General Jérôme Bellanger, the Chief of Staff of the French Air Force Provides an Update: November 2024

11/27/2024

By Pierre Tran

Paris – The French Air Force has requested a faster delivery of Rafale jets to replace the Mirage 2000-5 fighters due to be sent to Ukraine, the air chief of staff, General Jérôme Bellanger, told the Association des Journalistes Defense, a press club, on November 20, 2024.

The despatch of an undisclosed number of Mirage 2000-5s to help the Ukrainian service could be offset by shipping Rafales built for export clients to the French service, he said.

“We would take the exports which have not been signed,” he said.

The speeded up delivery depended on Dassault Aviation, the prime contractor which has increased production of the Rafale for client nations such as India, he said. A faster shipment of the Rafale to the French air force was possible as Dassault was increasing production to three units per month due to the export deals.

The company has previously said it took three years to build a Rafale once an order was confirmed with payment of a deposit.

The Indian authorities in July 2023 granted approval for negotiations for 26 Rafale M, the aircraft carrier version of the twin-engine fighter. That authorization also included talks for an order for three Scorpene attack submarines from Naval Group, a French shipbuilder.

France was due to ship the first batch of three Mirage 2000-5s to Ukraine in the first quarter 2025, the armed forces minister has said, an air force spokesman said.

A faster shipment of Rafale to replace the Mirage would allow deliveries to be brought forward to 2025 and 2026 from the planned delivery in 2027, the air force spokesman said.

There were already new Rafales due to be delivered to the French service in 2025, replacing the 12 Rafale fighters Paris has sold second hand in the export market to allied nations.

France signed in December 2023 an order for a 42-strong, fifth batch of Rafale, with delivery between 2027-2032, Dassault said July 23 in a statement on its 2024 first-half results. That order has long been awaited, but the military budget has been tight for quite some time.

The U.S. was sending over the F-16 fighter to boost the Ukrainian air force as a time when the exchange of fire has risen sharply.

Russia fired Nov. 21 a new intermediate range ballistic missile, the Oreshnik or Hazel Tree, at a military target in Dnipro, central Ukraine, and the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, went on television to warn Ukraine and Western allies more strikes could follow.

That Russian hypersonic missile came in response to Ukrainian forces firing long range weapons at military sites inside Russia, namely the U.S.-supplied army tactical missile systems (ATACMS) and U.K. Storm Shadow cruise missile. France has shipped to Ukraine the Scalp, its version of the cruise missile.

The Western allies had granted permission for Kyiv to use those missiles against targets inside Russia, after previously denying that authorization.

Moscow and Kyiv were seeking to win the most territory ahead of negotiations expected for a ceasefire next year, media reports said, with the U.S. president elect, Donald Trump, due to return to the White House in January for a second term.

Rafale To Maintain Capability

Meanwhile, in France, the despatch of those Mirage fighters will reduce French capability if there were not a faster delivery of the Rafale.

“That necessarily has an impact on the fighter fleet,” the air chief said when asked about the fighter deal with Kyiv.

Those Mirage 2000-5s would have flown in the French air force until 2030, he said, and there was need to smooth the transfer of the fighters to Ukraine. The armed forces minister fully understood that, he added.

The transfer of the Mirage will speed up the rate at which the Rafale will wear out, with increased orders for spare parts, he said. The service could handle that, but the long term solution was to speed shipment of new Rafale fighters.

Payment had been made for those Rafale due for delivery in 2027, the air chief said.

“It’s these aircraft ordered that we are trying to speed up and have as soon as possible,” he said, “and not necessarily wait until 2027. That compensates for the transfer.”

The air chief was confident Dassault would hit the production target of three per month, and the only problem was going above that output rate.

The Mirage deal with Kyiv was a “package,” he said, with support in France rather than in Ukraine. Training pilots and mechanics, and supply of spares and aircraft were part of that package. The U.S. would be supplying a similar package for the F-16, he said.

Saturate Skies With Threat

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy welcomed in August the arrival of the long awaited Lockheed Martin F-16, intended to help even the odds against the larger and highly capable Russian air force.

The plan was to fly the F-16 in longer range missions, seeking out air threats at greater distance rather than air-to-ground missions, the air chief said. They would intercept kamikaze drones, cruise missiles, and other air threats.

It was “still early days,” he said, with many lessons to be learnt.

