From Red Flag to the Real World: Marine Corps F-35Bs Integrated with USAF Strategic Bombers in Deterrent Deployment

09/06/2017

2017-08-31 It is difficult to miss the ramping up of tensions caused by North Korean missile launches and nuclear progress.

We have argued for some time that the command structure for US forces in Korea should be given to the USAF for it is an ADA, USAF, and USN capability team which can make a difference.

We are not about to replay 1953.

We have also argued that fifth generation aircraft are not replacement aircraft but part of shaping the way ahead to craft a war winning force for high intensity warfare.

And we have also documented over the past few years, the Marines arriving first in the next round of fifth generation development with their F-35Bs.

We have also argued that the USAF needs to ramp up its buy rate and get on with near term deployments to RAF Lakenheath in Europe and in Japan in the Pacific.

For now, the Marines are providing the key F-35 capabilities.

In a demonstration of ironclad U.S. commitment to our allies, U.S. Marine Corps’ F-35B Lightning II fighters assigned to the Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, Japan are joined by Republic of Korea Air Force F-15K fighters during a 10-hour mission from Andersen Air Force Base, into Japanese airspace and over the Korean Peninsula, August 30th. This mission was conducted in direct response to North Korea’s intermediate-range ballistic missile launch, which flew directly over northern Japan on August 28 amid rising tension over North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missile development programs. (Photo by Republic of Korea Air Force)

And the US has deployed F-35Bs with strategic bombers to South Korea.

According to an article by CDR David Bentham, US Pacific Command, in an article published on August 31, 2017:

The United States’ newest and most advanced fighter, the U.S. Marine Corps’ F-35B Lightning II, joined U.S. Air Force B-1B Lancers for the first time in a sequenced bilateral mission with Japan and Republic of Korea air forces in Northeast Asia August 30.

Two B-1Bs from Andersen Air Force Base, Guam; four U.S. Marine F-35Bs from Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, Japan; two Koku Jieitai (Japan Air Self-Defense Force) F-15Js; and four Republic of Korea Air Force (ROKAF) F-15Ks executed this mission to emphasize the combined ironclad commitment to the defense of Allies and the U.S. homeland. Enhancing combined military readiness through integrated missions ensures national leaders of viable and ready military options.

This mission was conducted in direct response to North Korea’s intermediate-range ballistic missile launch, which flew directly over northern Japan on August 28 amid rising tension over North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missile development programs.

“North Korea’s actions are a threat to our allies, partners and homeland, and their destabilizing actions will be met accordingly,” said Gen. Terrence J. O’Shaughnessy, Commander, U.S. Pacific Air Forces, who just returned from an unscheduled visit to Japan to meet with his counterparts. “This complex mission clearly demonstrates our solidarity with our allies and underscores the broadening cooperation to defend against this common regional threat. Our forward-deployed force will be the first to the fight, ready to deliver a lethal response at a moment’s notice if our nation calls.”

 Over the course of the 10-hour mission, the F-35Bs, B-1B bombers and Koku Jieitai fighters flew together over waters near Kyushu, Japan.

The U.S. and ROKAF aircraft then flew across the Korean Peninsula and practiced attack capabilities by releasing live weapons at the Pilsung Range training area before returning to their respective home stations.

 “The F-35 embodies our commitment to our allies and contributes to the overall security and stability of the Indo-Asia Pacific region,” said Lt. Gen. David H. Berger, commander, U.S. Marine Corps Forces Pacific.

U.S. Pacific Command maintains strategic bomber and fighter capabilities in the Indo-Asia-Pacific theater, retaining the ability to respond to any regional threat at a moment’s notice.

 http://www.pacom.mil/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/1295820/us-fifth-generation-fighters-strategic-bombers-conduct-show-of-force-with-allie/

It is hard to show up in a crisis if you are not there.

And the Marines are clearly there with their F-35Bs.

Editor’s Note: The Marines were first to Red Flag with their F-35s and this engagement has been important in shaping a real world deployment.

It is also important to note all the cross learning going on among the US service F-35 communities and with he allies in shaping an F-35 global enterprise.

This deployment is a force insertion which will lead to enhanced distributed knowledge to the F-35 global enterprise and to the US and allied combat fleets.

Late last year, we went to Yuma to say goodbye to the Green Knights as they were preparing to deploy to Japan.

2017-01-02 By Ed Timperlake and Robbin Laird

We last visited VMF-121 prior it being declared IOC with the F-35B.

That visit was in the Summer of 2014 and we spent time the then XO of the Squadron, Major Summa, now Lt. Col. Summa and the CO of the Beaufort Squadron of F-35s, namely the Warlords of Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron 501, which we have also visited.

https://sldinfo.com/visiting-the-f-35-squadron-at-yuma-air-station-the-executive-officer-of-vmf121-provides-an-update/

https://sldinfo.com/visiting-mcas-beaufort-air-station-f-35b-and-renorming-airpower/

During our most recent visit to MCAS Yuma we had a chance to visit both of the IOC F-35B squadrons in Marine Aircraft Group-13.

Ed Timperlake with Lt. Col. Bardo after our interview with him at Yuma.
Ed Timperlake with Lt. Col. Bardo after our interview with him at Yuma.

We also visited with MAWTS-1 and VMX-1, who have just returned from DT-III testing onboard the USS America.

The first F-35B IOC squadron in the world, VMF-121, the Green Knights, are in the processing of transitioning to their deployment in Japan.

Equipment and personnel are already on the way to Japan and the squadron will fly out this winter across the Northern Pacific to operate from Japan.

The deployment comes at a crucial time, given ongoing developments in the Pacific, and the opportunity to be combat operational with F-22s in Pacific Defense.

The F-35B will continue with this new generation of a V/STOL aircraft to work its flexibility with regard to ships and landing bases, which do not necessarily have to be regular airfields.

The flexibility which the B provides is an inherent advantage in the Pacific, with its rich tapestry of islands from which to operate to have the unique “F/A/E -35B” integrate into the emerging Kill Webs as expressed by Rear Admiral Manzer.

http://breakingdefense.com/2016/10/rear-adm-manazir-speaks-on-allied-force-transformation-a2ad/

We had a chance to talk with Lt. Col. Bardo, the CO of the squadron, who is taking the squadron to Japan but will soon thereafter transition from the squadron.

But Bardo has been with the squadron during its IOC and work up with the Marine Corps for its deployment to Japan.

He and his squadron are performing key historical tasks as the cutting edge operational F-35 squadron in the world.

This is an unusual situation for the Marines to find themselves in terms of combat air, but the flexibility of a combat information dominance aircraft fits right in with the evolving concepts of operations of the Marines.

Lt. Col. Bardo underscored the importance of Close Air Support for Marines and the role which the F-35 can play in significantly expanding the scope and nature of close air support.

“CAS is considered doctrinally a function which operates only in a permissive air environment.

We can expand CAS to deal with a much wider range of situations than when we would simply operate in a permissive air environment.

And we can provide greater assurance to Marines as they deploy on the ground that we can deal with a much wider array of pop-up threats than we could do with legacy aircraft.”

Lt. Col. Bardo described the path to get to where the squadron was right now as it prepared for its Japanese deployment.

The period since declaring IOC has been a busy and challenging one as the squadron pushed out the boundaries of the operational capabilities of the aircraft and worked with MAGTF to integrate the airplane into the CAS role as well as working with the USAF on the air to air missions as well.

It has been a busy period for Bardo and his squadron but certainly historic as well.

Throughout the squadron has found the core capabilities of the aircraft to be a solid foundation for shaping the way ahead.

As Lt. Col Bardo described the F-35:

“For the pilot, the ability to shift among missions without having to think sequentially about doing so is really a key strength of the aircraft.

The airplane can think CAS and air-to-air at the same time and the pilot can then mix and match as the mission demands rather than having to think through the sequence of going from one mission set to the next.”

In broad terms, Lt. Col. Bardo described the progress of the squadron going from its time at 29 Palms working CAS, to working closely with MAWTS-1 on shaping the tactics for the use of the aircraft in support of the MAGTF, to its participation in Red Flag this summer as the F-35 component of the air operations being exercised at Red Flag.

In total, these experiences have been crucial in preparing the squadron for its deployment to Japan.

With regard to 29 Palms, the support to the ground combat element was the focus of attention in Steel Knight 2016, which included operating from Red Beach, an austere combat training facility where the presence of FOD or ground debris is a challenge.

https://sldinfo.com/vmfa-121-at-red-beach/

https://sldinfo.com/steel-knight-16-a-step-for-vmfa-121-on-the-way-to-japan-in-2017/

“At the exercise we could show Marines that the F-35 is a core asset for expanding the operational environment in which the MAGTF could operate and how we can support the GCE.

We built trust in the infantry in what this revolutionary STOVL asset can bring to the force and to enhance their lethality and survivability as well.”

With MAWTS-1, the squadron has worked closely on shaping the tactics and training for the new aircraft.

The MAWTS-1 F-35 instructors have come from VMF-121, and the synergy has been crucial to shaping the way ahead for VMF-121 as it faces its deployment to Japan.

Then this summer, the squadron sent planes to Red Flag and flew in a US-only exercise with the full panoply of USN and USAF aircraft, excluding the F-15s.

