.

Screenshot 2015-05-24 06.26.21

In April 2015, I had a chance to visit the first operational base of the A400M, which is operated by the French Air Force near the city of Orleans, France, at the Bricy Air Base.

I spoke at length with Lieutenant-Colonel Benoît Paillard, Commander of Transport Squadron 1/61, Touraine, and I also toured the training facility…..

There are six A400Ms at the base, with a seventh coming this Fall. The base currently operates both C-130Hs and A400Ms, but eventually will only operate A400Ms and will probably be the largest base of A400Ms in the world by the time the French Air Force (FAF) receives its full compliment of aircraft.

Although the plane has been in operation only for a short period of time, and is undergoing further development, it has already had an important impact.

It directly connects France to operations in Africa and the Middle East without the need for refueling during the mission. It is flying two missions a month to Africa and two to the Middle East.

“One of the key advantages of the A400M will be that we can fly helicopters directly from France to the troops, which we can not do right now.

We cannot ship the helos directly back to France, currently, with our own assets. With the A400M we will be able to do so,” notes LCol Paillard.

For the rest of the story:

http://www.frontline-defence.com/index_archives.php?page=2256

 

The 2nd MEB Air Officer Focuses on the Way Ahead

05/23/2015

2015-05-23 By Robbin Laird

During my visit to 2nd Marine Expeditionary Brigade on March 17, 2015, I had a chance to interview Major General Richard L. Simcock II, Commanding General, 2d MEB, and Major Marcus Mainz, lead 2d MEB planner for Exercise Bold Alligator 2014, where we had a lengthy discussion regarding the Marine Corps’ innovative approach in addressing Combatant Commanders’ requirements.

I was able to talk as well with Major Andrew O’Derell, the MEB Air Officer.

In this role, he functions as the glue between the CG and the Air Combat Element, to right size the force against the missions set by the CG.

“My job is to make sure the intent of the CG is met. If a MAGTF for aviation assets to accomplish their mission, they’ll propose recommended sourcing solutions from the other MAGTF air assets.

We are kind of the vetting function, if you will. We make sure that their sourcing solution isn’t jeopardizing another MAGTFs missions that the MEB commander has assigned them, and will prioritize.”

And given the special focus of 2nd MEB on shaping innovative C2 solutions, the Air Officer is involved in the mix and match approach of ensuring that ACE elements match up to the other combat elements to meet the Commander’s intent.

This obviously can get complicated as air assets operate off of ships or land, and mixing and matching can challenge the limits of C2.

For example, during Bold Alligator 2014, “the Kearsarge was the lead C2 element for aviation.

We can only positive control as far as the radars would allow, and when we get closer to shore, those radars are degrading.”

We discussed the impact of the Osprey upon how the Marines can operate and the challenges which the shift to the Osprey has brought as well.

Major O’Derell noted that he was involved in the 2003 insertion from Souda Bay in Crete into Northern Iraq (“1000 Marines over 1000 miles”) but this required airlift to 5,000 foot airstrips.

“Now with the Osprey we can do the same thing but the MEU does not have to offload at airstrips and we can do it with a vertical insertion and extraction method.”

An MV-22B Osprey, with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 163, 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, maneuvers into position to receive fuel en route to Hawaii, July 30th, 2014. Four Ospreys launched from the USS Makin Island and traveled more than 800 nautical miles to insert an element of Marines into a simulated Embassy compound. USMC, 7/30/14.
An MV-22B Osprey, with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 163, 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, maneuvers into position to receive fuel en route to Hawaii, July 30th, 2014. Four Ospreys launched from the USS Makin Island and traveled more than 800 nautical miles to insert an element of Marines into a simulated Embassy compound. USMC, 7/30/14.

The limit is kit and fuel, which can accompany the inserition force, but reinforcements of both would come via other means, such as the CH-53C or the KC-130J on airstrips.

The Osprey has also put high demand on the refueling fleet as well.

Prior to the coming of the Osprey, the Harriers and F-18s were the main demand element for aerial refueling, along with CH-53s and Prowlers.

“We’ve got this huge demand for Osprey aerial refueling and we don’t have enough tankers to give them gas for all the stuff they want to do. We’re hopefully kind of cracking the code. We’ve got interim clearance to give gas on the KC-10s, so now the Ospreys can take gas on the KC-10s.”

He highlighted that in the Judicious Response exercise, “I requested KC-10s early in the exercise planning.

Now we’ve got KC-10s that can potentially dual role as getting fuel to our attack platforms and to our Osprey platforms.

I don’t know that that’s been done recently or if it’s been done before, even in simulation exercises but.

We’re trying that out to see how it works and see what the bugs are.”

Clearly, the new Airbus tankers can also come to play the role as it is doing with many allied aircraft in Iraq and Syria and with the Aussies and Singapore are buying upwards of 13 Airbus tankers (the Aussies already have five), they can play a role tanking Ospreys as well.

One of the challenges will be to align the altitude at which the Ospreys need to refuel with the operational envelope of the KC-10 and KC-30As.

This is a work in progress.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-35Bs Arrive Aboard USS WASP for Operational Testing

05/22/2015

2015-05-22

Six aircraft arrived for the opening of OT-1 (first phase of operational testing) on May 18, 2015 aboard the USS Wasp.

The six aircraft are from Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron 501, Marine Aircraft Group 31, 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing, Beaufort, South Carolina, and Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 121, Marine Aircraft Group 13, 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing, based in Yuma, Arizona.

All six were flown by operational F-35 pilots; not test pilots.