Meanwhile, the Mirage 2000-5 had yet to be converted to air-to-ground strike mission for Ukraine. “Not yet,” he said.

The Mirage to be sent to Ukraine will be adapted to air-to-ground missions and a boosted electronic warfare capability, the French armed forces minister, Sébastien Lecornu, has said, Opex 360, a specialist website reported Nov. 11.

On combat conditions, the more the sky was saturated when there was a Scalp cruise missile attack, the greater the chance of success, the air chief said. If there were only one Scalp missile flying in the Russian air defense system, there was less chance than if there were several missiles or drones, which could also be kamikaze drones.

The “big lesson” learnt was the saturation of airspace with low cost weapons, he said.

The French service had defensive electronic countermeasures, he said, but lacked an offensive capability, such as fielded in the 1980s with the Anglo-French Jaguar fighter and Martel missile. Although there were a few S300 missiles in Libya, there was little air defense, he said. There was some American support with the Prowler, but not much.

The French service used the Martel anti-radar missile in the 2011 Western allied operation  against Libya, then led by the late Muammar Gaddafi.

The Israeli air attack was a case study in electronic warfare, the air chief said, with some 20 Israeli fighters flying, yet showing up as around 120 signals on the radar of the Hezbollah in  Lebanon.

The U.S. fielded the Harm missile for that anti-radar capability, but rather than France buy the weapon off the shelf, it was better to wait for the MBDA RJ 10 weapon, he said. Funds for the RJ 10 project were in the multi-year military budget law, he added.

“My main point is there is need for a stand-off missile to hit enemy surface-to-air systems,” he said.

The supersonic ramjet RJ10 and subsonic stealthy TP 15 are the missiles MBDA is developing for the future cruise/anti-ship weapons (FC/ASW) project for France and the U.K. The European missile company displayed life sized models of the two weapons at Euronaval, a trade show which ran Nov. 4-7 in Villepinte, just outside the capital.

2035 Will Be Milestone Year

The European project for a future combat air system (FCAS) was going well, the air chief said, adding that a meeting had been held a couple of weeks ago with his German and Spanish counterparts.

A model was due to undergo the first wind tunnel tests to define the architecture as part of phase 1B, he said. The partners would decide at the end of 2025 or early 2026 to move on to phase 2 to build the FCAS technology demonstrator, with the new generation fighter (NGF) at the heart of the system.

The general election to be held in Germany would slow the project, he said. The key dates for service for FCAS were 2040-2045, while 2035 marked a “key milestone.”

The latter date drove a planned Rafale upgrade to an F5 version that would carry the ASN4G missile, he said. That will be a “game changer,” a project which “prefigures” the FCAS.

The ASN4G will be a fourth-generation, air-to-ground nuclear-tipped missile to replace the ASMPA supersonic missile, which is undergoing a midlife upgrade with the ASMPA-R (Renové) version.

The plan was for delivery of the Rafale F5 in 2033 and qualification tests for two years, with the upgraded fighter entering service in 2035 with a hypersonic nuclear weapon, the air chief said.

A Rafale B of the French air force test fired May 22 for the first time an ASMPA-R missile, without a nuclear warhead, the Direction Générale de l’Armement procurement office said in a statement.

That test fire was part of the Durandal exercise for an airborne nuclear raid, the DGA said, with the Rafale supported by A330 Phénix air tankers, pitched against an air defense consisting of air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles of the French air force.

The Rafale F5 will also fly with an uncrewed combat aerial vehicle (UCAV), the air chief said.

The UCAV will be based on a French-built stealthy demonstrator, dubbed Neuron, which was partnered by Italy, Greece, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.

The UCAV will be an “airborne sensor,” supporting the Rafale F5, which will carry the “real nuclear weapon,” to penetrate enemy airspace.

The work on the F5 version would help prepare ground for the FCAS – or not, he said.

There has been conjecture that an upgraded Rafale F5 and its UCAV loyal wingman could be a plan B substitute for the European FCAS, which includes remote carriers or combat drones, and a combat cloud for a communications network.

That fall-back to an all-French project was due to a previous bid by Airbus Defense and Space to claim a joint prime contractor status on the fighter project rather than accept Dassault as the lead actor.