There the USMC flew its jets and were part of reshaping of air to air operations associated with the F-35.

Lt. Col. Bardo noted that there were many F-16 National Guard pilots who were there, some of which had flown with the F-22 but had not flown with the F-35.

They soon learned that you did not want to be an adversary but to leverage what the F-35 brought the fight.

VMFA-121 Brings F-35B to Red Flag 16-3 For First Time

As they prepared to the deployment to Japan the CO reflected back on his time with the squadron.

“It has been hard work and we have been at the cutting edge of many things with this new aircraft.

The squadron has met the challenges with hard work, innovation and courage and that is how we are preparing for our first overseas deployment, namely to Japan.”

We concluded by reflecting back over the history of the Green Knights who from the beginning brought innovation to the fight in the Pacific.

Historically it is interesting to note that VMF-121 was activated in June 1941 and began flying air ground combat missions in August 1942, with the “Cactus Air Force” on Guadalcanal.

The Green Knights made Marine aviation history with fourteen aces, including the legendary Joe Foss CMH so the F-35 enabled squadron is making its own aviation history.

Recently, the Vietnam generation “Green Knights: visited Yuma. Together with the F-35 generation Green Knights, the Vietnam generation Green Knights celebrated the USMC’s 241st birthday on November 19, 2016

Lt. Col. Bardo commented:

“It was amazing for us to meet with and discuss with the Vietnam-era Green Knights.

Although much has changed; much has not.

What I told the squadron with our visitors present: look at our predecessors and that will be you in a few years.

You want to be as proud as they are; to look back at your achievements as being the first F-35 squadron and making aviation history.

You will not focus so much on the hard work we have done over the past two years, but will focus on the achievements.

And learn from them about how to meet the challenges and serve the nation.”

Biography of Lt. Col. Bardo

Lieutenant Colonel Bardo is a graduate of Whittier College and holds a B.A. in Biology.  He was commissioned a Second Lieutenant in May of 1998 and attended The Basic School that fall.  Upon completion, he began Aviation Preflight training at NAS Pensacola, FL.  He conducted his primary flight training in the T-34C while assigned to VT-28 at NAS Corpus Christi, TX.  Following primary flight training, he was reassigned to VT-22 at NAS Kingsville, TX. He earned his Naval Aviator’s Wings in September of 2001.

He completed fleet replacement training in the AV-8B Harrier at Marine Attack Training Squadron 203 at MCAS Cherry Point, NC.

Mayor Fukuda Visits MCAS Yuma Prior to Arrival of VMFA-121 to Japan

In September of 2002, First Lieutenant Bardo reported to MCAS Yuma and was assigned to Marine Attack Squadron 214.

While assigned to the “Black Sheep” he served as the Powerline Division Officer and a daily schedule writer.  Promoted to Captain in October of 2002, he deployed in support of Operations Southern Watch (OSW) and Iraqi Freedom (OIF) I.  In spring of 2004, Captain Bardo deployed aboard the USS Belleau Wood as part of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU).  Upon reaching the Persian Gulf, the 11th MEU transitioned ashore in support of OIF II.  Upon returning home from deployment, Captain Bardo transferred to 3D MAW headquarters in Miramar where he augmented the G-3 Staff while maintaining currency in the AV-8B.

In June of 2006, Captain Bardo returned to the “Black Sheep” and completed the flight leadership and instructor prerequisites to attend the Weapons and Tactics Instructor Course.  Upon completion of WTI class 1-07 in October, Captain Bardo served as the Pilot Training Officer.  In January 2007, he deployed to Japan for one year supporting two back-to-back 31st MEUs.

In October of 2008, he was promoted to Major and began serving as the Aircraft Maintenance Officer.  He deployed in May 2009 to Kandahar Air Base, Afghanistan in support of Marine Aircraft Group 40, 2d Marine Expeditionary Brigade flying in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF).

In December of 2009, Major Bardo reported to Eglin Air Force Base, FL as one of the initial cadre of instructors tasked with standing up the “Warlords” of Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron 501, the USMC’s first F-35B squadron.  In January of 2011, Major Bardo was selected to attend Intermediate Level School at the Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island where he earned a Master of Arts in National Security and Strategic Studies.  He returned to VMFAT-501 where he completed transition training to the F-35B.  While at VMFAT-501, he served as the Director of Safety and Standardization as well as the Operations Officer.

In January of 2015, Lieutenant Colonel Bardo reported to MAG-13, located at MCAS Yuma, Arizona and assumed command of VMFA-121 in July of 2015.

Lieutenant Colonel Bardo has over 1800 flight hours, primarily in the AV-8B and F-35B and over 480 combat hours in support of OSW, OIF, and OEF.  His qualifications include: Weapons and Tactics Instructor, Mission Commander, Training Landing Signal Officer, Air Combat Tactics Instructor, Low Altitude Tactics Instructor, Functional Check Flight pilot and Demonstration pilot.

His personal decorations include the Meritorious Service Medal, Air Medal with Strike Numeral “12”, Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal, third award, and Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal, fourth award.

http://www.3rdmaw.marines.mil/Leaders/LeadersView/Article/614148/lieutenant-colonel-bardo/

The first slideshow shows the squadron on the day we visited and are credited to Second Line of Defense.

The second slideshow shows the squadron participating in Steel Knight and operating at Red Beach.

The third slideshow shows them at Red Flag in an all-US air combat exercise.

The fourth slideshow shows a Japanese visit to the squadron in Yuma earlier this year with Lt. Col. Bardo working with the Japanese visitors.

The photos for the final three slideshows are all credited to the USMC.

Editor’s Note: When you visit the squadron, in the main building there is a Joseph Foss room.

Looking at the history of the squadron and Joe Foss’s role in that history, one can understand the heritage being built into the new combat capability represented by the F-35 B for the 21st Century USMC.

Tradition clearly matters.

Joseph Foss, C.O. VMF-121, Medal of Honor Recipient

By Stephen Sherman, July, 1999. Updated June 30, 2011.

Joe Foss was born on April 17, 1915 to a Norwegian-Scots family in South Dakota. He learned hunting and marksmanship at a young age. Like millions of others, 11-year old Joe Foss was inspired by Charles Lindbergh, especially after he saw Lindy at an airport near Sioux Falls.

Five years later he watched a Marine squadron put on a dazzling exhibition, led by Capt. Clayton Jerome, future wartime Director of Marine Corps Aviation.

In 1934, Joe began his college education in Sioux Falls, but he had to drop out to help his mother run the family farm. However he scraped up $65 for private flying lessons. Five years later he entered the University of South Dakota again and supported himself by waiting on tables. In his senior year he also completed a civilian pilot training program before he graduated with a Business degree in 1940.

Upon graduation he enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps reserves as an aviation cadet. Seven months later, he earned his Marine wings at Pensacola and was commissioned a second lieutenant. For the next nine months he was a ‘plowback’ flight instructor. He was at Pensacola when the news of Pearl Harbor broke, and since he was Officer of the Day, he was placed in charge of base security. Thus he prepared to defend Pensacola from Jap invaders, riding around the perimeter on a bicycle.

To his distress, he was then ordered to the aerial photographers school and assigned to a VMO-1, a photo reconnaissance squadron.

But he insisted he wanted fighter pilot duty, even after being told “You’re too ancient, Joe. You’re 27 years old!” After lengthy lobbying with Aircraft Carrier Training Group, he learned all about the new F4F Wildcat, logging over 150 flight hours in June and July.

When he finished training, he became executive officer of VMF-121.

Three weeks later, he was on his way to the South Pacific, where the United States was desperately trying to turn the tide of war. Arriving in the South Pacific, VMF-121 was loaded aboard the escort carrier Copahee.

Guadalcanal

On the morning of October 9, they were catapulted off the decks, in Joe’s only combat carrier mission. Landing at Henderson Field, he was told that his fighters were now based at the ‘cow pasture.’

He was impressed with the ‘make-do’ character of the ‘Cactus Air Force. The airfield was riddled with bomb craters and wrecked aircraft, but also featured three batteries of 90mm anti-aircraft guns and two radar stations. As ‘exec’ of -121, he would normally lead a flight of two four-plane divisions, whenever there were enough Wildcats to go around.

He was the oldest pilot in the flight, four years older than the average age of 23. The flight would become known as ‘Foss’s Flying Circus’ and rack up over 60 victories. Five of them would become aces; two would die in the in the fight for Guadalcanal.

On October 13, 1942, VMF-121 scored its first victories when Lts. Freeman and Narr each got a Japanese plane. Later that same day, Joe led a dozen Wildcats to intercept 32 enemy bombers and fighters. In his first combat, a Zero bounced Joe, but overshot, and Joe was able to fire a good burst and claim one destroyed aircraft.

Instantly, three more Zeros set upon him, and he barely made it back to ‘Fighter One’, his Wildcat dripping oil. Chastened by the experience, he declared “You can call me ‘Swivel-Neck Joe’ from now on.” From the first day, Joe followed the tactics of Joe Bauer: getting in close, so close that another pilot joked that the ‘exec’ left powder burns on his targets. The next day while intercepting a flight of enemy bombers, Joe’s engine acted up and he took cover in the clouds. But suddenly a Wildcat whizzed past him, tailed by a Zero. Joe cut loose and shot the Zero’s wing off. It was his second victory in two days.