Headquarters Marine Corps

5/18/15

According to a story by Lance Cpl. Remington Hall published on May 19, 2015:

USS Wasp (LHD-1) At Sea- Six Marine Corps F-35B Lightning II aircraft initiated the first phase of shipboard operational testing (OT-1) when they landed aboard the USS Wasp at sea on the afternoon of May 18.

OT-1 will evaluate and assess the integration of the F-35B into Marine Corps aviation while operating across different flight, maintenance and logistical operations that are seen in the Marine Corps’ operating forces.

The information gathered from OT-1 will lay the groundwork for F-35B deployments aboard U.S. Navy amphibious ships and help the Corps’ determine its initial operating capability of the aircraft.

“It’s an interim half-step between fully deployed operations and development tests,” said Maj. Richard Rusnok, the Marine Operational and Test Evaluation Squadron 22 F-35B Detachment officer in charge, and one of the primary pilots for the exercise.

OT-1 is the connecting block between the testing team, engineers and fleet operations, according to Rusnok. The equipment, personnel and support will all represent what will be used in the fleet field of operations for this aircraft, he added.

The six aircraft are from Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron 501, Marine Aircraft Group 31, 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing, Beaufort, South Carolina, and Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 121, Marine Aircraft Group 13, 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing, based in Yuma, Arizona.

“The F-35B is scheduled to replace the aircraft that the Marine Corps is currently using, which would be AV-8B Harrier, the F/A-18 Hornet, as well as the EA-6B Prowler,” said Col. Robert Rauenhorst, the commanding officer of Marine Test and Evaluation Squadron 22. “We’re looking at the manpower and logistical efficiencies in performing aircraft maintenance and aircraft sustainability over one type/model/series, versus three separate types of legacy aircraft.”

“With the six F-35Bs onboard, the Wasp is ready to support this first phase of operational testing with everything she’s got,” said U.S. Navy Capt. Kurt Kastner, the commanding officer of the USS Wasp (LHD-1). “It’s not every day you have the Lightning II land on your deck, so we have taken great care so that everything goes smoothly.”

After arriving, the aircraft displayed short take off, vertical landing capabilities. This was the first of many flight operations scheduled take place during OT-1.

“The performance of the Marines out here has been exceptional; they’re eager to learn and excited to transition from their legacy aircraft and come over to the F-35B,” said Rauenhorst.

Many modifications had to be made to the Wasp in order for it to accommodate the F-35B, including the installation of the Autonomic Logistics Information System known as ALIS.

“The Wasp is the only ship in the fleet that has all of the integrated F-35B modifications,” said Rusnok. “One of the most important things is they’ve installed ALIS on the ship.”

Rusnok explained that ALIS is the aircraft’s informational and technological backbone. Maintaining the aircraft is done through this program.

In addition to the technical aspects, Rusnok also said there are many new physical attributes to the ship, such as a special coating on the flight deck and flight deck equipment, and a lithium ion battery storage capability aboard ship. The U.S. Navy-Marine Corps team is working closely with Naval Sea Systems Command to assess specific modifications made to USS WASP to support future deployments.

The Marine Corps’ other objectives during the next two weeks of testing include demonstrating and assessing day and night flight operations in varying aircraft configurations, as well as day and night weapons loading. Additionally, teams will assess digital interoperability of aircraft and ship systems, F-35B landing signal officer’s launch and recovery software, and all aspects of maintenance, logistics, and sustainment support of the F-35B while deployed at sea.

Editor’s Note: For a look at the approach towards operational testing of the F-35 at Nellis see the interview with the CO of the 422nd Test and Evaluation Squadron:

https://sldinfo.com/the-future-of-airpower-as-seen-from-the-422nd-test-and-evaluation-squadron/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Visiting MCAS Beaufort Air Station: F-35B and Renorming Airpower

05/21/2015

2015-05-21 by Robbin Laird

Murielle Delaporte and I had the chance to visit 2nd Marine Air Wing and MCAS Beaufort this week.

I am going next week aboard the USS Wasp to watch some aspects of the sea trials of the Marines preparing for IOC of the aircraft

The visit to MCAS Beaufort highlighted the role of the F-35B training squadron, not just in flying the aircraft, but working through tactics with 4th generation aircraft as well.

As the CO of MAG-31, Col. Lieblein put it: “We have six F-18 squadrons and one F-35 training squadron at Beaufort.

One of our major tasks is developing integration between 4th and 5th generation aircraft.

Our F-35 training squadron participates on almost a daily local basis on such efforts and works on a greater scale as well.”

An example of the greater scale was Exercise Sentry Savannah 15-1 where the USMC F-35Bs participated in the Georgia Air National Guard’s Air Dominance center efforts to work integration.

According to the Georgia Air National Guard:

The Air Dominance Center is also an ideal location for large-scale Fighter Integration training because it can include participants from other aviation units stationed along the East Coast.

“Within about one hundred miles of Savannah there’s about 15 other fighter squadrons that fly indigenously … so when one fighter unit comes in here they can coordinate and do dissimilar air combat training with all of those units that fly around here on a daily basis,” said Maj. Merrick Baroni, ADC director of operations.

Sentry Savannah 15-1 consists of Air National Guard F-16 flying squadrons from Minnesota, South Carolina and the District of Columbia, an F-15 unit from the Florida Air National Guard, T-38 and F-22 aircraft from Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, and Marine F/A-18 and F-35s from Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, South Carolina.

Our interviews will highlight the engagement of the squadron both with the F-18s on base as well as with USAF aircraft in working tactics for 4th/5th generation integration.

The interviews with the CO of the Warlords, Lt. Col. OD Bachmann and Major Brian Bann highlighted the significant progress of the squadron and the maturing of the aircraft.

When I last interviewed OD Bachmann, he had just flown the 200th sortie of the aircraft.