Russia Mass Produces Drones

The Russian war economy was building large volumes of low-cost kamikaze drones and also high-cost Kinzhal air-launched missiles, the air chief said.

“The concept of operations has changed and has become effective,” he said. They saturated the Ukrainian airspace with cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, laser-guided bombs, and used electronic warfare.

The Russians were dropping 1,800 bombs a week over Ukraine, and that was separate from the cruise and ballistic missiles, and drones, he said.

Featured photo: This photos is from 2023 prior to General Jérôme Bellanger becoming Chief of Staff.

U.S. Air Force Maj. Gen. Andrew Gebara, left, Eighth Air Force and Joint – Global Strike Operations Center commander, speaks with French Air and Space Force Lt. Gen. Jérôme Bellanger, commander of French Strategic Air Forces Command, during a visit to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., May 30, 2023.

BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, LOUISIANA

05.30.2023

Photo by Staff Sgt. Codie Trimble 

8th Air Force/J-GSOC

31st MEU Aviation Combat Element

U.S. Marines with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 262 (Rein.), 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, and U.S. Navy sailors assigned to the amphibious transport dock ship USS Green Bay (LPD 20), receive AH-1Z Viper Helicopters aboard the USS Green Bay, in the Philippine Sea, July 20, 2024. VMM-262 (Rein.) conducted the fly-on to increase unit proficiency in preparation for the 24.2 patrol. The 31st MEU is operating aboard ships of the USS America Amphibious Ready Group in the 7th Fleet area of operations, the U.S. Navy’s largest forward-deployed numbered fleet, and routinely interacts and operates with allies and partners in preserving a free and open Indo-Pacific region.

PHILIPPINE SEA

07.20.2024

Video by Lance Cpl. Peter Eilen

31st Marine Expeditionary Unit

India Enhances its Nuclear Submarine Capability: Shaping a Way Ahead to Meet the Chinese Challenge

11/26/2024

The Indians are building new nuclear submarines as well as a new base to enhance their maritime capabilities.

This is clearly in response to China coming into the Indian backyard and shaping Chinese access to ports in the region and frequent military presence in such ports to expand their influence.

The Wall Street Journal recently published a video concerning the new nuclear submarine base being built by India.

As the WSJ comments about their video: “India and China are competing for influence in a critical area of the Indian ocean—the Bay of Bengal—with nuclear submarines, military bases and a naval build-up. Here’s why.”

We published an article by Debalina Ghoshal on September 9, 2024 which highlighted another aspect of the Indian effort.

She argued that India’s new class of submarines reinforced India’s “no first use doctrine” as well.

A nuclear ‘no first use’ doctrine implies that a state does not adhere to using its nuclear weapons first. The state would rather wait for the adversary to use them against the state in order to respond with nuclear weapons against the adversary.

While such doctrines could ensure strategic stability by lowering the nuclear threshold, they require adequate planning and most importantly, a credible nuclear force. Credibility does not only rely on possessing weapons systems, but also rely on making them survivable.

One of the best modes of nuclear weapons survivability has been submarine launched nuclear weapons. Submarines can remain submerged under sea for months and longer range missile capabilities on them would negate the need for such capabilities to be close to adversaries’ targets and hence, such submarines could work with stand-off capability.

India’s ‘no-first use’ nuclear doctrine commands for a survivable nuclear force that could compliment its strategy of ‘punitive retaliation’ mentioned in its nuclear doctrine. Under its Advanced technology Vessel (ATV) project, India focused on sea-based nuclear deterrence technology to strengthen its ‘credible minimum deterrence’ posture. A ‘credible minimum deterrence’ posture focuses less on quantity of nuclear weapons and relies more on qualitative improvements in nuclear forces through changes in doctrines, policies and strategies and developing capabilities to suit these implementations.

In August 2024, India reportedly commissioned its second INS Arighaat Ship, Submersible, Ballistic Nuclear (SSBN). In 2018, India’s first SSBN, INS Arihant was commissioned into the Indian Navy. India is expected to have more SSBN fleet in its nuclear arsenal for credible nuclear deterrence. INS Aridhaman being one of them that will be larger than the INS Arighaat and hence, can carry more long range missile systems. This SSBN is expected to be commissioned next year in 2025. These positive developments could strengthen India’s nuclear deterrence in its immediate neighbourhood.

However, developing SSBNs alone for credible deterrence does not resolve the complexities of sea-based deterrence.