While the Wildcats’ primary responsibility was air defense, they also strafed Japanese infantry and ships when they had enough ammunition. Joe led on such mission on the 16th. Mid-October was the low point for the Americans in the struggle for Guadalcanal.

Japanese warships shelled the U.S. positions nightly, with special attention to the airstrips. To avoid the shelling, some fliers slept in the front lines. Foss grew to appreciate the Navy’s fighter doctrine and found that the “Thach Weave” effectively countered the Zero’s superior performance, because “it allowed us to point eyes and guns in every direction.”

Joe was leading an interception on morning of the 18th when the Zero top cover pounced on them and downed an F4F. But Foss was able to get above them and flamed the nearest, hit another, and briefly engaged a third. Gaining an angle, he finally shot up the third plane’s engine.

Marine Corps F4F Wildcat at Guadalcanal, marked with 19 Japanese flags.
Marine Corps F4F Wildcat at Guadalcanal, marked with 19 Japanese flags.

Next he found a group of Bettys already under attack by VF-71. He executed a firing pass from above, flashed through the enemy bombers, and pulled up sharply, blasting one from below. Nine days at Guadalcanal and he was an ace! Two days later Lt. Col. Harold Bauer and Foss led a flight of Wildcats on the morning intercept. In the dogfighting, Joe downed two Zeros, but took a hit in his engine. He landed safely at Henderson Field with a bad cut on his head, but otherwise unharmed.

‘Cactus Fighter Command’ struggled to keep enough Wildcats airworthy to meet the daily Japanese air strikes. On the 23rd, it put up two flights, led by Foss and Maj. Davis. There were plenty of targets and Joe soon exploded a Zero. He went after another which tried to twist away in a looping maneuver. Joe followed and opened up while inverted at the top of his loop. He caught the Zero and flamed it. He later described it as a lucky shot.

Next he spotted a Japanese pilot doing a slow roll; he fired as the Zero’s wings rolled through the vertical and saw the enemy pilot blown out of the cockpit, minus a parachute. Suddenly he was all alone and two Zeros hit him, but his rugged Grumman absorbed the damage, permitting Foss to flame one of his assailants.

Once again, he nursed a damaged fighter back to Guadalalcanal. So far he had destroyed eleven enemy planes, but had brought back four Wildcats that were too damaged to fly again.

October 25 was the day that the Japanese planned to occupy Henderson Field; they sent their fighters over, with orders to circle until the airstrip was theirs. It didn’t work out that way, as the U.S. ground forces held their lines and ‘Cactus’ did its part. Joe Foss led six Wildcats up before 10 AM, and claimed two of the Marine’s three kills on that sortie.

Afterwards, he berated himself for wasting ammunition on long-range shooting. He kept learning how important it was to get close. (The great German ace, Erich Hartmann, said “Get close enough until the airplane fills the whole windscreen; then you can’t miss.”) In an afternoon mission on the 25th, he downed three more, to become the Marine Corps’ first ‘ace in a day’. He had achieved 14 victories in only 13 days.

Despite rugged living conditions and the stress of daily combat flying, Foss retained his enthusiasm. He and some other fliers of VMF-121 occasionally went prowling with their rifles in the jungle, looking for Japanese soldiers, but Col. Bauer stopped this activity; trained fighter pilots were too valuable to risk this way.

They slept in six-man tents and ate the wretched powdered eggs that are mentioned in almost every pilot’s memoirs. On guy had a gramophone that they played scratchy records on. They bathed in the Lunga River; many grew beards rather than try to shave in cold water. They kept the beards neatly trimmed, not for appearances, but to ensure their beards didn’t interfere with the close-fitting oxygen masks. ‘Washing Machine Charlie’ and ‘Millimeter Mike’ harassed the field nightly, so some pilots tried to sleep in the daytime.

Down!

On November 7th Foss led seven F4Fs up the Slot to attack some IJN destroyers and a cruiser, covered by six Rufe floatplane fighters. They dispatched five of the Rufes promptly and prepared to strafe the destroyers. Joe climbed up to protect the others and got involved in a dogfight with a Pete, a two-man float biplane. He shot down the slow-flying plane, but not before its rear gunner perforated the Wildcat’s engine with 7.7mm machine gun fire.

Once again, Foss’ aircraft started sputtering on the way home. But his time, it didn’t make it. As the engine died, he put it into the longest possible shallow dive, to get as close to home as he could.

As his plane went into the water off Malaita Island, Foss struggled with his parachute harness and his seat. He went under with his plane, gulped salt water, and almost drowned before he freed himself and inflated his Mae West. Exhausted and with the tide against him, he knew that he couldn’t swim to shore. While trying to rest and re-gain his strength in his life raft, he spotted shark fins nearby. He sprinkled the chlorine powder supplied for that purpose in his emergency pack and that seemed to help.

As darkness approached, he heard some searchers looking for him. They hauled him in and brought him to Malaita’s Catholic mission. There were a number of Europeans and Australians, including two nuns who had been there for forty years and had never seen an automobile. They fed him steak and eggs and invited him stay for two weeks.

The next day a PBY Catalina, piloted by Maj. Jack Cram rescued him. On his return to Guadalcanal, he learned that ‘Cactus’ had downed 15 Japanese planes in the previous day’s air battle. His own tally stood at 19. On the ninth, Admiral Bull Halsey pinned the Distinguished Flying Cross on him and two other pilots.

The Americans were bringing four transports full of infantry to Guadalcanal on November 12. The Japanese sent 16 Betty bombers and 30 covering Zeroes after them, while the American Wildcats and Airacobras defended.

Foss and his Wildcats were flying top cover CAP and dived headlong into the attackers, right down onto the deck. As Barrett Tillman described it in Wildcat Aces of WWII: Ignoring the peril, Foss hauled into within 100 yards of the nearest bomber and aimed at the starboard engine, which spouted flame. The G4M tried a water landing, caught a wingtip and tumbled into oblivion. Foss set his sight on another Betty when a Zero intervened. The F4F nosed up briefly and fired a beautifully aimed snapshot which sent the A6M spearing into the water. He then resumed the chase.

Joe Foss
Joe Foss

Foss caught up with the next Betty in line and made a deflection shot into its wingroot; the bomber flamed up and then set down in the water. The massive dogfight continued, until Joe ran out of fuel and ammunition.

Between the fighters and the AA, the Americans destroyed almost all the bombers and many of the Zeros. No U.S. ships were seriously damaged. But that night another naval surface battle raged in Ironbottom Sound. Warships on both sides were sunk or damaged, including the IJN battleship Hiei which Marine bombers and torpedo planes finished off on the 13th. The major Japanese effort continued on the 14th, as they brought in a seven ship troop convoy. The American air forces cut this up as well.

Late that afternoon, Col. Bauer, tired of being stuck on the ground at Fighter Command, went up with Joe to take a look. It was his last flight, described by Joe Foss in a letter to Bauer’s family. No trace of ‘Indian Joe’ was ever found. Back at Guadalcanal, Foss was diagnosed with malaria. Two great leaders of Cactus Fighter Command were gone, although Foss would return in six weeks.

He recuperated in New Caledonia and Australia. He met some of the high-scoring Australian aces, who viewed the Japanese as inferior opponents and were a little dismissive of Joe’s 23 victories. After a brief relapse of malaria, Joe returned to Guadalcanal on New Year’s Day. Improvements had been made in his absence, notably pierced steel planking (PSP) for the Fighter Strip. Foss returned to combat flying on the 15th when he shot down three more planes to bring his total to 26.

He flew his last mission ten days later when his flight and four P-38s intercepted a force of over 60 Zeros and Vals. Quickly analyzing the situation, he ordered his flight to stay high, circling in a Lufbery. This made his small flight look like a decoy to the Japanese. Soon Cactus scrambled more fighters and the Japanese planes fled. It was ironic that in one of Joe Foss’ most satisfying missions, he didn’t fire a shot.

http://acepilots.com/usmc_foss.html

 

 

The Way Ahead for the RAAF in the Integrated Defense Force: The Perspective of Air Marshal Leo Davies

2017-08-31 By Robbin Laird

During my recent stay in Australia to attend and write the report for the Williams Foundation seminar on the future of electronic warfare, I had the chance to continue my discussions with Air Marshal Leo Davies, the Chief of Staff of the RAAF.

The RAAF is certainly leading the pack in shaping and crafting a fifth generation air force.

In my most recent interview with the Air Commander Australia the strategic shift was described very clearly.

Question: You have raised the question of the shift in recruitment and training with regard to your pilots. 

How would you regard the shift on the demand side for the pilot?

Air Vice-Marshal Roberton: You go from having to manage a package to being a node, a sensor, and a shooter in a network.

We are no longer operating as little bespoke package and building block of a force. 

If you’re doing this properly to prepare for a fifth-generation fight, you start them in the middle of the web, and our warfighters understand what they can contribute and where they can draw upon to be a sensor and a shooter in that web.