Fast forward to 2015, and the F-35B has more than 10,000 flight hours and the aircraft at Beaufort are among the 140 flying today.

When asked what are the differences between our last meeting and now, the CO of the Warlords had much to say and that will be discussed in the full interview.

But for now, the key thing to highlight is simply that the Marines in the past 2 and 1/2 years have gone from basic flying of the aircraft to training a “much more capable pilot.

We operate a variety of tactical missions including CAS, armed reconnaissance support, tactical intercepts and we operate multiple airplanes operating together via data links.”

Although the air trials aboard the USS WASP are clearly part of the IOC process, in reality what is converging on the WASP are multiple dynamics.

Yuma is present with all the convergent work of the MAWTS-1, VMX-22 and Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 121 upon F-35B IOC and integration with the MAGTF.

And this squadron is working the F-22 and F-35 integration with the MAGTF as well as working with the USAF and the USN.

Beaufort is clearly there in many ways, including providing a maintenance detachment for the aircraft.

And the Brits are there too as the Wasp is mission rehearsal for the HMS Queen Elizabeth and its coming F-35B squadrons.

At Beaufort, we had a chance to interview Squadron Leader Hugh Nichols a well about the UK involvement at Beaufort and at Edwards which are crucial elements of their preparing for their carrier operations as well.

The Italians will come to Beaufort to train as well as other F-35B partners, of which there could be several in the next few years.

The interviews will be forthcoming from the visit, but some of the photos taken during the visit can be seen here:

The first photo shows a Beaufort F-35B with USS Wasp markings.

The “Marine” shown in the third photo is actually Sqn LDR Hugh Nichols, standing in front of the UK F-35B at Beaufort.

He flies USMC airplanes as well as the UK one and vice versa.

The next to last photo shows Nichols with Major Brian Bann and Murielle Delaporte

The final photo shows Lt. Col. Bachmann with Major Bann and Murielle Delaporte.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The USS America, CVN-78 and HMS Queen Elizabeth: Crafting Capabilities for 21st Century Operations

05/17/2015

2015-05-09 By Robbin F. Laird

In the famous opening lines of Charles Dickens Tale of Two Cities, he noted that “it was the best of times; its was the worst of times.”

So it is for aircraft carriers. The critics of aircraft carriers focus on their vulnerability and the rise of capabilities such as the DF-21 Chinese “carrier killer” missiles; yet new carriers are emerging tailored for 21st century operations.

It is clear that the USN, the USMC, the Royal Air Force and the Royal Navy are all pursuing new carrier programs designed to thrive, not just survive in 21st century operations.

I have had the rare opportunity to be aboard all three of the new carriers: the 52,000 ton USS America, which is the amphibious assault ship ever built; the 100,000 ton CVN-78 (or the USS Gerald Ford to non US Navy folks) and the 65,000 ton HMS Queen Elizabeth.

The ships have several twenty-first century technologies in common.

Notably, the construction of vastly improved command and control (C2) capabilities, and capabilities to work with networked forces in a distributed operational environment is a key one.

The ships will have a 40 plus service life (although combat has its own logic), and will host significant transformation with regard to the combat assets carried aboard.

But each ship is built around significant airpower modernizations.

The USS America will host the Ospreys (including refueling Ospreys), F-35Bs, and the CH-53K (which can carry externally three times the load of the CH-53E); CVN-78 will see the new Hawkeye, the F-35C, and UCAS aboard her; and the HMS Queen Elizabeth is built around the F-35B as well as new airborne command capabilities.

And the Ford and the Queen Elizabeth have advanced electric power generation capabilities to take on board directed energy weapons as those capabilities evolve. Both ships have significant communications capabilities (with miles of fiber optic cable built in) and reconfigurable C2 workstations to allow for operations against the ROMO or Range of Military Operations.

For Carriers are very good at providing capabilities across the spectrum of operations, and the presence required for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief is a critical part of building the engagements crucial for enhanced deterrence as well.

The three carriers all provide basing flexibility and the capability to operate with both sea control as well land attack functionalities.

And the logistical integrity of the carriers is crucial as well, which allows for operate from the sea without having to set up land bases for which to operate.

And as ISIS demonstrated, capturing equipment left behind, can fuel capabilities of the very adversaries which you want to defeat; something which sea basing can minimize.

And the carriers are born in the context of the connectivity revolution whereby distributed operations and enhanced capability to operate as an integrated force allows the carriers to leverage the strike capabilities of subsurface, and surface assets as well as land-based air as well.

Of course, each ship is different and will contribute differently to US and allied forces operating in the battlespace. And working to more effectively integrate those three carriers is a work in progress but given the close working relationships of the USMC, the USN, the RAF and the RN, innovations demonstrated in one class of ship will become part of the operational environment for all of them.

The USS America: Reinventing Amphibious Assault

The USS America is the largest amphibious ship ever built by the United States.

The ship has been built at the Huntington Ingalls shipyard in Pascagoula, Mississippi and departed mid-July 2014 for its trip to its initial home part at San Diego, California and then was commissioned in San Francisco in mid-October 2014. It is now undergoing its final trials and preparing to enter the fleet.

The USMC is the only tiltrotar-enabled assault force in the world.

(Japan is now buying 17 Ospreys and will work with the USN/USMC team to integrate Ospreys into the Japanese Self Defense Force).

The USS America has been built to facilitate this capability and will be augmented as the F-35B is added to the Ospreys, and helicopters already operating from the ship and as unmanned vehicles become a regular operational element as well.

The Osprey has obviously been a game changer, where today, the basic three ship formation used by the Amphibious Ready Group-Marine Expeditionary Unit can “disaggregate” and operate over a three-ship distributed 1,000-mile operational area. Having the communications and ISR to operate over a greater area, and to have sustainment for a disaggregated fleet is a major challenge facing the future of the USN-USMC team.