SSBNs would need to be accompanied by smaller submarines that could be either conventionally powered or nuclear powered as a ‘defence by denial’ shield for SSBNs.

India is reported to focus on nuclear attack submarines (SSNs) in order to make sea-based deterrence more potent and lethal. This potency and lethality in sea-based deterrence is crucial for states having ‘no-first use’ nuclear doctrine. The submarines may be vulnerable to adversaries’ anti-submarine warfare systems and hence, attack submarines strengthen deterrence through a ‘deterrence by punishment’ strategy. In addition to SSNs, India is also having diesel-electric attack submarines.

Air independent propulsion (AIPs) systems are also a major focus for improving the survivability options of attack submarines once they are operational by reducing the need for periodic surfacing of the submarine that is necessary for atmospheric oxygen for fuel burning and generating electricity to recharge batteries. AIPs on attack submarines along with SSBNs would considerably strengthen the credibility of India’s sea-based nuclear deterrence.

The strategic deterrence that is strengthened with SSBNs is not a possibility without credible delivery systems. In fact, India’s nuclear triad that includes the three legs of nuclear deterrence: land-based, aerial and sea-based is not only reliant on the delivery platform, but also on the delivery systems.

Hence, India’s K-family of submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) would compliment these SSBNs with their accuracy and long range strike capability. Given that India’s land-based long range ballistic missile, Agni-V would be capable of carrying multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicles (MIRVs), its SLBMs too would be MIRV-ed to evade adversaries’ missile defence capabilities. Fitting MIRVs on these missiles may not be technologically challenging as the missiles are lighter and more compact. The missile also has stealth features to counter adversaries’ missile defence capabilities. India’s SLBM capabilities could range from 750kms to 3500kms and even beyond.

Similarly, for attack submarines, India has progressed with submarine launched cruise missiles (SLCMs) of variants Land Attack Cruise Missiles (LACMs) and Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles (ASCMs). These missiles will have greater maneuverability, compact designs, enhanced stealth, warhead flexibility and high speed performance.

A state with naval power always aspires to become a blue water capability.

However, blue water capabilities could only be achieved when a state is able to ensure its conventional and nuclear deterrence for a longer period of time by exerting longer operational time at sea. SSBNs would provide a fillip to India’s maritime dominance in the IOR and may be also beyond in the near future.

Recently, there were also reports that India has retired its Dhanush nuclear capable sea-launched ballistic missiles. If such reports hold true, then it is obvious that India is moving towards achieving longer range capabilities for sea-based nuclear deterrence that is more survivable and also attach strategic value to them rather than tactical value.

As India progresses towards becoming a maritime power, such ambitions could only be realized when credible naval weapon systems and delivery platforms to fire such weapons systems exist.

Credit graphic: ID 178792237 | India Map © José Pedro Pascual | Dreamstime.com

31st MEU Conducts F-35B Ordnance Load

11/25/2024

U.S. Marines with Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 121, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, load ordnance during F-35B Lightning II ordnance operations aboard the amphibious assault ship the USS America (LHA 6), in the vicinity of Miyako Strait, Aug. 21, 2024. Marine F-35Bs brings a 5th generation multi-discipline strike capability to support combined-joint all domain operations in key maritime terrain. The 31st MEU is operating aboard ships of the America Amphibious Ready Group in the 7th Fleet area of operations to enhance interoperability with allies and partners and serve as a ready response force to defend peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific Region.

MIYAKO STRAIT, PHILIPPINE SEA

08.21.2024

Video by Cpl. Tyler Andrews

31st Marine Expeditionary Unit

MQ-9 LACM Strike Against Houthi Positions

11/23/2024

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces executed a series of precise airstrikes on multiple Houthi weapons storage facilities situated within Houthi-controlled territories in Yemen, Nov. 9-10.

These facilities housed a variety of advanced conventional weapons used by the Iran-backed Houthis to target U.S. and international military and civilian vessels navigating international waters in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.

The operation involved U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy assets to include the F-35C.

YEMEN

11.13.2024

U.S. Central Command Public Affairs

The War in Ukraine: The Trump Election and Its Impact (Podcast)

11/22/2024

We have recently published several articles which deal with the challenge of the Ukrainian war on global security.

One article analyzes the implications of Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential election victory on the ongoing war in Ukraine.