And that’s not just airpower, that’s across the entire joint space.

This requires us to fundamentally change our exercise approach to train aviators in the kill web. It is a fundamental in dealing with the kinds of adversaries we find in the real world.

We cannot take yesterday’s “block and tackle” combat aircraft approach to train to be the kind of distributed mission commanders we need in the future air combat force.

We need to focus on the sensor-shooter relationship in which we can deliver distributed kinetic and non-kinetic effects.

And this comes from within the kill web.

Put another way, you are training for autonomy in all of the weapon shooter nodes and crafting the overall impact accordingly.

Our decisive advantage is going to be in our ability to operate in high-tempo ops, fully networked.

Wreath laying at the Pool of Reflection during the Last Post Ceremony, commemorating the 75th Anniversary of the Battle of Milne Bay at the Australian War Memorial.

(L-R) Chief of Army, Lieutenant General Angus J. Campbell, AO, DSC; Regimental Sergeant Major – Army, Warrant Officer Don Spinks, OAM; Chief of Air Force, Air Marshal Leo Davies, AO, CSC and Warrant Officer of the Air Force, Warrant Officer Robert Swanwick.

That’s what will make it a completely unfair fight.

It’s not going to be about mass and numbers; that will always have a part to play.

But our decisive advantage has to be our ability to just run our kill web at high speed.

We have parts of our organization that are now thinking at the tactical and operational level in fifth-generation sense, but we are yet to exercise the enabling and support function in that same mindset.

That’s a challenge for us.

https://sldinfo.com/the-way-ahead-for-the-raaf-in-an-integrated-defense-force-the-perspective-of-the-new-air-commander-australia-air-vice-marshal-zed-roberton/

With a major reshaping effort under way as described by Air Commander Australia, how does the Chief of the RAAF see then the role of the RAAF?

“Our core business is to ensure that we can be a responsible element of whatever coalition the government determines we need to work with to meet Australian interests

“Australia and the Air Force in particular need to be equipped, trained and agile enough to be effective.

“Our core business is to focus on day-to-day management of sovereign Australia territory and interests.

“And that can vary from our contribution to the monitoring of fisheries, or of dealing with people smuggling, or of being aware of what’s in the sky above us, and what might be in the sky above us in years to come, is our everyday evolution of a defense force.

“We can do that better if we understand our neighborhood as well as we understand our own country.

“We have consciously begun to shape a trained workforce and a strategy which prioritizes our international engagement and our relationship with our neighbors,

“We’ve had strong military-to-military relationships with our neighbors for many decades. And we look to strengthen and improve our effect in this domain.”

Question: You are being a more integrated force, but this template, which you are shaping, could then form a solid foundation for the kinds of innovation, which your government might see as important in the years ahead.

What kinds of innovations do you see in the mid term from this perspective?

Air Marshal Davies: Clearly, situational awareness of the air and space domain is critical, but so is an ability to affect an adversary; potentially at long range as part of an integrated package.

“What form this will take is a work in progress and will reflect judgments about need in the period ahead within a coalition context.

“If we shape a force that can only do parts of the warfighting continuum we will have failed.

“That is why in our exercises with partners such as in Talisman Saber 2017 we are working the spectrum of conflict both to shape capability, but to lay a solid foundation for thinking about future operational needs.”

Question: As we go forward, it is important to think through the military force we are building up against the objectives, which Australia and its allies can establish within the region and beyond.

You are building a very flexible and in that overused term, agile force, but these tools need to be matched up against objectives.

Clearly, as you have said, protection of Australian territory is crucial but beyond that what approach do we need?

Air Marshal Davies: As you suggest, military capability is a necessary but not sufficient condition for success.

“It is crucial that we sort out objectives among ourselves in the region and beyond,

“What are the most crucial challenges to be met?

“How and where do our approaches overlap and where do they differ?

“And we need to remain aware that the military responses are only one of those options that each respective government has.

“We need to be credible

“And building of credible military options, should they be needed, requires coordination with our allies.”

Question: How do you view the fundamentals of the Australian approach going forward?

Air Marshal Davies: A key element is simply our unique geography and the nature of our neighborhood. We have a unique geography, which provides protection as well as challenges within our region.

“As I mentioned earlier, this means shaping robust and clear relationships with our closest neighbors.

“It means working with allies like the US and Japan to shape very flexible military options to adapt to changes in the region.

“Space is becoming increasingly important.

“We have used space largely as a communications domain, but as adversaries adopt new approaches, we need to reconsider how we do business as well.

“And we are adding Tritons and F-35s, which means we can reshape our networks, and access to space will be needed to enable configurable and redundant networks.

“Antarctica will become increasingly important in the period ahead. It is the world’s back door and states will look to use transit over the pole to shorten operating distances to areas of interest.

“We want to make sure that we are able to properly defend our ability to maintain Antarctica as a neutral environment.”

Question: Integrated air and missile defense is clearly an important coming capability for Australia.

How best to approach that challenge?

Air Marshal Davies: We have a project, Air 6500, which is designed to get to this capability, and we have tactical pieces relevant to such an effort.

“But we are certainly not there.

“We should be starting with, “How are we going to coordinate air warfare destroyers, space-based communications, F-35, future frigates, Triton and P-8 into an integrated operating picture?

“How do we coordinate all of the command and control, including the civilian air traffic control sensors?

“How do you get them onto the same sheet of music?

“How do you begin to get all the different parts of the national orchestra to play a tune we have not finished writing yet?

“We are working to shape intellectual warriors who allow us to use those disparate elements, and pull them together.

“And without that web, without that integrated air and missile defense, within which we have to plug our allies, or at least make it pluggable, we’ll have fallen short.

“That is one of the next big steps for us.”

Editor’s Note: With regard to the photo above, here is the full caption provided by the Australian Department of Defence which highlights the World War II approach to integrated operations:

On Friday 25 August 2017 a dedicated Last Post service was held at the Australian War Memorial marking the 75th anniversary of the Battle of Milne Bay.

The Battle of Milne Bay was an important victory for Allied forces, marking the first time that Japanese forces were defeated on land. feature of the battle was the close cooperation between the Australian Army and the RAAF.

Hudson bombers from RAAF No.6 Squadron provided reconnaissance and bomber support, No.75 Squadron provided Kittyhawks, and the flying squadrons were supported by No 37 Radar Station and No8 Fire Control Unit during the Battle.

Personnel from the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) conducted a naval survey of the bay in Laurabada, which was manned by RAN personnel.

RAN warships, including HMAS Arunta, escorted the transport vessels delivering earth moving equipment, food, ammunition, aviation fuel and other essential supplies.

The Australian Army deployed its 7th and 18th Infantry Brigades.

More than 370 Australians were killed or wounded while the Japanese suffered almost 1500 casualties.

 

An Update on Plan Jericho: Shaping a Way Ahead for the Fifth-Generation Force

2017-09-06 By Robbin Laird

During my visit to Australia last Spring, I discussed the evolution of Plan Jericho with the do-leads of Plan Jericho, Group Captains Campbell and Mitchell.

I had a chance at the end of the Williams Foundation seminar and the following week AFTER the Jericho Dawn exercise to talk with them about the exercise and its place and significance within the Plan Jericho effort.

The exercise involved changing how the air and ground communicated with one another in the maneuver space. As such, the exercise could seem to be a look at new technologies to connect the force.

But this would miss the real point of the effort, which is the reshaping the concept of operations and the co-evolution of the ground and air forces.

And the reshaping effort requires an ongoing operational training regime to understand what further changes are required to ensure that the air-ground maneuver forces work in an effective manner.

It is about technological enablement, but changing the culture and approach of the forces as they work the new technology into new approaches.

https://sldinfo.com/an-update-on-plan-jericho-from-the-perspective-of-jericho-dawn-a-discussion-with-group-captains-campbell-and-mitchell/

The focus of that interview was upon the challenges of working through C2 innovation to get better force structure operational capabilities.

During my most recent visit, I had a chance to sit down at Russell with the new co-lead, Group Captain Carl Newman and Group Captain Mitchell.

In various articles which we have recently published on Second Line of Defense, we have highlighted barriers to getting the kind of 21st century combat force we need to deal with the threats which come at us in high intensity warfare.

Not only have we launched a Forum to deal with the challenge of shifting from slo mo to high intensity warfare, but we have been highlighting in some of our recent interviews some of those challenges.

One of those is clearly the fragmented and cumbersome security system which places layers of players in place and ensures that we will not achieve the kind of C2 in a dynamic threat environment which our forces will need.

For example, during our recent visit to the Naval Air Warfare Development Center at Fallon, we discussed with many of the participants the security challenge and the critical necessity to shape a new approach.

Director Plan Jericho, Group Captain Pete Mitchell (right) briefs personnel attending the Senior Airman Conference held at the Air Warfare Centre, RAAF Base Williamtown. August 2017. Credit: Australian Department of Defence

Group Captain Peter Mitchell, co-head of the Jericho project, speaking on the second day of the RAAF Airpower Conference, March 16, 2016.

We concluded during that visit the following with regard to this challenge:

One of the critical advances in the coming together of many 21st Century technological advances is the exponential growth in ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance) is a critical component of a countries military battle planning and execution, and that can be a very good thing.