A major change in the ship can be seen below the flight deck, and these changes are what allow the assault force enabled by new USMC aviation capabilities to operate at greater range and ops tempo. The ship has three synergistic decks, which work together to support flight deck operations. Unlike a traditional large deck amphibious ship where maintenance has to be done topside, maintenance is done in a hangar deck below the flight deck. And below that deck is the intermediate area, where large workspaces exist to support operations with weapons, logistics and sustainment activities.

With the coming of the F-35B to the USS America, the tiltrotar-enabled force adds significant capability. This can work a couple of different ways.

The ship can hold more than 20 F-35Bs, but more likely when F-35Bs are being featured would have a 16 F-35B flying with 4 Osprey combinations. The Ospreys would be used to carry fuel and or weapons, so that the F-35B can move to the mission and operate in a distributed base. This is what the Marines refer to as shaping distributed STOVL ops for the F-35B within which a sea base is a key lily pad from which the plane could operate or could move from.

Alternatively, the F-35B could operate as the ISR, C2 and strike asset to work with the rest of the assault force. The beauty of the F-35B for the Marines is that it allows them to operate off of an amphibious ship with a plane which can do C2 or provide forward leaning ISR.

In other words, the F-35 working with an Osprey-enabled insertion force operating off of the USS American could well re-define the meaning of Close Air Support (CAS). 

The F-35 could enter the objective area prior to the arrival of the combat landing team or CLT, push data back to the incoming force, and then provide fire support, “kinetic” and “non-kinetic,” C2 and ISR support during the insertion and operation.

The other new aviation, which will fly off of the USS America, is the CH-53K, which is the replacement for the CH-53E. Although less sexy than an Osprey or a JSF, the K is a backbone element for an airborne amphibious strike force. The CH-53K will be able to carry three times the load external to itself than can a CH-53E and has many operational improvements, such as a fly by wire system.

In short, when one looks at the outside of the USS America and sees a flight deck roughly the size of its predecessors, one would totally miss the point of how this ship fits into USN-USMC innovation.

Looking under the decks, understanding how a radical change in the workflow, enabling and operating with 21st century USMC strike and insertion assets, is how to understand the ship and its impact.

It is an enabler of 21st century amphibious assault operations and not simply an upgrade on the past.

The Coming of CVN-78: Redefining the Large-Deck Carrier

The coming of the USS Gerald R. Ford sets in motion a very different type of large-deck carrier.  The hull form of the Ford is a tribute to the very successful Nimitz-class hull design. That is where the comparisons basically end.

In effect, the new carrier is built to provide an infrastructure for 21st century warfighting, not just for the U.S. Navy, but for the joint and coalition force as well.

The ship is designed to operate more effectively with an evolving airwing, which will change over the 50+ year life of the carrier.

It has as well significantly greater C2 capabilities so that the carrier can play an expanded role in evolving 21st century U.S. and alliance distributed operations which will be central to U.S. warfighting capabilities going forward. The significant increase in electric power generation, three times greater than Nimitz, is designed to allow the electronic systems associated with defense, attack and C2 to grow over time.

A number of the changes associated with the ship are quite visible: the new launching and recovery systems, the weapons handling system and many other improvements. But central to rethinking the role of the carrier is the revolution in C2 underway. The super computers onboard the ship, with the power to support them as well as having significant power available for system cooling along with the deployment of future laser weapons is a crucial baseline for building out of C2 capabilities.

The next generation in active sensor technology in the dual band radars provides a solid foundation, not simply for the organic defense and strikes capability of the carrier, but for the battle fleet as a whole. Significant increase in bandwidth is a fundamental requirement for an expanded C2 capability at sea which can support land, sea and air operations. And the unique rapidly reconfigurable command suites on board allow for C2 to be provided for joint or coalition partners in a manner appropriate to the mission set.

In an interview with Captain John Meier, the skipper of CVN-78, on January 9, 2015 highlighted a number of innovations, two of which are the new launch system and the second is the new weaponization systems and pit stop approach to operating aircraft.

The first involves the shift from steam catapults to an electronic system or EMALS. “The EMALs system we will visit on board the ship and will allow us to provide for an ability to launch aircraft more smoothly and with less wear and tear on the airplanes and the pilots. Coupled with the new advanced arresting gear, we will be able to launch and recover a variety of types of aircraft, including future designs that haven’t been developed.”

The second is the change in weaponization, including anticipating fielded directory energy weapons, put particularly a new weapons loading capability. “You have a great capacity for diversity of weapons, and the advanced weapon elevators themselves are located on the ship to facilitate faster movement and loading of the weapons.  That’s the underlying principle of the advanced weapon elevators. The elevators carry more weight and they go faster, twice the speed and twice the weight essentially of the legacy weapons elevators.

They’re located in the flight deck, which puts them positionally where the crew will spend a lot less time from an ergonomics perspective pushing the ordnance around. The ordnance comes up right near the aircraft and facilitates more efficient weapons loading.”

With the weapons coming directly to the flight deck, combat jets will be loaded in “pit stops” aboard the deck and then launched from the EMALs system, allowing for better capability to arm and launch combat aircraft more rapidly.

And with the coming of the F-35 C, the head of Naval Air Warfare, Rear Admiral Manazir noted in an interview done after the visit to the Ford:

“Reach not range is a key aspect of looking at the carrier airwing and its ability to work with joint and coalition forces.

This is clearly enhanced with the F-35. The carrier has a core ability to operate organically but its real impact comes from its synergy with the joint and coalition force, which will only go up as the global F-35 fleet emerges. And this will get better with the coming of the USS Ford.  What the Ford does is it optimizes the things that we think are the most important.”