The articles explore differing perspectives on a potential negotiated settlement, contrasting the approaches of a Trump administration prioritizing a ceasefire with Russia’s retention of conquered territories, and the Biden administration’s focus on supporting Ukraine’s military efforts.

Concerns are raised about the potential for appeasement of Russia, the impact on NATO, and the role of European nations in mediating a resolution.

Finally, the articles examine the evolving geopolitical landscape in Europe and the United States’ role within it, particularly concerning defense strategies and alliances.

This podcast discusses these articles and  is a Deep Dive podcast made via Notebook LM.

And below the podcast is a PDF combining the articles with the date published and the author indicated.

Featured photo: President of Russian speech on TV regarding the Russia and Ukraine war.

ID 242050777 © Rokas Tenys | Dreamstime.com

 

 

F-35Bs with Air-to-Air Refueling

U.S. Marine Corps F-35B Lightning II strike fighter aircraft assigned to Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 121, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, fly alongside a KC-130J Super Hercules tanker aircraft assigned to Marine Aerial Refueler Transport Squadron (VMGR) 152, during an aerial refueling exercise in the vicinity of the Miyako Strait, Aug. 21, 2024.

The air-to-air refueling extends the patrolling and strike range abilities of F-35Bs, outspreading a 5th generation multi-discipline strike capability to support combined-joint all domain operations in key maritime terrain.

The 31st MEU is operating aboard ships of the America Amphibious Ready Group in the 7th Fleet area of operations to enhance interoperability with allies and partners and serve as a ready response force to defend peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific Region.

MIYAKO STRAIT, PHILIPPINE SEA

08.21.2024

Video by Cpl. Christopher Lape

31st Marine Expeditionary Unit

Flying the Osprey: Combat Experience and Training Matter

11/21/2024

Next year, I am publishing a book on the tiltrotor enterprise. I have been interviewing and engaging with Marines using the aircraft since 2007, the first time I flew on the aircraft.

There seems to be a cottage industry of folks writing about the difficulty of flying the aircraft and implying that this somehow suggests it is too dangerous for the missions it has been successfully doing since its first appearance in Iraq in 2007.

My own observation has been that training and experience do matter with a combat aircraft which is unique as the Osprey is, for after all you need to know how to fly a plane, how to fly a rotorcraft and how to transition from one to the other and vice versa.

I wanted to talk with an experienced Osprey practitioner with regard to the importance of training, muscle memory and pilot competence and was fortunate to talk on November 20, 2024 with a Marine whom I had the opportunity to interview several years ago.

In a 2016 article which I wrote with my colleague Ed Timperlake, we talked with the then  XO of MAWTS-1, Lt Col “Cowboy” Nelson. He had been on the deployment to Afghanistan under the command of Lt Col Bianca when I interviewed Lt Col Bianco after an Osprey raid in 2010.

In the earlier 2010 interview conducted by telephone when the squadron was in Afghanistan, Lt. Col. Bianca highlighted a number of key contributions of the aircraft to the fight.

The most compelling point underscored by the squadron commander is how, in effect, the Osprey has inverted infrastructure and platform.

Normally, the infrastructure shapes what the platform can do. Indeed, a rotorcraft or a fixed wing aircraft can operate under specific circumstances.

With the range and speed of the Osprey aircraft, the plane shapes an overarching infrastructure allowing the ground forces to range over all of Afghanistan, or to be supported where there are no airfields, or where distributed forces need support.

The envelopment role of the Osprey is evident in Afghanistan as well, whereby the Osprey can provide the other end of the operational blow for the ground or rotorcrafts in hot pursuit of Taliban.

The Osprey can move seamlessly in front of rotorcraft and land forces, allowing the pursuit of different lines of attack. The envelopment role was not the focus of the interview because of security considerations, but anecdotal evidence suggests such an emerging role.

Early morning depart in Afghanistan, February 10, 2010. Credit: Lt Col Bianca

When we talked to “Cowboy” during our visit to MAWTS-1 in 2016, he was applying his by then extensive experience with the Osprey and connecting to the then new kid on the block, namely the F-35s and referred the new generation of Marines working the intersection of these two revolutionary capabilities as follows:

Cowboy: The new generation is so technologically sophisticated that they will thrive in the evolving digital environment – of which the F-35 is a key element.