However, what we picked up at Fallon builds on some of the comments we heard in our visit to the Navy Jax, P-8, Triton community.

To put it in our words the “mechanics” of getting actionable timely intelligence to the aircrews and Fleet commanders is often a weak link. The “Intel” can be there but the process is often not helpful. It can be both a macro issue and a micro issue.

On a “macro” level there is a move to send “Intel” up first to higher command then back down. This challenge was discussed at Jax Navy in the context of declaring Triton ocean surveillance information part of a national strategic collection effort. Of course it is an easy solution to let the Intel flow both up and down concurrently.

Hopefully this is in work toward a successful resolution.

https://sldinfo.com/air-wing-fallon-the-challenges-facing-predeployment-training-for-the-carrier-air-wing/

The conversation with the Plan Jericho co-leads started with this security challenge.

“One of our challenges is the security and policy framework needed to engage at the appropriate level with our Joint colleagues in shaping a transformation approach.

“Plan Jericho is addressing some of these challenges and sees as a key way ahead getting much greater integration between the air, land and naval forces.

“But this will not happen if we cannot reshape our security processes and approaches.

“We need to cross-pollinate across the various elements of the force structure to get the kind of operational integration which we need.”

“We need to shape the kind of cross platform Training, Tactics and Procedures (TTPs) which allow for and can accelerate integration.

“We have done that on a case by case basis but have not figured how to do that across the board or at the strategic level.”

“We are talking about the joint space, where we have influence but not ownership.

“We need to consider revolutionary innovation concepts, not the biological build approach which we are pursuing.

“The RAAF could pursue revolutionary concepts but if everyone else is pursuing evolution we will have significant gaps in our approach to achieve the kind of operational integration which we will need.”

Laird: At the end of the day, we’re talking here about changing authorities.

We’re recognizing the technologies can talk to each other, for example Wedgetail with Naval radars,

This needs to happen so that the ability of the machines to talk with one another, can unleash the man-machine relationships which we will need for high intensity conflict.

We talk about man to machine, but it’s machine to machine that we’re unleashing as well.

Then we’re changing what the man does with the machine to machine conversation.

We can make this sound harder than it is, but at the end of the day, you start with things Wedgetail or Growler talking with your new naval radars and you are going down the transformation path.

The Plan Jericho Team: Absolutely.

We can see that.

Directors Plan Jericho, Group Captain Pete Mitchell (left) and Group Captain Carl Newman, brief personnel attending the Senior Airman Conference at RAAF Base Williamtown.August 2017. Credit: Australian Department of Defence

One of the barriers that we see at the moment is the security and policy framework that actually prevents that from happening.

We see progress along these lines within Air Force, but we need ensure we can work with the Navy and Army as well to establish a joint framework.

Laird: It seems that the E7 is really a forcing function aircraft for you in this overall effort to rework TTPs to get more joint integration.

Recently, for example, the F-22s in Australia worked closely with Wedgetail to expand their capabilities to work together.

There are examples that have already been demonstrated and it seems this aircraft and its evolution is especially useful in the kind of approach which you are taking with Plan Jericho.

The Plan Jericho Team: That is a good point.

The E7 has significant potential and we need to ensure we establish a roadmap and growth path that meets the joint force needs and then leverage that growth path as a key driver for much of Air Force’s airborne integration efforts.

Laird: So in effect, you need to have a fifth generation security system to go along with the platforms shaping a fifth generation air force, and in this case the Australian owned Wedgetail is a key enabler and forcing function system.

In this case, it is far more than simply a platform.

The Plan Jericho Team: What we’re actually looking at within Jericho next is defining and distilling what the key themes, concepts, and characteristics and risks are to shaping a fifth-generation force.

“What are the defining characteristics?”

“If we can define those, then we have the opportunity to actually have a revolutionary look at security, logistics, integrated tactics and even what a 5th Gen workforce needs to look like.

“At the recent Williams Foundation Seminar on Electronic Warfare, Group Captain Glen Braz hammered home the point that we need to view Growler as part of the joint force, not as supporting the joint force.

“And making that the reality is the challenge.

“And part of what we need to address is leveraging the forcing function of such efforts as Growler integration to reshape the security piece.

“We see the Air Warfare Centre as an important piece of working the key problems of joint TTPs beyond the single platform.

“We’re not just building on what we’ve currently done.

“We’re actually looking at developing tactics in a more integrated manner.

“And this approach is something we are looking to permeate through our force.

“For example, the Growlers are collocated with our Super Hornets.

“We need to see how to integrate these assets.

“The Growler is a very different payload asset; the Super Hornet community can not simply operate in a legacy manner as a kill chain.

“We need to shape a kill web and clearly Super Hornet and Growler integration is part of the equation.

“And we are not simply inheriting approaches born elsewhere outside of Australia in this domain.

“And a major piece of the effort is about training the right kind of workforce.

“We need to shape a workforce very open to the kind of integration we are talking about here and indeed demanding further progress as part of the professional lives.”

Editor’s Note: It should be also noted that the past heads of Plan Jericho have moved on and are continuing to help shape a transformation process.

Air Commodore Rob Chipman is now Director General of Capability Planning within the RAAF. In this capacity, he is taking the Jericho approach into shaping a way ahead for capability planning within the joint force.

Air Commodore Andrew ‘Jake’ Campbell is now Deputy Commander of the Joint Task Force on Operation Sovereign Borders working with Australian Customs and Border Protection agencies against illegal immigrants.

https://sldinfo.com/the-challenge-of-shaping-future-capabilities-informing-the-evolving-force-the-perspective-of-air-commodore-chipman/

For earlier discussions of Plan Jericho, see the following:

https://sldinfo.com/plan-jericho-shaping-a-transformed-training-system/

https://sldinfo.com/plan-jericho-the-raaf-shapes-a-transformation-strategy-2/

https://sldinfo.com/the-co-directors-of-plan-jericho-group-captain-rob-chipman-and-group-captain-jake-campbell-discuss-the-way-ahead-for-the-raaf/

https://sldinfo.com/the-evolution-of-the-raafs-air-mobility-group-its-contribution-to-plan-jericho/

https://sldinfo.com/a-discussion-with-the-australian-air-chief-air-marshal-davies-discusses-iraq-plan-jericho-and-the-way-ahead/

https://sldinfo.com/the-air-commander-australia-discusses-plan-jericho-and-the-way-ahead/

 

 

 

 

Major Publisher Exits New York Times Bestseller List: A Challenge to NYT Credibility

09/05/2017

2017-09-05 By Ed Timperlake

Today, Marji Ross, Publisher of Regnery Publishing, a Salem Media Group Company has announced that the publishing house is no longer interested in working with the New York Times and its bestseller list.

She announced this decision based on the publisher’s perception of clear political bias.

The publishing house has had many books on the New York Times best seller list, so the decision was not an easy one.

Here is the letter which I received as an author who has published a best seller on the New York Times list.

September 2, 2017

Dear Regnery Author,

I am writing to inform you of an important decision we have made here at Regnery Publishing. After many years of using the New York Times’ bestseller list despite what we believe to be a clear bias against conservative books and authors and an underreporting of the bestseller rankings of those books and authors, we have concluded that we cannot in good conscience endorse this list any longer.

We will therefore immediately cease following, tracking, reporting on, promoting and publicizing the Times’ list and will henceforth use the Publishers Weekly bestseller list instead.

As many of you have experienced personally, it appears the Times has gathered book sale data in a manner which prioritizes liberal-themed books over conservative books and authors. The net result has been a bestseller list that has increasingly become less relevant to the Regnery audience, and less reflective of which books are actually selling best in the country, regardless of one’s political persuasion.

Books that have clearly outsold those at the top of the Times’ list based on Nielsen BookScan data are placed lower on the list, or eliminated from the list altogether. That’s not to say that conservative books and authors don’t appear on the Times’ list, even in the #1 spot, but too often we see what we saw yet again this week: a conservative book that sold more than 12,000 copies – more than any other book on the Times’ list—placed at #7, while Al Franken’s book, which sold 7,600, listed at #3.

I’m certainly not the first person to accuse the New York Times of allowing its liberal bias to influence the way it covers the news. But most people still expect the bestseller list to be driven simply by data. Opinions are one things, data should be immune to political views. Unfortunately, the Times’

list does not appear to accurately and fully report on sales; oftentimes it seems to reflect what the editors think Americans ought to be reading—or perhaps what the editors themselves are reading.

We realize it may be a bit unsettling to our authors that we will no longer use the “New York Times

Bestseller” moniker. Let me respond in two ways. First, if your book outsells other books in the country, it should appear on the list. If the Times treats you fairly, great! If the Times does not accurately report sales of ALL titles, whether liberal or conservative, the list has lost its value and their influence will continue to fade. Secondly, I ask you to consider this: we are often told it’s foolish to bite the hand that feeds you. I say it’s just as foolish to feed the hand that bites you.

As for the Grey Lady, the time has come to say: “this Emperor has no clothes.”

Thank you for your friendship, your partnership, and your support,

Marji Ross

President and Publisher

Editor: Also, see the following:

Calling into Question the New York Times: A Major Publisher Exits its Bestseller List

About Marji Ross, President and Publisher, Regnery

Ross has been president and publisher of conservative publisher Regnery since 2003.