HMS Queen Elizabeth: Reinventing the Large Deck Carrier

The Brits invented carrier warfare; and in many ways with their new 65,000 ton carrier they are reinventing the large deck carrier and providing something of a hybrid between the USS America and CVN-78. The flight deck is impressive and is about 90% of the size of the Nimitz class and has a very wide deck upon which operations can be generated.

When I stood at the end of the ski jump and looked down at the flight deck, its width was significant. And I learned that the flight deck was built by Laird Shipbuilding (unfortunately no relation!).

This ship is designed to operate F-35Bs, which means that the RAF and the RN will drive every bit of innovation out of the aircraft to provide C2, ISR and strike capabilities. And given the F-35B enabled USS America, it is no surprise to learn that their working relationship with the USN-USMC team is close. And the Brits will train with the Marines along with other international partners that will fly the F-35B at Beaufort Marine Corps Air Station in North Carolina.

Walking the ship takes time, but several innovations one sees aboard the Ford can be found aboard the HMS Queen Elizabeth: significant energy generation, significant C2 capabilities, very large rooms for reconfigurable C2 suites for operations across the ROMO, as well as well designed work areas for the F-35B crews which will handle the operations and data generated by the F-35 to the fleet.

It is a ship designed to transform both the RAF and the RN for it will integrate significantly with the surface and subsurface fleet and the land-based air for the RAF.

To take an example, with RAF jets operating from Cyprus or in the Middle East, the HMS Queen Elizabeth can mesh its air assets with the land based assets and the command center directing the air operations could be on the ship, on land at an operating base, or in the air, even in the new tankers.

It is a ship designed to be part of the transformation not just of the Royal Navy but for the Royal Air Force as well as the Typhoons take over Tornado missions and the F-35 comes into the force concurrently. And it is a transformation where joint integration of land and sea based forces will be featured.

The HMS Queen Elizabeth in common with CVN-78 has a new way to load weapons and to configure the weapons loads to enhance the safety and speed of the weaponization process.

The weapons are brought to either end of the deck to be loaded onto the combat aircraft; and the mechanism for loading and moving the weapons can provide for a mix and match capacity to push the proper loads to the particular aircraft for the missions of the day. In fact, the system aboard the HMS Queen Elizabeth can prepare those loads the night before the early morning missions.

Another aspect in common between these two carriers is innovations in the islands controlling the ship compared to the Nimitz class. For the Ford class, this means moving the island back on the flight deck and opening up more flight space and providing for a cleaner flight deck, a change which when working with the new launch system will provide the flight operations to work more effectively aboard the flight deck.

For HMS Queen Elizabeth, there are two islands onboard the ship.

This is due to the fact that it is not a nuclear carrier and the exhausts for the engines exit on two parts of the flight deck; and there is an island incorporating those exit points. One island is used to operate the ship; and the second runs flight deck operations.

And in a crisis, either island can perform both tasks, but visiting the two islands it is clear that the designers have focused on ways to enhance the work flow for the two different tasks, namely running the ship and operating the aircraft aboard the flight deck.

Conclusion

Despite the critics, new carriers are being built.

They are designed to work more effectively in an integrated operational space and can provide both defense and offense to the joint and coalition force.

They are key elements of the distributed force, one which is forging a 21st century approach to offense-defense enterprise and able to operate across the spectrum of military operations.

We can only see the glimmer of the future, but the paths to the future are clear and one pathway is through the reinvention of the large deck carrier.

The author would like to thank Ed Timperlake for his assistance, insights and contributions in the work underlying this piece.

The Slideshows:

The first slideshow:

The USS America is optimized for aviation operations.

The three-deck set up provides a significant upgrade in the ability to support an aviation supported assault force.

Indeed, the USMC as the only tiltrotar-enabled assault force in the world, now has a ship well designed both to operate and maintain the core asset to insert and support the Ground Combat Element at significant distances of operations.

Credit: USS America:Summer 2014

  • In the first photo, a U.S. Navy aviation boatswain’s mate (handling) directs an MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft carrying Marines assigned to Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force South to land on the flight deck of the newly commissioned amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6) in the Caribbean Sea following bilateral training with Colombian service members July 19, 2014.
  • In the second, third and fourth photos, U.S. Marines assigned to Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force South return to the newly commissioned amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6) in the Caribbean Sea following bilateral training with Colombian service members July 19, 2014. The America embarked on a mission to conduct training engagements with partner nations throughout the Americas before reporting to its new homeport of San Diego. The America was set to be ceremoniously commissioned Oct. 11, 2014.
  • In the fifth photo, a tilt-rotor MV-22 Osprey, assigned to the “Argonauts” of Marine Operational Test and Evaluation Squadron (VMX) 22, takes off from the flight deck of future amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6) during flight operations.
  • In the sixth photo, an Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Handler) directs a pilot to an MH-60S Seahawk helicopter, assigned to the “Blackjacks” of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 21, in preparation for flight operations aboard the future amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6).
  • In the seventh photo, an MH-60S Seahawk helicopter, assigned to the “Blackjacks” of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 21, takes off from the flight deck of future amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6) during flight operations.
  • In the eighth photo, an Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Handler) directs a tilt-rotor MV-22 Osprey, assigned to the “Argonauts” of Marine Operational Test and Evaluation Squadron (VMX) 22, to take off from the flight deck of future amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6) during flight operations.
  • In the 9th  and 10th photos, Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Handling) 1st Class Kenny Vida, flight deck leading petty officer aboard future amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6), observes an MH-60S Seahawk helicopter as it takes off.
  • In the 11th photo, Sailors assigned to future amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6) chock and chain an MH-60S Seahawk helicopter after it lands during flight quarters.
  • In the 12th photo, Aviation Electronics Technician 3rd Class Trevor Vindelov, assigned to the “Blackjacks” of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 21, performs a corrosion inspection on a MH-60S Seahawk helicopter in the hangar bay of future amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6).
  • In the 13th photo, Aviation Boatswain’s Mate 2nd Class Jeff Acevedo, left, assigned to Air Department’s V-3 division, directs his tractor driver, Airman Robert Johnson, while moving MV-22 Osprey in the hangar bay aboard future amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6).
  • In the 14th photo, Aviation Boatswain’s Mate 1st Class Jeff Acevedo, left,  directs Aviation Boatswain’s Mate 2nd Class Jeff Acevedo, both assigned to Air Department’s V-3 division, while moving an MV-22 Osprey in the hangar bay aboard future amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6).
  • In the 15th photo, Sailors assigned to the “Blackjacks” of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 21, embarked aboard future amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6), perform preventive maintenance on aircraft tie-down chains in the ship’s hangar bay.
  • In the final photo, Aviation Structural Mechanic 2nd Class Reginald Gilmore, assigned to the “Blackjacks” of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 21, embarked aboard future amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6), performs routine maintenance on an MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter in the ship’s hangar bay.