Connecting with him again, now eight years later, we returned to a discussion of the Osprey and the importance of generating the flight hours and training commensurate with the combat benefits which the aircraft delivers to the Marines and the joint force.

He started by underscoring the importance of squadron readiness when operating the Osprey, which of course, is true across the flying community. And readiness and training have not been high on recent Administration’s shopping lists.

Cowboy: It is a resourcing issue. If you don’t resource and give a squadron the people they need, the parts they need to fix something, the airplanes aren’t going to fly effectively.

And I think that goes back to the flying hours issue.

The trend has been to lower the number of flying hours which Osprey pilots have, which has a direct impact on readiness.

Nothing replaces air sense, by which I mean being off the ground in the air.

It hones your decision making, your experience and your skills as a pilot,

You know, when I was a young man and started out in helicopters, before I went to MAWTS-1, I don’t think that I had a year where I didn’t fly more than 300 hours. 

An average year for a V-22 pilot now is probably closer to 150 hours. 

My CO’s had 3000-5000 flight hours and today I think we are seeing many with much few flight hours when they take command. 

There is little doubt that the question of flight hours contributes significantly to the current mishap rate.

Are we putting pilots in a position where they are more likely to make mistakes because their skills are not refined?

We then focused on a core flying challenge which requires significant training time and that is CALs or (confined area landings).

I once experienced at New River one afternoon 22 landings in a V-22 which is very different from a rotorcraft because the pilot is using the advantages of being a plane to adjust where he will approach the landing zone and then shifts to rotorcraft mode to land.

This is a key area where he felt that flight time should be increased in operating and training with the aircraft.

Cowboy: Pilots need the muscle memory of getting into landing environments.

And it’s further complicated when you get in the dust.

We’ve got great simulators, but nothing will replace the time in the airplane for flying and building muscle memory.

Featured photo: An MV-22B Osprey with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 262, 1st Marine Aircraft Wing, lands at Chitose Air Base, Hokkaido, Japan, Feb. 4, 2020. The arrival of the Osprey to exercise Northern Viper brings an added element, further advancing opportunities for continued bilateral coordination between the U.S. Marine Corps and the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force. Northern Viper is a regularly scheduled training exercise that is designed to enhance the interoperability of the U.S. and Japan Alliance by allowing Marine Air-Ground Task Forces from III Marine Expeditionary Force to maintain their lethality and proficiency in MAGTF Combined Arms Operations in cold weather environments. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Dylan Hess)

Kirk “Cowboy” Nelson

He is Director of Advanced Training Systems, Xiphos Partners

Kirk “Cowboy” Nelson serves on the Xiphos Partners Team as Director of the Advanced Training Systems business unit and Program Manager of the JTAC virtual training system (JVT). In this role he is responsible for the transition of the JVT training system to a Program of Record as well as the development of new and related Advanced Training products.

Kirk came to Xiphos from Bell Textron. He served as the Director Sustainment, V-22 from May of 2020 until April of 2023.

In this role, Kirk is responsible for multiple Performance Based Logistics contracts that exceeded all performance metrics during his tenure. Kirk led his team in expanding the PBL business at Bell and the V-22 sustainment team was routinely recognized for their superior support to the warfighter. He was also responsible for Bell’s Fleet Service team which included over 100 Field Service Representatives.

He previously held the position of Manager, Flight Operations Maintenance, at the Bell Flight Research Center. His responsibilities included supporting aircraft maintenance and logistics for Bell experimental flight test.  Kirk supported the 525 and the V-280 programs during his tenure.

Before joining Bell, LtCol Nelson was the Commanding Officer of VMM-266 where he was responsible for the tactical employment of 12 MV-22B/C aircraft. As Commander, he led his squadron in operations across North and West Africa. His squadron was the first to deploy to both Ghana and Gabon for an extended period in support of both training and contingency operations.

He also established the MV-22 curriculum and was the first MV-22 MAWTS-1 instructor.

Kirk also deployed and flew combat missions in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He was a member of the first MV-22 squadron to operate in Afghanistan.

Kirk enlisted in the Marine Corps and became a CH-46E mechanic and was later selected to attend the United States Naval Academy.

He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in History and was commissioned into the United States Marine Corps.

He went on to serve 24 years in Marine Aviation and graduated from multiple military training courses.