She joined Regnery in 1999 as vice president and general manager, and previously worked as senior group publisher for newsletter publisher Phillips International, where she ran several business units, including investment, business and health newsletters.

She currently serves on the boards of the National Conservative Campaign Fund, the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute and the Beth Chai Congregation. In February 2005, she was named the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute’s Woman of the Year.

  • Tip: “Be the conductor, not a one-man band. … Most successful female executives I know thrive on proving their competence and productivity. But as the leader of an organization, we must … prioritize those things on which we can have the greatest impact. And then we must hire people smarter than us to do those things we are not particularly good at … [or] are not a particularly good use of our time.”

50 Top Women in Book Publishing

Lt. General (Retired) Davis Focuses on Distributed Electronic Warfare Capabilities

09/04/2017

2017-08-31 By Robbin Laird

On August 23, 2017, the Williams Foundation held a seminar on the future of electronic warfare.

With the introduction of the Growler, this has provided a natural hook into the broader discussion of the evolving payloads, which need to be part of an integrated 21st century combat force.

As Group Captain Braz put the objective of Growler introduction within the ADF:

“New thinking in terms of dynamic targeting, particularly of non-lethal effects, many of which may be temporary in nature, will be a key to success.

“Delegating these engagement authorities forward will be essential.”

Lt. General (Retired) Jon Davis, the former Deputy Commandant of Aviation, echoed these sentiments within his presentation to the Williams Foundation seminar.

He described the USMC transition from a core aircraft delivering an EW effect to building out the MAGTF to include ubiquitous access to non-kinetic tron warfare capabilities.

The core approach going forward is very clear.

“MAGTF EW transitions the Marine Corps from a focus on low density/high-demand EW platforms, to a distributed, platform-agnostic strategy – where every platform contributes/ functions as a sensor, shooter and sharer – to include EW.

“Under MAGTF EW the Marine Corps is leveraging emerging technologies and integrating multiple platforms, payloads, nodes, and capabilities to provide commanders with an organic and persistent air and ground EW capability.”

Lt. General (Retired) Jon Davis on a panel at the Williams Foundaton Seminar on Electronic Warfare, August 23,
2017

Davis underscored that with the changing nature of warfare and how the Marines operate, shaping a distributed strategy was a necessity, not an option.

“We operate on ships, from ships to shore and ashore.

“We cannot simply have an on call EW asset.

“We can confront the threat requiring an EW capability anywhere we operate.”

He described the sun setting of the unique EW aircraft, the Prowler, in favor of a sequential role out of distributed capability to the MAGTF.

He focused initially on Intrepid Tiger which is an EW pod being incorporated the Marine Corps legacy air.

It is on the Harrier and UH-1Y currently but will be added to other aircraft in the force.

“It’s made over 20 deployments now.

“It’s an open architecture system.

“It does electronic surveillance; it does electronic attack.

“We have a new one called Intrepid Tiger Block 2X which is being built to do radar jamming.

“It’s about 305 pounds for the Harriers and Hornets.

“It’s going to go next on V-22 then on C-130 and then on the CH-53 helo.

“We had about 120 we’ve built so far, we have 268 in the program of record.”

It’s completely an open architecture.

“And we have invited manufacturers if they have a card that can fit into the system to propose putting it into the pod.

“If you have a card that fits in that slot and you can do so, bring it and you can plug it in, but do not ask us to change the box for us to take your card.

“You have to adapt your card to fix my box.”

The Marines are deploying the F-35 at the same time, which is a core capability for the USMC in delivering non-kinetic effects throughout the distributed force as well.

“The F-35 is part of our electronic warfare strategy for the United States Marine Corps. Indeed, it is a key part of our strategy.”

He then described an exercise involving the F-35.

“We were doing a drill, and the F-35 does a great job at a lot of things.

“It does a very good job in terms of electronic warfare as well.

“Bottom line, I was out there, I saw four ship of F-35s, and the scenario was a double digit SAM threat, it was 1,000 foot overcast, we had four Bs out there, we had a forward air controller on the ground, and these guys had launched off the ship and they were overhead, and they were going to go take out ground vehicles and suppress and shutdown the SAM.

“We brought in all of our senior one and two star generals. In short period of time, the F-35s got rid of the SAMs.

“They were operating more like a pack of dogs than ever seen in 36 years of flying strike airplanes including being the CO of the Weapons School.

“It was a work of art.

“The infantry officer came at the end came up says, “Hey, that was fantastic, but I think that’s not very realistic.”

“We need to capture it on live streaming video see we can see a confirmation of those targets.”

“I commented: Well it’s overcast, they’re not going to be streaming video, and you’re probably not going to have a Reaper out there, right? It’s going to get shot down.”

“He goes, “We need more time so we can review the video feeds.”

“I said, we have to remove the admirals and the generals out of the kill chain.

“If the pilots have got the right RoE, let them loose.

“If you inject too many decision makers from on high, you’re going to get Solders, Sailors and Airmen killed.”

Davis added: “We’re going to grow the F-35; We’re going to be very aggressive about growing capabilities in the F-35. It’s good at what it does right now; it’ll be a hell of a lot better in the future.”

He then went on to describe other roll-outs of evolving EW capability for the MAGTF.

The Blackjack UAV, which has a modular payload structure, has an EW payload inside as well and is currently working with the USS America amphibious group.

The goal is clear: “There will never be a Marine infantry unit or a group on the ground that will not have access to electronic warfare capability.

“The guys on ground can go up and e-connect.

“Almost like they’re going to a server in the sky and pulling the information for them, he or she can basically pull the capability down from the air asset.”

The next platform, which will provide an EW delivery capability to the MAGTF will be the Group 5 UAV, the Marines are working on right now.

This will be a VTOL UAV and will have an open architecture with modular payloads.

And clearly one of those payloads will be an EW one. And by having a VTOL asset this can provide MAGTF support throughout its operational cycle, whether on the ship, coming off the ship or operating ashore.

He concluded by reminding the audience of the philosophy of the Marine Corps as the big green killing machine. It was not about the fair fight; it was about speed and combat success against a determined enemy.

He quoted the most famous Australian general officer from World War I, General Sir John Monash to provide perspective on how the Marines looked at the inclusion of EW as a ubiquitous asset for the MAGTF.

“The true role of infantry was not to extend itself upon heroic physical effort, not to whither away under merciless machine gun fire, not to impale itself upon hostile bayonets, but on the contrary, to advance under the maximum possible array of mechanical resources, in the form of guns, …tanks, mortars and aircraft; to advance with as little impediment as possible; to be relieved as far as possible of the obligation to fight their way forward.”

Editor’s Note: During the panel discussion after the presentations by Group Captain Braz and CDR Mike Paul, a question was asked about the challenge of working with the US Navy and its approach leveraging Growler and the USAF’s approach to leveraging fifth generation aircraft in shaping a way ahead.

The answers were quite noteworthy.

Group Captain Braz viewed the RAAF as in an interesting bridging function between the USN and USAF and playing a potentially useful and significant role in shaping integrated capability across the RAAF, the USN, and USAF as well.

“The diversity that we bring is very useful in shaping the combined team of US Navy and US Air Force capabilities.”

Lt. General (Retired) Davis from the floor added his thoughts on how integration is proceeding in the US.

He sees the schools, MAWTS-1, Nellis and Fallon as key elements in shaping an integrated force. He mentioned that a Marine is for the first time teaching at Nellis and a USAF pilot is training at MAWTS-1 and will be an instructor there as well.

“The more we learn from each other, the better we will be.”

And then CDR Paul added that it remains to be seen how the US Navy will employ the F-35 but that cross learning from the USMC and the USAF will be crucial in this process.

The Maritime Services and the Kill Web

This special report looks at the emergence of the kill web from the perspective of the maritime and air forces.

Airpower and naval power emerged from World War II as integrated components able to fight in a single battlespace.

For the navies, carrier aviation was the key element for air enablement along with land based air which could operate from key land based choke points to provide for key capabilities to assist in controlling the sea lines of communication.

With the emergence of fifth generation aviation, the manned-unmanned dynamic and the evolution of weapons, a new version of operating in the integrated battlespace is emerging.

The US Navy refers to this as the kill web, a capability to move from a linear kill chain to a distributed fleet able to tap into capabilities available throughout an integrated force.

This is an aspiration more than the current reality, but the US and its core allies are working hard to move aspiration to reality.

We first look at some conceptual issues in terms of how to characterize the way ahead for the fleet as it integrates with land and sea based capabilities to deliver its combat effect.

We next look at the emergence of key elements of the kill web entering service with today’s US Navy, USMC, the RAF and the Royal Navy, and the RAAF and the Royal Australian Navy.

Our visits to FALLON, MAWTS-1, to the UK and to Australia provided several data points on how the U.S. and core allies are working on building out a kill web air enabled force.

We then look at the significant opportunities, which new training and development integration can provide to shape a more integrated force able to execute a kill web going forward.

Finally, we then address two case studies of the way ahead: working the unmanned-manned transition and the electronic warfare or the non-kinetic payload domain.