The second slideshow:

 The photos in the slideshow were shot during the visit to CVN-78 on January 9, 2015 and are credited to Second Line of Defense.

  • The second photo shows Captain Meier in his stateroom aboard the ship.  The third photo shows the captain and Construction superintendent Hicks near an EMALs catapult, and was shot after Hicks had explained to us in detail the nature of the EMALS and arrested landing gear system and its projected impact on operations.
  • The fourth and fifth photos are external shots of the USS Ford prior to boarding the ship.
  • The sixth shot is a view from the bridge of the significantly expanded launch area aboard the deck.  Moving the island as well as removing one aviation elevator from the deck have facilitated the expanded flight deck.
  • Photos 7-9, provide views of the island including the new radar locations.
  • The tenth photo shows the flight deck.
  • The 11th photo shows a station for providing jet fuel.
  • The 12th through 15th photo shows a finished area of the ship, namely the galley.  Even though there will be 600 less sailors aboard the ship, the galley will serve a large crew.
  • The final two shots are of the hanger aboard the ship.

The third slideshow:

At the end of March 2015, Second Line of Defense visited HMS Queen Elizabeth in Scotland. 

These photos were shot during the visit by the RN/RAF team and are credited to them.

  •  The first photo shows the ski jump on the flight deck for the F-35B.  The second photo is of the ski jump and a shot of the Hood Dock from which HMS Hood left to go after Bismarck and to which HMS Prince of Wales returned after the Bismarck was sunk.
  •  The third photo is shot from the ski jump and looks down at the entire flight deck.
  •  The fourth photo shows Robbin Laird with one of the HMS Queen Elizabeth team at the end of the flight deck.
  •  The fifth photo shows several members of the team who provided the tour of the ship.
  •  The sixth, seventh and eighth photos show the islands aboard the flight deck.
  •  The ninth photo provides another shot of the flight deck; the tenth photo is a shot of the reconfigurable C2 spaces aboard the ship;; the eleventh photo shows the massive crane used in the course of construction.
  •  And the final photo shows those who provided the tour for whom more than thanks are due for providing insights into a key element of evolving air and sea power.

 

 

 

 

RAF Typhoons in Russian Intercepts Near Estonia

05/16/2015

2015-05-16 The Baltic states have no air force.

NATO provides the Baltic Air Patrol to provide for air protection for them.

According to one of the first articles on the UK MoD website after the Purdah publishing ban during the time of the election, RAF typhoons from 6 squadron intercepted Russian jets operating near Estonia.

The jets, which deployed to the region on 1 May, identified and escorted a Russian reconnaissance aircraft which was flying in international airspace earlier today. The aircraft was monitored and later departed the area.

The interception comes as 175 UK personnel and two other RAF jets have joined Estonia’s largest military exercise, as part of NATO assurances to Baltic states.

A flight over Tallinn City, Estonia, by two Royal Air Force Typhoons from 6 Squadron on NATO's Baltic Air Poilicing Patrol. Credit: UK MoD
A flight over Tallinn City, Estonia, by two Royal Air Force Typhoons from 6 Squadron on NATO’s Baltic Air Poilicing Patrol. Credit: UK MoD

During Exercise Steadfast Javelin (Siil in Estonian) this week, 13,000 troops and reserves are defending positions against a simulated attack by land and air.

The national exercise has been linked to NATO, and includes participants from the US, Belgium, Germany, Poland, Holland and Latvia.

The UK is the second largest contributing nation, with 120 soldiers from 2nd Battalion, The Yorkshire Regiment, taking part.

A further 55 RAF personnel are supporting two Hawk jets, which are providing air support alongside US A-10 “tank buster” aircraft. British soldiers are playing the part of attacking forces, partnered with a similar sized US Army unit and working as part of an Estonian infantry brigade.

The participation of UK personnel in Exercise Siil will help to develop the Estonian military’s capabilities in deploying, supporting, and fighting with a large infantry force, as well as further improving the interoperability of British and NATO units.

Secretary of State for Defence, Michael Fallon said:

Air interceptions like this underline the vital importance of the UK’s contribution to the Baltic Air Policing mission. The UK’s role in the protection of NATO airspace and the involvement of our personnel in the Estonian exercise currently taking place demonstrate our commitment to NATO’s collective defence and the value of our Armed Forces’ expertise in improving the military capabilities of our allies.

Four RAF Typhoons recently deployed to Amari airbase in Estonia as part of NATO’s Baltic air policing mission.

The Typhoons are operating alongside Norwegian aircraft between May and August 2015, working to secure NATO’s airspace over the Baltic nations of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania which do not have their own air defence fighters.

 

 

A400M Crashes in Seville

05/13/2015

2015-05-13 The tragic crash of an A400M (MSN 23), a plane for the Turkish Air Force, at Seville on May 9th, 2015 near the final assembly plant, reminds us of how risky the introduction of new systems can be.

The plane was due to be delivered to the Turkish Air Force in June, but the plane crashed during a test flight killing four-test crew.

When one grew up in the 1950s, the ongoing development of new aircraft unfortunately saw many injuries and fatalities in the development and test processes as an integral part of the aerospace innovation effort.

Fortunately, new techniques and technologies of development and testing have dramatically reduced the numbers of fatalities in the test process but have not eliminated the risk inherent to introducing new systems.

The crash reminds us that innovation does not come without human cost.

According to a story published by our partner, India Strategic, shortly after the first reports of the accident:

Company spokesperson Maggie Bergsma said the aircraft was on its first production flight and was scheduled for delivery to the Turkish Air Force next month, in June. “

Airbus is devastated to confirm that of a total crew of 6 on board we have lost 4 of our crew members in the accident. Two other crew members are currently in hospital in a serious condition.

All crew members are Airbus Defence and Space employees of Spanish nationality.

Our thoughts are with the families and friends of those affected by this tragic accident and we are providing all our care and support.”

The fate of the two pilots was not disclosed.

Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy promised transparency in the investigation and said he shared the pain at the tragedy.

The Airbus A400M, designated Atlas, is produced here in Seville, in Southern Spain, by Airbus Defence and Space along with another aircraft, C295. The production facility here originally belonged to the Spanish aircraft maker, Construcciones Aeronauticas S.A. (CASA), absorbed in EADS in 1999 and then in Airbus Military in 2009.

European partners in the Airbus spent about Euro 20 billion ($ 22 billion at current rate) to develop the aircraft after the success of several civil platforms beginning with Airbus A320 till Airbus A380, successfully capturing nearly half the global market from US aerospace giant Boeing.

The A400 M mishap took place just as a large number of journalists, invited by Airbus Military, were about to converge here for the company’s annual Trade Media briefing to showcase the company’s achievements. The event was understandably cancelled.

This was the first accident of the newly developed aircraft, inducted into service just two years ago, in 2013. Soon after the mishap, Britain and Germany announced they were grounding their fleets for a review.

Other nations which have taken delivery of the aircraft are likely to follow. But notably, this is a standard practice in aviation industry for understanding and identifying any problems towards preventing any further mishap, and routine trials are likely to resume earliest possible.

The ill-fated aircraft had taken off from the San Pablo or Seville airport, adjoining the Airbus facility, which was closed to air traffic for some time because of the fire and heavy smoke rising from the debris. Emergency services were activated immediately, and rescue workers pulled out the two survivors.

Ms Bergsma said that the aircraft, with serial number MSN023, was the third in line for Turkey. The company had set up a team to coordinate investigation into the possible causes of the crash. The inquiry will determine if there is a design flaw, equipment failure or human error leading to the accident.

Local media reports said that the pilots indicated something was wrong with flight controls and tried to land the aircraft but hit an electricity tower and wires during the attempt.

Both the black boxes, the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder, were recovered and their data is being analysed.

The A400 M is a powerful, new generation four-engine turboprop with tactical short takeoff and landing capability, in size somewhere between Lockheed Martin’s C 130J and Boeing’s C 17 Globemaster III. The aircraft is designed for multiple roles from troops and cargo drops to medical evacuation and midair refueling.

Airbus has orders for 174 aircraft from Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Spain and Britain. Only a dozen or so have been delivered so far.

The aircraft has also been under study by the Indian Air Force (IAF) for possible induction in future.

http://www.indiastrategic.in/topstories3759_Airbus_Military_A400M_aircraft_crashes_4_killed.htm

The test program will recommence shortly.

According to a story in The Guardian:

Airbus said flight testing would continue according to schedule, with Fernando Alonso, the executive vice-president of military aircraft at Airbus Defence and Space, due to be aboard an A400M that will fly from Toulouse to Seville on Tuesday.

In a letter to staff, Airbus’s chief executive, Tom Enders, said it would “demonstrate to our customers, the air forces, that we fully trust this great transport plane and are as committed to the program and the further ramp up of deliveries and capabilities as ever”.

 

 

 

The B-3 is Not a Replacement Bomber: It is Part of the Revolution in Air Combat Affairs

05/12/2015

2015-05-12 By Robbin Laird

The bomber has a long and distinguished history in first the Army Air Corps and then the US Air Force.

When the B-17 was born, it was a controversial aircraft, which proved its worth when Nazi Germany controlled a continent and only the B-17 fleet could deliver strikes inside Nazi-controlled territory, given the bomber’s range and payload.

Unfortunately, there was significant conflict before the war when fighter pilots and bomber advocates argued for the primacy of the one over the other — with the result being B-17s flying unescorted into Nazi territory and facing significant attrition.

Bombers and fighters are interactive capabilities, then and now.

With the addition of the B-29, a new tool set was added as well to Pacific operations, which become the harbinger of things to come in the Cold War, as the B-52 entered the fleet.

The bomber started as a “strategic” asset in terms of being a central part of the nuclear triad and then in terms of the amount of ordinance it could deliver in conventional operations.

That role became clear in the Vietnam War.