And we conclude with some thoughts from the newly appointed Air Commander Australia on the challenge of shaping an effective 21st century combat force.

The A400M Becomes an Integral Part of the Combat Force: An Interview With Captain Cyril, French Air Force

2017-08-31 By Murielle Delaporte

Former Transall (C160) pilot and “Touraine” Transport Squadron, Captain Cyril is currently in charge of operations within the 61st Wing at Orléans Air Base.

This wing was specifically created for the arrival of the A400M.

This interview was done onboard the MSN 31 last Spring while in route to the Inherent Resolve theater of operation, which for the French forces is the  Chammal operation,

The interview underscores two key developments with regard to the A400m.

First, the aircraft has matured in terms its availability rates and its capabilities.

Second, the skills and training of the crews to work with the new aircraft are maturing as well.

QuestionCaptain, how would you describe today’s mission and how does today’s flight differ from past ones onboard older generation transport aircrafts?

Captain Cyril: Starting in Orléans, this flight is quasi-weekly and ensures a regular shuttle towards the United Arab Emirates, Jordan and Djibouti.

We must for instance during this week’s trip replace a Mirage 2000 engine and deliver a generator as well as various pallets.

We also bring military personnel back and forth between the theater of operation and home.

We have left with 39 passengers and we shall be 50 people onboard on the way back.

The fact that we are able to carry up to 50 passengers and a total of nine pallets constitutes the very first change between the A400M and the C130 (Hercule) or C160 (Transall).

With those aircraft, we would have had to make a compromise between the number of passengers and the number of pallets.

The freight deck of the A400M is the very first advantage of the aircraft on many grounds: the hold itself is one thing, but it is also much easier and faster to safely load and unload even very heavy equipment, such as helicopters or, as it happened recently, the 35 ton land vehicle VBCI (“véhicule blindé de combat d’infanterie”).

The plane remains stable, the ramp does not break thanks to improved physical support systems, as well as a whole new generation of software on which the loadmasters can now rely in order to best calculate the loads and switching them around depending on each stopover’s requirements.

This allows us to save a lot of time, and therefore a lot of money, since military equipment is being immobilized for shorter periods of time, while the cost of stopping over (taxes; crew lodging and pay; etc) is reduced as well.

It takes now about the same time to prepare the plane for its next flight at a stopover in terms of flight planning, cargo loading and the mechanics checks, i.e. roughly an hour (depending of course on the load).

The digitalization of the plane has already had a tremendous impact in terms of training and the definition of job profiles for the coming generations.

For both pilots and maintainers, the learning curve and gain in autonomy have been accelerated, since everything and every single mission are digitally archived.

If a mistake is made, no need to start all over and recalculate it all by hand: the time saved in mission planning is tremendous as well.

Another key change is a transfer of tasks within the crew because of the evolution of maintenance and the digital dialogue being established.

In case of a serious breakdown, the aircraft is repaired by military maintainers in Orléans or at the Airbus plant or onsite with spares sometimes being flown by Airbus and a team of mechanics coming especially.

That means that the role of flying mechanics have now been reduced to mainly a loadmaster function with a console located in the freight deck, while the pilots on the other hand learn to decrypt the diagnostics the machine hands out to them in the cockpit.

The mechanics part of the job is less and less “flying” and onboard or in transit anymore, but at the mother-base.

We closely work with Airbus in order to pool scarce resources and enhance readiness that way.

QuestionL What is the readiness rate of the A400M and which capabilities is the French Air Force using at the moment?

Captain Cyril: Ever since the beginning,  the A400M been used on theater of operations.

It is a matter of priority and the way things are being traditionally done in the French armed forces.

[As of April 2017], we juggle with eleven aircrafts, eight of them being based in Orléans.

The one we are flying right now is the MSN 31, which is relatively recent compared to the very first MSN7 and 8.

It is never the same A400M which does the same shuttle.

Starting with the MSN 30, we now expect a certain standard: what changes is the opening our aperture towards new capabilities.

We are currently working for instance on certifying the aircraft airdrop capabilities for equipment (first) and paratroopers (second).

Because this is a new field for Airbus, we have been establishing a dialogue in order to proceed with performance calculus tests as well as the implementation of the right proceedings.

Whenever we need to test live, we usually go to Toulouse along with the French Army military units in charge of airdropping equipment, i.e. the 1er RTP (“Régiment du Train Parachutiste”).

As far as airdropping paratroopers, if all is working fine for commando jumps from the rear of the plane, we are still working with the constructor to sort out initial issues that were encountered for lateral automatic jumps.

These issues are in actual fact the other side of the coin of the great stability and maneuverability of the A400M, since the counter-rotor propellers generate an air cushion under the plane and therefore turbulences that can be fatal for the jumpers.

We have hence been working out what type of procedure and equipment – such as the length of the opening belt, trigger time of the parachute, etc -.

QuestionL How do you integrate the lessons learned and did you benefit from the Rafale experience in the French fighter world?

Captain Cyril: Lessons learned are all we seem to be doing!

We have ground maintainers at the Orléans Squadron (ESTA) which participate to the implementation of the aircraft and send back all information – sorties statistics; breakdown occurrence; false detection occurrence ; etc – in a formalized standard (so they can be exploited right away) to both the FAF and Airbus.

In the past two years, an enormous effort was accomplished by both the FAF and Airbus, the former to better communicate data, the latter to better improve sensors faulty detection. As a result we have fewer and fewer non-real detected breakdowns.

It is going to take some time since upgrades correcting such issues are very expensive and only take place during specific maintenance visits.

As far as the Rafale learning curve goes, it is important to stress that from the beginning on pilots from all horizons – Casa, Hercule, Transall, Airbus, Falcon, fighter jets – were assigned to this program.

Some pilots indeed knew how to fly in a threatened environment for tactical approaches and landing on tough terrain; others were familiar with datalinks (such as Link16).

This changed the whole picture.

As a matter of fact, our squadron Commander was initially a Rafale mechanic and had a much more relaxed attitude with regard to the small breakdowns that occurred.

He was not astonished, but rather pleasantly surprised at the relatively fast rate of improvement.

Such a cultural mix is very rewarding as it allows us to closely work with the industrial to fine-tune the man-machine interface.

Computers talk to us, but we need to be able to act on it, especially since updates and evolutions are frequent and there is still a lot we need to discover about the plane’s potential.

A great amount of work as far as standardization and training are concerned still needs to be done.

It is obvious that we cannot all train for all offered capabilities all at once.

The goal is therefore to go bit by bit, deepen the understanding of matters considered high priorities, set up the training syllabus for our transport crew instruction center, the CIET (“Centre d’instruction des équipages transport”), in order to deliver on time and transfer trained and certified transport crews to our “Touraine” Transport Squadron.

It is the same process no matter what the new program is, but when several new capabilities arrive simultaneously, it is necessary to tailor the training curriculum depending on what are the armed forces’ priorities.

Question: As an operational transport pilot, how would you compare tactical approaches when flying a Transall or when flying an A400M?

Captain Cyril: This plane is a like big toy: it is extremely maneuvering and powerful.

It is very reactive to commands.

The general feeling is rather different than flying a Transall, because the flight commands are electrical.

The generation gap is visible even in the way we do maneuver.

When you are in a “degraded situation” [threatened environment], it is not so simple to fly 130 tons with accuracy.

Piloting aids are really very precise and non-intrusive.

And because the plane self-compensates, if I put it in a certain position, it will hold it even without automatic pilot.

The same goes when diving: if I make sure, I place the plane in the right descending angle at the right moment, then it will also holds it with barely any correction.

That was never the case with former generation transport aircrafts, which needed more adjustments.

If we did import all these flying tools from the civilian world, it is, on the other hand, the only certified plane with the HUD (Head Up Display) as a primary pilot tool.

The HUD, traditionally used by fighter pilots is the trusted instrument to fly the plane, and that has never been done before.

It is indeed extremely practical to be able to fly the aircraft, while having a view of what is going on outside.

It adds a whole new level of safety.

On more conventional aircrafts, we descended “head down” looking at the instruments and occasionally we would go “head up” to acquire a visual of our landing zone in the fog or in the midst of clouds.

Heading up and down is unpleasant when flying at night, because of the big light variations. Air France is actually quite interested in this way of working “Head Up”, that we initially inaugurated on our Transalls as a piloting aid.

Question: What kind of international exchanges are there among A400M end-users?

The French Air Force is ahead as far as using the plane is concerned, since we were first to be delivered.

We are for instance currently working with a Spanish Air Force exchange pilot, who is onboard with us.

We also have a German officer at the CIET, as well as a German maintainer within the ESTA.

These exchanges last three years and every procedure is being done in English.

The plan is for ab initio logistics training to be implemented in Germany and for pilots’ final tactical training to be done in France.

As far as maintenance goes, we are also trying to develop a common pool of spares with the British within the framework of a bilateral agreement, as some of these parts are rather expensive.

Editor’s Note: The photos in the slideshow were shot during the operation by Murielle Delaporte last Spring.

The delivery of the first A400M to the Spanish Air Force is highlighted in the video below:

Inherent Resolve and the A400M: Providing a Regular Shuttle Capability

A US Navy Perspective on the Way Ahead for EW Capabilities: CDR Mike Paul at the Williams Foundation Seminar on EW

09/03/2017

2017-08-29 By Robbin Laird

Earlier, I had a chance along with Ed Timperlake to visit HAVOC at the Naval Air Warfare Development Center, and to get the perspective from Fallon on the evolution of EW within the joint force, seen from a US Navy perspective.

In that interview, there was a clear emphasis on Growler as part of a larger effort, and a piece of the puzzle to solve how best to survive and prevail in the contested battlespace.

“There are many of us around here who think that the concept of the E2D the F35 and the Growler integrating would accelerate our transition to where warfare is going with regard to the contested battlespace.

“There are many of us around here who think that would be an outstanding idea that we should really push for and should be a focus of testing and evaluation.

“But there will be people around as well who will say but how does that lead to me dropping bombs?”

https://sldinfo.com/havoc-works-the-electronic-warfare-payload-in-the-digital-battlespace/

The integration piece and getting those who think in legacy kill chains to embrace a very different way of thinking, namely the kill web was also emphasized by CDR Mike Paul when he presented at the Williams Foundation and participated in the panels and discussed these issues over dinner at the Foundation as well.

A key element of shaping the way ahead was highlighted not only in his presentation but the presence of the US Navy Growler community in Australia.

The US DoD’s new EW Strategy tells us that Electronic Warfare underpins U.S. national military objectives through demonstration of electromagnetic spectrum (EMS) superiority. “A force multiplier for a range of military operations, EW maximizes lethality of precision strike weapons, assures mission command and increases mobility by protecting complex battle networks, weapon systems and forces. EW provides rapid situational awareness and produces chaos in adversary decision-making.”

CDR Mike Paul, Williams Foundation Conference on EW,. August 23, 2017

The fact is that U.S. military operations are rarely conducted unilaterally and are increasingly reliant on contributions from our partners and allies. The Navy I think has done great work, ensuring EW development efforts are interoperable, and aligned with our allies (the Growler is a good example). The battlespace awareness you get with the passive sensing capabilities in the Growler is not free – by nature, our mission requires interoperable data sources and software formats.

In fact our Chief of Naval Operation’s Maritime Strategy states that we must also expand opportunities for coalition EW training and education in the U.S. and abroad. We’re tasked to build or enhance partner EW capabilities and capacity, and ensure partner and ally capabilities remain viable against emerging peer or near-peer threats.

Of the 4 Objectives in the DoD’s EW Strategy, we like to say we achieved the “4th Objective” – to foster access, enhance interoperability and grow warfighting capacity – at least at the operational and tactical levels.

This is Operational partnering. It’s easy to say “no,” or “you can’t,” much more difficult to say yes. We had plenty of hurdles, some seeming impossible. I count significant “No’s” that were turned into yes:

A significant part of the presentation detailed how the integration of the RAAF with the US Navy Growler force was achieved and in relatively compressed period of time.

This is a case study in many ways of the kind of integration, which the US and the core allies need to achieve to have the kind of force multiplier effect from an integrated coalition force.

This event is a great opportunity to mention some of the wins we’ve had in operationalizing our partnership in Airborne Electronic Attack (AEA).

We at Whidbey Island and leaders in NAVAIR removed years of cultural barriers limiting collaboration in a short amount of time.

That took people to lead and innovate. But that’s what it took to begin to operationalize a strategic AEA partnership.

Our stated goal was to produce 100% fully capable & interoperable EA-18G wingmen, at all security levels.

At the peak of my Wing’s support phase to 6 Squadron standup in March, we had Australian students and instructors alike in our replacement squadron, Australian officers operationally employed in 3 different squadrons – primarily in this part of the globe.

Multiple deployments to the PACOM AOR, multiple reps and sets of high end exercises, Australian aircrew were put in leadership roles in the squadrons in the air and on the ground.

Australian maintainers getting on the job training during pressurized Growler Tactics Instructor course sortie rates.

At one point we had roughly 45 Australians invading the Pacific Northwest of the US making lasting friendships… our neighbors… babies being born… We went “all in.” We formed personal relationships that make the distance between Canberra and Pacific Northwest coast seem insignificant. Now look at what 6SQN did during their IOT&E for Growler. Amazing.

CDR Paul outlined that the non-kinetic payload was growing in importance both for adversaries and the US and allied forces, but that it was clearly different from a kinetic action.

EW is unlike kinetic air-to-ground payloads that simply require target coordinates, or an air-to-air missile that needs an appropriate target.

As CDR Mike Lisa, Commanding Officer of a “combined RAAF USN squadron” best stated, “it requires our sensors to call the signals the exact same thing, employ the exact same waveforms/payloads, and deliver at the exact same time with exact positioning.”

This means that the secret ingredient within an effective EW contributor to the joint fight is a well trained, effective and coordinated workforce.

That is, in order to get the right effect or impact there is a clear need for the EW team to be on the same page, to understand the signals they are reading, what they mean and to dial up the correct response to have the desired effect or impact.

It takes work to innovatively maximize our capabilities. For the US Navy, it has taken perseverance to innovate from a standoff EA-6B Jammer mindset, to a platform and community of experts focused on distributing battlespace awareness and attacking the enemy’s kill web across all mission areas.

 It all relies on a well-trained EMW workforce

  •  Growler-specific, Operational EW-Personnel Qualification Standards for our enlisted sailors
  •  A focus on efficient improvement of pre/post mission data analysis
  •  Air Wing Fallon validation of HAVOC tactics
  •  Advanced technologies + today’s AEA suite
  • World-class Information Warfare team providing efficiencies for VAQ (Electronic Attack Squadron).

Because of the nature of the blended capability one needs between technology and the work force, for EW to work within a coalition force, there needs to be tight integration.

This is why the way the US and Australia are working the issue is so crucial to mission success.

During his presentation, he presented a photo within which showed the team necessary to execute the EW mission. And he had this to say about the team and the challenge.

On the right side of the lower picture is Petty Officer Amber Hart. She understands who does weapons-to-target pairing for non-kinetics – she does! She wears an Information Warfare pin. She’s a warfighter and understands that modern, data-hungry aircraft are a mission-kill without her.

Our CAOCs are excellent at creating a Master Air Attack Plan and JDPI apportionment. The CFACC can tell you exactly what his JDPI servicing capacity is at H-hour of a conflict.

But if we do not put the “right” payloads on the “right” target, we become less lethal.

Simply put, having the same equipment is not enough.

Mission effectiveness requires that we think alike, train alike, and speak the same EW language.

Given the differences between kinetic and non-kinetic targeting, having tight integration of technology and training (TTPs) was crucial in shaping a 21st century EW Warfighting capability.

What’s in the wingtips of that EA-18G, when operating the full capability, is unparalleled battlespace awareness distributed to the airborne force. And the Navy continues to invest in its passive sensing capabilities as our adversary systems become more complex.

And well integrated with 5th gen aircraft capability, and in about 4-5 years, next gen EA capabilities.

But EW boxes and aircraft are not what makes this work – it takes people and innovation with complicated EW technologies to realize the capability.

When we were at Fallon, we discussed how the US Navy and Air Force are working integration of EW capabilities and the challenges to doing so.

The Aussies are working Wedgetail with F-22s, and the US Navy is working Growlers with F-22s, and at the Red Flags they are now working F-35s, with F-22s, with Growlers, with the new EW capabilities on the Typhoon to shape ways to deliver integrated EW combat capabilities.

https://sldinfo.com/an-update-on-red-flag-16-1-air-combat-integration-and-the-role-of-the-f-22-the-typhoon-and-wedgetail/

https://sldinfo.com/f-35-at-red-flag-renorming-of-airpower-in-process/

https://sldinfo.com/red-flag-2017-1-the-perspective-of-the-6-squadron-officer-commanding/

This is clearly a work in progress.

I had the opportunity to see it up close in Red Flag Alaska last year. 4th gen Canadian classic hornets, F-15Es, VAQ-135 Growlers (with Aussie crews), Raptors, Wedgetail. Everyone has gaps – physics has limits.

But our innovative JO’s roll up their sleeves and mission plan, making EW/SEAD contracts with their counterparts – they’re talking spectrum; sensors; gaps in capabilities; and contracts to ensure that non-kinetic effects are layered and distributed to increase lethality across the force.

It takes work to maximize innovatively our capabilities. For the US Navy, it took perseverance to innovate from a standoff EA-6B Jammer mindset, to a platform and community of experts focused on distributing battlespace awareness and attacking the enemy’s kill web across all mission areas.

US Growler Operating at RAAF Base Amberley from SldInfo.com on Vimeo.

As CDR Paul summarized how he saw the way ahead: “An innovative, team-based collaborative culture that ingrains Information Warfare strengthens the VAQ community’s enduring international partnership in EW.”

Editor’s Note: The photos in the slideshow were shot during  a visit this Spring to Amberley Airbase where the Aussie Growlers are based and are credited to Second Line of Defense.

See also the following:

Group Captain Braz on the RAAF and the Way Ahead on Electronic Warfare: Shaping a Core Distributed Capability for the Integrated Force