Flash forward to 2015, and the B-52 is still around having been joined by the B-1 and the B-2; all of which are playing roles unimagined at the time the B-52 was introduced. Now bombers can perform a wide variety of tactical missions, including close air support, given the revolution in precision-guided munitions and the sensors that can be used to guide those weapons to their targets.

There has been an inversion of the strategic and tactical with the evolution of airpower, whereby small teams of aircraft can deliver strategic effects while conducting “tactical” missions.

Any new bomber will be born in a period where the tactical and strategic are being redefined.

Although the new bomber will build upon the technology enhancements made over the years to the B-2, the B-3 will be no more a successor to the B-2 than the Osprey was a replacement for the CH-46. As Lt. Col. Berke of the USMC – the only F-22 and F-35 operational pilot and the first F-35B squadron commander — has put it: “The Osprey is the chronological successor to the CH-46 but that is about it. It compares in no other way.”

Clearly, the B-3 has the possibility of being defined as a blend of advanced airframe approaches and the proven, modern avionics and sensors that are being integrated on the F-35.

The new bomber therefore “replaces” the B-2 in the sense that the Osprey replaces the Ch-46. And a Lt. Col.

In the USAF 15 years from now might make the same comment which Berke made about the Osprey with regard to the B-3.

The B-3 will enter a fleet in the midst of a revolution in air combat affairs.

This revolution is seeing sea and air operations inextricably intertwined with air power, so much so that airpower is the ubiquitous enabler for 21st century combat operations.

And, with the introduction of the F-35 global fleet, a re-norming of airpower is underway y and an offensive-defensive enterprise is being created for the US and its allies to prevail against the wide-ranging global threats in the 21st century strategic environment.

The strategic thrust of integrating modern systems is to create a grid that can operate in an area as a seamless whole, able to strike or defend simultaneously.

This is enabled by the evolution of C5ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance), and it is why Secretary Wynne has underscored for more than a decade that fifth generation aircraft are not merely replacements for existing tactical systems but an entirely new approach to integrating defense and offense.

By shaping a C5ISR system inextricably intertwined with platforms and assets, which can honeycomb an area of operation, an attack and defense enterprise can operate to deter aggressors and adversaries or to conduct successful military operations.

Rather than looking solely at the organic capability of the B-3, the synergy the B-3 brings to the battlespace is the key discriminator in how it is built, deployed and used.

For example, forward-deployed fifth generation aircraft and missile defense systems can find targets for the weapons loads on the B-3, which in turn can function as the battle manager for an integrated missile defense, fifth generation, attack and defense enterprise. This means that that the sensors, the C2 and information management capabilities of the bomber are a crucial element of its capability.

At the heart of shaping an offensive-defensive enterprise is what one might call the S3Revolution.

Sensors, stealth and speed enable the air combat enterprise to find, kill and respond effectively to the numerous adversarial threats global powers and pop up forces can present to the US and its allies.

A redesign of forces is underway and modular capabilities provide for scalable forces which can provide both presence and reach-back and forces can be tailored to match the threat. As the central force in the air combat enterprise, the B3 can enable the United States tohave the upper hand with the Chinese in a 21st-century strategic engagement.

The bomber as the centerpiece of the air enterprise provides a new kind of presence, linked with highly interoperable, Lego-like blocks able to work with allies that allow for scalable forces with reach-back to U.S. capabilities in the littoral and the homeland. The bottom line: U.S. forces need to be highly connected and interoperable with its allies. The bomber provides a core reach-back capability enabling the entire engagement force.

The B-3 will be born in a period of the offensive-defensive enterprise, the S-cubed revolution and the redesign of forces around modularity scalability and reach-back.

It is not simply going to provide more ordnance over greater distance to do strategic missions; it is about reinforcing and enabling greater capabilities for the combat air force undergoing a revolution in air combat affairs.

Slide Credit: Ed Timperlake
Slide Credit: Ed Timperlake 

The platform needs to be built with the revolution in air combat affairs in mind.

Range and payload will be important elements of the basic platform, as will leveraging new concepts of stealth to provide low observability.

But that is simply a foundation to what the B-3 is all about.

First, it needs to be capable of drawing upon the sensor rich environment being delivered by the global F-35 fleet, unmanned systems and various ISR assets.

Second, it needs to have a C2 system whereby it can obtain and provide tailored information to the warfighter engage in a particular mission set.

Third, with the scalable force it will need to be able to provide battle management capabilities for more forward deployed or shorter-range assets.

Fourth, the weapons revolution is accelerating, and over time, different weapons could well be placed on different platforms, so that the B-3 will need to able to not simply to manage the weapons it has onboard organically, but to be able to operate in a sensor-enabled strike environment, where it is a key but not necessary the lead or even most important asset.

Fifth, with the coming of the second nuclear age, not only will the B-3 become a nuclear delivery vehicle but a deterrent asset able to work with the combat air force to deliver timely and effective strikes against nuclear powers like North Korea BEFORE they can use their missiles and weapons against US and allied targets.

In other words, the B-3 is part of the re-norming of airpower, a key enabler of the forward deployed F-35 global enterprise, a key element in both living off and providing targeted information, and key user and provider of sensor enabled weapons, and a key deterrent weapon against second nuclear age powers.

This has little to do with the B-17, somewhat more like the B-52 but not really about building a powerful organic strategic asset like the B-2.

It is about being a highly effective enabler of more effective longer-range engagement operations, which can effectively tap into joint or coalition airpower.

It is not simply about being a powerful thing in itself (a bomber), but providing significant enhancement of the contextual capabilities of 21st century airpower.

Editor’s Note: This piece was first published on Breaking Defense:

http://breakingdefense.com/2015/05/what-the-b-3-bomber-should-be/